Key research themes on governance and sustainable urban mobility

References

• Atkinson, R. (2002). The white paper on European governance: Implications for urban policy. European Planning Studies, 10(6), 781–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2000). Sustainable urban development and transport—A Eurovision for 2020. Transport Reviews, 20(1), 113–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D, Anderton, K, Bonilla, D, Givoni, M, & Schwanen, T. (2011). Transportation and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36, 247–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D, Stead, D, Steen, P, Dreborg, K, Åkerman, J, Nijkamp, P, & Schleicher-Tappeser, R. (2000). European transport policy and sustainable development. London, UK: Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Benz, A. (2007). Inter-regional competition in co-operative federalism: New modes of multi-level governance in Germany. Regional & Federal Studies, 17(4), 421–436.
   Google Scholar
• Borzacchiello, M. T., Torrieri, V., & Nijkamp, P. (2009). An operational information systems architecture for assessing sustainable transportation planning: Principles and design. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(4), 381–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multi-level governance and the urban politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 42–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, J, Odendaal, N, & Todes, A. (2004). Integrated area development projects: Working towards innovation and sustainability. Urban Forum, 15 (4), 311–339.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza, R. (2000). Visions of alternative (unpredictable) futures and their use in policy analysis. Conservation Ecology, 4(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Dobranskyte-Niskota, A, Pejrujo, A, & Pregl, M. (2007). Indicators to assess sustainability of transport activities—Part 1: Review of the existing transport sustainability indicator initiatives and development of an indicator set to assess transport sustainability performance. Ispra, Italy: European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2788/54736.
   Google Scholar
• Dudley, G. (2013). Why do ideas succeed and fail over time? The role of narratives in policy windows and the case of the London congestion charge. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(8), 1139–1156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eising, R., & Kohler-Koch, B., eds. (1999). The transformation of governance in the European Union. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency (EEA). (2009). Transport at a crossroads. TERM 2008: Indicators Tracking Transport and Environment in the European Union (EEA Report 3/2009). Copenhagen, Denmark: EEA.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M. (2009). New directions in the study of policy transfer. Policy Studies, 30(3), 237–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, R, Guy, S, & Marvin, S. (2001). Views of the city: Multiple pathways to sustainable transport futures. Local Environment, 6(2), 121–133.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S. R., & Hutchins, M. (2002). The development of strategic transport assets in greater Manchester and Merseyside: Does local governance matter? Regional Studies, 36(4), 429–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geerlings, H., Shiftan, Y., & Stead, D. (Eds.). (2012). Transition towards sustainable mobility: The role of instruments, individuals and institutions. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Geerlings, H., & Stead, D. (2003). The integration of land use planning, transport and environment in European policy and research. Transport Policy, 10(3), 187–196.
   Google Scholar
• Givoni, M., & Banister, D. (Eds.). (2010). Integrated transport: From policy to practice. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Givoni, M., Macmillen, J., Banister, D., & Feitelson, E. (2013). From policy measures to policy packages. Transport Reviews, 33(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaister, S. (2002). UK transport policy 1997–2001. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(2), 154–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabosky, P. (1995). Counterproductive regulation. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 23(4), 347–369.
   Google Scholar
• Gudmundsson, H., & Sørensen, C. H. (2013). Some use—Little influence? On the roles of indicators in European sustainable transport policy. Ecological Indicators, 35, 43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudmundsson, H., Wyatt, A., & Gordon, L. (2005). Benchmarking and sustainable transport policy: Learning from the BEST network. Transport Reviews, 25(6), 669–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, S., & Marvin, S. (1999). Understanding sustainable cities: Competing urban futures. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(3), 268–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Wagenaar, H. (2003). Introduction. In M. Hajer, & H. Wagenaar (eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 1–30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006). Transforming governance: Challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space. European Planning Studies, 14(3), 299–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., Kerwer, D., Knill, C., Lehmkuhl, D., Teutsch, M., & Douillet, A., eds. (2001). Differential Europe—The European Union impact on national policymaking. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D., & Maher, I. (2001). The open method as a new mode of governance: The case of soft economic policy co-ordination. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(4), 719–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, A. (2005). Integrated transport planning in the UK: From concept to reality. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(4), 318–328.
   Google Scholar
• Hysing, E. (2009). From government to governance? A comparison of environmental governing in Swedish forestry and transport. Governance, 22(4), 647–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E. (1998). Information in communicative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(1), 52–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., Avelino, F., & Bressers, N.. (2011). Transition management as a model for sustainable mobility. European Transport, 47:25–46.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R, & Rotmans, J. (2004). Managing the transition to sustainable mobility. In B. Elzen, F. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy (pp. 137–167). Cheltenham, UK: Edgar Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kenworthy, G. (2006). The eco-city: Ten key transport and planning dimensions for sustainable city development. Environment & Urbanization, 18(1), 67–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B. (1999). The evolution and transformation of European governance. In R. Eising, & B. Kohler-Koch (eds.), The transformation of governance in the European Union (pp. 14–35). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kübler, D, & Koch, P. (2008). Re-scaling network governance. The evolution of public transport management in two Swiss agglomerations. Flux—International Scientific Quarterly on Networks and Territories, 72/73, 108–119.
   Google Scholar
• Lidström, A. (2007). Territorial governance in transition. Regional & Federal Studies, 17(4), 499–508.
   Google Scholar
• Loughlin, J. (2007). Reconfiguring the state: Trends in territorial governance in European states. Regional & Federal Studies, 17(4), 385–403.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, G. (2011). Influences on the rollout of good policies. Transportation Research Record, 2211, 44–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, G., & May A. D. (2006). Do institutional arrangements make a difference to transport policy and implementation? Lessons for Britain. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24(5), 771–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, G., & Stead, D. (2011). Policy transfer and learning in the field of transport: A review of concepts and evidence. Transport Policy, 18(3), 492–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, A. D., & Crass, M. (2007). Sustainability in transport: Implications for policy makers. Transportation Research Record, 2017, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, A. D., Kelly, C., & Shepherd, S. (2006). The principles of integration in urban transport strategies. Transport Policy, 13(4), 319–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences, 42(4):323–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (1998). Managing horizontal government: The politics of coordination. Public Administration, 76(2), 295–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(4), 595–628.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, S., & Skinner, M. J. (2000). On transport integration: A contribution to better understanding. Futures, 32(3-4), 275–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, J. (2010). What's so funny about peace, love and transport integration? Research in Transportation Economics, 29(1), 329–338.
   Google Scholar
• Pucher, J, & Buehler, R. (2005). Transport policy in post-Communist Europe. In K. Button, & D. Hensher (eds.), Handbook of transport strategy, policy and institutions (pp. 725–743). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, J, & Howlett, M. (2009). Introduction: Understanding integrated policy strategies and their evolution. Policy and Society, 28(2), 99–109.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, RAW, ed. (2000). Transforming British Government. London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T., & Ravlum, I. A. (2005). The political relevance of planners’ analysis: The case of a parliamentary standing committee. Planning Theory, 4(1), 33–64.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, G., Behrendt, H., & Teytelboym, A. (2010). Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 28(1), 46–91.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, P. L., Bruun, E. C., & Kenworthy, J. R. (2010). An introduction to sustainable transportation: Policy, planning and implementation. London, UK: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J., MacKinnon, D., & Docherty, I. (2009). Divergence or convergence? Devolution and transport policy in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(3), 546–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, C. H., & Gudmundsson, H. (2010). The impact of governance modes on sustainable transport: The case of bus transport in Greater Manchester, UK. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 3(1/2), 8–25.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2003). Transport and land use planning policy in Britain: Really joined up? International Social Science Journal, 55(2):333–347.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2012). Best practices and policy transfer in spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D, de Jong, M, & Reinholde, I. (2008). Urban transport policy transfer in Central and Eastern Europe. disP—The Planning Review, 44(172), 62–73.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D., & Geerlings, H. (2005). Integrating transport, land use planning and environment policy: Views of practitioners from Denmark, England and Germany. Innovation—The European Journal of Social Science Research, 18(4), 443–453.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D., Geerlings, H., & Meijers, E., eds. (2004). Policy integration in practice: The integration of land use planning, transport and environmental policy-making in Denmark, England and Germany. Delft, the Netherlands: Delft University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D, Geerlings, H, & Shiftan, Y. (2012). Epilogue. The role of instruments, individuals and institutions in promoting sustainable transport: Concluding remarks. In H. Geerlings, Y. Shiftan, & D. Stead (Eds.), Transition towards sustainable mobility: The role of instruments, individuals and institutions (pp. 347–355). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D., & Meijers, E. (2009). Spatial planning and policy integration: Concepts, facilitators and inhibitors. Planning Theory & Practice, 10(3), 317–332.
   Google Scholar
• Szejnwald Brown, H., Vergragt, P., Green, K., & Berchicci, L. (2003). Learning for sustainability transition through bounded socio-technical experiments in personal mobility. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(3), 291–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (2003). How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis. In J. Mahoney, D. Rueschemeyer (eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 208–240). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Treib, O, Bähr, H, & Falkner, G. (2007). Modes of governance: Towards a conceptual clarification. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhel, R., & Weber, J. L.. (2005). EEA: The European transport and environment reporting mechanism: From statistics to policy indicators. In M. Linster, K. Michalak (eds.), OECD-China Seminar on Environmental Indicators Proceedings (OECD Report ENV/EPOC/NMC/CHINA(2005)1) (pp. 101–110). Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Underdal, A. (1980). Integrated marine policy—What? Why? How? Marine Policy, 4(3), 159–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigar, G., & Stead, D. (2003). Implementing transport policy in local government. In I. Docherty, & J. Shaw (eds.), New deal for transport? The UK's struggle with the sustainable transport agenda (pp. 51–72). London, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. (2010). Sustainable cities: Research and practice challenges. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 1(1-2), 128–132.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. A. (2000). Policy regimes and policy change. Journal of Public Policy, 20(3), 247–271.
   Google Scholar
• Wolman, H., Hill, E. W., & Furdell, K. (2004). Evaluating the success of urban success stories: Is reputation a guide to best practice? Housing Policy Debate, 15(4), 965–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolman, H, & Page, E. (2002). Policy transfer among local governments: An information theory approach. Governance, 15(4), 477–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WRR (Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid) [Dutch Scientific Council for Government Policy]. (2002). Duurzame Ontwikkeling: Bestuurlijke Voorwaarden Voor een Mobiliserend Beleid (Rapporten aan de Regering Nr. 62) [Sustainable development: Administrative conditions for an activating policy, reports to the government no. 62]. The Hague, Netherlands: SDU.
   Google Scholar
• Zito, A. R., Radaelli, C. M., & Jordan, A. (2003). Introduction to the symposium on “new” policy instruments in the European Union. Public Administration, 81(3), 509–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar