Impact of higher income on environmental interest

References

• Ala-Mantila, S., J. Heinonen, and S. Junnila. 2014. Relationship between urbanization, direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions, and expenditures: A multivariate analysis. Ecol. Econ. 104:129–383. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azam, W., I. Khan, and S. Ali. 2022. Alternative energy and natural resources in determining environmental sustainability: A look at the role of government final consumption expenditures in France. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30:1949–65. DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-22334-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Azhar, A., and K. Yang. 2019. Workplace and non‐workplace pro‐environmental behaviors: Empirical evidence from Florida city governments. Public Adm. Rev. 79:399–410. DOI:10.1111/puar.13003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk, R., D. Schulman, and M. McKeever. 1993. Measuring the impact of water conservation campaigns in California. Clim. Change 24:233–48. DOI:10.1007/BF01091831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, C. O., A. Bryan, and M. Anestis. 2020. Associations among exaggerated threat perceptions, suicidal thoughts, and suicidal behaviors in U.S. firearm owners. J. Psychiatric Res. 131:94–101. DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büchs, M., and S. Schnepf. 2013. Who emits most? Associations between socio-economic factors and UK households’ home energy, transport, indirect and total CO2 emissions. Ecol. Econ. 90:114–23. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callado, S., H. Staats, and P. Sancho. 2019. Normative influences on adolescents’ self-reported pro-environmental behaviors: The role of parents and friends. Environment and Behavior 51:288–314. DOI:10.1177/0013916517744591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Census. 2022. Quick facts Utah. Census. Available at: March 19 https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/UT/PST045222.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. 2017. Graphical methods for data analysis. Chapman. DOI: 10.1201/9781351072304.
   Google Scholar
• Climate Change. 2020. https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/climate-change.
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva, D., and R. Pownall. 2014. Going green: Does it depend on education, gender or income? Applied Economics 46:573–86. DOI:10.1080/00036846.2013.857003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, J., and L. Steg. 2009. Morality and prosocial behavior: The role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model. The Journal of Social Psychology 149:425–49. DOI:10.3200/SOCP.149.4.425-449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desilver, D. 2021. As national eviction ban expires, a look at who rents and who owns in the U.S. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/08/02/as-national-eviction-ban-expires-a-look-at-who-rents-and-who-owns-in-the-u-s/.
   Google Scholar
• Diekmann, A., and P. Preisendörfer. 2003. Green and greenback: The behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society 14:441–72. DOI:10.1177/1043463103154002.
   Google Scholar
• Enzler, H., and A. Diekmann. 2019. All talk and no action? An analysis of environmental concern, income and greenhouse gas emissions in Switzerland. Energy Research & Social Science 51:12–19. DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2019.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faletar, I., D. Kovačić, and M. Cerjak. 2021. Purchase of organic vegetables as a form of pro-environmental behaviour: Application of norm activation theory. Journal of Central European Agriculture 22:211–25. DOI:10.5513/JCEA01/22.1.3026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrow, K., G. Grolleau, and L. Ibanez. 2017. Social norms and pro-environmental behavior: A review of the evidence. Ecological Economics 140:1–13. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara, I., and P. Missios. 2005. Recycling and waste diversion effectiveness: Evidence from Canada. Environmental and Resource Economics 30:221–38. DOI:10.1007/s10640-004-1518-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1974. Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review 81:59–74. DOI:10.1037/h0035872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guagnano, G., P. Stern, and T. Dietz. 1995. Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior 27:699–718. DOI:10.1177/0013916595275005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, H. 2015. Travelers’ pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior. Tourism Management 47:164–77. DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, E. 2020. State and County population estimates for Utah: 2020. Research brief. Salt Lake City, UT: The University of Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Hines, J., H. Hungerford, and A. Tomera. 1987. Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education 18:1–8. DOI:10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S., K. Keplinger, and J. Kirk. 2019. Has sexual harassment at work decreased since #MeToo? Harvard Business Review, July.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. 2019. Conservatives greatly outnumber liberals in 19 U.S. States. https://news.gallup.com/poll/247016/conservatives-greatly-outnumber-liberals-states.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, F., and S. Dewitte. 2019. Measuring pro-environmental behavior: Review and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology 63:92–100. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., M. Alharthi, A. Atil, M. Zafar, and I. Khan. 2022. A non-linear analysis of the impacts of natural resources and education on environmental quality: Green energy and its role in the future. Resources Policy 79:102940. DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., I. Khan, A. Zakari, and M. Alharthi. 2022. Roles of trilemma in the world energy sector and transition towards sustainable energy: A study of economic growth and the environment. Energy Policy 170:113–238. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, A. 2016. National income and environmental concern: Observations from 35 countries. Public Understanding of Science 25:873–90. DOI:10.1177/0963662515581302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhi, S. (2013). Individual pro-environmental behaviour in the household context. ISER working paper series. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/91690/1/770556108.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Makower, J., and C. Pike. 2008. Strategies for the green economy: Opportunities and challenges in the new world of business. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott. 2012. Cost of service regulation in the investor-owned electric industry: A history of adaption. Edison Electric Institute. https://www.ourenergypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/COSR_history_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. 2015. Does education increase pro-environmental behavior? Evidence from Europe. Ecological Economics 116:108–21. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezger, S. 2018. Customer Centricity: Must-have or a waste of energy? The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine 3:909–11. DOI:10.1373/jalm.2018.027144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moll, H., K. Jan Noorman, R. Kok, R. Engström, H. Throne-Holst, and C. Clark. 2005. Pursuing more sustainable consumption by analyzing household metabolism in European Countries and Cities. Journal of Industrial Ecoloy 9:259–75. DOI:10.1162/1088198054084662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, A., J. Videras, and S. Wu. 2010. Identity and environmentalism: The influence of community characteristics. Review of Social Economy 68:465–86. DOI:10.1080/00346760903480533.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson, T., and K. Tollefson. 2023a. Asian disease problem applied to climate change: A study of the impact of framing risk preferences driven by socio-economic indicators for climate-change-related risks. Businesses 3:166–80. DOI:10.3390/businesses3010012.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, T., and K. Tollefson. 2023b. Nudging climate action: Exploring the impact of active default choices on renewable energy program participation. Energy Efficiency 16. DOI:10.1007/s12053-023-10164-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M., L. Aknin, J. Axsen, and R. L. Shwom. 2018. Unpacking the relationships between pro-environmental behavior, life satisfaction, and perceived ecological threat. Ecological Economics 143:130–40. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. 1977. Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 10:221–79. DOI:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, M., and J. Johar. 1992. On improving the effectiveness of test marketing decisions. European Journal of Marketing 26:22–33. DOI:10.1108/03090569210012390.
   Google Scholar
• Semega, J., and M. Kollar 2022. Income in the United States. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2022/demo/p60-276.html#:~:text=Real%20median%20household%20income%20was,and%20Table%20A%2D1).
   Google Scholar
• Shemkus, S. 2021. Solar power cuts energy bills, but few low-income people have access. https://talkpoverty.org/2021/02/25/solar-power-low-income-programs/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics, U. S. B. O. L. 2022. Quartiles and selected deciles of usual weekly earnings by educational attainment. https://www.bls.gov/charts/usual-weekly-earnings/usual-weekly-earnings-by-quartiles-and-selected-deciles-by-education.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Steg, L., and C. Vlek. 2009. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29:309–17. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. 2000. New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. The Journal of Social Issues 56:407–24. DOI:10.1111/0022-4537.00175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzar, U. 2022. Is income inequality a driver for renewable energy consumption? Journal of Cleaner Production 255:120287. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente-Molina, M. A., A. Fernández-Sainz, and J. Izagirre-Olaizola. 2018. Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the Basque Country University students. Journal of Cleaner Production 176:89–98. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, D. 2022. Electric vehicles are out of reach for most U.S. Consumers. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-18/electric-vehicles-are-out-of-reach-for-most-u-s-consumers.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, L., and S. O’Neill. 2010. Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30:305–14. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M., A. Davis, Y. Xin, N. Sepeda, P. Grigas, S. Sinnott, and A. Haeny. 2021. People of color in North America report improvements in racial trauma and mental health symptoms following psychedelic experiences. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy 28:215–26. DOI:10.1080/09687637.2020.1854688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakari, A., V. Tawiah, I. Khan, R. Alvarado, and G. Li. 2022. Ensuring sustainable consumption and production pattern in Africa: Evidence from green energy perspectives. Energy Policy 169:113183. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., I. Khan, and M. Zafar. 2022. Assessing environmental quality through natural resources, energy resources, and tax revenues. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29:89029–44. DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-22005-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z., J. Liu, H. Zeng, T. Zhang, and X. Chen. 2020. How does soil pollution risk perception affect farmers’ pro-environmental behavior? The role of income level. Journal of Environmental Management 270. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoric, J., and N. Hrovatin. 2012. Household willingness to pay for green electricity in Slovenia. Energy Policy 47:180–87. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar