Multi-Criteria Sustainability Assessment in Transport Planning for Recreational Travel

REFERENCES

• Cambridge Systematics . 2002 . Small Communities Benefits Innovative Traffic Management Practices in Small Communities. Prepared for Federal Highway Administration, Cambridge, MA. http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/jpodocs/repts_te/13612.html
   Google Scholar
• Chow JYJ , Regan AC , Ranaiefar F , Arkhipov DI . 2011 . A network option portfolio management framework for adaptive transportation planning . Transportation Research Part A 45 ( 8 ): 765 – 778 .
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson JE , Calver S , Watters K , Wilkes K . 2004 . Journeys to heritage attractions in the UK: A case study of National Trust property visitors in the south west . Journal of Transport Geography 12 ( 2 ): 103 – 113 .
   Google Scholar
• Dilworth VA . 2003 . Visitor perceptions of alternative transportation systems and intelligent transportation systems in national parks. PhD diss., Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency . 2009 . Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator. http://www.epa.gov/RDEE/energy-resources/calculator.html#results
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency . 2009 . Household Emissions Calculator Frequent Questions, http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/ind_calc_faq.html
   Google Scholar
• Fan Y , Khattak A . 2012 . Time use patterns, lifestyles, and sustainability of nonwork travel behavior . International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 6 ( 1 ): 26 – 47 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Transit Administration . 2011 . National Transit Database. http://www.ntdprogram.gov/ntdprogram
   Google Scholar
• Hallo JC , Manning RE . 2009 . Transportation and recreation: A case study of visitors driving for pleasure at Acadia National Park . Journal of Transport Geography 17 ( 6 ): 491 – 499 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison GS . 1975 . The people and the park: Reactions to a system of public transportation in Mt . McKinley National Park, Alaska. Journal of Leisure Research 7 ( 1 ): 6 – 15 .
   Google Scholar
• Holly FM , Hallo JC , Baldwin ED , Mainella FP . 2010 . Incentives and disincentives for day visitors to park and ride public transportation at Acadia National Park . Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 28 ( 2 ): 74 – 93 .
   Google Scholar
• Jakimavičius M , Burinskiene M . 2009 . Assessment of Vilnius city development scenarios based on transport system modelling and multicriteria analysis . Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 15 ( 4 ): 361 – 368 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon CM , Amekudzi AA , Guensler RL . 2010 . Evaluating plan alternatives for transportation system sustainability: Atlanta metropolitan region . International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 4 ( 4 ): 227 – 247 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura R , Sakamoto K , Waygood O . 2008 . Declining sustainability: the case of shopping trip energy consumption . International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 2 ( 3 ): 158 – 176 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Y , Littlejohn MA , Hollenhorst SJ . 2004 . Mojave National Preserve Visitor Study: Fall 2003, Visitor Services Project Report 151, Social Science Program, National Park Service, Cooperative Park Studies Unit, University of Idaho.
   Google Scholar
• Litman T . 2007 . Developing indicators for comprehensive and sustainable transport planning . Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2017 : 10 – 15 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlejohn M . 1997 . Mojave National Preserve Visitor Study: Spring 1997, Visitor Service Project Report 94, National Park Service, Cooperative Park Studies Unit, University of Idaho.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden G , Kimble M , Nellthorp J , Kelly C . 2010. Sustainability assessment: the definition deficit. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 4(4):189–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattingly SG , Jayakrishnan R , McNally MG . 2000 . Determining the overall value of implemented new technology in transportation: integrated multiple objective-attribute methodology . Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1739 : 92 – 102 .
   Google Scholar
• McNally MG . 2007 . The four step model . In: Hensher DA , Button KJ (eds.), The Handbook of Transport Modeling . Oxford , UK : Pergamon , pp. 35 – 52 .
   Google Scholar
• National Household Travel Survey . 2009 . Number of person miles (PMT) by mode and purpose . Washinton , DC : U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration .
   Google Scholar
• National Park Conservation Association . 2009 . CLIP Tool – Emission Inventory Module – Mojave National Preserve Summary, Technical memorandum, May 29 . Washington , DC : National Park Convervation Association .
   Google Scholar
• National Park Service . 1999 . Transportation Planning Guidebook . Washington , DC : National Park Service, Park Facility Management .
   Google Scholar
• National Park Service . 2006 . Yosemite National Park, Visitor Study Summer 2005 . Moscow , ID : NPS Park Studies Unit .
   Google Scholar
• National Park Service . 2007 . 2006 statistical abstract. http://www2.nature.nps.gov/stats
   Google Scholar
• Nijkamp P , Borzacchiello MT , Ciuffo B , Torrieri F . 2007 . Sustainable urban land use and transportation planning: A cognitive decision support system for the Naples metropolitan area . International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 1 ( 2 ): 91 – 114 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil A , Herder P , Brown K . 2010 . Investment decision making for alternative fuel public transport buses: The case of Brisbane Transport . Journal of Public Transportation 13 ( 2 ): 115 – 133 .
   Google Scholar
• Sahagun L . 2010 . Kelso Flyer – This short, scenic Mojave train tour was a long time coming. Los Angeles Times, October 18.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro P , Anspacher D , Atkins J . 2009 . So you think you need transit in a Federal Land Management Area?. Proceedings of the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Simongáti G . 2010 . Multi-criteria decision making support tool for freight integrators: Selecting the most sustainable alternative . Transport 25 ( 1 ): 89 – 97 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims CB , Hodges DG , Fly JM , Stephens B . 2005 . Modeling visitor acceptance of a shuttle system in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park . Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 23 ( 3 ): 25 – 44 .
   Google Scholar
• Tzeng GH , Lin CW , Opricovic S . 2005 . Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation . Energy Policy 33 ( 11 ): 1373 – 1383 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc . 2008 . Transportation Planning Process for Transit on Federal Land Management Areas . Report sponsored by Federal Transit Administration. Watertown , MA : Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) . 2009 . 2008–07-07 operating cost comparison summary V2, Technical memorandum, N. Bottigheimer, June 14.
   Google Scholar
• White DD . 2007 . An interpretive study of Yosemite National Park visitors’ perspectives toward alternative transportation in Yosemite Valley . Environment Management 39 ( 1 ): 50 – 62 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yedla S , Shrestha RM . 2003 . Multi-criteria approach for the selection of alternative options for environmentally sustainable transport system in Delhi . Transportation Research Part A 37 ( 8 ): 717 – 729 .
   Google Scholar