Extraction and numerical simulation of gas–water flow in low permeability coal reservoirs based on a pore network model

References

• Afsharpoor, A., F. Javadpour, J. Q. Wu, L. T. Ko, and Q. S. Liang. 2017. Network modeling of liquid flow in Yanchang shale. Interpretation-A Journal of Subsurface 5 (2):SF99–SF107. doi:10.1190/INT-2016-0100.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, S. Y., J. Yao, Y. F. Yang, L. Zhang, J. L. Zhao, and Y. Gao. 2016. Influence of pore structure parameters on flow characteristics based on a digital rock and the pore network model. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 31:156–63. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2016.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Y. P., C. B. Deng, X. Zhang, F. Q. Li, and X. Y. Wang. 2018. Numerical study of multi-branch horizontal well coalbed methane extraction. Energy Sources Part A 40 (11):1342–50. doi:10.1080/15567036.2018.1476616.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, H., H. Sang, S. X. Liu, and S. P. Liu. 2019. Experimental simulation of replacing and displacing CH4 by injecting supercritical CO2 and its geological significance. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 81:115–25. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire-Gormaly, M., J. S. Ellis, H. L. MacLean, and A. Bazylak. 2016. Pore structure characterization of indiana limestone and pink dolomite from pore network reconstructions. Oil & Gas Science and Technology 71 (3):1–14. doi:10.2516/ogst/2015004.
   Google Scholar
• Golparvar, A., Y. Zhou, F. Wu, J. Ma, and Z. Yu. 2018. A comprehensive review of pore scale modeling methodologies for multiphase flow in porous media. Advances in Geo-Energy Research 2 (4):418–40. doi:10.26804/ager.2018.04.07.
   Google Scholar
• Hafeznia, H., F. Pourfayaz, and A. Maleki. 2017. An assessment of iran’s natural gas potential for transition toward low-carbon economy. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 79 (Supplement C):71–81. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.042.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., J. Sun, X. Liu, and H. Wang. 2012. Numerical study of the effect of natural gas saturation on the reservoir rocks’ elastic parameters. Well Logging Technology 36 (3):239–43. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist, W. B., S. M. Lee, D. A. Coker, K. W. Jones, and P. Spanne. 1996. Medial axis analysis of void structure in three-dimensional tomographic images of porous media. Journal of Geophysical Research 101 (B4):8297–310. doi:10.1029/95JB03039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. Q., S. X. Sang, Q. P. Zhu, J. F. Zhang, H. F. Gao, L. H. Liu, and L. X. Lin. 2015. Triple medium physical model of post fracturing high-rank coal reservoir in southern Qinshui Basin. Journal of Earth Science 26 (3):407–15. doi:10.1007/s12583-014-0501-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mech, D., and J. S. Sangwai. 2018. Investigations on the formation kinetics of semiclathrate hydrate of methane in an aqueous solution of tetra-n-butyl ammonium bromide and sodium dodecyl sulfate in porous media. Energy Sources Part A 40 (20):2415–22. doi:10.1080/15567036.2018.1496203.
   Google Scholar
• National Development and Reform Commission. 2007. Test method for two phase relative permeability in rock. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press.in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Sampath, K. H. S. M., and M. S. A. Perera, Li, Dong-yin., Ranjith, P. G., and Matthai, S. K. 2019. Chaudhari, L., Hadia, N. J., Mitra, S. K., and Vinjamur, M. 2011. Flow visualization of two-phase flow through layered porous media. Energy Sources Part A. 33 (10): 948–958.
   Google Scholar
• SCPNG (Standing Committee on Petroleum and Natural Gas). 2016. Production of coalbed methane – fourteenth report. New Delhi: Lok Sabha Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Shovkun, I., and D. N. Espinoza. 2017. Coupled fluid flow-geomechanics simulation in stress-sensitive coal and shale reservoirs: Impact of desorption-induced stresses, shear failure, and fines migration. Fuel 195:260–72. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.01.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silin, D., and T. Patzek. 2006. Pore space morphology analysis using maximal inscribed spheres. Physica A 371 (2):336–60. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2006.04.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, R., J. J. Liu, and M. M. Cui. 2016. Single‑and two‑phase flow simulation based on equivalent pore network extracted from micro‑CT images of sandstone core. SpringerPlus 5:1–10. doi:10.1186/s40064-015-1659-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun, L., X. Wang, X. Jin, J. M. Li, and S. T. Wu. 2016. 3D characterization and quantitative connectivity analysis of micro/nano pore space. Petroleum Exploration and Development 43 (3):537–46. doi:10.1016/S1876-3804(16)30063-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taud, H., R. Martinez-Angeles, J. F. Parrot, and L. Hernandez-Escobedo. 2005. Porosity estimation method by X-ray computed tomography. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 47 (3):209–17. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2005.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valvatne, P. H. 2004. Predictive pore-scale modelling of multiphase flow. London: Imperial College.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. K., and J. J. Sheng. 2019. Multi-scaled pore network modeling of gas-water flow in shale formations. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 177:899–908. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2019.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, D., and J. F. Willemsen. 1999. Invasion percolation: A new form of percolation theory. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 16 (14):3365–76. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/16/14/028.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Y. S. Li, and C. F. Wang. 2013. Application of classification tree in credit risk analysis. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice 20 (3):50–55.
   Google Scholar