Bi-stage planning framework for a solar-battery based micro-grid using techno-socio-economic evaluation

References

• Ajlan, A., C. W. Tan, and A. Mohamed Abdilahi. 2017. Assessment of environmental and economic perspectives for renewable-based hybrid power system in Yemen. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 75:559–22. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akram, U., M. Khalid, and S. Shafiq. 2018. Optimal sizing of a wind/solar/battery hybrid grid-connected microgrid system. IET Renewable Power Gener 12 (1):72–80. doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2017.0010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirreza, J., T. Khalili, H. G. Ganjehlou, and A. Bidram. 2020. Optimal integration of renewable energy sources, diesel generators, and demand response program from pollution, financial, and reliability viewpoints: A multi-objective approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 247:19100. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askari, B., and M. Ameri. 2012. Techno-economic feasibility analysis of stand-alone renewable energy systems (PV/bat, Wind/bat and Hybrid PV/wind/bat) in Kerman, Iran. Energy Sources Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy 7 (1):45–60. doi:10.1080/15567240903330384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtiari, H., and R. A. Naghizadeh. 2018. Multi-criteria optimal sizing of hybrid renewable energy systems including wind, photovoltaic, battery, and hydrogen storage with ɛ-constraint method. IET Renewable Power Gener 12 (8):883–92. doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2017.0706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candia, R. A. R., J. A. A. Ramos, S. L. B. Subieta, J. G. P. Balderrama, V. S. Miquélez, H. J. Florero, and S. Quoilin. 2019. Techno-economic assessment of high variable renewable energy penetration in the Bolivian interconnected electric system. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 22:17–38. doi:10.5278/ijsepm.2659.
   Google Scholar
• CEA, Govt. of India. 2014. Tariff and duty of electric supply in India (India: Central Electricity Authority).
   Google Scholar
• Chedid, R., and A. Sawwas. 2019. Optimal placement and sizing of photovoltaics and battery storage in distribution networks. Energy Storage 1 (4). doi: 10.1002/est2.46.
   Google Scholar
• Demirbas, A., M. Kabli, R. H. Alamoudi, W. Ahmad, and A. Basahel. 2017. Renewable energy resource facilities in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Prospects, social and political challenges. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 12 (1):8–16. doi:10.1080/15567249.2014.996303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, J., F. Gao, X. Guan, Q. Zhai, and J. Wu. 2016. Storage-Reserve sizing with qualified reliability for connected high renewable penetration Micro-Grid. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 7 (2):732–43. doi:10.1109/TSTE.2015.2498599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Zonkoly, A. 2014. Optimal placement and schedule of multiple grid connected hybrid energy systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 61:239–47. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.03.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, M., Y. Chen, Y. Chen, and Y. Chang. 2014. Optimal operating strategies and management for smart microgrid systems. Journal of Energy Engineering 140:04013011. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• India Meteorological Department. 2009. Solar radiant energy over India (India: Ministry of Earth Sciences).
   Google Scholar
• Kalkhambkar, V., R. Kumar, and R. Bhakar. 2016. Joint optimal allocation methodology for renewable distributed generation and energy storage for economic benefits. IET Renewable Power Gener 10 (9):1422–29. doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamdar, R., P. Paliwal, and Y. Kumar. 2020. A hybrid multi-agent based BFPSO algorithm for optimization of benchmark functions. Journal of Circuits, Systems, and Computers 29 (7):2050112. doi:10.1142/S0218126620501121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatod, D. K., V. Pant, and J. D. Sharma. 2010. Analytical approach for well-being assessment of small autonomous power systems with solar and wind energy sources. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 25:535e45. doi:10.1109/TEC.2009.2033881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, G., G. Xu, Y. Chen, and R. Ju. 2017. Multi-objective optimal configuration method for a standalone wind–solar–battery hybrid power system. IET Renewable Power Gener 11 (1):194–202. doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manbachi, M., A. Parsaeifard, and M.-R. Haghifam. 2015. Generation expansion planning of distributed generation sources in an energy market based on Monte-Carlo simulation and game theory. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 10 (2):139–47. doi:10.1080/15567249.2010.518216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, M., P. Jin, L. Chang, and H. Xu. 2014. Economic analysis and optimal design on microgrids with SS-PVs for industries. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 5 (4):1328–36. doi:10.1109/TSTE.2014.2327067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michas, S., V. Stavrakas, N. Spyridaki, and A. Flamos. 2019. Identifying research priorities for the further development and deployment of solar photovoltaics. International Journal of Sustainable Energy 38 (3):276–96. doi:10.1080/14786451.2018.1495207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oboudi, M. H., R. Hooshmand, and S. Rahimi. 2020. Stochastic operation framework of microgrid under uncertainties of load, generation, and contingency. Journal of Energy Engineering 46 (1):04019037.
   Google Scholar
• Pagnarith, K., and B. Limmeechokchai. 2015a. Integrated resource planning for long-term electricity supply in selected GMS countries, Part 1: Energy efficiency and renewable energy. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 10 (2):167–75. doi:10.1080/15567249.2010.536813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagnarith, K., and B. Limmeechokchai. 2015b. Integrated resource planning for long-term electricity supply in selected GMS countries, Part 2: Environmental and economic impact. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 10 (4):340–47. doi:10.1080/15567249.2010.549900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paliwal, P., N. P. Patidar, and R. K. Nema. 2014a. A novel method for reliability assessment of autonomous PV-wind-storage system using probabilistic storage model. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 55:692–703. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paliwal, P., N. P. Patidar, and R. K. Nema. 2014b. Determination of reliability constrained optimal resource mix for an autonomous hybrid power system using Particle Swarm Optimization. Renewable Energy 63:194–204. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paliwal, P., N. P. Patidar, and R. K. Nema. 2020. Probabilistic indices for analyzing the impact of DER penetration on system reliability. IET Renewable Power Gener 14 (12):2154–65. doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2019.1214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paliwal, P. 2020. Reliability constrained planning and sensitivity analysis for solar-wind-battery based isolated power system. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 29:109–26. doi:10.5278/ijsepm.4599.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, G. 2020. Perspectives and economics of combining biomass liquefaction with solar PV for energy storage and electricity production. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy. doi:10.1080/15567249.2020.1749910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramli, M. A. M., H. R. E. H. Bouchekara, and A. S. Alghamdi. 2018. Optimal sizing of PV/wind/diesel hybrid microgrid system using multi-objective self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm. Renewable Energy 121:400–11. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.01.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricke, K., L. Drouet, K. Caldeira, and M. Tavoni. 2018. Country-level social cost of carbon. Nature Climate Change 8 (10):895–900. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0282-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, D., and Y. Odyuo. 2019. An ab initio issues on renewable energy system integration to grid. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 23:27–38. doi:10.5278/ijsepm.2802.
   Google Scholar
• Seyed, H., H. Arezoo, S. K. Miadreza, and C. João. 2019. Optimal sizing and siting of smart microgrid units under high renewables penetration considering demand response. IET Renewable Power Gener 13 (10):1809–22. doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2018.6015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Som, T., and N. Chakraborty. 2014. Studies on economic feasibility of an autonomous power delivery system utilizing alternative hybrid distributed energy resources. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 29 (1):172–81. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2280214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tariq, J. 2020. Energy management using storage to facilitate high shares of variable renewable energy. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 25:61–76. doi:10.5278/ijsepm.3453.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, L., M. Dong, B. Ai, and C. Jing. 2018. A simple butterfly particle swarm optimization algorithm with the fitness-based adaptive inertia weight and the opposition-based learning average elite strategy. Fundamenta Informaticae 163 (2):205–23. doi:10.3233/FI-2018-1738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., and C. Singh. 2009. Multicriteria design of hybrid power generation systems based on a modified particle swarm optimization algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 24 (1):163–72. doi:10.1109/TEC.2008.2005280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D., C. Jiang, G. Cai, and N. Huang. 2019. Optimal sizing of a wind/solar/battery/diesel hybrid microgrid based on typical scenarios considering meteorological variability. IET Renewable Power Gener 13 (9):1446–55. doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2018.5944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar