How uncertain is the future of electric vehicle market: Results from Monte Carlo simulations using a nested logit model

References

• Axsen, J., & Kurani, K. S. (2009). Early U.S. market for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles: Anticipating consumer recharge potential and design priorities. TRB 88th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers DVD, Paper #09-1272.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Science, 15(5), 215–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, F. M. (2004). Comments on ‘a new product growth for model consumer durables': The bass model. Management Science, 50(12), 1833–1840.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, T. A., Siduh, I., & Tenderich, B. (2009). Electric vehicles in the United States: A new model with forecasts to 2030. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Brownstone, D., Bunch, D. S., Golob, T. F., & Ren, W. (1996). A transactions choice model for forecasting demand for alternative-fuel vehicles. Research in Transportation Economics, 4, 87–129.
   Google Scholar
• Brownstone, D., Bunch, D. S., & Train, K. (2000). Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part B, 34(5), 315–338.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, J., & Lin, Z. (2012). Within-day recharge of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles: Energy impact of public charging infrastructure. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17(5), 405–412. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2012.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, J., Liu, C., & Lin, Z. (2014). Charging infrastructure planning for promoting battery electric vehicles: An activity-based approach using multiday travel data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 38, 44–55. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Energy Assessment (GEA). (2012). Toward a sustainable future. Cambridge, UK/New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Gosh, A., Hemmert, G., Holtermann, M., Massiani, J., & Weinmann, J. (2011). MMEM Report, Part 2, Technical Notes, ESMT. Also available as: EMOB, technical documentation, Research note from Dipartimento di Economia, Università Cà Foscari, Venice, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, D. L. (2001). TAFV alternative fuels and vehicles choice model documentation. ORNL/TM–2001/134, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, D. L. (2010). How consumers value fuel economy: A literature review. EPA-420-R-10-008, Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, March 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, D. L., Lin, Z., & Dong, J. (2013a). Analyzing the sensitivity of hydrogen vehicle sales to consumers' preferences. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(36), 15857–15867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, D. L., Park, S., & Liu, C. (2013b). Analyzing the transition to electric drive vehicles in the U.S. Futures, 58, 34–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, D. L., Liu, C. (2012). Consumer Vehicle Choice Model Documentation (EPA-420-B-12-052). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
   Google Scholar
• Ito, N., Takeuchi, K., & Managi, S. (2013). Willingness to pay for the infrastructure investments for alternative fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 18, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurani, K. S., Axsen, J., Caperello, N., Davies, J., & Stillwater, T. (2009). Learning from consumers: Plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) demonstration and consumer education, outreach, and market research program. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, CA, Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-09-21.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Z. (2012). MA3T model: Modeling the market acceptance of advanced automotive technologies. Center for Transportation Analysis, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Retrieved from http://cta.ornl.gov/ma3t/.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Z., Dong, J., & Greene, D. L. (2013). Hydrogen vehicles: Impacts of DOE technical targets on market acceptance and societal benefits. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(19), 7973–7985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Z., & Greene, D. L. (2010). A plug-in hybrid consumer choice model with detailed market segmentation. Presented at the 89th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Z., & Greene, D. L. (2011a). Assessing energy impact of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles: Significance of daily distance variation over time and among drivers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2252(1): 99–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Z., & Greene, D. L. (2011b). Promoting the market for plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles: Role of recharge availability. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2252(1), 49–56. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2252-07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabit, S. L., & Fosgerau, M. (2011). Demand for alternative-fuel vehicles when registration taxes are high. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(3), 225–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massiani, J. (2012). Using Stated preferences to forecast alternative fuel vehicles market diffusion. Italian Journal of Regional Sciences—Scienze Regionali, 11(3), 93–122.
   Google Scholar
• Massiani, J. (2014). Stated preference surveys for electric and alternative fuel vehicles: are we doing the right thing? Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research, 6(3), 152–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2013). Transitions to alternative vehicles and fuels. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palisade Corporation (2016). @Risk software. Retrieved from https://www.palisade.com/risk/
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Glencoe, IL: Free Press of Glencoe/MacMillan & Company.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE). (2013). EV everywhere grand challenge blueprint. Retrieved from http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/electric_vehicles/pdfs/eveverywhere_blueprint.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (U.S. DOE/EIA). (2012). Annual energy outlook 2012, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. EPA/DOT). (2012). 2017 and later model year light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emissions and corporate average fuel economy standards. Pre-publication rule. Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-12-01/pdf/2011-30358.pdf.
   Google Scholar