Strange, Unusual, and Creative Sentences: Analyzing “Outside the Box” Criminal Sentencing

References

• Albonetti, C. A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991–1992. Law & Society Review, 31(4), 789. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckett, K., Reosti, A., & Knaphus, E. (2016). The end of an era? Understanding the contradictions of criminal justice reform. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 664(1), 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215598973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagan, D., & Teles, S. M. (2016). Prison break: Why conservatives turned against mass incarceration. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freed, D. J., & Mahoney, B. (1990). Between prison and probation: Using intermediate sanctions effectively. The Judges’ Journal, 29(1), 6–44.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, M. A., & Ulmer, J. T. (2022). Expanding our understanding of focal concerns: Alternative sentences, race, and “salvageability”. Justice Quarterly, 39(6), 1332–1353. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2021.1954234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvey, S. P. (1998). Can shaming punishments educate? The University of Chicago Law Review, 65(3), 733–794. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertner, N. (2021). Preliminary thoughts on reimagining judging (Executive session on the future of justice policy). The Square One Project. https://squareonejustice.org/paper/reimaginingjudging/
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, M. (2015). Caught: The prison state and the lockdown of American politics. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, K. R., & Bennett, T. H. (2016). Drug interventions. In D. Weisburd, D. P. Farrington, & C. Gill (Eds.), What works in crime prevention and rehabilitation: Lessons from systematic reviews. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3477-5
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. (2005). Downsizing prisons: How to reduce crime and end mass incarceration. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. (2006). What’s really wrong with shaming sanctions. Texas Law Review, 84(7), 2075–2096.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, P. A. O. (1999). Ideology of shame: An analysis of first amendment and eighth amendment challenges to scarlet-letter probation conditions. North Carolina Law Review, 77(2), 783–864.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, J., & Steffensmeier, D. (1993). Race and imprisonment decisions. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(2), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00395.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, J., & Ulmer, J. T. (1996). Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines. Justice Quarterly, 13(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829600092831
   Google Scholar
• Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2005). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. The Prison Journal, 85(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885505276969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, B. L. (2002). Asking questions: Techniques for semistructured interviews. Political Science & Politics, 35(4), 665–668. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096502001129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markel, D. (2001). Are shaming punishments beautifully retributive? Retributivism and the implications for the alternative sanctions debate. Vanderbilt Law Review, 2157–2242. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.410922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markel, D. (2007). Wrong turns on the road to alternative sanctions. Texas Law Review, 85(6), 1385–1412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlowe, D. B., Hardin, C. D., & Fox, C. L. (2016). Painting the current picture: A national report card on drug courts and other problem-solving court programs in the United States. National Drug Court Institute. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.ndci.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Painting-the-Current-Picture-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Martinson, R. (1974). What works? - Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35, 22.
   Google Scholar
• Massaro, T. M. (1991). Shame, culture, and American criminal law. Michigan Law Review, 89(7), 1880. https://doi.org/10.2307/1289392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskos, P. (2011). In defense of floggint. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Murakawa, N. (2014). The first civil right: How liberals built prison America. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, H. L. (1964). Two models of the criminal process. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 113(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.2307/3310562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, R. (2020). Punishing violent crime. New York University Law Review, 95(5), 40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, A. E. (2016). Sentencing and deterrence. In D. Weisburd, D. P. Farrington, & C. Gill (Eds.), What works in crime prevention and rehabilitation: Lessons from systematic reviews. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3477-5
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (1999). A decade of experimenting with intermediate sanctions: What have we learned? Justice Research & Policy, 1(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.3818/JRP.1.1.1999.9
   Google Scholar
• Pfaff, J. (2017). Locked in: The true causes of mass incarceration—And how to achieve real reform. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, E. (1966). Crime and punishment in early Massachusetts. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruhland, E., & Scheibler, E. (2022). Probation officer discretion in monitoring and violating supervision conditions. Probation Journal, 69(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/02645505211041578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. Federal courts: Who is punished More Harshly? American Sociological Review, 65(5), 705. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240006500505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, B. (2012). We need to talk about an injustice. TED Ideas Worth Spreading. https://www.ted.com/talks/bryan_stevenson_we_need_to_talk_about_an_injustice
   Google Scholar
• Strang, H., Sherman, L. W., Mayo‐Wilson, E., Woods, D., & Ariel, B. (2013). Restorative justice conferencing (RJC) using face‐to‐face meetings of offenders and victims: Effects on offender recidivism and victim satisfaction. A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 9(1), 1–59. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2013.12
   Google Scholar
• Strong, S. M., Rantala, R. R., & Kyckelhahn, T. (2012). Census of problem-solving courts, 2012 [ NCJ 249803]. U.S. Department of Justice. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/cpsc12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tonry, M. (1998). Intermediate sanctions in sentencing guidelines. Crime and Justice, 23, 199–253. https://doi.org/10.1086/449271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice?: Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law & Society Review, 22(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, V. M., & Lerman, A. E. (2010). Political consequences of the carceral state. American Political Science Review, 104(4), 817–833. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, J. B. (1989). Prison need not be mandatory: There are options under the U.S. Sentencing guidelines. The Judges’ Journal, 28(Winter), 16–47.
   Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., Farrington, D. P., & Gill, C. (2017). What works in crime prevention and rehabilitation: An assessment of systematic reviews. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(2), 415–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, D. F., & Turner, N. R. (2002). Is the budget crisis changing the way we look at sentencing and incarceration? Federal Sentencing Reporter, 15(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2002.15.1.41
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. B. (2016). Correctional programs. In D. Weisburd, D. P. Farrington, & C. Gill (Eds.), What works in crime prevention and rehabilitation: Lessons from systematic reviews (pp. 193–218). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3477-5
   Google Scholar
• Zimring, F. E., Hawkins, G., & Kamin, S. (2001). Punishment and democracy: Three strikes and you’re out in California. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar