How exposure to policy tools transforms the mechanisms behind public acceptability and acceptance—The case of the Gothenburg congestion tax

References

• Bamberg, S., & Rölle, D. (2003). Determinants of people's acceptability of pricing measures—Replication and extension of a causal model. In J. Schade & B. Schlag (Eds.), Acceptability of transport pricing strategies (pp. 235–248). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Button, K. J. (1993). Transport economics (2nd ed.). UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (1998). The transit metropolis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Bringing values back in. The adequacy of the European social survey to measure values in 20 countries. Public Opinion Quarterly. 72(3), 420–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Dan, A., & Shwom, R. (2007). Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology, 72, 185–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2001). Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Political Theory. 29(5), 651–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson, J. (2009). A cost–benefit analysis of the Stockholm congestion charging system. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(4), 468–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. (2008). Interrupting habitual car use: The importance of car habit strength and moral motivation for personal car use reduction. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 11, 10–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. (2006). Acceptability of travel demand management measures: The importance of problem awareness, personal norm, freedom, and fairness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, P. (2010). Will citizens take no for an answer? What government officials can do to enhance decision acceptance. European Political Science Review, 2, 351–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Gehlert, T., & Nielsen, O. A. (2007). Triangulation of data sources for analysing car drivers’ responses to road pricing in Copenhagen. Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Giuliano, G. (1992). An assessment of the political acceptability of congestion pricing. Transportation, 19(4), 335–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammar, H., & Jagers, S. C. (2006). Can trust in politicians explain individuals' support for climate policy? The case of CO2 tax. Climate Policy, 5(6), 613–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hårsman, B., & Quigley, J. M. (2010). Political and public acceptability of congestion pricing: ideology and self-interest. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 29(4), 854–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaensirisak, S., Wardman, M., & May, A. D. (2005). Explaining variations in public acceptability of road pricing schemes. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 39, 127–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, S. C., & Hammar, H. (2009). Environmental taxation for good and for bad: the efficiency and legitimacy of Sweden's carbon tax. Environmental Politics, 18(2), 218–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, S. C., Martinsson, J., & Matti, S. (2014). Ecological citizenship: A driver of pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental Politics, 23(3), 434–445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson, C., Fujii, S., & Gärling, T. (2000). Determinants of private car users’ acceptance of road pricing. Transport Policy, 7, 153–158.
   Google Scholar
• Kallbekken, S., & Saelen, H. (2011). Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns. Energy Policy, 39, 2966–2973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallbekken, S., Garcia, J. H., & Korneliussen, K. (2013). Determinants of public support for transport taxes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 58, 67–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leape, J. (2006). The London congestion charge. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(4), 1–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Meng, Q., & Wang, S. (2013). Speed-based toll design for cordon-based congestion pricing scheme. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 31, 83–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Zahran, S., & Vedlitz, A. (2007). Collective action and citizens responses to global warming. Political Behavior. 29(3), 391–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odeck, J., & Bråthen, S. (1997). Public attitudes towards toll roads. Transport Policy, 4, 73–83.
   Google Scholar
• Odeck, J., & Bråthen, S. (2002). Toll financing in Norway: The success, failures and perspective for the future. Transport Policy, 9, 253–260.
   Google Scholar
• Raux, C., & Souche, S. (2004). The acceptability of urban road pricing: a theoretical analysis applied to the experience in Lyon. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. 38, 191–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinstra, S. A., Rietveld, P., & Verhoef, E. T. (1999). The social support for policy measures in passenger transport. A statistical analysis for the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 4, 181–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohan, M. J. (2000). A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 255–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotaris, L., Danielis, R., Marcucci, E., & Massiani, J. (2010). The urban road pricing scheme to curb pollution in Milan, Italy: Description, impacts and preliminary cost–benefit analysis assessment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 44(5), 359–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schade, J., & Schlag, B. (2003). Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 6, 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Schlag, B., & Teubel, U. (1997). Public acceptability of transport pricing. IATSS Research. 21, 134–142.
   Google Scholar
• Schmöcker, J.-D., Pettersson, P., & Fujii, S. (2012). Comparative analysis of proximal and distal determinants for the acceptance of coercive charging policies in the UK and Japan. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 6(3), 156–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuitema, G., Steg, L., & Forward, S. (2010). Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 44, 99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, K. A., & Verhoef, E. T. (2007). The economics of urban transportation. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmental concern. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Stockholmförsöket. (2006). Fakta och resultat från Stockholmsförsöket (Facts and results from the Stockholm trials: Final version) (2nd ed.).Retrieved from “http://www.stockholmsforsoket.se”, provided by the City of Stockholm and the Swedish Road Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Transport for London (2004). Congestion Charging Central London. Impacts monitoring. Second Annual Report: April 2004. Published by Transport for London and Mayer of London. Retrieved from http://content.tfl.gov.uk/impacts-monitoring-report-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Transportstyrelsen. (2014). Congestion Tax Gothenburg. Retrieved from http://www.transportstyrelsen.se/Global/Vag/Trangselskatt/Information%20på%20engelska.pdf (retrieved Sep. 22, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Tretvik, T. (2003). Urban road pricing in Norway: public acceptability and travel behaviour. In J. Schade & B. Schlag (Eds.), Acceptability of transport pricing strategies (pp. 77–92). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Winslott-Hiselius, L., Brundell-Freij, K., Vagland, A., & Byström, C. (2009). The development of public attitudes towards the Stockholm congestion trial. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43, 269–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Z., Liu, L., Liu, C., & Shiwakoti, N. (2014). Understanding public response to a congestion charge: A random-effects ordered logit approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 70, 117–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar