A system identification-based MPPT algorithm for solar photovoltaic pumping system under partial shading conditions

References

• Agatino Rizzo, S. A., and G. Scelba May 2021. A hybrid global MPPT searching method for fast variable shading conditions. Journal of Cleaner Production 298:126775. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, M., M. Abdelrahem, R. Kennel, and C. M. Hackl. A robust maximum power point tracking based model predictive control and extended Kalman filter for PV systems. In 2020 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion, SPEEDAM 2020 Sorrento, Italy, 514–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, R. M., N. E. Zakzouk, M. I. Abdelkader, and A. K. Kadry Abdelsalam. 2021. Modified partial-shading-tolerant multi-input-single-output photovoltaic string converter. IEEE Access 9:30663–76. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3058695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Greer, M., M. Armstrong, M. Ahmeid, and D. Giaouris. July 2019. Advances on system identification techniques for DC-DC switch mode power converter applications. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 34(7):6973–90. doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2018.2874997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-wesabi, I., M. B. S. Fang Zhijian, G. Al-Muthanna, and Y. Shah. 2021. Comparative study of solar pv system performance under partial shaded condition utilizing different control approaches. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 14(22): 1864–1893. doi:10.17485/IJST/v14i22.827 .
   Google Scholar
• Alik, R., and A. Jusoh. 2018 March. An enhanced P&O checking algorithm MPPT for high tracking efficiency of partially shaded PV module. Solar Energy. 163 570–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliyu, M., G. Hassan, S. A. Said, M. U. Siddiqui, A. T. Alawami, and I. M. Elamin may 2018. A review of solar-powered water pumping systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 87:61–76. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrija, T. S., K. T. Mark, and M. S. Aleksandar. March 2018. Information geometry for model identification and parameter estimation in renewable energy - DFIG plant case. IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution 12(6):1294–302. doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.0606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avila, L., M. De Paula, M. Trimboli, and I. Carlucho. Deep reinforcement learning approach for MPPT control of partially shaded PV systems in Smart Grids. Applied Soft Computing. December 2020. 97:106711. 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106711
   Google Scholar
• Aydogmus, O. August 2012. Design of a solar motor drive system fed by a direct-connected photovoltaic array. Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering 12(3):53–58. doi: 10.4316/aece.2012.03008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, Y., L. YiWang , C. Wang, and Y. Wang June 2018. Hammerstein models and real-time system identification of load dynamics for voltage management. IEEE Access 6:34598–607. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2849002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belhachat, F., and C. Larbes September 2017. Global maximum power point tracking based on ANFIS approach for PV array configurations under partial shading conditions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 77:875–89. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belhachat, F., and C. Larbes. 2021. PV array reconfiguration techniques for maximum power optimization under partial shading conditions: A review. Solar Energy 230:558–82. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2021.09.089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beohar, N., V. N. K. Malladi, D. Mandal, S. Ozev, and B. Bakkaloglu. February 2018. Online built-in self-test of high switching frequency Dc-Dc converters using model reference based system identification techniques. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers 65(2):818–31. doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2017.2739479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, P., and V. John. 2021. Optimized Global Maximum Power Point Tracking of Photovoltaic Systems Based on Rectangular Power Comparison. IEEE Access 9:53602–16. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3071136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boztas, G., O. Aydogmus, and H. Guldemir. 2021. Design and implementation of a high-efficiency low-voltage synchronous reluctance motor. Electrical Engineering 104:717–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boztas, G., and O. Aydogmus. 2022. Implementation of sensorless speed control of synchronous reluctance motor using extended Kalman filter. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal 31:101066. doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2021.09.012.
   Google Scholar
• Celikel, R., and A. Gundogdu 2020 . System identification-based MPPT algorithm for PV systems under variable atmosphere conditions using current sensorless approach. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems 30(8):August 2020 1–21. doi:10.1002/2050-7038.12433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelikel, R., and A. Gündoğdu. April 2021. Comparison of PO and INC MPPT methods using FPGA in-the-loop under different radiation conditions. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 9(2):114–22. doi: 10.17694/bajece.884815.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., S. Ma, J. Wu, and L. Huang. January 2017. Analysis of MPPT failure and development of an augmented nonlinear controller for MPPT of photovoltaic systems under partial shading conditions. Applied Sciences 7(1):95. doi: 10.3390/app7010095.
   Google Scholar
• Elahi, M., H. M. Ashraf, and C.-H. Kim. 2022. An improved partial shading detection strategy based on chimp optimization algorithm to find global maximum power point of solar array system. Energies 15 (4):1549. doi:10.3390/en15041549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engin Basoglu, M. E. March 2019. An Improved 0.8 V OC model based GMPPT technique for module level photovoltaic power optimizers. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 55(2):1913–1921. doi: 10.1109/TIA.2018.2885216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, G., V. Klass, M. Behm, G. Lindbergh, and J. Sjoberg. May 2018. Model-based lithium-ion battery resistance estimation from electric vehicle operating data. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 67(5):3720–28. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2018.2796723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokdag, M., M. Akbaba, and O. Gulbudak. 2018. Switched-capacitor converter for PV modules under partial shading and mismatch conditions. Solar Energy 170:723–31. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundogdu, A., R. Celikel, and O. Aydogmus. 2020. Comparison of SI-ANNand extended Kalman filter-based sensorless speed controls of a DC motor. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 46 (2):1241–56. October 2020. doi:10.1007/s13369-020-05014-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., R. Gupta, and S. Padhee. July 2018. Parametric system identification and robust controller design for liquid–liquid heat exchanger system. IET Control Theory & Applications 12(10):1474–82. doi: 10.1049/iet-cta.2017.1128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalaleddini, K., E. Sobhani Tehrani, and R. E. Kearney. June 2017. A subspace approach to the structural decomposition and identification of ankle joint dynamic stiffness. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 64(6):1357–68. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2604293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karabacak, M. A., Z. Kesilmiş, and M. Aksoy. 2022. A novel two-stage MPPT method based on inflection voltages. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 44 (1):591–612. doi:10.1080/15567036.2022.2049400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karras, G. C., P. Marantos, C. P. Bechlioulis, and K. J. Kyriakopoulos. July 2019. Unsupervised online system identification for underwater robotic vehicles. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 44(3):642–63. doi: 10.1109/JOE.2018.2827678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesilmiş, Z., M. A. Karabacak, and M. Aksoy. A novel MPPT method based on inflection voltages. Journal of Cleaner Production. September 2020. 266:121473. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121473
   Google Scholar
• Kofinas,Anastasios, P., I. Dounis, G. Papadakis, and M. N. Assimakopoulos March 2015. An Intelligent MPPT controller based on direct neural control for partially shaded PV system. Energy and Buildings 90:51–64. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.12.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostko, J. K. October 1923. Polyphase reaction synchronous motors. Journal of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers 42(11):1162–68. doi: 10.1109/JoAIEE.1923.6591529.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, B. P., D. P. Winston, S. C. Christabel, and S. Venkatanarayanan. 2017. Implementation of a switched PV technique for rooftop 2 kW solar PV to enhance power during unavoidable partial shading conditions. Journal of Power Electronics 17(6) :1600–1610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar Behura, A., A. Kumar, D. Kumar Rajak, C. I. Pruncu, and L. Lamberti. 2021. Towards better performances for a novel rooftop solar pv system. Solar Energy 216:518–29. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2021.01.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larbes, C., S. M. Aït Cheikh, T. Obeidi, and A. Zerguerras. October 2009. Genetic algorithms optimized fuzzy logic control for the maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic system. Renewable Energy 34(10):2093–100. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2009.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasheen, M., A. Kamel Abdel Rahman, M. Abdel-Salam, and S. Ookawara. April 2017. Adaptive reference voltage-based MPPT technique for PV applications. IET Renewable Power Generation 11(5):715–722. doi: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, B., L. Wang, and Q. Wu 2020 . Maximum power point scanning for PV systems under various partial shading conditions. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 11(4):October 2020 2556–2566. doi:10.1109/TSTE.2020.2965570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodhi, E., F.-Y. Wang, G. Xiong, G. A. Mallah, M. Y. Javed, T. S. Tamir, and D. W. Gao. 2021. A dragonfly optimization algorithm for extracting maximum power of grid-interfaced PV systems. Sustainability 13 (19):10778. doi:10.3390/su131910778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyden, S., H. Galligan, and M. Enamul Haque. A hybrid simulated annealing and perturb and observe maximum power point tracking method. IEEE Systems Journal 15(3):1–9. September 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manganiello, P., M. Ricco, G. Petrone, E. Monmasson, and G. Spagnuolo. December 2014. Optimization of perturbative PV MPPT methods through online system identification. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 61(12):6812–21. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2014.2317143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, M., L. Cui, Q. Zhang, K. Guo, L. Zhou, and H. Huang. 2020. Classification and summarization of solar photovoltaic MPPT techniques: A review based on traditional and intelligent control strategies. Energy Reports 6:1312–27. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2020.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad, M., R. Abbassi, H. Jerbi, F. Waly Ahmed, H. Abdalqadir Kh Ahmed, and A. Rezvani June 2021. A new MPPT design using variable step size perturb and observe method for PV system under partially shaded conditions by modified shuffled frog leaping algorithm- SMC controller. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 45:101056. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto, Y., R. Hoshino, S. Wakao, and T. Tsuburaya. March 2018. Improvement of Torque characteristics for a synchronous reluctance motor using MMA-based topology optimization method. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 54(3):1–4. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2017.2762000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostadrahimi, A., and Y. Mahmoud. January 2021. Novel spline-MPPT technique for photovoltaic systems under uniform irradiance and partial shading conditions. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 12(1):524–32. doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2020.3009054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathak, P. K., S. Padmanaban, A. K. Yadav, P. A. Alvi, and B. Khan. 2022. Modified incremental conductance MPPT algorithm for SPV-based grid-tied and stand-alone systems. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 16 (4):776–791. doi:10.1049/gtd2.12328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punitha, K., D. Devaraj, and S. Sakthivel December 2013. Artificial neural network based modified incremental conductance algorithm for maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions. Energy 62:330–40. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyrhönen, J., V. Hrabovcová, and R. Scott Semken. 2016. Electrical Machine Drives Control: An Introduction ISBN:978-1-119-26045-5. UNITED KINGDOM: John Wiley & Sons, 524. https://ch.mathworks.com/help/ident/ref/idtreepartition.html?s_tid=doc_ta
   Google Scholar
• Rezk, H., and A. M. Eltamaly 2015. A comprehensive comparison of different MPPT techniques for photovoltaic systems. Solar Energy 112:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2014.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricco, M., P. Manganiello, E. Monmasson, G. Petrone, and G. Spagnuolo. February 2017. FPGA-Based implementation of dual Kalman filter for PV MPPT applications. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 13(1):176–85. doi: 10.1109/TII.2015.2462313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabaan, S., M. I. A. El-Sebah, and P. Bekhit. 2018. Maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic solar pump based on ANFIS tuning system. Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology 5 (1):11–22. doi:10.1016/j.jesit.2018.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, J., D. Jun Kwak, and Y. Il Lee. june 2017. Adaptive path-following control for an unmanned surface vessel using an identified dynamic model. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 22(3):1143–53. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2017.2651057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subudhi, B., and R. Pradhan. 2013. A comparative study on maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic power systems. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 4 (1):89–98. doi:10.1109/TSTE.2012.2202294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vankadara, S. K., S. Chatterjee, and P. K. Balachandran. 2022. An accurate analytical modeling of solar photovoltaic system considering Rs and Rsh under partial shaded condition. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 1–10. doi:10.1007/s13198-022-01658-6.
   Google Scholar