Prediction and application of porosity based on support vector regression model optimized by adaptive dragonfly algorithm

References

• Ahmadi, M. A., S. Zendehboudi, A. Lohi, A. Elkamel, and I. Chatzis. 2013. Reservoir permeability prediction by neural networks combined with hybrid genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization. Geophysical Prospecting 61 (3):582–98. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01080.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anifowose, F. A., and A. Abdulraheem. 2010. A functional networks-type-2 fuzzy logic hybrid model for the prediction of porosity and permeability of oil and gas reservoirs. Paper presented at the 2010 Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence,Modelling and Simulation, Tuban, Indonesia, September 28–30. IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Awad, M., and R. Khanna. 2007. Support vector regression. Neural Information Processing Letters and Reviews 11 (10):203–24.
   Google Scholar
• Barati-Harooni, A., A. Najafi-Marghmaleki, S. M. Hosseini, S. Moradi, M. Lee, and A. Bahadori. 2016. A model for estimation of permeability and free flowing porosity. Liquid Fuels Technology 34 (23):8.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, C., and G. Roderich. 2015. Swarm intelligence in optimization and robotics. In Springer handbook of computational intelligence (pp. 1291–1309). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-43505-2_66
   Google Scholar
• Bolandi, V., A. Kadkhodaie, and R. Farzi. 2017. Analyzing organic richness of source rocks from well log data by using svm and ann classifiers: A case study from the kazhdumi formation, the persian gulf basin, offshore iran. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering 151:224–34. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2017.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, J., Yang, J., and Wang Y. 2015. Extreme learning machine for reservoir parameter estimation in heterogeneous reservoir. In Proceedings of ELM-2014, ed. Cao J., Mao K., Cambria E., Man Z., and Toh KA. Vol. 2, 199–208. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14066-7_20.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, R. J., Almond, S., Ward, R. S., Jackson, R. B., Adams, C. and Worrall, F., Herringshaw, L. G., Gluyas, J. G., and Whitehead, M. A.. 2015. Reply: “oil and gas wells and their integrity: Implications for shale and unconventional resource exploitation. Marine and Petroleum Geology 59:674–75. doi:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, Y., Y. Li,G. Li,and Q. Sun. 2018. A new neural network model for rock porosity prediction.Paper presented at the 2016 International Conference on Identification.Information and Knowledge in the Internet of Things (IIKI), Beijing, China, October 20–21. IEEE.doi:10.1109/IIKI.2016.44
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Y., den Hartog, S. A., Elsworth, D., Marone, C., and Cladouhos, T. 2016. Anomalous distribution of microearthquakes in the newberry geothermal reservoir: Mechanisms and implications. Geothermics 63:62–73. doi:10.1016/j.geothermics.2015.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, Y., Z. Bao, Y. Lin, Z. Qin, J. Lu, and H. Wang. 2017. The porosity and permeability prediction methods for carbonate reservoirs with extremely limited logging data: Stepwise regression vs. N-Way Analysis of Variance. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 42:99–119. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2017.03.010.
   Google Scholar
• Hariharan, M., Sindhu, R., Vijean, V., Yazid, H., Nadarajaw, T., Yaacob, S.,and Polat, K. 2017. Improved binary dragonfly optimization algorithm and wavelet packet based non-linear features for infant cry classification. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 155: 39–51. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.11.021
   Google Scholar
• He, Z., X. Wen, H. Liu, and J. Du. 2014. A comparative study of artificial neural network, adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and support vector machine for forecasting river flow in the semiarid mountain region. Journal of Hydrology,509(379-386) (379–386). doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.054.
   Google Scholar
• Hema,C.,Sankar,S. and Sandhya. 2016. Energy efficient cluster based protocol to extend the RFID network lifetime using dragonfly algorithm. Paper presented at the 2016 International Conference on Communication & Signal Processing. IEEE. Melmaruvathur, India, April 6–8. doi: 10.1109/ICCSP.2016.7754194.
   Google Scholar
• Fister, I., Yang, X. S., Ljubič, K., Fister, D., and Brest, J. 2014. Towards the novel reasoning among particles in pso by the use of rdf and sparql. The Scientific World Journal vol 2014, doi:10.1155/2014/121782.
   Google Scholar
• Konaté, A.A., Pan, H.,Khan,N.,andZiggah,Y.Y. 2015. Prediction of porosity in crystalline rocks using artificial neural networks: An example from the chinese continental scientific drilling main hole. Studia Geophysica Et Geodaetica 59(1):113–136.doi: 10.1007/s11200-013-0993-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, K.,Lin, Q., Zhou, C., and Yao, J. 2007. Time Series prediction based on linear regression and SVR. International Conference on Natural Computation. IEEE Computer Society. Haikou, Hainan, China, August 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mirjalili, S. 2016. Dragonfly algorithm: A new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Computing and Applications 27 (4):1053–73. doi:10.1007/s00521-015-1920-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik, M. K., andPanda, R. 2016. A novel adaptive cuckoo search algorithm for intrinsic discriminant analysis based face recognition. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. Applied Soft Computing 38: 661–675. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.10.039.
   Google Scholar
• Saljooghi, B. S., and A. Hezarkhani. 2014. Comparison of wavenet and ann for predicting the porosity obtained from well log data. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 123:172–82. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2014.08.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sihag, N., 1Ph.D. Scholar. 2018. A novel adaptive dragonfly algorithm for global optimization problems. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development 14(2):27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S., A. I. Kanli, and S. Sevgen. 2015. A general approach for porosity estimation using artificial neural network method: A case study from kansas gas field. Studia Geophysica Et Geodaetica 60 (1):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahmasebi, P., F. Javadpour, and M. Sahimi. 2017. Data mining and machine learning for identifying sweet spots in shale reservoirs. Expert Systems with Applications 88:435–47. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, Y., H. Yan, H. Gao, Y. Sun, and G. Li. 2018. Application of SVR optimized by modified simulated annealing (MSA-SVR) air conditioning load prediction model. Journal of Industrial Information Integration. doi:10.1016/j.jii.2018.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. C., and V. J. Pugh. 1989. A statistical analysis of the accuracy and reproducibility of standard core analysis. Log Analyst 30 (2):71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi, S., V. V. Srinivas, and R. S. Nanjundiah. 2006. Downscaling of precipitation for climate change scenarios: A support vector machine approach. Journal of Hydrology 330 (3–4):0–640. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X. S., andDeb,S. 2010. Cuckoo Search via Lévy flights.Paper presented at the 2009 World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC). IEEE.Coimbatore, India, December 9–11. doi:10.1109/NABIC.2009.5393690.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, C., Wei, Y., Zhou, X. Cheng, Y., Huang, Y., and Zhang, L. 2018. Prediction of total organic carbon content in shale reservoir based on a new integrated hybrid neural network and conventional well logging curves. Journal of Geophysics & Engineering 15:(3): 1050–1061. doi:10.1088/1742-2140/aaa7af.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar