The 4 A's of sustainable city distribution: Innovative solutions and challenges ahead

References

• Allen, J., Browne, M., Piotrowska, M., & Woodburn. (2010). Freight quality partnerships in the UK—An analysis of their work and achievements. London: University of Westminster.
   Google Scholar
• Anand, N., Yang, M., van Duin, J.H.R., & Tavasszy, L. (2012). GenCLOn: An ontology for city logistics. Expert Systems with Applications, 39 (15), 11944–11960. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., Allen, J., & Browne, M. (2005). Urban logistics—How can it meet policy makers' sustainability objectives? Journal of Transport Geography, 13 (1), 71–81. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• Anten, N., Ploos van Amstel, W., & Verweij, K. (2014). Lean and green?: Creating a network community for sustainable logistics. Proceedings of the Transport Research Arena (Vol. 31), Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizens participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 35 (4), 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, N. (2013). The milk run revisited: A load factor paradox with economic and environmental implications for urban freight transport. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 51, 56–62. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2013.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, N., & Browne, M. (2013). A review of the success and failure of tram systems to carry urban freight: The implications for a low emission intermodal solution using electric vehicles on trams. European Transport/Trasporti Europei, 54, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Atash, Farhad. (2007). The deterioration of urban environments in developing countries: Mitigating the air pollution crisis in Tehran, Iran. Cities, 24 (6), 399–409. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2007.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baindur, D., & Macário, R. M. (2013). Mumbai lunch box delivery system: A transferable benchmark in urban logistics? Research in Transportation Economics, 38 (1), 110–121. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2012.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, E. E. F., Lindholm, M., & Whiteing, A. (2013). A comparative study of urban freight transport planning: Addressing stakeholder needs. Journal of Transport Geography, 32, 93–101. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.08.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrends, S. (2012a). The urban context of intermodal road-rail transport—Threat or opportunity for modal shift? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 463–475. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.122.
   Google Scholar
• Behrends, S. (2012b). The significance of the urban context for the sustainability performance of intermodal road-rail transport. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 54, 375–386. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.757.
   Google Scholar
• Behrends, S., Lindholm, M., & Woxenius, J. (2008). The impact of urban freight transport: A definition of sustainability from an actor's perspective. Transportation Planning and Technology, 31 (6), 693–713. doi:10.1080/03081060802493247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari, R., Trudewind, C. A., & Zapp, P. (2014). Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production via electrolysis—A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 151–163. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerkan, K. Y., Sund, A. B., & Nordtømme, M. E. (2014). Stakeholder responses to measures green and efficient urban freight. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 11, 32–42. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2014.05.001.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, E. E., & Fransoo, J. C. (2013). Reaching 50 million nanostores: Retail distribution in emerging megacities. Beta Working Paper Series 404.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M., Allen, J., & Leonardi, J. (2011). Evaluating the use of an urban consolidation centre and electric vehicles in Central London. IATSS Research, 35 (1), 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.iatssr.2011.06.002.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M., Allen, J., Nemoto, T., Patier, D., & Visser, J. (2012). Reducing social and environmental impacts of urban freight transport: A review of some major cities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 19–33. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.088.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M., Allen, J., Nemoto, T., & Visser, J. (2010). Light goods vehicles in urban areas. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2 (3), 5911–5919. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.006.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M., Sweet, M., Woodburn, A., & Allen, J. (2005). Urban freight consolidation centres. Final Report (Report for Department of Transport). London: University of Westminster.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, J. T., & Kuse, H. (2005). Impacts of large truck restrictions in freight carrier operations in Metro Manila. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 2947–2962.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-H., Chen, C.-Y., & Lee, S.-C. (2011). Technology forecasting and patent strategy of hydrogen energy and fuel cell technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (12), 6957–6969. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherrett, T., Allen, J., McLeod, F., Maynard, S., Hickford, A., & Browne, M. (2012). Understanding urban freight activity—Key issues for freight planning. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 22–32. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. (2014). Understanding the drone epidemic. Computer Law & Security Review, 30 (3), 230–246. doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2014.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, B., & Muñoz, P. (2015). Sharing cities and sustainable consumption and production: Towards an intergrated framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 87–97. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colicchia, C., Marchet, G., Melacini, M., & Perotti, S. (2013). Building environmental sustainability: Empirical evidence from logistics service providers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 197–209. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, A., Fatisson, P.-E., Eickemeyer, P., Cheng, J., & Peters, D. (2012). Urban micro-consolidation and last mile goods delivery by freight-tricycle in manhattan: Opportunities and challenges. TRB Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Cruijssen, F., Cools, M., & Dullaert, W. (2007). Horizontal cooperation in logistics: Opportunities and impediments. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43 (2), 129–142. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2005.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dablanc, L. (2007). Goods transport in large european cities: Difficult to organize, difficult to modernize. Transportation Research Part A, 41 (3), 280–285. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.005.
   Google Scholar
• Dablanc, L., Diziain, D., & Levifve, H. (2011). Urban freight consultations in the Paris region. European Transport Research Review, 3 (1), 47–57. doi:10.1007/s12544-011-0049-2.
   Google Scholar
• Dablanc, L., & Rodrigue, J.-P. (2014). City logistics: Towards a global typology. Proceedings of the Transport Research Arena, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Diziain, D., Ripert, C., & Dablanc, L. (2012). How can we bring logistics back into cities? The case of paris metropolitan area. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 267–281. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.107.
   Google Scholar
• Diziain, D., Taniguchi, E., & Dablanc, L. (2014). Urban logistics by rail and waterways in France and Japan. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125, 159–170. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1464.
   Google Scholar
• Egbunike, O. N., & Potter, A. T. (2011). Are freight pipelines a pipe dream? A critical review of the UK and European perspective. Journal of Transport Geography, 19 (4), 499–508. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L., Eds. (1997). Universities and the global knowledge economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2006). Freight transport logistics in Europe—The key to sustainable mobility, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). White paper roadmap to a single european transport area—Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. COM(2011) 144 Final, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2011). A fall in average vehicle loads. Average loads, distances and empty running in road freight transport, 2010. Eurostat. Statistics in focus, 63/2011.
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista, P. (2014). Environmental sustainability practices in the transport and logistics service industry: An exploratory case study investigation. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 12, 63–72. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2014.10.002.
   Google Scholar
• Filippi, F., Nuzzolo, A., Comi, A., & Site, P. D. (2010). Ex-ante assessment of urban freight transport policies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2 (3), 6332–6342. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.042.
   Google Scholar
• Gatta, V., & Marcucci, E. (2014). Urban freight transport and policy changes: Improving decision makers' awareness via an agent-specific approach. Transport Policy, 36, 248–252. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevaers, R. (2013). Evaluation of innovations in B2C last mile, B2C reverse & waste logistics (Ph.D. dissertation), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, J., Kihm, A., & Lenz, B. (2014). A new vehicle for urban freight? An ex-ante evaluation of electric cargo bikes in courier services. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 11, 53–62. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2014.03.004.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, R., Saxena, S., Banister, D., & Ashiru, O. (2012). Examining transport futures with scenario analysis and MCA. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46 (3), 560–575. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, D., & Huizenga, C. (2013). Implementation of sustainable urban transport in Latin America. Research in Transportation Economics, 40 (1), 66–77. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2012.06.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holguín-Veras, J.. (2008). Necessary conditions for off-hour deliveries and the effectiveness of urban freight road pricing and alternative financial policies in competitive markets. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42, 392–413. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2007.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holguín-Veras, J., Wang, C., Browne, M., Hodge, S. D., & Wojtowicz, J. (2014). The New York City off-hour delivery project: Lessons for city logistics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125, 36–48. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1454.
   Google Scholar
• Huschebeck, M. (2004). BEST urban freight solutions. Deliverable D1.4. Recommendations for further activities (IV). Karlsruhe, Germany: PTV.
   Google Scholar
• Ibeas, A., dell'Olio, L., & Montequín, R. B. (2011). Citizen involvement in promoting sustainable mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, 19 (4), 475–487. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janjevic, M., & Ndiaye, A. B. (2014). Development and application of a transferability framework for micro-consolidation schemes in urban freight transport. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125, 284–296. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1474.
   Google Scholar
• Kin, B., Verlinde, S., van Lier, T., & Macharis, C. (2016). Is there life after subsidy for an urban consolidation centre? An investigation of the total costs and benefits of a privately-initiated concept. Transportation Research Procedia, 12, 357–369.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., Whitmarsh, L., Nykvist, B., Schilperoord, M., Bergman, N., & Haxeltine, A. (2009). A transitions model for sustainable mobility. Ecological Economics, 68 (12), 2985–2995. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korzhenevych, A., Dehnen, N., Bröcker, J., Holtkamp, M., Meier, H., Gibson, G., Varma. H., & Cox, V. (2014). Update of the Handbook on External Costs of Transport, Final Report. Report for the European Commission, Directorate-General Mobility and Transport.
   Google Scholar
• Lammgård, C., & Andersson, D. (2014). Environmental considerations and trade-offs in purchasing of transportation services. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 10, 45–52. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2014.04.003.
   Google Scholar
• Lebeau, P., Macharis, C., van Mierlo, J., & Lebeau, K. (2015). Electrifying light commercial vehicles for city logistics? A total cost of ownership analysis. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure, 15 (4), 551–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz, B., & Riehle, E. (2013). Bikes for urban freight?? Experience for the European case. 92th Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board (TRB), 13–17 January 2013, Washington, United States of America.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, J., Browne. M., & Allen, J. (2012). Before-after assessment of a logistics trial with clean urban freight vehicles: A case study in London. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 146–157. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.097.
   Google Scholar
• Lieb, K. J., & Lieb, R. C. (2010). Environmental sustainability in the third-party logistics (3PL) industry. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40 (7), 524–533. doi:10.1108/09600031011071984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm, M. (2013). Urban freight transport from a local authority perspective—A literature review. European Transport/Trasporti Europei, 3 (54), 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm, M., & Behrends, S. (2012). Challenges in urban freight transport planning—A review in the Baltic Sea region. Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 129–136. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm, M., & Browne, M. (2013). Local authority cooperation with urban freight stakeholders: A comparison of partnership approaches. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 13 (1), 20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macário, R., Galelo, A., & Martins, P. M. (2008). Business models in urban logistics. Ingeniería Y Desarrollo, 24, 77–96.
   Google Scholar
• Macharis, C. (2005). The importance of stakeholder analysis in freight transport. European Transport/Trasporti Europei, 25–26, 114–126.
   Google Scholar
• Macharis, C., Kin, B., & Lebeau, P. (2015). Multi actor multi criteria analysis as a tool to involve stakeholders within the city distribution context. Paper presented at the URBE Conference 2015, Rome, Italy, 1–2 October 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Macharis, C., Turcksin, L., & Lebeau, K. (2012). Multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) as a tool to support sustainable decisions: State of use. Decision Support Systems, 54 (1), 610–620. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcucci, E., & Danielis, R. (2007). The potential demand for a urban freight consolidation centre. Transportation, 35 (2), 269–284. doi:10.1007/s11116-007-9147-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, G., Frick, K.T., May, a.D., & Deakin, E. (2011). How do cities approach policy innovation and policy learning? A study of 30 policies in Northern Europe and North America. Transport Policy, 18 (3), 501–512. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MDS Transmodal (2012). DG MOVE European Commission: Study on Urban Freight Transport. Final report. Chester, UK: MDS Transmodal Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Messagie, M., Boureima, F. S., Coosemans, T., Macharis, C., & Van Mierlo, J. (2014). A Range-based vehicle life cycle assessment incorporating variability in the environmental assessment of different vehicle technologies and fuels. Energies, 7, 1467–1482. doi:10.3390/en7031467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollenkopf, D., Stolze, H., Tate, W. L., & Ueltschy, M. (2010). Green, lean, and global supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40 (1/2), 14–41. doi:10.1108/09600031011018028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mommens, K., & Macharis, C. (2014). Location analysis for the modal shift of palletized building materials. Journal of Transport Geography, 34, 44–53. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morganti, E., Dablanc, L., & Fortin, F. (2014). Final deliveries for online shopping: The deployment of pickup point networks in urban and suburban areas. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 11, 23–31. doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2014.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Muñuzuri, J., Larrañeta, J., Onieva, L., & Cortés, P. (2005). Solutions applicable by local administrations for urban logistics improvement. Cities, 22 (1), 15–28. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2004.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nykvist, B., & Whitmarsh, L. (2008). A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: Niche development in the UK and Sweden. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75 (9), 1373–1387. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, K. W. (1992). Urban goods movements: A guide to policy and planning. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Paloheimo, H., Lettenmeier, M., & Waris, H. (2015). Transport reduction by crowdsourced deliveries—A library case in Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 132, 240–251. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, S., Chen, C., & Zhong, R. Y. (2015). A crowdsourcing solution to collect E-commerce reverse flows in metropolitan areas. IFAC-Papers OnLine, 48 (3), 1984–1989. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.379.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. London: Collier Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Prager, K., & Freese, J. (2009). Stakeholder involvement in agri-environmental policy making—Learning from a local- and a state-level approach in Germany. Journal of Environmental Management, 90 (2), 1154–1167. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quak, H. (2008). Sustainability of urban freight transport. Retail distribution and local regulations in cities (Ph.D. dissertation), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Quak, H. (2011). Urban freight transport: the challenge of sustainability. In C. Macharis & S. Melo (Eds.), City distribution and urban freight transport. Multiple perspectives (pp. 37–55). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. doi:10.4337/9780857932754.00016.
   Google Scholar
• Rawson, R., & Hooper, P. D. (2012). The importance of stakeholder participation to sustainable airport master planning in the UK. Environmental Development, 2, 36–47. doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2012.03.013.
   Google Scholar
• Rayna, T., & Striukova, L. (2016). From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: How 3D printing is changing business model innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 102, 214–224. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141 (10), 2417–2431. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regué, R., & Bristow, A. L. (2013). Appraising freight tram schemes: A case study of Barcelona. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 13 (1), 56–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, S., Colicchia, C., Cozzolino, A., & Christopher, M. (2013). The logistics service providers in eco-efficiency innovation: An empirical study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18 (6), 583–603. doi:10.1108/SCM-02-2012-0053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rougès, J.-F., & Montreuil, B. (2014). Crowdsourcing delivery: New Interconnected business models to reinvent delivery. 1st International Physical Internet Conference, May 28–30, 2014, Québec City, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, J., & Slack, F. (2004). Conducting a literature review. Management Research News, 27 (6), 31–39. doi:10.1108/01409170410784185.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, F., & Comi, A. (2012). City characteristics and urban goods movements: A way to environmental transportation system in a sustainable city. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 61–73. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.091.
   Google Scholar
• Sarac, A., Absi, N., & Dauzère-Pérès, S. (2010). A literature review on the impact of RFID technologies on supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 128 (1), 77–95. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.07.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silas, M. A., Holguín-Veras, J., & Jara-Díaz, S. (2012). Optimal distribution of financial incentives to foster off-hour deliveries in urban areas. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46 (8), 1205–1215. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2012.05.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stathopoulos, A., Valeri, E., & Marcucci, E. (2012). Stakeholder reactions to urban freight policy innovation. Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 34–45. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.11.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strale, M. (2013). An emprical typology of logistics platforms and activities. Revue d´Économie Régionale & Urbane, 1, 139–162.
   Google Scholar
• Strand, Ø., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). Where is synergy indicated in the Norwegian innovation system? Triple-helix relations among technology, organization, and geography. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80 (3), 471–484. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SUGAR. (2010). SUGAR. Good practices analysis. Deliverable 3.3.
   Google Scholar
• SUGAR. (2011). City logistics best practices: A handbook for authorities. Bologna: Interreg IVC .
   Google Scholar
• Tachizawa, E. M., Alvarez-Gil, M. J., & Montes-Sancho, M. J. (2015). How ‘smart cities’ will change supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20 (3), 237–248. doi:10.1108/SCM-03-2014-0108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taniguchi, E., & Tamagawa, D. (2005). Evaluating city logistics measures considering the behavior of several stakeholders. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 3062–3076.
   Google Scholar
• Taniguchi, E., Thompson, R. G., Yamada, T., & van Duin, R. (2001). City logistics network modelling and intelligent transport systems. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Taniguchi, E. (2014). Concepts of city logistics for sustainable and liveable cities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 151, 310–317. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.029.
   Google Scholar
• Transport for London. (2009). Cycle freight in London?: A scoping study. Mayor of London, London.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2014). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision, highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). United Nations, New York. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2005.12.9.
   Google Scholar
• van Duin, J. H. R., van Kolck, A., Anand, N., Tavasszy, L. A., & Taniguchi, E. (2012). Towards an agent-based modelling approach for the evaluation of dynamic usage of urban distribution centres. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 333–348. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.112.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, T. (2014). The development of an external cost calculator framework for evaluating the sustainability of transport solutions (Ph.D. dissertation), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Ixelles, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, T., & Macharis, C. (2011). Transport of goods to and from the center of Brussels: Using the port to improve sustainability. In C. Macharis & S. Melo, City distribution and urban freight transport. Multiple perspectives (pp. 176–199). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. doi:10.4337/9780857932754.00016.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. (2004). The triple bottom line and impact assessment: How do TBL, EIA, SIA, SEA and EMS relate to each other? Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 6 (3), 265–288.
   Google Scholar
• Verlinde, S. (2015). Promising but challenging urban freight transport solutions: Freight flow consolidation and off-hour deliveries (Ph.D. dissertation), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Ixelles, Belgium; Universiteit Gent, Ghent, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Verlinde, S., Macharis, C., Milan, L., & Kin, B. (2014). Does a mobile depot make urban deliveries faster, more sustainable and more economically viable: Results of a pilot test in Brussels. Transportation Research Procedia, 4, 361–373. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2014.11.027.
   Google Scholar
• Verlinde, S., Macharis, C., & Witlox, F. (2012). How to consolidate urban flows of goods without setting up an urban consolidation centre? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 39, 687–701. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.140.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, J., Nemoto, T., & Browne, M. (2014). Home delivery and the impacts on urban freight transport: A review. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125, 15–27. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1452.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Xu, J., Zheng, X., & Qin, P. (2013). Will a driving restriction policy reduce car trips? Environment for Development, 67, 279–290. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangapisit, O., Taniguchi, E., Teo, J. S. E., & Qureshi, A. G. (2014). Multi-agent systems modelling for evaluating joint delivery systems. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125, 472–483. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1489.
   Google Scholar
• Witkowski, J., & Kiba-Janiak, M. (2014). The role of local governments in the development of city logistics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125, 373–385. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1481.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M. (2004). Expert working group on sustainable urban transport plans. D4 Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2015). Data: GDP growth (annual %). Retrieved from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG (Sep. 17, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Wynn, D and Hill, N. (2010) Review of potential radical future transport technologies and concepts. Task 9 Report VI produced as part of contract ENV.C.3/SER/2008/0053 between European Commission Directorate- General Environment and AEA Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Zunder, T. H., & Ibanez, J. N. (2004). Urban freight logistics in the european union. European Transport/Trasporti Europei, 28, 77–84.
   Google Scholar