The Pronouns of Sexual Assault: Results from a Factorial Vignette Experiment Examining the Role of Gender on Public Perceptions of Perpetrators

References

• Ahrens, C. E. (2006). Being silenced: The impact of negative social reactions on the disclosure of rape. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38(3–4), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-006-9069-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, P. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer (1st ed.). Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, I. (2007). What is a typical rape? Effects of victim and participant gender in female and male rape perception. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(1), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466606X101780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, S., & Schaffner, B. F. (2014). Does survey mode still matter? Findings from a 2010 multi-mode comparison. Political Analysis, 22(3), 285–303. . https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, D. B., & Hassan, S. (2021). Gender and prosecutorial discretion: An empirical assessment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierie, D. M., & Davis-Siegel, J. C. (2014). Measurement matters: Comparing old and new definitions of rape in federal statistical reporting. Sexual Abuse, 27(5), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214521470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgida, E., & Brekke, N. (1985). Psycholegal research on rape trials. In A. W. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault: A research handbook (pp. 313–342). Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Bringer, J. D., Brackenridge, C. H., & Johnston, L. H. (2002). Defining appropriateness in coach-athlete sexual relationships: The voice of coaches. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 8(2), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600208413341
   Google Scholar
• Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Budd, K. M., Bierie, D. M., & Williams, K. (2015). Deconstructing incidents of female perpetrated sex crimes: Comparing female sexual offender groupings. Sexual Abuse, 29(3), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063215594376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, D. M., Tewksbury, R., Mustaine, E. E., & Payne, B. K. (2011). Factors contributing to perceptions about policies regarding the electronic monitoring of sex offenders: The role of demographic characteristics, victimization experiences, and social disorganization. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(1), 25–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11426698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byers, E. S. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 8(1–2), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v08n01_02
   Google Scholar
• Chapleau, K. M., Oswald, D. L., & Russell, B. L. (2008). Male rape myths: The role of gender, violence, and sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(5), 600–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507313529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, W. T., Sun, F., & Li, X. (2011). Attitudes toward the treatment of sex offenders: A SEM analysis. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 1(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2011.541213
   Google Scholar
• Corder, B. F., & Whiteside, R. (1988). A survey of jurors’ perception of issues related to child sexual abuse. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 6(3), 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Cortoni, F., Babchishin, K. M., & Rat, C. (2016). The proportion of sexual offenders who are female is higher than thought: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816658923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2002). Male sexual assault victims: A selective review of the literature and implications for support services. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(3), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00043-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M., Pollard, P., & Archer, J. (2001). The influence of victim gender and sexual orientation on judgments of the victim in a depicted stranger rape. Violence and Victims, 16(6), 607–619. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/influence-victim-gender-sexual-orientation-on/docview/808564677/se-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies, M., Smith, R., & Rogers, P. (2009). Police perceptions of rape as function of victim gender and sexuality. The Police Journal, 82(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1350/pojo.2009.82.1.466
   Google Scholar
• Denov, M. S. (2001). A culture of denial: Exploring professional perspectives on female sex offending. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43(3), 303–329. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjcrim.43.3.303
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, K., & Anderson, I. (2004). Making sense of male rape: Constructions of gender, sexuality and experience of rape victims. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14(2), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, L. M., Aubrey, M., Doherty, E., Isquith, P., Levine, M., & Scheiner, J. (1989). The credibility of children as witnesses in a simulated child sex abuse trial. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Togli (Eds.), Perspectives on children’s testimony (pp. 71–99). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelhor, D. (1984). Child sexual abuse: Theory and research. Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, H. (2013). Sexual scripts, sexual refusals and rape. In M. A. H. Horvath & J. Brown (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 122–145). Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Gabora, N. J., Spanos, N. P., & Joab, A. (1993). The effects of complainant age and expert psychological testimony in a simulated child sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behavior, 17(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Aldine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gakhal, B. K., & Brown, S. J. (2011). A comparison of the general public’s, forensic professionals’ and students’ attitudes towards female sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2010.540678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, G. L., Cronin, J. M., & Steigman, H. J. (2004). Attributions of blame in sexual assault to perpetrators and victims of both genders1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2149–2165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02694.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, L. C., & Gertz, M. (1994). Race and gender effects on perception of criminal events: Testing hypotheses from Black’s “The Behavior of Law.” Journal of Correctional Education, 45(2), 62–70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23294049.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Graham, A., Pickett, J. T., & Cullen, F. T. (2021). Advantages of matched over unmatched opt-in samples for studying criminal justice attitudes: A research note. Crime and Delinquency, 67(12), 1962–1981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128720977439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb, A., & Turner, E. (2012). Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld, E., Willis, D. G., & Easton, S. D. (2017). “A very steep climb”: Therapists’ perspectives on barriers to disclosure of child sexual abuse experiences for men. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 26(6), 731–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2017.1332704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., & Jackson, J. E. (2006). Statistical methods for social scientists. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. J., & Socia, K. M. (2016). What’s in a name? Evaluating the effects of the “sex offender” label on public opinions and beliefs. Sexual Abuse, 28(7), 660–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214564391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldman, C., Conroy, M., & Ackerman, A. R. (2018). Sex and gender in the 2016 Presidential election. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Hird, M. J. (2002). Heteronormativity and sexual coercion: Adolescents practicing gender. In M. J. Hird (Ed.), Heterosexual interpersonal violence from childhood to adulthood (pp. 44–66). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J., Kreft, I. G. G., & Hermkens, P. L. J. (1991). The analysis of factorial surveys. Sociological Methods & Research, 19(4), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124191019004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javaid, A. (2015). Police responses to, and attitudes towards, male rape: Issues and concerns. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 17(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461355715580914
   Google Scholar
• Javaid, A. (2016). Male rape, stereotypes, and unmet needs: Hindering recovery, perpetuating silence. Violence and Gender, 3(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2015.0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, S. (2017). Coach–athlete sexual relationships: If no means no does yes mean yes? In H. Piper, D. Garratt, & B. Taylor (Eds.), Moral panic in physical education and coaching (pp. 104–119). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, S., & Lundqvist, C. (2017). Sexual harassment and abuse in coach–athlete relationships in Sweden. European Journal for Sport and Society, 14(2), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2017.1318106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. L., Rocchino, G. H., Wolf, J. A., Gutekunst, M. H. C., Paulvin, C., & Farrell, J. A. (2021). Rape culture and candidate selection in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 28(1), 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxz021
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C., Mercer, A., Keeter, S., Hatley, N., McGeeney, K., & Gimenez, A. (2016). Evaluating online nonprobability surveys. Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• King, L. L., & Roberts, J. J. (2017). The complexity of public attitudes toward sex crimes. Victims & Offenders, 12(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2015.1005266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x
   Google Scholar
• Link, B. G., Phelan, J. C., Bresnahan, M., Stueve, A., & Pescosolido, B. A. (1999). Public conceptions of mental illness: Labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1328–1333. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisak, D. (1993). Men as victims: Challenging cultural myths. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6(4), 577–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.2490060414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, D. A. (2004). Multilevel modeling (Vol. 143). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P. Y., Reynolds, J. R., & Keith, S. (2002). Gender bias and feminist consciousness among judges and attorneys: A standpoint theory analysis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 27(3), 665–701. https://doi.org/10.1086/337941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, C., & Wiederman, M. (1997). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of child sexual abuse: Effects of age, sex, and gender-role attitudes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 21(9), 833–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(97)00045-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCorkle, R. C. (1993). Research note: Punish and rehabilitate? Public attitudes toward six common crimes. Crime and Delinquency, 39(2), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128793039002008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meidinger, M. H. (2012). Peeking under the covers: Taking a closer look at prosecutorial decision-making involving queer youth and statutory rape. Boston College Journal of Law and Social Justice, 32(2), 421–451. https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/jlsj/vol32/iss2/10
   Google Scholar
• Muniz, C. N., & Powers, R. A. (2021). The influence of authority role and victim gender on perceptions of female-perpetrated child sexual abuse. Child Maltreatment, 10775595211033536. doi:10.1177/10775595211033537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muniz, C. N., Powers, R. A., & Leili, J. A. (2021). The influence of gender on perceptions of culpability and victim status in statutory rape offenses involving teachers. Sexual Abuse, 33(5), 529–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063220928955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex in labeling their own experiences. Sex Roles, 51(3–4), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000037758.95376.00
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, J. T., Mears, D. P., Stewart, E. A., & Gertz, M. (2012). Security at the expense of liberty: A test of predictions deriving from the culture of control thesis. Crime and Delinquency, 59(2), 214–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712461612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard, P. (1992). Judgements about victims and attackers in depicted rapes: A review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31(4), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1992.tb00975.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rerick, P. O., Livingston, T. N., & Davis, D. (2019). Rape and the jury. In W. T. O‘Donohue, &P. A. Schewe (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault and sexual assault prevention (pp. 551–571). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rivers, D. (2006). Sample matching: Representative sampling from internet panels (White Paper Series). Polimetrix.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, P., & Davies, M. (2007). Perceptions of victims and perpetrators in a depicted child sexual abuse case: Gender and age factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(5), 566–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506298827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, P., Hirst, L., & Davies, M. (2011). An investigation into the effect of respondent gender, victim age, and perpetrator treatment on public attitudes towards sex offenders, sex offender treatment, and sex offender rehabilitation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50(8), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2011.602472
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, P., Josey, N., & Davies, M. (2007). Victim age, attractiveness and, abuse history as factors in the perception of a hypothetical child sexual abuse case. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 13(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600701644835
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. E. H. (1979). The politics of rape: The victim’s perspective. Stein and Day.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, K. M. (1988). Rape and seduction scripts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12(2), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1988.tb00939.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, K. M. (2011). The relationship between rape myths and sexual scripts: The social construction of rape. Sex Roles, 65(11–12), 774–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0033-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rye, B. J., Greatrix, S. A., & Enright, C. S. (2006). The case of the guilty victim: The effects of gender of victim and gender of perpetrator on attributions of blame and responsibility. Sex Roles, 54(9), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9034-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahl, D., & Keene, J. R. (2012). The effects of age, authority, and gender on perceptions of statutory rape offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(18), 3701–3722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512447523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. C., & Freeman, N. J. (2009). Female sex offender recidivism: A large-scale empirical analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21(4), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063209347898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saradjian, J. (2010). Understanding the prevalence of female-perpetrated sexual abuse and the impact of that abuse on victims. In T. A. Gannon & F. Cortoni (Eds.), Female sexual offenders: Theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 10–30). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schuller, R. A., & Stewart, A. (2000). Police responses to sexual assault complaints: The role of perpetrator/complainant intoxication. Law and Human Behavior, 24(5), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005519028528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, A. D., & Bobo, L. D. (2015). Can non-full-probability internet surveys yield useful data? A comparison with full-probability face-to-face surveys in the domain of race and social inequality attitudes. Sociological Methodology, 45(1), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175015570096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleath, E., & Bull, R. (2012). Comparing rape victim and perpetrator blaming in a police officer sample: Differences between police officers with and without special training. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(5), 646–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854811434696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A., & Bosker, R. J. (1994). Modeled variance in two-level models. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(3), 342–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124194022003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A., & Bosker, R. J. (2011). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Socia, K. M., & Harris, A. J. (2016). Evaluating public perceptions of the risk presented by registered sex offenders: Evidence of crime control theater? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(4), 375. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., & Hebert, C. (1999). Women and men policymakers: Does the judge’s gender affect the sentencing of criminal defendants? Social Forces, 77(3), 1163–1196. https://doi.org/10.2307/3005975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stotzer, R. L. (2009). Violence against transgender people: A review of United States data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(3), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struckman-Johnson, C., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (1992). Acceptance of male rape myths among college men and women. Sex Roles, 27(3), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, N. (2007). Juror attitudes and biases in sexual assault cases ( No. 344; Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice). Australian Institute of Criminology.
   Google Scholar
• Testa, R. J., Sciacca, L. M., Wang, F., Hendricks, M. L., Goldblum, P., Bradford, J., & Bongar, B. (2012). Effects of violence on transgender people. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 43(5), 452. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. J., & Pickett, J. T. (2020). Are relational inferences from crowdsourced and opt-in samples generalizable? Comparing criminal justice attitudes in the gss and five online samples. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36(4), 907–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09436-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turchik, J. A., & Edwards, K. M. (2012). Myths about male rape: A literature review. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Bruggen, M., & Grubb, A. (2014). A review of the literature relating to rape victim blaming: An analysis of the impact of observer and victim characteristics on attribution of blame in rape cases. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(5), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandiver, D., Braithwaite, J., & Stafford, M. (2017). Sex crimes and sex offenders. Research and realities. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vandiver, D. M., & Kercher, G. (2004). Offender and victim characteristics of registered female sexual offenders in Texas: A proposed typology of female sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320401600203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J., Archer, J., & Davies, M. (2005). Effects of rape on men: A descriptive analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-005-1001-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, A., Sexton, L., Valcore, J. L., Sumner, J., & Wodda, A. (2018). Transgender and nonbinary individuals. In C. Roberson (Ed.), Routledge handbook of social, economic and criminal justice (pp. 220–233). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Keenan, T. (1999). Child molesters’ implicit theories. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(8), 821–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626099014008003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterman, C., & Foss-Goodman, D. (1984). Child molesting: Variables relating to attribution of fault to victims, offenders, and nonparticipating parents. The Journal of Sex Research, 20(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498409551231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, B. H., & Kurpius, S. E. R. (2002). Effects of victim sex and sexual orientation on perceptions of rape. Sex Roles, 46(5–6), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019617920155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, G. M., Malinen, S., & Johnston, L. (2013). Demographic differences in public attitudes towards sex offenders. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20(2), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2012.658206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zack, E., Lang, J. T., & Dirks, D. (2018). “It must be great being a female pedophile!”: The nature of public perceptions about female teacher sex offenders. Crime, Media, Culture, 14(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659016674044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellman, G. L. (1992). The impact of case characteristics on child abuse reporting decisions. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(92)90008-F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar