Research on the evaluation of distributed integrated energy system using improved analytic hierarchy process-information entropy method

References

• Bamisile, O., M. Dagbasi, Q. Huang, N. Williams, T. Ruwa, A. Babatunde, and A. D. Kemena. 2020. A biomass-integrated comprehensive energy system: Thermodynamics assessment and performance comparison of sugarcane bagasse and rice husk as input source. Energy Sources: Part A, Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 1–18. doi:10.1080/15567036.2020.1824037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Z. Xu, J. Wang, P. D. Lund, Y. Han, and T. Cheng. 2022. Multi-objective optimization of an integrated energy system against energy, supply-demand matching and exergo-environmental cost over the whole life-cycle. Energy Conversion and Management 254:115203. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, T., D. Jiang, Y. Yang, and T. Yuan. 2022. Research on business operation mode of hydrogen integrated energy system based on NSGA-II and entropy weight method. Electric Power 55 (1):110–18.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Z., F. Ma, D. Wu, H. Zhang, F. Dong, P. Li, and L. Xiao. 2021. Collaborative optimization method and operation performances for a novel integrated energy system containing adiabatic compressed air energy storage and organic Rankine cycle. Journal of Energy Storage 41:102942. doi:10.1016/j.est.2021.102942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, D., G. Liu, Y. Chen, J. Miao, and X. Yao. 2022. Evaluation and prediction of train communication network performance. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 71 (5):4898–910. doi:10.1109/TVT.2022.3156068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoła, A., and S. Czarnecki. 2022. Brick wall moisture evaluation in historic buildings using neural networks. Automation in Construction 141:104429. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilham, Z., I. Subramaniam, A. A. Jamaludin, W. A. A. Q. Wan-Mohtar, S. A. Halim-Lim, H. Ohgaki, K. Ishihara, and M. R. A. Mansor. 2022. Analysing dimensions and indicators to design energy education framework in Malaysia using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Energy Reports 8:1013–24. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.07.126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishaq, H., and I. Dincer. 2019. Exergy analysis and performance evaluation of a newly developed integrated energy system for quenchable generation. Energy 179:1191–204. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke, Y., J. Liu, J. Meng, S. Fang, and S. Zhuang. 2022. Comprehensive evaluation for plan selection of urban integrated energy systems: A novel multi-criteria decision-making framework. Sustainable Cities and Society 81:103837. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2022.103837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Y. Cui, J. Wang, C. Yue, Y. S. Agbodjan, and Y. Yang. 2022a. Multi-objective optimization of multi-energy complementary integrated energy systems considering load prediction and renewable energy production uncertainties. Energy 254:124399. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.124399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., J. Liu, K. Ren, X. Liu, and J. Liu. 2022b. An integrated fuzzy multi-energy transaction evaluation approach for energy internet markets considering judgement credibility and variable rough precision. Energy 261:125327. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.125327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, X., J. Wu, W. Hu, C. Chi, X. Jiang, and X. Li. 2020. Synthetic evaluation of integrated energy system based on AHP- fuzzy comprehensive assessment method. E3S Web of Conferences 185:1010. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202018501010.
   Google Scholar
• Mohd Chachuli, F. S., N. Ahmad Ludin, M. A. Md Jedi, and N. H. Hamid. 2021. Transition of renewable energy policies in Malaysia: Benchmarking with data envelopment analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 150:111456. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, J., X. Chen, X. Luo, X. Zeng, Z. Liu, W. Lai, Y. Xu, and C. Lu. 2022. Analysis of the impact of China’s energy industry on social development from the perspective of low-carbon policy. Energy Reports 8:14–27. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Si, T., C. Wang, R. Liu, Y. Guo, S. Yue, and Y. Ren. 2020. Multi-criteria comprehensive energy efficiency assessment based on fuzzy-AHP method: A case study of post-treatment technologies for coal-fired units. Energy 200:117533. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, D., W. Meng, M. Dong, J. Yang, J. Wang, X. Chen, and L. Huang. 2022. A critical survey of integrated energy system: Summaries, methodologies and analysis. Energy Conversion and Management 266:115863. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahir, M. F., C. Haoyong, and H. Guangze. 2021. Exergy hub based modelling and performance evaluation of integrated energy system. Journal of Energy Storage 41:102912. doi:10.1016/j.est.2021.102912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., F. Dong, Z. Ma, H. Chen, and R. Yan. 2021a. Multi-objective optimization with thermodynamic analysis of an integrated energy system based on biomass and solar energies. Journal of Cleaner Production 324:129257. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., L. Guo, Y. Ma, X. Han, J. Xing, W. Miao, and H. Wang. 2022a. Study on operation optimization of decentralized integrated energy system in northern rural areas based on multi-objective. Energy Reports 8:3063–84. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., F. Jiang, and R. Li. 2022b. Assessing supply chain greenness from the perspective of embodied renewable energy – a data envelopment analysis using multi-regional input-output analysis. Renewable Energy 189:1292–305. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.02.128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., W. Zhao, L. Qiu, and P. Yuan. 2021b. Evaluation and selection of integrated energy system construction scheme equipped with smart energy management and control platform using single-valued neutrosophic numbers. Sustainability 13 (5):2615. doi:10.3390/su13052615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., J. H. Zheng, Z. Li, and Q. H. Wu. 2022c. Multi-attribute decision analysis for optimal design of park-level integrated energy systems based on load characteristics. Energy 254:124379. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.124379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, Q., G. Liu, W. Wu, and S. Liao. 2021. Multicriteria comprehensive evaluation framework for industrial park-level distributed energy system considering weights uncertainties. Journal of Cleaner Production 282:124530. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L. 2021. Research on multi index evaluation method of integrated energy system based on AHP-entropy weight method. North China Electric Power University.
   Google Scholar
• Zang, H., M. Geng, M. Huang, Z. WeiI, S. Chen, G. Sun, and A. Amir. 2022. Review and prospect of state estimation for electricity-heat-gas integrated energy system. Automation of Electric Power Systems 46 (07):187–99.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., B. Li, H. Lu, X. Wang, H. Li, S. Guo, W. Xue, and Y. Wang. 2022. Economy-environment-energy performance evaluation of CCHP microgrid system: A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method. Energy 240:122830. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.122830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., Y. Ma, H. Wang, Y. Li, J. Yu, and J. Yang. 2022. Optimal scheduling of integrated energy system for low carbon considering combined weights. Energy Reports 8:527–35. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., Y. Wu, C. Wu, Z. Deng, C. Xu, and Y. Hu. 2019. A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for performance analysis and evaluation of park-level integrated energy system. Energy Conversion and Management 201:112134. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar