New mobility service users' perceptions on electric vehicle adoption

References

• Axsen, J., & Kenneth, S. K. (2013). Hybrid, plug-in hybrid, or electric—What do car buyers want? Energy Policy (Elsevier), 61, 532–543. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axsen, J., Caroline, O., & Stephen, S. (2013). Social influence and consumer preference formation for pro-environmental technology: The case of a UK workplace electric-vehicle study. Ecological Economics (Elsevier), 95, 96–107. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axsen, J., Joseph, B., & Marisol, A. C. (2015). Preference and lifestyle heterogeneity among potential plug-in electric vehicle buyers. Energy Economics (Elsevier), 50, 190–201. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengio, Y., & Yves, G. (2004). No unbiased estimator of the variance of K-fold cross-validation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5, 1089–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicocchi, N., & Marco, M. (2014). Investigating ride sharing opportunities through mobility data analysis. Pervasive and Mobile Computing (Elsevier), 14, 83–94. doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2014.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carley, S., Rachel M. K., Bradley W. L., & John D. G. (2013). Intent to purchase a plug-in electric vehicle: A survey of early impressions in large US cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment (Elsevier), 18, 39–45. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2012.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheron, E., & Michel, Z. (1997). Electric vehicle purchasing intentions: The concern over battery charge duration. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice (Elsevier), 31(3), 235–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirillo, C., Yan, L., & Michael, M. (2017). A time-dependent stated preference approach to measuring vehicle type preferences and market elasticity of conventional and green vehicles. Transportation Research Part A, 100, 294–310.
   Google Scholar
• Clewlow, R., & Gouri, M. (2017). Disruptive Transportation: The Adoption, Utilization, and Impacts of Ride-Hailing in the United States. Davis, Davis: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, B., & Jan, K. (2014). Ride on! Mobility business models for the sharing economy. Organization & Environment (SAGE Publications), 27(3), 279–292. doi:10.1177/1086026614546199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degirmenci, K., & Michael H. B. (2017). Consumer purchase intentions for electric vehicles: Is green more important than price and range? Transportation Research Part D, 51, 250–260. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2017.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D. J., & Kara, M. K. (2014). The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies (Elsevier), 40, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2013.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, T., & Josef, F. K. (2013). What drives range preference in electric vehicle users? Transport Policy (Elsevier), 30, 56–62. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furuhata, M., Maged, D., Fernando, O., Marc-Etienne, B., Xiaoqing, W., & Sven K. (2013). Ridesharing: The state-of-the-art and future directions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological (Elsevier), 57, 28–46. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2013.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackbarth, A., & Reinhard, M. (2016). Willingness-to-pay for alternative fuel vehicle characteristics: A stated choice study for Germany. Transportation Research Part A, 85, 89–111.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner, R. J., Ian, W., & Bas, V. (2017). Image, not environmentalism: A qualitative exploration of factors influencing vehicle purchasing decisions. Transportation Research Part A, 97, 89–105.
   Google Scholar
• Hahnel, Ulf J. J., Sebastian, G., & Hans, S. (2014). How does green suit me? Consumers mentally match perceived product attributes with their domain-specific motives when making green purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 13, 317–327. doi:10.1002/cb.1471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardman, S., Eric, S., & Robert, Steinberger-Wilckens. (2016). Comparing high-end and low-end early adopters of battery electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A, 88, 40–57.
   Google Scholar
• Heyvaert, S., Coosemans, T., Van Mierlo, J., & Macharis, C. (2015). Electric vehicle attitudes and purchase intention: A flemish case study. International Journal of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles (Inderscience Publishers), 7(1), 83–100. doi:10.1504/IJEHV.2015.068946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson, N., Till, G., Patrick, P., Frances, S., & Sten, K. (2016). Are multi-car households better suited for battery electric vehicles? Driving patterns and economics in Sweden and Germany. Transportation Research Part C, 65, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, J., Jayakrishnan, R., & Keechoo, C. (2017). A dually sustainable urban mobility option: Shared-taxi operations with electric vehicles. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(8), 567–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamargianni, M., Weibo, L., Melinda, M., & Andreas, S. (2016). A critical review of new mobility services for urban transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 3294–3303. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.277.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D., Joonho, K., & Yujin, P. (2015). Factors affecting electric vehicle sharing program participants' attitudes about car ownership and program participation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment (Elsevier), 36, 96–106. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohavi, R. (1995). A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 14(2), 1137–1145.
   Google Scholar
• Krupa, J. S. (2014).et al. Analysis of a consumer survey on plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice (Elsevier), 64, 14–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuemmerling, M., Christian, H., & Gerrit, M. (2013). Towards seamless mobility: Individual mobility profiles to ease the use of shared vehicles. IFAC Proceedings Volumes (Elsevier), 46(15), 450–454. doi:10.3182/20130811-5-US-2037.00029.
   Google Scholar
• Kuntzky, K., Wittke, S., & Herrmann, C. (2013). Car and ride sharing concept as a product service system = simulation as a tool to reduce environmental impacts. In The Philosopher's Stone for Sustainability, Springer: 381–386. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32847-3_64.
   Google Scholar
• Noppers, E. H., Kees, K., Jan, W. B., & Linda, S. (2014). The adoption of sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental motives. Global Environmental Change, 25, 52–62. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noppers, E. H., Kees, K., Marija, B., & Linda, S. (2015). The adoption of sustainable innovations: The role of instrumental, environmental, and symbolic attributes for earlier and later adopters. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 74–84. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plotz, P., Uta, S., & Elisabeth, D. (2014). Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany. Transportation Research Part A, 67, 96–109.
   Google Scholar
• Rayle, L., Danielle, D., Nelson, C., Robert, C., & Susan, S. (2016). Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transport Policy (Elsevier), 45, 168–178. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezvani, Z., Johan, J., & Jan, B. (2015). Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment (Elsevier), 34, 122–136. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodier, C., Farzad, A., & Dylan, S. (2015). Synergistic interactions of dynamic ridesharing and battery electric vehicles land use, transit, and auto pricing policies.” Mineta Transportation Institute Publications, MTI, 12–50.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, J. D., Aritz, Perez, & Jose, Antonio Lozano (2010). “Sensitivity analysis of k-fold cross validation in prediction error estimation.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32(3), 569–575. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2009.187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santi, Paolo, Giovanni, Resta, Michael, Szell, Stanislav, Sobolevsky, Steven, H. Strogatz, & Carlo, Ratti. (2014). “Quantifying the benefits of vehicle pooling with shareability networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (National Academy of Sciences), 111(37), 13290–13294. doi:10.1073/pnas.1403657111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, Jungwoo, Chandra, R. Bhat, Daehyun, You, Venu, M. Garikapati, & Ram, M. Pendyala. (2015). “Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for advanced vehicle technology options and fuel types.” Transportation Research Part C, 60, 511–524. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2015.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierzchula, William, Sjoerd, Bakker, Kees, Maat, and Bert van, Wee., (2014). “The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption.” Energy Policy (Elsevier), 68, 183–194. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teubner, Timm, & Christoph, M. Flath. (2015). “The economics of multi-hop ride sharing.” Business & Information Systems Engineering (Springer), 57(5), 311–324. doi:10.1007/s12599-015-0396-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallsten, Scott (2015). “The competitive effects of the sharing economy: How is uber changing taxis?” Technology Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• White, Lee V., & Nicole, D. Sintov. (2017). “You are what you drive: Environmentalist and social innovator symbolism drives electric vehicle adoption intentions.” Transportation Research Part A, 99, 94–113.
   Google Scholar