382
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Spatial Energy Efficiency Patterns in New York and Implications for Energy Demand and the Rebound Effect

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • ACS. (2020). Total housing units in New York state (2013-2017)–decennial census. American Community Survey (ACS). https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/.
  • Anderson, R., D. Mooney, and S. Hauser. 2013. Energy convergence: Integrating increased efficiency with increased penetration of renewable generation. In Energy efficiency: Towards the end of demand growth, ed. F. P. Sioshansi, 495–517. Boston, MA: Academic Press.
  • Anselin, L. 1995. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis 27 (2):93–115. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x.
  • Anselin, L. 2002. Under the hood Issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricultural Economics 27 (3):247–67. doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00120.x.
  • Anselin, L., A. K. Bera, R. Florax, and M. J. Yoon. 1996. Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics 26 (1):77–104. doi:10.1016/0166-0462(95)02111-6.
  • Anselin, L., I. Syabri, and Y. Kho. 2006. GeoDa: An Introduction to spatial data analysis. Geographical Analysis 38 (1):5–22. doi:10.1111/j.0016-7363.2005.00671.x.
  • Barbose, G., C. Goldman, I. Hoffman, and M. Billingsley. 2013. The future of utility customer-funded energy efficiency programs in the USA: Projected spending and savings to 2025. Energy Efficiency 6 (3):475–93. doi:10.1007/s12053-012-9187-1.
  • Bednar, D. J., T. G. Reames, and G. A. Keoleian. 2017. The intersection of energy and justice: Modeling the spatial, racial/ethnic and socioeconomic patterns of urban residential heating consumption and efficiency in Detroit, Michigan. Energy and Buildings 143:25–34. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.028.
  • Bell, K. P., and N. E. Bockstael. 2000. Applying the generalized-moments estimation approach to spatial problems involving microlevel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics 82 (1):72–82. doi:10.1162/003465300558641.
  • Berg, W., S. Nowak, G. Relf, S. Vaidyanathan, E. Junga, M. DiMascio, and E. Cooper (2018). The 2018 state energy efficiency scorecard. Report U1808. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE). https://www.aceee.org/research-report/u1808.
  • Bertoldi, P., and R. Mosconi. 2020. Do energy efficiency policies save energy? A new approach based on energy policy indicators (in the EU member states). Energy Policy 139:111320. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111320.
  • Bilgen, S., and İ. Sarıkaya. 2016. Contribution of efficient energy use on economy, environment, and sustainability. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 11 (12):1166–72. doi:10.1080/15567249.2016.1177622.
  • Bohr, J., and A. C. McCreery. 2019. Do energy burdens contribute to economic poverty in the United States? A panel analysis. Social Forces 99 (1):155–77. doi:10.1093/sf/soz131.
  • Brännström, L., B. Trolldal, and M. Menke. 2016. Spatial spillover effects of a community action programme targeting on-licensed premises on violent assaults: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 70 (3):226–30. doi:10.1136/jech-2015-206124.
  • Bridge, G., S. Bouzarovski, M. Bradshaw, and N. Eyre. 2013. Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy 53:331–340.
  • Brinks, D., and M. Coppedge. 2006. Diffusion is no illusion: Neighbor emulation in the third wave of democracy. Comparative Political Studies 39 (4):463–89. doi:10.1177/0010414005276666.
  • Byrne, J., and J. Taminiau. 2018. Utilizing the Urban fabric as the solar power plant of the future. Urban energy transition. ed., P. Droege. 31–49. 2nd New York City: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102074-6.00016-4.
  • Carley, S., and S. Nicholson-Crotty. 2018. Moving beyond theories of neighborly emulation: Energy policy information channels are plentiful among American states. Energy Research & Social Science 46 (1):245–51. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.026.
  • Chokhachian, A., K. Perini, S. Giulini, and T. Auer. 2020. Urban performance and density: Generative study on interdependencies of urban form and environmental measures. Sustainable Cities and Society 53:101952. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101952.
  • Chung, W. 2011. Review of building energy-use performance benchmarking methodologies. Applied Energy 88 (5):1470–79. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.022.
  • Day, R., G. Walker, and N. Simcock. 2016. Conceptualising energy use and energy poverty using a capabilities framework. Energy Policy 93:255–64. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.019.
  • Dormady, N., M. Hoyt, A. Roa-Henriquez, and W. Welch. 2019. Who pays for retail electric deregulation? Evidence of cross-subsidization from complete bill data. The Energy Journal 40 (2):161–94. doi:10.5547/01956574.40.2.ndor.
  • Douthat, T., J. D. Morgan, H. Alibašić, and A. Grant. 2020. Passive building characteristics, and summertime residential energy use: A spatial analysis of energy efficiency in Gainesville, FL. Building and Environment 169:106542. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106542.
  • EIA. 2020. Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS). Washington, DC: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/data/2015/index.php.
  • Fan, R., M. Luo, and P. Zhang. 2016. A study on evolution of energy intensity in China with heterogeneity and rebound effect. Energy 99:159–69. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.041.
  • Fell, H., S. Li, and A. Paul. 2014. A new look at residential electricity demand using household expenditure data. International Journal of Industrial Organization 33:37–47. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2014.02.001.
  • Fournier, E. D., F. Federico, E. Porse, and S. Pincetl. 2019. Effects of building size growth on residential energy efficiency and conservation in California. Applied Energy 240:446–52. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.072.
  • Geels, F. W. 2012. A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography 24:471–82. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021.
  • Geels, F. W., T. Schwanen, S. Sorrell, K. Jenkins, and B. K. Sovacool. 2018. Reducing energy demand through low carbon innovation: A sociotechnical transitions perspective and thirteen research debates. Energy Research & Social Science 40:23–35. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.003.
  • Getis, A., and J. K. Ord. 1992. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis 24 (3):189–206. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x.
  • Gillingham, K., A. Jenn, and I. M. L. Azevedo. 2015. Heterogeneity in the response to gasoline prices: Evidence from Pennsylvania and implications for the rebound effect. Energy Economics 52:S41–S52. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.011.
  • Granade, H. C., J. Creyts, A. Derkach, P. Farese, S. Nyquist, and K. Ostrowski. 2009. Unlocking energy efficiency in the U.S. economy. New York, NY: McKinsey & Company. www.mckinsey.com/USenergyefficiency.
  • Graziano, M., and K. Gillingham. 2015. Spatial patterns of solar photovoltaic system adoption: The influence of neighbors and the built environment. Journal of Economic Geography 15 (4):815–39. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbu036.
  • Graziano, M., M. Fiaschetti, and C. Atkinson-Palombo. 2019. Peer effects in the adoption of solar energy technologies in the United States: An urban case study. Energy Research & Social Science 48:75–84. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.002.
  • Haining, R. 2010. The Nature of Georeferenced Data. In Handbook of applied spatial analysis, ed. M. M. Fischer and A. Getis, 197–217. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Heijden, J. V. D. 2017. Innovations in urban climate governance: Voluntary programs for low-carbon buildings and cities, 1st ed. ( ISBN: 9781108415361) Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hood, C. C. 1986. The Tools of Government. United States: Chatham House.
  • Howard, B., L. Parshall, J. Thompson, S. Hammer, J. Dickinson, and V. Modi. 2012. Spatial distribution of urban building energy consumption by end use. Energy and Buildings 45:141–51. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.10.061.
  • Kanger, L., F. W. Geels, B. Sovacool, and J. Schot. 2019. Technological diffusion as a process of societal embedding: Lessons from historical automobile transitions for future electric mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 71:47–66. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2018.11.012.
  • Katircioğlu, S. T. 2014. Estimating higher education induced energy consumption: The case of Northern Cyprus. Energy 66:831–38. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.040.
  • Kontokosta, C. 2011. Greening the regulatory landscape: The spatial and temporal diffusion of green building policies in U.S. cities. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate 3 (1):68–90.
  • Labanca, N., F. Suerkemper, P. Bertoldi, W. Irrek, and B. Duplessis. 2015. Energy efficiency services for residential buildings: Market situation and existing potentials in the European Union. Journal of Cleaner Production 109:284–95. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.077.
  • Lele, S. M., E. S. Brondízio, J. Byrne, G. M. Mace, J. Martínez Alier, and J. R. Lupp. 2019. Rethinking environmentalism: Linking justice, sustainability, and diversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Lesage, J. P., and R. K. Pace. 2009. Introduction to spatial econometrics, [u.a.] Boca Raton: CRC Press. ISBN: 9781420064247.
  • Li, Y., S. Kubicki, A. Guerriero, and Y. Rezgui. 2019. Review of building energy performance certification schemes towards future improvement. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 113:109244. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109244.
  • Liu, Y., X. Yao, and T. Wei. 2019. Energy efficiency gap and target setting: A study of information asymmetry between governments and industries in China. China Economic Review 57:101341. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101341.
  • Lundberg, D. C., J. A. Tang, and S. Z. Attari. 2019. Easy but not effective: Why “turning off the lights” remains a salient energy conserving behaviour in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science 58:101257. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101257.
  • Ma, J., and J. C. P. Cheng. 2016. Identifying the influential features on the regional energy use intensity of residential buildings based on random forests. Applied Energy 183:193–201. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.096.
  • MacDonald, S., B. Winner, L. Smith, J. Juillerat, and S. Belknap. 2019. Bridging the rural efficiency gap: Expanding access to energy efficiency upgrades in remote and high energy cost communities. Energy Efficiency 13:503–21. doi:10.1007/s12053-019-09798-8.
  • Maiorano, J. 2019. Towards an uncertainty theory for organizations: Energy efficiency in Canada’s public sector. Energy Research & Social Science 54:185–98. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.014.
  • Matosović, M., and Ž. Tomšić. 2018. Modeling energy efficiency investment choices – A case study on Croatia’s residential sector. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 13 (7):311–19. doi:10.1080/15567249.2018.1488899.
  • Meyers, E. M., and M. G. Hu. 2001. Clean distributed generation: Policy options to promote clean air and reliability. The Electricity Journal 14 (1):89–98. doi:10.1016/S1040-6190(00)00180-9.
  • Michas, S., V. Stavrakas, N. Spyridaki, and A. Flamos. 2019. Identifying research priorities for the further development and deployment of solar photovoltaics. International Journal of Sustainable Energy 38 (3):276–96. doi:10.1080/14786451.2018.1495207.
  • Mills, B., and J. Schleich. 2010. What’s driving energy efficient appliance label awareness and purchase propensity? Energy Policy 38 (2):814–25. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.028.
  • Mills, B., and J. Schleich. 2012. Residential energy-efficient technology adoption, energy conservation, knowledge, and attitudes: An analysis of European countries. Energy Policy 49:616–28. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.008.
  • Moran, P. 1948. The interpretation of statistical maps. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 10 (2):243–51. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1948.tb00012.x.
  • Morris, J., and J. Stutt. 2012. Energy efficiency in New York: Midcourse status report of ’15 by 15ʹ. New York, NY: Pace Energy and Climate Center, Pace Law School.
  • Morris, J., and J. Stutt. 2013. Sizing Up progress toward ‘15 by 15ʹ: A 2012 EEPS Update. New York, NY: Pace Energy and Climate Center, PACE Law School.
  • Morton, C., J. Anable, G. Yeboah, and C. Cottrill. 2018. The spatial pattern of demand in the early market for electric vehicles: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Journal of Transport Geography 72:119–30. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.08.020.
  • Nemet, G. F., E. O’Shaughnessy, R. Wiser, N. Darghouth, G. Barbose, K. Gillingham, and V. Rai. 2017. Characteristics of low-priced solar PV systems in the U.S. Applied Energy 187 (February 2017):501–13. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.056.
  • Nyangon, J. (2017). Distributed energy generation systems based on renewable energy and natural gas blending: New business models for economic incentives, electricity market design and regulatory innovation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Newark, College of Engineering, University of Delaware.
  • Nyangon, J., and J. Byrne. 2018. Diversifying electricity customer choice: REVing Up the New York energy vision for polycentric innovation. In Energy systems and environment, ed.. P. V. Tsvetkov, 3–23. London, UK: IntechOpen. doi:10.5772/intechopen.76023.
  • Nyangon, J. 2021. Smart energy frameworks for smart cities: The need for polycentrism. In Handbook of smart cities, J. C. Augusto, ed. ISBN: 978-3-030-15145-4, 1–32. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15145-4_4-2.
  • Nyangon, J. 2021. Tackling the risk of stranded electricity assets with machine learning and artificial intelligence. In Sustainable energy investment: Technical, market and policy innovations to address risk, ed. NyangonJ. and ByrneJ., 1–22. London, UK: IntechOpen
  • Nyangon, J., J. Byrne, and J. Taminiau. 2017. Assessment of price convergence between natural gas and solar photovoltaic in the U.S. electricity market. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment 6 (3):1–20.
  • NYPSC. (2008). Order establishing energy efficiency portfolio standard and approving programs (Case 07-M-0548). Case 07-M-0548. Albany: New York State Public Service Commission (NYPSC). http://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/EEPS/EEPSReport.aspx
  • NYPSC. (2020a). Energy efficiency portfolio standard (program reports). New York public service commission (NYPSC). http://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/EEPS/EEPSSearch.aspx
  • NYPSC. (2020b). New York energy efficiency portfolio standard (EEPS) New York public service commission (NYPSC). http://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/EEPS/EEPSPortfolio.aspx
  • Ord, J. K., and A. Getis. 1995. Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geographical Analysis 27 (4):286–306. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00912.x.
  • Pang, Z., Z. O’Neill, Y. Li, and F. Niu. 2020. The role of sensitivity analysis in the building performance analysis: A critical review. Energy and Buildings 209:109659. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109659.
  • Papadopoulos, S., B. Bonczak, and C. E. Kontokosta. 2018. Pattern recognition in building energy performance over time using energy benchmarking data. Applied Energy 221:576–86. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.079.
  • Papadopoulos, S., and C. E. Kontokosta. 2019. Grading buildings on energy performance using city benchmarking data. Applied Energy 233-234:244–53. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.053.
  • Pasichnyi, O., J. Wallin, and O. Kordas. 2019. Data-driven building archetypes for urban building energy modelling. Energy 181 (August 2019):360–77. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.197.
  • PolicyMap. (2020). Demographics, incomes and spending and housing data estimated percentage of families. PolicyMap. https://www.policymap.com
  • Polzin, F., P. von Flotow, and C. Nolden. 2016. What encourages local authorities to engage with energy performance contracting for retrofitting? Evidence from German municipalities. Energy Policy 94:317–30. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.049.
  • Prabatha, T., K. Hewage, H. Karunathilake, and R. Sadiq. 2020. To retrofit or not? Making energy retrofit decisions through life cycle thinking for Canadian residences. Energy and Buildings 226:110393. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110393.
  • Safarzadeh, S., and M. Rasti-Barzoki. 2019. A game theoretic approach for assessing residential energy-efficiency program considering rebound, consumer behavior, and government policies. Applied Energy 233-234:44–61. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.032.
  • Salmerón, R., C. B. García, and J. García. 2018. Variance inflation factor and condition number in multiple linear regression. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 88 (12):2365–84. doi:10.1080/00949655.2018.1463376.
  • Seebauer, S. 2018. The psychology of rebound effects: Explaining energy efficiency rebound behaviours with electric vehicles and building insulation in Austria. Energy Research & Social Science 46:311–20. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.006.
  • Seebauer, S., M. Friesenecker, and K. Eisfeld. 2019. Integrating climate and social housing policy to alleviate energy poverty: An analysis of targets and instruments in Austria. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 14 (7–9):304–26. doi:10.1080/15567249.2019.1693665.
  • Shaker, R. R., Y. Altman, C. Deng, E. Vaz, and K. W. Forsythe. 2019. Investigating urban heat island through spatial analysis of New York city streetscapes. Journal of Cleaner Production 233:972–92. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.389.
  • Shao, S., T. Huang, and L. Yang. 2014. Using latent variable approach to estimate China׳s economy-wide energy rebound effect over 1954–2010. Energy Policy 72:235–48. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.041.
  • Sorrell, S. 2009. Jevons’ paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency. Energy Policy 37 (4):1456–69. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.003.
  • Spyridaki, N., V. Stavrakas, Y. Dendramis, and A. Flamos. 2020. Understanding technology ownership to reveal adoption trends for energy efficiency measures in the Greek residential sector. Energy Policy 140:111413. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111413.
  • Taminiau, J., and J. Byrne. 2020. City-scale urban sustainability: Spatiotemporal mapping of distributed solar power for New York city. WIREs Energy and Environment 10 (e374):1–24.
  • Toroghi, S. H., and M. E. Oliver. 2019. Framework for estimation of the direct rebound effect for residential photovoltaic systems. Applied Energy 251:113391. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113391.
  • Trencher, G., and J. van der Heijden. 2019. Instrument interactions and relationships in policy mixes: Achieving complementarity in building energy efficiency policies in New York, Sydney and Tokyo. Energy Research & Social Science 54:34–45. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.023.
  • Tsemekidi Tzeiranaki, S., P. Bertoldi, F. Diluiso, L. Castellazzi, M. Economidou, N. Labanca, T. Ribeiro Serrenho, and P. Zangheri. 2019. Analysis of the EU residential energy consumption: Trends and determinants. Energies 12:6. doi:10.3390/en12061065.
  • Tso, G. K. F., and K. K. W. Yau. 2007. Predicting electricity energy consumption: A comparison of regression analysis, decision tree and neural networks. Energy 32 (9):1761–68. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.11.010.
  • Urquizo, J., C. Calderón, and P. James. 2018. Modelling household spatial energy intensity consumption patterns for building envelopes, heating systems and temperature controls in cities. Applied Energy 226:670–81. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.125.
  • Wang, W., J. Chen, G. Huang, and Y. Lu. 2017. Energy efficient HVAC control for an IPS-enabled large space in commercial buildings through dynamic spatial occupancy distribution. Applied Energy 207:305–23. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.060.
  • Wei, T., J. Zhou, and H. Zhang. 2019. Rebound effect of energy intensity reduction on energy consumption. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 144:233–39. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.012.
  • Wilson, E., C. Christensen, S. Horowitz, J. Robertson, and J. Maguire (2017). Energy efficiency potential in the U.S. single-family housing stock. Task no. EPSA.Z165 Golden, CO:. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy18osti/68670.pdf
  • Wilson, E., C. Harris, J. Robertson, and J. Agan. 2019. Evaluating energy efficiency potential in low-income households: A flexible and granular approach. Energy Policy 129:710–37. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.054.
  • Winzar, H. 2015. The ecological fallacy: How to spot one and tips on how to use one to your advantage. Australasian Marketing Journal 23 (1):86–92. doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2014.12.002.
  • Woolf, T., A. Napoleon, P. Luckow, W. Ong, and K. Takahashi. 2016. Aiming higher: Realizing the full potential of cost-effective energy efficiency in New York. Boston, MA: Synapse Energy Economics.
  • Xu, P., H. Huang, and N. Dong. 2018. The modifiable areal unit problem in traffic safety: Basic issue, potential solutions and future research. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering 5 (1):73–82.
  • Yalcintas, M., and A. Kaya. 2017. Roles of income, price and household size on residential electricity consumption: Comparison of Hawaii with similar climate zone states. Energy Reports 3:109–18. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2017.07.002.
  • Yang, T., and L. Jensen. 2015. Exploring the inequality-mortality relationship in the US with Bayesian spatial modeling. Population Research and Policy Review 34 (3):437–60. doi:10.1007/s11113-014-9350-9.
  • Zabaloy, M. F., M. Y. Recalde, and C. Guzowski. 2019. Are energy efficiency policies for household context dependent? A comparative study of Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Uruguay. Energy Research & Social Science 52:41–54. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.01.015.
  • Zhou, S., D. C. Matisoff, G. A. Kingsley, and M. A. Brown. 2019. Understanding renewable energy policy adoption and evolution in Europe: The impact of coercion, normative emulation, competition, and learning. Energy Research & Social Science 51 (May):1–11. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.011.
  • Zhou, W., J. Wang, and M. L. Cadenasso. 2017. Effects of the spatial configuration of trees on urban heat mitigation: A comparative study. Remote Sensing of Environment 195:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.043.
  • Zou, P. X. W., D. Wagle, and M. Alam. 2019. Strategies for minimizing building energy performance gaps between the design intend and the reality. Energy and Buildings 191:31–41. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.03.013.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.