The puzzle of energy efficiency in Turkey: combining a multiple criteria decision making and the time series analysis

References

• Akazili, J., M. Adjuik, S. Chatio, E. Kanyomse, A. Hodgson, M. Aikins, and J. Gyapong. 2008. What are the technical and allocative efficiencies of public health centres in Ghana? Ghana Medical Journal 42 (4):149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akram, R., F. Chen, F. Khalid, Z. Ye, and M. T. Majeed. 2020. Heterogeneous effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on carbon emissions: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 247:119122. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apak, S., E. Atay, and G. Tuncer. 2017. Renewable hydrogen energy and energy efficiency in Turkey in the 21st century. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42 (4):2446–17. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apergis, N., G. C. Aye, C. P. Barros, R. Gupta, and P. Wanke. 2015. Energy efficiency of selected OECD countries: A slacks based model with undesirable outputs. Energy Economics 51:45–53. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsu, T. 2021. Analyzing the efficiency of renewable energy sources in terms of electricity generation: The case of Turkey. In Interdisciplinary perspectives on operations management and service evaluation, ed. P. Manolitzas, C. Zopounidis, M. Talias, E. Grigoroudis, and N. Matsatsinis, 155–76. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Arutyunov, V. S., and G. V. Lisichkin. 2017. Energy resources of the 21st century: Problems and forecasts. Can renewable energy sources replace fossil fuels? Russian Chemical Reviews 86 (8):777. doi:10.1070/RCR4723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aye, G. C., R. Gupta, and P. Wanke. 2018. Energy efficiency drivers in South Africa: 1965–2014. Energy Efficiency 11 (6):1465–82. doi:10.1007/s12053-018-9644-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros, C. P., and P. Wanke. 2015. An analysis of African airlines efficiency with two-stage TOPSIS and neural networks. Journal of Air Transport Management 44-45:90–102. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behzadian, M., S. K. Otaghsara, M. Yazdani, and J. Ignatius. 2012. A state of the art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications 39 (17):13051–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian, Y., P. He, and H. Xu. 2013. Estimation of potential energy saving and carbon dioxide emission reduction in China based on an extended non-radial DEA approach. Energy Policy 63:962–71. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgili, M., H. Bilirgen, A. Ozbek, F. Ekinci, and T. Demirdelen. 2018. The role of hydropower installations for sustainable energy development in Turkey and the World. Renewable Energy 126:755–64. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boran, K. 2017. An evaluation of power plants in Turkey: Fuzzy TOPSIS method. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 12 (2):119–25. doi:10.1080/15567249.2015.1050561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boran, F. E., K. Boran, and T. Menlik. 2012. The evaluation of renewable energy technologies for electricity generation in Turkey using intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 7 (1):81–90. doi:10.1080/15567240903047483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borozan, D. 2018. Technical and total factor energy efficiency of European regions: A two-stage approach. Energy 152:521–32. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bölük, G., and M. Mert. 2015. The renewable energy, growth and environmental kuznets curve in Turkey: An ARDL approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 52:587–95. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capik, M., A. O. Yilmaz, and I. Cavusoglu. 2012. Present situation and potential role of renewable energy in Turkey. Renewable Energy 46:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamodrakas, I., and D. Martakos. 2011. A utility-based fuzzy TOPSIS method for energy efficient network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. Applied Soft Computing 11 (4):3734–43. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2011.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charakopoulos, A., T. Karakasidis, and I. E. Sarris. 2019. Pattern identification for wind power forecasting via complex network and recurrence plot time series analysis. Energy Policy 133:110934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, J., J. Wu, Q. Zhu, Q. An, and B. Xiong. 2019. Analysis of China’s regional eco-efficiency: A DEA two-stage network approach with equitable efficiency decomposition. Computational Economics 54 (4):1263–85. doi:10.1007/s10614-015-9558-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily, S. 2021. Turkey’s solar power grows but still below potential. Accessed January 16, 2022. https://www.dailysabah.com/business/energy/turkeys-solar-power-grows-but-still-below-potential
   Google Scholar
• Difiglio, C., B. Ş. Güray, and E. Merdan. 2020. Turkey energy outlook 2020. Sabancı university Istanbul international center for energy and climate. Istanbul, Turkey: TEO Book Printing. https://iicec.sabanciuniv.edu/sites/iicec.sabanciuniv.edu/files/inline-files/TEO.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Doukas, H., C. Karakosta, and J. Psarras. 2009. A linguistic TOPSIS model to evaluate the sustainability of renewable energy options. International Journal of Global Energy Issues 32 (1–2):102–18.
   Google Scholar
• Doukas, H., C. Karakosta, and J. Psarras. 2010. Computing with words to assess the sustainability of renewable energy options. Expert Systems with Applications 37 (7):5491–97. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlauf, S. N., A. Kourtellos, and A. Minkin. 2001. The local solow growth model. European Economic Review 45 (4–6):928–40. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00120-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EIA (International U.S. Energy Administration). 2021. Accessed March 15, 2021. https://www.eia.gov/international/data/world
   Google Scholar
• Enerji, A. 2021. Türkiye rüzgar enerjisi potansiyeli haritası [Turkey’s potential wind power map]. Accessed December 20, 2021. https://www.enerjiatlasi.com/ruzgar-enerjisi-haritasi/turkiye
   Google Scholar
• Ervural, B. C., S. Zaim, and D. Delen. 2018. A two-stage analytical approach to assess sustainable energy efficiency. Energy 164:822–36. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ervural, B. C., S. Zaim, O. F. Demirel, Z. Aydin, and D. Delen. 2018. An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT analysis for Turkey’s energy planning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82:1538–50. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. European Union, trade in goods with Turkey. Accessed February 26, 2022. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/isdb_results/factsheets/country/details_turkey_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eyre, N. 1998. A golden age or a false dawn? Energy efficiency in UK competitive energy markets. Energy Policy 26 (12):963–72. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00051-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, M. J. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General) 120 (3):253–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferroukhi, R., A. Lopez-Peña, G. Kieffer, D. Nagpal, D. Hawila, A. Khalid, L. El-Katiri, S. Vinci, and A. Fernandez. 2016. Renewable energy benefits: Measuring the economics. Abu Dhabi: IRENA (International Renewable Energy Agency). Accessed February 02, 2022. http://www.irena.org/publications/2016/Jan/Renewable-Energy-Benefits-Measuring-the-Economics
   Google Scholar
• Genc, C., A. Sakalli, I. Stoyanov, T. Iliev, G. Mihaylov, I. Beloev, I. Nastase, A. H. Wierling, T. Totev, A. Terziev, et al. 2020. Development of wind energy and the installed wind power plants in Turkey. E3S Web of Conferences 207:02013.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Calvet, R., D. Conesa, A. R. Gómez-Calvet, and E. Tortosa-Ausina. 2016. On the dynamics of eco-efficiency performance in the European Union. Computers & Operations Research 66:336–50. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2015.07.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groningen Growth and Development Centre. 2021. Penn World table, 10.0. Accessed February 20, 2021. https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/productivity/pwt/?lang=en
   Google Scholar
• Hepbasli, A., and O. Ozgener. 2004. A review on the development of wind energy in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 8 (3):257–76. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2003.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilorme, T., K. Tkach, O. Dorenskyi, O. Katerna, and A. Durmanov. 2019. Decision making model of introducing energy-saving technologies based on the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences 22 (4):489–94.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, C. L., and K. Yoon. 1981. Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making, ed. C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, 58–191. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Investing. 2022. Crude oil WTI futures. Accessed February 02, 2022. https://www.investing.com/commodities/crude-oil
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. Z., and M. A. Delucchi. 2011. Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, part I: Technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials. Energy Policy 39 (3):1154–69. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jollands, N., P. Waide, M. Ellis, T. Onoda, J. Laustsen, K. Tanaka, P. De T’Serclaes, I. Barnsley, R. Bradley, and A. Meier. 2010. The 25 IEA energy efficiency policy recommendations to the G8 Gleneagles plan of action. Energy Policy 38 (11):6409–18. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakosta, C. 2016. A holistic approach for addressing the issue of effective technology transfer in the frame of climate change. Energies 9 (7):503. doi:10.3390/en9070503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakosta, C., and J. Psarras. 2012. Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for understanding a country’s development priorities within the scope of climate technology transfer. In Advances in energy research, ed. M. J. Acosta, Vol. 9, 123–49. 1st ed. Hauppauge, NY./USA: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, D. 2006. Renewable energy policies in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 10 (2):152–63. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2004.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaygusuz, K. 2007. Energy for sustainable development: Key issues and challenges. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 2 (1):73–83. doi:10.1080/15567240500402560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaygusuz, K., and A. Kaygusuz. 2002. Renewable energy and sustainable development in Turkey. Renewable Energy 25 (3):431–53. doi:10.1016/S0960-1481(01)00075-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keles, S., and S. Bilgen. 2012. Renewable energy sources in Turkey for climate change mitigation and energy sustainability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16 (7):5199–206. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kentel, E., and E. Alp. 2013. Hydropower in Turkey: Economical, social and environmental aspects and legal challenges. Environmental Science & Policy 31:34–43. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucukali, S., and K. Baris. 2009. Assessment of small hydropower (SHP) development in Turkey: Laws, regulations and EU policy perspective. Energy Policy 37 (10):3872–79. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R. D., A. Mason, and T. Miller. 2003. Saving, wealth, and population. In Population matters: Demographic change, economic growth, and poverty in the developing world, ed. N. Birdsall, A. C. Kelley, and S. W. Sinding, 137–64. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ligus, M., and P. Peternek. 2018. Determination of most suitable low-emission energy technologies development in Poland using integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method. Energy Procedia 153:101–06. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.046.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., and J. F. Shi. 2014. Energy efficiency analysis on Chinese industrial sectors: An improved super-SBM model with undesirable outputs. Journal of Cleaner Production 65:97–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv, W., X. Hong, and K. Fang. 2015. Chinese regional energy efficiency change and its determinants analysis: Malmquist index and Tobit model. Annals of Operations Research 228 (1):9–22. doi:10.1007/s10479-012-1094-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, A. C., J. A. Fuinhas, and C. Tomás. 2019. Energy efficiency and sustainable growth in industrial sectors in European Union countries: A nonlinear ARDL approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 239:118045. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midilli, A., I. Dincer, and M. Ay. 2006. Green energy strategies for sustainable development. Energy Policy 34 (18):3623–33. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, Republic of Turkey. 2022. Energy diplomacy Accessed January 5, 2022. https://enerji.gov.tr/info-bank-energy-diplomacy-detail
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Turkey. 2022. Turkey’s international energy strategy. Accessed February 02, 2022 https://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkeys-energy-strategy.en.mfa
   Google Scholar
• Muneer, T., S. Maubleu, and M. Asif. 2006. Prospects of solar water heating for textile industry in Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 10 (1):1–23. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2004.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, S., and P. Perron. 2001. Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69 (6):1519–54. doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugroho, F., N. Syaifudin, R. H. Setyobudi, E. Alasaarela, F. Pasila, G. Chan, and S. G. Lee. 2018. Partial-factor energy efficiency model of Indonesia. The 3rd International Conference on Electrical Systems, Technology and Information 164:01009.
   Google Scholar
• Owusu, P. A., S. Asumadu-Sarkodie, and S. Dubey. 2016. A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Engineering 3 (1):1167990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozgener, O. 2005. A review of blade structures of SWTSs in the Aegean region and performance analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 9 (1):85–99. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk, M., and Y. E. Yuksel. 2016. Energy structure of Turkey for sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 53:1259–72. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papapostolou, A., C. Karakosta, and H. Doukas. 2017. Analysis of policy scenarios for achieving renewable energy sources targets: A fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Energy & Environment 28 (1–2):88–109. doi:10.1177/0958305X16685474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papapostolou, A., C. Karakosta, V. Marinakis, and A. Flamos. 2016. Assessment of RES cooperation framework between the EU and North Africa: A multicriteria approach based on UTASTAR. International Journal of Energy Sector Management 10 (3):402–26. doi:10.1108/IJESM-12-2014-0007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papapostolou, A., C. Karakosta, A. Nikas, and J. Psarras. 2017. Exploring opportunities and risks for RES-E deployment under cooperation mechanisms between EU and Western Balkans: A multi-criteria assessment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 80:519–30. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passos, A. C., and R. C. Souza. 2013. Defining a quality index for electric power utilities using multiple criteria decision support and time series analysis. Gestão & Produção 20 (1):1–12. doi:10.1590/S0104-530X2013000100001.
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H., Y. Shin, and R. J. Smith. 2001. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics 16 (3):289–326. doi:10.1002/jae.616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimonenko, T. V., Y. O. Us, L. Y. Liulova, and N. V. Kotenko. 2021. The impact of the macroeconomic stability on the energy-efficiency of the European countries: A bibliometric analysis. Paper presented at The International Conference on Innovation, Modern Applied Science & Environmental Studies, E3S Web of Conferences, Kenitra, Morocco, February 02.
   Google Scholar
• Raugei, M., P. Fullana-I-Palmer, and V. Fthenakis. 2012. The energy return on energy investment (EROI) of photovoltaics: Methodology and comparisons with fossil fuel life cycles. Energy Policy 45:576–82. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roszkowska, E. 2011. Multi-criteria decision making models by applying the TOPSIS method to crisp and interval data. In Multiple criteria decision making, ed. T. Trzaskalik and T. Wachowics, Vol. 6, 200–30. 1st ed. Katowice: University of Economics in Katowice.
   Google Scholar
• Saidi, K., and A. Omri. 2020. The impact of renewable energy on carbon emissions and economic growth in 15 major renewable energy-consuming countries. Environmental Research 186:109567. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafiee, S., and E. Topal. 2009. When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished? Energy Policy 37 (1):181–89. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbaz, M., D. Balsalobre-Lorente, and A. Sinha. 2019. Foreign direct investment–co2 emissions nexus in Middle East and North African countries: Importance of biomass energy consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production 217:603–14. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, H. S., H. J. Shyur, and E. S. Lee. 2007. An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 45 (7–8):801–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, Y., B. Yu, and M. Greenwood-Nimmo. 2014. Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt, ed. R. C. Sickles and W. C. Horrace, 281–314. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Solow, R. 1956. A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 70 (1):65–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soyhan, H. S. 2009. Sustainable energy production and consumption in Turkey: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 (6–7):1350–60. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiawan, Y., and S. Managi. 2016. The environmental kuznets curve in Indonesia: Exploring the potential of renewable energy. Energy Policy 98:187–98. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavrek, R., and J. Chovancová. 2019. Assessment of economic and environmental energy performance of EU countries using CV-TOPSIS technique. Ecological Indicators 106:105519. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. N., T. T. Dang, H. Tibo, and D. H. Duong. 2021. Assessing renewable energy production capabilities using DEA window and fuzzy TOPSIS model. Symmetry 13 (2):334.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. X., and Y. Y. Wang. 2014. Evaluation of the provincial competitiveness of the Chinese high-tech industry using an improved TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications 41 (6):2824–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K., X. Zhang, Y. M. Wei, and S. Yu. 2013. Regional allocation of CO2 emissions allowance over provinces in China by 2020. Energy Policy 54:214–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanke, P., C. P. Barros, and Z. Chen. 2015. An analysis of Asian airlines efficiency with two-stage TOPSIS and MCMC generalized linear mixed models. International Journal of Production Economics 169:110–26. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2021. World development indicators. Accessed January 25, 2021. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.IMP.CONS.ZS
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2022. World development indicators. Accessed February 25, 2022. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
   Google Scholar
• Wu, A. H., Y. Y. Cao, and B. Liu. 2014. Energy efficiency evaluation for regions in China: An application of DEA and Malmquist indices. Energy Efficiency 7 (3):429–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalcin, H. E., and C. Yalcin. 2021. Energy efficiency, renewable energy and current account balance: Econometric findings and scenario analysis for Turkey. Paper no. 21/29, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey. Accessed February 25, 2022. https://ideas.repec.org/p/tcb/wpaper/2129.html
   Google Scholar
• Yuksel, I. 2010. Energy production and sustainable energy policies in Turkey. Renewable Energy 35 (7):1469–76. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2010.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusuf, S. A., and O. Malomo. 2007. Technical efficiency of poultry egg production in Ogun state: A data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. International Journal of Poultry Science 6 (9):622–29. doi:10.3923/ijps.2007.622.629.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, N., and Y. Choi. 2013. Environmental energy efficiency of China’s regional economies: A non-oriented slacks-based measure analysis. The Social Science Journal 50 (2):225–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar