Misunderstanding and Sensemaking among Juvenile Probation Officers Working with Evidence-Based Practices

References

• Allen, J. D., Linnan, L. A., Emmons, K. M., Brownson, R., Colditz, G., & Proctor, E. (2012). Fidelity and its relationship to implementation effectiveness, adaptation, and dissemination. In R. C. Brownson, G. A. Colditz, & E. K. Proctor (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice (2nd ed., pp. 281–304). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belenko, S., Johnson, I. D., Taxman, F. S., & Rieckmann, T. (2018). Probation staff attitudes toward substance abuse treatment and evidence-based practices. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(2), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X16650679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogue, B., Woodward, B., Campbell, N. M., Clawson, E., & Faust, D. (2004). Implementing evidence-based practice in community corrections: The principles of effective intervention. National Institute of Corrections.
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., Bourgon, G., Rugge, T., Scott, T. L., Yessine, A. K., Gutierrez, L., & Li, J. (2011). An experimental demonstration of training probation officers in evidence-based community supervision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(11), 1127–1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811420678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitenstein, S. M., Gross, D., Garvey, C. A., Hill, C., Fogg, L., & Resnick, B. (2010). Implementation fidelity in community‐based interventions. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2000). (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 18(6), 741–760. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, N., Dewolf, A., & Serin, R. (2015). Effectively training community supervision officers: A meta-analytic review of the impact on offender outcome. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(10), 977–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815595661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: A qualitative method for advancing social justice research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. E. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 507–535). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Myer, A. J., & Latessa, E. J. (2009). Eight lessons from Moneyball: The high cost of ignoring evidence-based corrections. Victims and Offenders, 4(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880802612631
   Google Scholar
• Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damschroder, L. J., & Hagedorn, H. J. (2011). A guiding framework and approach for implementation research in substance use disorder treatment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25(2), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, J. L., Young, D. W., & Taxman, F. S. (2011). Effects of organizational factors on use of juvenile supervision practices. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(6), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811401786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, National Implementation Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Frontline. (n.d.) Juvenile vs. Adult justice. PBS. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/juvenile/stats/juvvsadult.html
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, M. L., Woo, Y., Hafoka, M., van Wormer, J., Stohr, M. K., & Hemmens, C. (2016). Assessing the current state of juvenile probation practice: A statutory analysis. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 55(5), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2016.1181693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. M., Elam, P., Lebold, S. M., & Burrouchs, R. (2018). Use of research evidence by criminal justice professionals. Justice Policy Journal, 16(2), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lehman, W. E., Greener, J. M., & Simpson, D. D. (2002). Assessing organizational readiness for change. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22(4), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-5472(02)00233-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W. (2018). Effective use of the large body of research on the effectiveness of programs for juvenile offenders and the failure of the model programs approach. Criminology & Public Policy, 17(1), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., Howell, J. C., Kelly, M. R., Chapman, G., & Carver, D. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of juvenile justice programs. Center for Juvenile Justice Reform at Georgetown University.
   Google Scholar
• Magnuson, S., Kras, K. R., Aleandro, H., Rudes, D. S., & Taxman, F. S. (2020). Using Plan-Do-Study-Act and participatory action research to improve use of risk needs assessments. Corrections, 5(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2018.1555442
   Google Scholar
• McCart, M. R., & Sheidow, A. J. (2016). Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for adolescents with disruptive behavior. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 45(5), 529–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2016.1146990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, E. C., & Rapp, L. (2014). The current status of evidence-based practice in juvenile justice. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 11(4), 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2014.897099
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, J. M., & Miller, H. V. (2015). Rethinking program fidelity for criminal justice. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(2), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Juvenile Justice (NCJJ) & Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). (2019). Characteristics and trends of delinquency cases resulting in probation. http://www.ncjj.org/Publication/Characteristics-and-Trends-of-Delinquency-Cases-Resulting-in-Probation.aspx
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Justice. (n.d.) Crime solutions. https://crimesolutions.ojp.gov
   Google Scholar
• Nevo, I., & Slonim-Nevo, V. (2011). The myth of evidence-based practice: Towards evidence-informed practice. British Journal of Social Work, 41(6), 1176–1197. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillippi, S. W., Jr, Cocozza, J., & DePrato, D. K. (2013). Advancing evidence-based practices for juvenile justice reform through community development. Journal of Community Practice, 21(4), 434–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2013.849636
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ralph, N. (2012). Evidence-based practice with juveniles. ATSA Forum XXIV(3). http://newsmanager.commpartners.com/atsa/issues/2012-06-14/5.html
   Google Scholar
• Rigsbee, A. C., & Vicinage, C. (2015). Evidence based practice readiness for juvenile probation in New Jersey. National Center for State Courts. https://www.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0027/19287/evidence-based-practice-readiness-for-juvenile-probation-in-new-jersey.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rudes, D. S., Viglione, J., & Taxman, F. S. (2011). Juvenile probation officers: How the perception of roles affects training experiences for evidence-based practice implementation. Federal Probation, 75(3), 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J. (2010). Gold standard myths: Observations on the experimental turn in quantitative criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(4), 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-010-9117-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenwald, S. K., & Hoagwood, K. (2001). Effectiveness, transportability, and dissemination of interventions: What matters when? Psychiatric Services, 52(9), 1190–1197. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.52.9.1190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheidow, A. J., McCart, M. R., Chapman, J. E., & Drazdowski, T. K. (2020). Capacity of juvenile probation officers in low-resourced, rural settings to deliver an evidence-based substance use intervention to adolescents. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 34(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shlonsky, A., Noonan, E., Littell, J. H., & Montgomery, P. (2011). The role of systematic reviews and the Campbell Collaboration in the realization of evidence-informed practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 39(4), 362–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-010-0307-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P., Schweitzer, M., Labrecque, R. M., & Latessa, E. J. (2012). Improving probation officers’ supervision skills: An evaluation of the EPICS model. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.674826
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S. (2012). Crime control in the twenty-first century: Science-based supervision (SBS). Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.686583
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S., & Belenko, S. (2011). Implementing evidence-based practices in community corrections and addiction treatment. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S., Henderson, C., Young, D., & Farrell, J. (2014). The impact of training interventions on organizational readiness to support innovations in juvenile justice offices. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41(2), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-012-0445-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trotter, C. (2013). Reducing recidivism through probation supervision: What we know and don’t know from four decades of research. Federal Probation, 77(2), 43.
   Google Scholar
• Viglione, J. (2017). Street-level decision making: Acceptability, feasibility, and use of evidence-based practices in adult probation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(10), 1356–1381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817718583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, J. (2018). A multi-level examination of organizational context on adult probation officer attitudes toward evidence-based practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(5), 1331–1356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X16675630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, J., Blasko, B. L., & Taxman, F. S. (2018). Organizational factors and probation officer use of evidence-based practices: A multilevel examination. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(6), 1648–1667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X16681091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, J., Rudes, D. S., & Taxman, F. S. (2015). Misalignment in supervision: Implementing risk/needs assessment instruments in probation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814548447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Thiele Schwarz, U., Giannotta, F., Neher, M., Zetterlund, J., & Hasson, H. (2021). Professionals’ management of the fidelity–adaptation dilemma in the use of evidence-based interventions—an intervention study. Implementation Science Communications, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00131-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walker, S. C., Bumbarger, B. K., & Phillippi, S. W., Jr. (2015). Achieving successful evidence-based practice implementation in juvenile justice: The importance of diagnostic and evaluative capacity. Evaluation and Program Planning, 52(1), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. B. (2019, February 13–14). Identifying change levers related to program effectiveness: Evidence from a large meta-analysis of juvenile delinquency programs [Keynote address]. Applied Research in Crime and Justice Conference, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. B., Olaghere, A., & Kimbrell, C. S. (2018). Effectiveness of restorative justice principles in juvenile justice: A meta-analysis. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. W., Farrell, J. L., & Taxman, F. S. (2013). Impacts of juvenile probation training models on youth recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 30(6), 1068–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.673633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar