Does habitual behavior affect the choice of alternative fuel vehicles?

References

• Achtnicht, M. (2012). German car buyers' willingness to pay to reduce CO2 emissions. Climatic Change. Climatic Change, 113(3), 679–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akamavi, R. K., Mohamed, E., Pellmann, K., & Xu, Y. (2015). Key determinants of passenger loyalty in the low-cost airline business. Tourism Management, 0(46), 528–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahamonde-Birke, F. J., & Ortúzar, J. de D. (2014a). On the variability of hybrid discrete choice models. Transportmetrica, 10(1), 74–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahamonde-Birke, F. J., & Ortúzar, J. de D. (2014b). Is sequential estimation a suitable second best for the estimation of hybrid choice models? Transportation Research Record, 2729, 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batley, R. P., Knight, M. J., & Toner, J. P. (2004). A mixed logit model of U.K. household demand for alternative-fuel vehicles. International Journal of Transport Economics, 31, 55–77.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M. E., Walker, J. L., Bernardino, A. T., Gopinath, D. A., Morikawa, T., & Polydoropoulou, A. (2002). Integration of choice and latent variable models. In H. S. Mahmassani (Ed.), Perpetual motion: Travel behaviour research opportunities and challenges. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., & Dubey, S. K. (2014). A new estimation approach to integrate latent psychological constructs in choice modeling. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 67, 68–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., & Castelar, S. (2002). A unified mixed logit framework for modelling revealed and stated preferences: Formulation and application to congestion pricing analysis in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 36, 593–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierlaire, M., & Fetiarison, M. (2009, September). Estimation of discrete choice models: Extending BIOGEME. Paper presented at the Ninth Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Bliemer, M. C. J., & Rose, J. M. (2010). Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44, 720–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliemer, M. C. J., & Rose, J. M. (2011). Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: An empirical study in air travel choice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45, 63–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bočkarjova, M., Rietveld, P., & Knockaert, J. S. A. (2013). Adoption of electric vehicle in the Netherlands: A stated choice experiment. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Tinbergen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bunch, D. S., Bradley, M., Golob, T. F., Kitamura, R., & Occhiuzzo, G. P. (1993). Demand for clean-fuel vehicles in California: A discrete-choice stated preference pilot project. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 27, 237–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantillo, V., Ortúzar, J. de D., & Williams, H. C. W. L. (2007). Modelling discrete choices in the presence of inertia and serial correlation. Transportation Science, 41, 195–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreira, R., Patrício, L., Natal Jorge, R., & Magee, C. (2014). Understanding the travel experience and its impact on attitudes, emotions, and loyalty towards the transportation provider: A quantitative study with mid-distance bus trips. Transport Policy, 31, 35–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrus, G., Passafaro, P., & Bonnes, M. (2008). Emotions, habits, and rational choices in ecological behaviours: The case of recycling and use of public transportation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherchi, E., & Manca, F. (2011). Accounting for inertia in modal choices: Some new evidence using RP/SP dataset. Transportation, 38, 679–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherchi, E., Meloni, I., & Ortúzar, J. de D. (2013, July). The latent effect of inertia in the choice of mode. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• ChoiceMetrics. (2011). Ngene 1.1 user manual and reference guide: The cuting edge in experimental design, http://www.choice-metrics.com.
   Google Scholar
• Daziano, R. A., & Bolduc, D. (2013). Incorporating pro-environmental preferences towards green automobile technologies through a Bayesian hybrid choice model. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 9, 74–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daziano, R. A., & Chiew, E. (2012). Electric vehicles rising from the dead: Data needs for forecasting consumer response toward sustainable energy sources in personal transportation. Energy Policy, 51, 876–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erciş, A., Ünal, S., Candan, F. B., & Yıldırım, H. (2012). The effect of brand satisfaction, trust, and brand commitment on loyalty and repurchase intentions. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1395–1404.
   Google Scholar
• Glerum, A., Stankovikj, L., Themans, M., & Bierlaire, M. (2013). Forecasting the demand for electric vehicles: Accounting for attitudes and perceptions. Transportation Science, 48(4), 483–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackbarth, A., & Madlener, R. (2013). Consumer preferences for alternative fuel vehicles: A discrete choice analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied choice analysis: A primer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoang-Tung, N., Kojima, A., & Kubota, H. (2014). Recognising customers' patterns of bus service patronage using a loyalty framework. IATSS Research, 37, 148–156.
   Google Scholar
• Hoen, A., & Geurs, K. T. (2011). The influence of positionality in car-purchasing behaviour on the downsizing of new cars. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16, 402–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne, M., Jaccard, M., & Tiedemann, K. (2005). Improving behavioral realism in hybrid energy-economy models using discrete choice studies of personal transportation decisions. Energy Economics, 27, 59–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, J., & Zwerina, K. (1996). The importance of utility balance and efficient choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 307–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISTAT. (2004). I consumi delle famiglie italiane—Anno 2004. Rome, Italy: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, N., Takeuchi, K., & Managi, S. (2013). Willingness-to-pay for infrastructure investments for alternative fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 18, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jara-Díaz, S. R., & Videla, J. (1989). Detection of income effect in mode choice: Theory and application. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 23, 393–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. F., Cherchi, E., & Mabit, S. L. (2013). On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 24–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. F., Cherchi, E., Mabit, S., & Ortuzar, J. de D. (2014, January). Predicting the potential market of electric vehicles. Paper presented at the 93rd Seminar on Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, C. A., & Train, K. (1979). A disaggregate model of auto-type choice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 13, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabit, S. L., & Fosgerau, M. (2011). Demand for alternative-fuel vehicles when registration taxes are high. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16, 225–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manski, C. F., & Sherman, L. (1980). An empirical analysis of household choice among motor vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 14, 349–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potoglou, D., & Kanaroglou, P. S. (2007). Household demand and willingness to pay for clean vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 12, 264–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potoglou, D., & Kanaroglou, P. S. (2014). Disaggregate demand analyses for conventional and alternative fueled automobiles: A review. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2, 234–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raveau, S., Álvarez-Daziano, R., Yáñez, M. F., Bolduc, D., & Ortuzar, J. de D. (2010). Sequential and simultaneous estimation of hybrid discrete choice models. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2156(1), 131–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raveau, S., Yáñez, M. F., & Ortúzar, J. de D. (2010, 11–15 July). Identification of discrete choice models with latent variables: The role of constraints in sequential and simultaneous estimation. Paper presented at the WCTR Conference, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Rusich, A., & Danielis, R. (2013). The private and social monetary costs and the energy consumption of a car: An estimate for seven cars with different vehicle technologies on sale in Italy (Working Paper No. 13.01). Societa Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica (SIET), Laboratorio del Territorio e dei Trasporti Facoltà di Economia e Commercio Università degli Studi di Parma Viale Kennedy, n. 443100, Parma, Italia.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S., Bonsall, P., & Harrison, G. (2012). Factors affecting future demand for electric vehicles: A model based study. Transport Policy, 20, 62–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, K., & Bhargavi, P. (2007). Longer-term changes in mode choice decisions in Chennai: A comparison between cross-sectional and dynamic models. Transportation, 34(3), 355–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struben, J., & Sterman, J. D. (2008). Transition challenges for alternative fuel vehicle and transportation systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35(6), 1070–1097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thøgersen, J. (2006). Understanding repetitive travel mode choices in a stable context: A panel study approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40, 621–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train, K. (1986). Qualitative choice analysis: Theory, econometrics, and an application to automobile demand. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valeri, E. (2013). Air and rail transport in the Rome–Milan corridor: Competition policy implications based on a discrete choice analysis (Ph.D. thesis). University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Valeri, E., & Danielis, R. (2015). Simulating the market penetration of cars with alternative fuel/powertrain technologies in Italy. Transport Policy, 37, 44–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlachos, I., & Lin, Z. (2014). Drivers of airline loyalty: Evidence from the business travelers in China. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 71, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yáñez, M. F., Cherchi, E., Heydecker, B. G., & Ortuzar, J. de D. (2009, December). Inertia and shock effects on mode choice panel data: Implications of the Transantiago implementation. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Jaipur, India.
   Google Scholar
• Yáñez, M. F., Raveau, S., & Ortuzar, J. de D. (2010). Inclusion of latent variables in mixed logit models: Modelling and forecasting. Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice, 44(9), 744–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar