Optimization of performance and emission characteristics of liquid fuel fired porous medium burner using RSM and desirability approach

References

• Altemimi, A., D. A. Lightfoot, M. Kinsel, and D. G. Watson. 2015. Employing response surface methodology for the optimization of ultrasound assisted extraction of lutein and β-carotene from spinach. Molecules 20 (4):6611–25. doi:10.3390/molecules20046611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arini Putri, T., L. Fauziah, and L. Fauziah. 2017. Performance evaluation of a pressurized cooking stove using vegetable cooking oils as fuel. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology 7 (4):1255–61. doi:10.18517/ijaseit.7.4.2430.
   Google Scholar
• Avdic, F., M. Adzic, and F. Durst. 2010. Small scale porous medium combustion system for heat production in households. Applied Energy 87 (7):2148–55. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baadhe, R. R., N. K. Mekala, S. R. Parcha, and Y. P. Devi. 2013. Optimization of amorphadiene production in engineered yeast by response surface methodology. 3 Biotech 4 (3):317–24. doi:10.1007/s13205-013-0156-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banerjee, A., and D. Paul. 2021. Developments and applications of porous medium combustion: A recent review. Energy 221:119868. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.119868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, W., R. Othman, R. P. Jaya, M. Rosli, M. Hasan, M. Nabiałek, B. Jeż, P. Pietrusiewicz, D. Kwiatkowski, P. Postawa, et al. 2021. Design of experiment on concrete mechanical properties prediction: A critical review. Materials (Basel) 14 (8):1–17. doi:10.3390/ma14081866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couto, H. S., J. A. Carvalho Jr, and D. Bastos Netto. 1997. Theoretical formulation for sauter mean diameter of pressure-swirl atomizers. Journal of Propulsion & Power 13 (5):691–96. doi:10.2514/2.5221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, S., L. K. Kaushik, M. A. Kumar, S. H. V. Satish, and P. Muthukumar. 2021. Clustered porous radiant Burner: A cleaner alternative for cooking systems in small and medium scale applications. Journal of Cleaner Production 308:127276. Jul. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devi, S., N. Sahoo, and P. Muthukumar. 2023. Comparative performance evaluation of a porous burner with a conventional burner: Biogas combustion. Applied Thermal Engineering 218:119338. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkotb, M. M. 1982. Fuel Atomization for Spray Modelling. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 8 (1):61–91. doi:10.1016/0360-1285(82)90009-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falsafi, I., H. Nemati, and A. Zare. 2023. Mathematical modeling of porous combustion under various working conditions. Chemical Engineering Communications 210 (6):920–32. doi:10.1080/00986445.2021.1986702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heister, S. D. 2011. Handbook of atomization and sprays. Handb. At. Sprays. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7264-4.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, L., K. Liusheng, Y. Zhi, Y. Xiaoxi, and W. Duo. 2020. Investigation of flame characteristic in porous media burner with pores step distribution in radial direction. Combustion Theory and Modelling 24 (4):666–81. doi:10.1080/13647830.2020.1739335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indian Standard. 2018. Oil pressure stoves-offset burner type-specification (second revision), IS10109:2018. New Delhi, India: BIS.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, N. C., M. Z. Abdullah, N. M. Mazlan, and K. F. Mustafa. 2020. Entropy generation and exergy analysis of premixed fuel-air combustion in micro porous media burner. Entropy 22(10):1–18. doi:10.3390/e22101104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasuja, A. K. 1979. Atomization of Crude and Residual Fuel Oils. Journal of Engineering for Power 101 (2):250–58. doi:10.1115/1.3446480.
   Google Scholar
• Jugjai, S., and C. Pongsai. 2007. Liquid fuels-fired porous burner. Combustion Science and Technology 179(9):1823–40. doi:10.1080/00102200701260179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, M., and M. J. Hall. 1995. The combustion of liquid fuels within a porous media radiant burner. Experimental Thermal & Fluid Science 11 (1):13–20. doi:10.1016/0894-1777(94)00106-I.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik, L. K., and P. Muthukumar. 2020. Thermal and economic performance assessments of waste cooking oil/kerosene blend operated pressure cook-stove with porous radiant burner. Energy 206(118102):118102. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118102.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, S., and F. McClintock. 1953. Describing uncertainties in single sample experiments. Mechanical Engineering 75 (3):8.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, A. H. 1989. Properties of sprays. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization 6 (1–4):176–86. doi:10.1002/ppsc.19890060129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., H. Liu, M. Xie, and X. Liu. 2019. Experimental characterization of diesel combustion in an electrically pre-heated porous media burner. Energy & Fuels 33 (12):12749–57. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b02812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., G. Wu, P. Wang, Y. Cui, C. Tian, and H. Han. 2021. A mathematical model for predicting the sauter mean diameter of liquid-medium ultrasonic atomizing nozzle based on orthogonal design. Applied Science 11 (11628):11628. doi:10.3390/app112411628.
   Google Scholar
• Malico, I., M. A. Mujeebu, I. Malico, and M. A. Mujeebu. 2015. Potential of porous media combustion technology for household applications. International Journal of Advanced Thermofluid Research 1 (1):2455–1368.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamad, A. A. 2005. 11-combustion in porous media:Fundamentals and applications. In Transport phenomena in porous media III, Pergamon, ed. D. B. Ingham and I. Pop, ISBN 9780080444901 287–304. doi:10.1016/B978-008044490-1/50015-6.
   Google Scholar
• Mujeebu, M. A., M. Z. Abdullah, M. Z. A. Bakar, A. A. Mohamad, and M. K. Abdullah. 2009. Applications of porous media combustion technology – a review. Applied Energy 86 (9):1365–75. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.01.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthukumar, P., and P. I. Shyamkumar. 2013. Development of novel porous radiant burners for LPG cooking applications. Fuel 112:562–66. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2011.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahemiah, D., I. Nkama, and M. H. Badau. 2016. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for the production and optimization of extruded instant porridge from broken rice fractions blended with Cowpea. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences 5 (2):105–16. doi:10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160502.13.
   Google Scholar
• Palanisamy, M., L. K. Kaushik, A. K. Mahalingam, S. Deb, P. Maurya, S. R. Shaik, and M. A. Mujeebu. 2023. Evolutions in Gaseous and Liquid Fuel Cook-Stove Technologies. Energies 16 (2):763. doi:10.3390/en16020763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, P., W. Jin, X. Li, Y. Chen, J. Jiang, H. Wan, and D. Yu. 2018. Optimization of multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction based on response surface methodology and an artificial neural network-genetic algorithm approach. PLoS One 13 (7):1–14. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peasura, P. 2015. Application of response surface methodology for modeling of postweld heat treatment process in a pressure vessel steel ASTM A516 grade 70. Scientific World Journal 2015:1–8. doi:10.1155/2015/318475.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan, P., and P. C. Mishra. 2018. Performance evaluation of novel surface flame self-aspirated porous radiant burners for cooking applications. Sādhanā 123456789 (x). doi: 10.1007/s12046-018-0934-7.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan, P., C. Mishra, and B. B. Samantaray. 2018. Performance and emission analysis of a novel porous radiant burner for domestic cooking application. Heat Transfer Engineering 39(9):784–93. doi:10.1080/01457632.2017.1341231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronceros, J. R., A. Porto, J. Sumara, and G. A. Ronceros. 2022. An improved theoretical formulation for Sauter mean diameter of pressure-swirl atomizers using geometrical parameters of atomization. Propulsion & Power Research 11 (2):240–52. doi:10.1016/j.jppr.2022.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagar Sinha, G., and P. Muthukumar. 2019, Aug. Study of effects of various parameter on thermal efficiency of porous burner with kerosene pressure stove. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1240(1):012136. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1240/1/012136.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, P. R., and A. Ganesh. 2017. Study the in fl uence of pre-heating on atomization of straight vegetable oil through ohnesorge number and Sauter mean diameter. Journal of the Energy Institute 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.joei.2017.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, M., and S. C. Mishra. 2009. Thermal efficiency study of conventional kerosene pressure stoves equipped with porous radiant inserts. International Energy Journal 10:247–54.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, M., S. C. Mishra, and P. Mahanta. 2011. An experimental investigation on efficiency improvement of a conventional kerosene pressure stove. International Journal of Energy for a Clean Environment 12 (1):79–93. doi:10.1615/InterJEnerCleanEnv.2012005580.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, M., S. C. Mishra, and P. Mahanta. 2016. Effect of burner configuration and operating parameters on the performance of kerosene pressure stove with submerged porous medium combustion. Applied Thermal Engineering 107:516–23. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, L., S. S. Sehgal, R. Tonk, and S. Chhabra. 2021. Combustion analysis of porous radiant burner for commercial cooking applications. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science & Engineering 1017 (1):1017. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/1017/1/012023.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, H., A. Sharma, M. Kumar, V. Anand, V. Nhanh Nguyen, N. Kumar Singh, Y. Singh, D. Balasubramanian, B. Deepanraj, and T. Hai Truong. 2023. Enhancement of combustion characteristics of waste cooking oil biodiesel using TiO 2 nanofluid blends through RSM. Fuel 331 (1):125681. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125681.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, D. K., and J. V. Tirkey. 2022. Performance optimization through response surface methodology of an integrated coal gasi fi cation and CI engine fuelled with diesel and low-grade coal-based producer gas. Energy 238:121982. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.121982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subhaschandra, T., U. Rajak, O. David, P. K. Chaurasiya, K. Natarajan, T. N. Verma, and P. Nashine. 2021. Optimization of performance and emission parameters of direct injection diesel engine fuelled with microalgae Spirulina (L .) – response surface methodology and full factorial method approach. Fuel 285 (January):119103. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119103.
   Google Scholar
• Takami, H., S. Tomohiro, Y. Itaya, and M. Hasatani. 1998. Performance of flammability of kerosene and NOX emission in the porous burner. Fuel 77 (3):165–71. doi:10.1016/S0016-2361(97)00180-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tongbai, P., K. Keawchart, and B. Krittacom. 2021. Spherical packed-bed porous burner using diesel oil as fuel. Energy Reports 7 (May):1–11. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.09.053.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, C., and J. R. Howell. 1996. Combustion of Liquid Fuels in a Porous Radiant Burner. Combustion Science and Technology 112 (January):141–61. doi:10.1080/00102209608951953.
   Google Scholar
• Vahidhosseini, S. M., J. A. Esfahani, and K. C. Kim. 2021. Assessment of a cylindrical porous radiant burner with internal combustion regime for sustainable energy: Numerical analysis of the radiant efficiency and NO production. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 43:100974. Feb. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2020.100974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera, L., M. M. De Zan, M. S. Cámara, and C. Goicoechea. 2014. Talanta experimental design and multiple response optimization. Using the desirability function in analytical methods development. Talanta 124:123–38. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2014.01.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voinea, A., S. Stroe, and G. Gabriela. 2020. Use of response surface methodology to investigate the effects of sodium chloride substitution with potassium chloride on Dough’s rheological properties. Applied Science 10 (4039):1–13. doi:10.3390/app10114039.
   Google Scholar
• Waseem, M., B. Salah, T. Habib, W. Saleem, M. Abas, R. Khan, U. Ghani, and M. U. R. Siddiqi. 2020. Multi-response optimization of tensile creep behavior of PLA 3D printed parts using categorical response surface methodology. Polymers (Basel) 2962 (12):2962. doi:10.3390/polym12122962.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, X., and H. Yong. 2014. Improved semiempirical correlation to predict Sauter mean diameter for pressure-swirl atomizers. Journal of Propulsion & Power 30 (6):1628–35. doi:10.2514/1.B35238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yirgu, Z., S. Leta, A. Hussen, M. Mazharuddin, and T. Aragaw. 2021. Heliyon optimization of microwave-assisted carbohydrate extraction from indigenous Scenedesmus sp. grown in brewery ef fl uent using response surface methodology. Heliyon 7 (5):e07115. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar