Balanced Standalone Clustering Unit Commitment Solution for Smart Grid Using Probability Algorithms

References

• Ahrabi, M., M. Abedi, H. Nafisi, M. A. Mirzaei, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, and M. Marzband. 2021. Evaluating the effect of electric vehicle parking lots in transmission-constrained AC unit commitment under a hybrid IGDT-stochastic approach. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 125:106546. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarado-Barrios, L., A. R. Del Nozal, J. B. Valerino, I. G. Vera, and J. L. Martínez-Ramos. 2020. Stochastic unit commitment in microgrids: Influence of the load forecasting error and the availability of energy storage. Renewable Energy 146:2060–69. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand, H., N. Narang, and J. S. Dhillon. 2019. Multi-objective combined heat and power unit commitment using particle swarm optimization. Energy 172:794–807. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu, M., and P. Ray. 2021. A Review on Energy Forecasting Algorithms Crucial for Energy Industry Development and Policy Design. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 1–24. doi:10.1080/15567036.2021.2006370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito, B. H., E. C. Finardi, and F. Y. Takigawa. 2020. Unit-commitment via logarithmic aggregated convex combination in multi-unit hydro plants. Electric Power Systems Research 189:106784. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., Z. Li, C. Guo, Y. Ding, and Y. He. 2020. Two-stage chance-constrained unit commitment based on optimal wind power consumption point considering battery energy storage. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 14 (18):3738–49. doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2019.1492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Q., B. Ming, P. Liu, K. Huang, Y. Gong, X. Li, and Y. Zheng. 2021. Solving hydro unit commitment problems with multiple hydraulic heads based on a two-layer nested optimization method. Renewable Energy 172:317–26. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghan, S., P. Aristidou, N. Amjady, and A. J. Conejo. 2021. A Distributionally Robust AC Network-Constrained Unit Commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 36 (6):5258–70. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3078801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Y., Y. Li, C. Duan, H. B. Gooi, and L. Jiang. 2020. Adjustable uncertainty set constrained unit commitment with operation risk reduced through demand response. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 17 (2):1154–65. doi:10.1109/TII.2020.2979215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi, M. R., and N. Amjady. 2021. Contingency‐constrained operation optimization of microgrid with wind and solar generations: A decision‐driven stochastic adaptive‐robust approach. IET Renewable Power Generation 15 (2):326–41. doi:10.1049/rpg2.12026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Guillamón, A., J. I. Sarasúa, M. Chazarra, A. Vigueras-Rodríguez, D. Fernández-Muñoz, and Á. Molina-García. 2020. Frequency control analysis based on unit commitment schemes with high wind power integration: A Spanish isolated power system case study. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 121:106044. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández‐Muñoz, D., and J. I. Pérez‐Díaz. 2021. Unit commitment in a hybrid diesel/wind/pumped‐storage isolated power system considering the net demand intra‐hourly variability. IET Renewable Power Generation 15 (1):30–42. doi:10.1049/rpg2.12003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorani, R., F. Pourahmadi, M. Moeini-Aghtaie, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, and M. Shahidehpour. 2019. Risk-based networked-constrained unit commitment considering correlated power system uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 11 (2):1781–91. doi:10.1109/TSG.2019.2943311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håberg, M. 2019. Fundamentals and recent developments in stochastic unit commitment. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 109:38–48. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.01.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habibi, M., V. Vahidinasab, J. Aghaei, and B. Mohammadi‐Ivatloo. 2021. Assessment of energy storage systems as a reserve provider in stochastic network constrained unit commitment. IET Smart Grid 4 (2):139–50. doi:10.1049/stg2.12012.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, X., Y. Zhang, X. Han, P. Ye, B. Xu, and Y. Yu. 2021. Multi-level interactive unit commitment of regional power system. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 125:106464. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2020.106464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, K. B., and D. Kim. 2020. Enhanced method for considering energy storage systems as ancillary service resources in stochastic unit commitment. Energy 213:118675. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagos, D., and N. D. Hatziargyriou. 2021. Data-Driven Frequency Dynamic Unit Commitment for Island Systems with high RES penetration. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 36 (5):4699–711. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3060891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., H. Zhong, T. Cheng, J. Pi, and F. Meng. 2021. Redundant and Nonbinding Transmission Constraints Identification Method Combining Physical and Economic Insights of Unit Commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 36 (4):3487–95. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2020.3049001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, F., M. Sahraei-Ardakani, D. Trakas, and N. D. Hatziargyriou. 2021. Machine Learning Assisted Stochastic Unit Commitment during Hurricanes with Predictable Line Outages. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 36 (6):5131–42. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3069443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaidis, P., and A. Poullikkas. 2020. Enhanced Lagrange relaxation for the optimal unit commitment of identical generating units. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 14 (18):3920–28. doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2020.0410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning, C., and F. You. 2019. Data-driven adaptive robust unit commitment under wind power uncertainty: A Bayesian nonparametric approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 34 (3):2409–18. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2891057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, J. S., P. Hu, and S. C. Chu. 2021. Binary fish migration optimization for solving unit commitment. Energy 226:120329. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.120329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda, R., and P. K. Tiwari. 2021. Risk assessment by security-constrained unit commitment for hybrid wind-thermal by pair copula approach in reserve power market: A stochastic approach. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 14 (26):6639–49. doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2020.1128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paturet, M., U. Markovic, S. Delikaraoglou, E. Vrettos, P. Aristidou, and G. Hug. 2020. Stochastic unit commitment in low-inertia grids. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 35 (5):3448–58. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2020.2987076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineda, S., J. M. Morales, and A. Jiménez-Cordero. 2020. Data-driven screening of network constraints for unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 35 (5):3695–705. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2020.2980212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poncelet, K., E. Delarue, and W. D’haeseleer. 2020. Unit commitment constraints in long-term planning models: Relevance, pitfalls and the role of assumptions on flexibility. Applied Energy 258:113843. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raygani, S. V., M. Forbes, and D. Martin. 2020. Robust risk-averse unit commitment with solar PV systems. IET Renewable Power Generation 14 (15):2966–75. doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2019.1489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safipour, H., A. Abdollahi, M. S. Hajmohammadi, and M. I. Alizadeh. 2020. Optimal demand response strategies to mitigate wind power variability and gas-supply uncertainty in a multi-resolution robust security constrained unit commitment. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 14 (14):2740–50. doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2019.1752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shayan, H., and T. Amraee. 2019. Network constrained unit commitment under cyber-attacks driven overloads. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 10 (6):6449–60. doi:10.1109/TSG.2019.2904873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh, M., R. Meenakumari, H. Panchal, V. Priya, E. S. El Agouz, and M. Israr. 2020. An enhanced multiobjective particle swarm optimisation algorithm for optimum utilisation of hybrid renewable energy systems. International Journal of Ambient Energy 1–9. doi:10.1080/01430750.2020.1737837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, Y., W. Wu, K. Wang, Y. Fu, and G. Li. 2019. Robust transmission constrained unit commitment under wind power uncertainty with adjustable conservatism. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 14 (5):824–32. doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2019.1361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., X. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. Dong, X. Dong, and M. Wang. 2021. Two stage unit commitment considering multiple correlations of wind power forecast errors. IET Renewable Power Generation 15 (3):574–85. doi:10.1049/rpg2.12037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., J. C. H. Peng, C. Ye, Z. Ye, and Y. Ding. 2021. A Criterion and Stochastic Unit Commitment towards Frequency Resilience of Power Systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 37(1):640–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., and L. Wu. 2021. Machine learning approaches to the unit commitment problem: Current trends, emerging challenges, and new strategies. The Electricity Journal 34 (1):106889. doi:10.1016/j.tej.2020.106889.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai, F., and L. Shi. 2020. Solution proposal to the unit commitment problem incorporating manifold uncertainties. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 14 (21):4763–74. doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2020.0805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., L. Le, J. Fang, X. Ai, W. Yao, and J. Wen. 2019a. Stochastic unit commitment with air conditioning loads participating in reserve service. IET Renewable Power Generation 13 (16):2977–85. doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2019.0360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., X. Han, M. Yang, B. Xu, Y. Zhao, and H. Zhai. 2019b. Adaptive robust unit commitment considering distributional uncertainty. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 104:635–44. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.07.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., J. Fang, X. Ai, B. Zhou, W. Yao, Q. Wu, and J. Wen. 2020. Partition-combine uncertainty set for robust unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 35 (4):3266–69. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2020.2967887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., Z. Yu, and X. Liu. 2020. Security constrained unit commitment with extreme wind scenarios. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy 8 (3):464–72. doi:10.35833/MPCE.2018.000797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar