Identification of determinants for rescheduling travel mode choice and transportation policies to reduce car use in urban areas

References

• Adler, T., & Ben-Akiva, M. (1979). A theoretical and empirical model of trip chaining behavior. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 13(3), 243–257. doi:10.1016/0191-2615(79)90016-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Arentze, T., & Timmermans, H. (2000). Albatross: A learning based transportation oriented simulation system (pp. 6–70). Eindhoven: Eirass.
   Google Scholar
• Auld, J., Williams, C., Mohammadian, A., & Nelson, P. (2009). An automated GPS-based prompted recall survey with learning algorithms. Transportation Letters, 1(1), 59–79. doi:10.3328/TL.2009.01.01.59-79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axhausen, K. W., & Gärling, T. (1992). Activity-based approaches to travel analysis: Conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems. Transport Reviews, 12(4), 323–341. doi:10.1080/01441649208716826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badland, H., & Schofield, G. (2005). Transport, urban design, and physical activity: An evidence-based update. Transportation Research Part D, 10(3), 177–196. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2004.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akivai, M., Bowman, J. L., & Gopinath, D. (1996). Travel demand model system for the information era. Transportation, 23(3), 241–266. doi:10.1007/BF00165704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canzler, W. (2016). Mobility in the age of digital modernity: Why the private car is losing its significance, intermodal transport is winning and why digitalisation is the key. Applied Mobilities, 1, 56–67. doi:10.1080/23800127.2016.1147781.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, S., Harmer, C., Hopkin, J., & Skippon, S. (2014). Sociological perspectives on travel and mobilities: A review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 63, 107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005). How do individuals adapt their personal travel? Objective and subjective influences on the consideration of travel-related strategies for San Francisco Bay Area commuters. Transport Policy, 12(4), 291–302. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapin Jr, F. S. (1974). Human activity patterns in the city. Things people do in time and space. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. F., & Chao, W. H. (2011). Habitual or reasoned? Using the theory of planned behavior, technology acceptance model, and habit to examine switching intentions toward public transit. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14(2), 128–137. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2010.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Gärling, T., & Kitamura, R. (2004). Activity rescheduling: Reasoned or habitual? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(6), 351–371. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2004.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A., & Doherty, S. (2009). Activity rescheduling strategies and decision processes in day-to-day life. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2134), 143–152. doi:10.3141/2134-17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. F., & Doherty, S. T. (2010). A multi-instrumented approach to observing the activity rescheduling decision process. Transportation, 37(1), 165–181. doi:10.1007/s11116-009-9225-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, K. J., & Handy, S. L. (2001). Qualitative methods in travel behaviour research., Davis, California: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T., & Priya Uteng, T. (2008). Gendered mobilities: Towards an holistic understanding. In Cresswell & Priya Uteng (eds), Gendered Mobilities New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, I., & Godson, V. (1975). Urban networks: The structure of activity patterns. Progress in Planning, 4, 1–96. doi:10.1016/0305-9006(75)90006-9.
   Google Scholar
• Dill, J. (2009). Bicycling for transportation and health: The role of infrastructure. Journal of Public Health Policy, 30, Supplement 1, S95–S110. doi:10.1057/jphp.2008.56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doherty, S. T., & Miller, E. J. (2000). A computerized household activity scheduling survey. Transportation, 27(1), 75–97. doi:10.1023/A:1005231926405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A., & Urry, J. (2010). Mobile lives. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M., Hartmann-Petersen, K., Kjærulff, A. A., & Nielsen, L. D. (2017). Interactive environmental planning: Creating utopias and storylines within a mobilities planning project. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(6), 941–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer, S., Ruiz, T., & Mars, M. (2015). A qualitative study on the role of the built environment for short walking trips. Transportation Research Part F, 33, 141–160. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.014.
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to Qualitative Research. Verlag (Hamburg): SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, B., & Abraham, C. (2007). What drives car use? A grounded theory analysis of commuters' reasons for driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 10(3), 187–200. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2006.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, K. N., Sasic, A., Weis, C., & Axhausen, K. (2013). Investigating the nonlinear relationship between transportation system performance and daily activity–travel scheduling behaviour. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 49, 342–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägerstraand, T. (1970). What about people in regional science?. Papers in Regional Science, 24(1), 7–24. doi:10.1111/j.1435-5597.1970.tb01464.x.
   Google Scholar
• Helbich, M., van Emmichoven, M. J. Z., Dijst, M. J., & Kwan, M. P. (2016). Natural and built environmental exposures on children's active school travel: A Dutch global positioning system-based cross-sectional study. Health & Place, 39, 101–109. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.03.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P. M., Dix, M. C., Clarke, M. I., & Heggie, I. G. (1983). Understanding travel behaviour. Aldershot: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, J., Dowling, R., & Maalsen, S. (2017). Catalysts for transport transitions: Bridging the gap between disruptions and change. Journal of Transport Geography, 60, 200–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knafl, K. A., & Breitmayer, B. J. (1989). Triangulation in qualitative research: Issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. Qualitative Nursing Research: A Contemporary Dialogue, 226, 193–203.
   Google Scholar
• Kitamura, R. (1984). Incorporating trip chaining into analysis of destination choice. Transportation Research Part B, 18(1), 67–81. doi:10.1016/0191-2615(84)90007-9.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lois, D., Moriano, J. A., & Rondinella, G. (2015). Cycle commuting intention: A model based on theory of planned behaviour and social identity. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 32, 101–113. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loukopoulos, P., & Gärling, T. (2005). Are car users too lazy to walk? The relationship of distance thresholds for driving to the perceived effort of walking. Transportation Research Record, 1926, 206–211. doi:10.3141/1926-24.
   Google Scholar
• Maibach, E., Steg, L., & Anable, J. (2009). Promoting physical activity and reducing climate change: Opportunities to replace short car trips with active transportation. Preventive Medicine, 49, 326–327. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.06.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manderscheid, K. (2014). The movement problem, the car and post-Fordist mobility: Automobility as dispositif and mode of regulation. Mobilities, Special Issue: Foucault and Mobilities Research, 4/9, 604–626. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.961257.
   Google Scholar
• Mars, L., & Ruiz, T. (2016). Determinants of eliminations decisions in the activity scheduling process. Transportation Letters. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2016.1242882.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370. doi:10.1037/h0054346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateo-Babiano, I. (2016). Pedestrian's needs matters: Examining Manila's walking environment. Transport Policy, 45, 107–115. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milles, M. B., & Hubermann, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McGuckin, N., & Murakami, E. (1999). Examining trip-chaining behavior: Comparison of travel by men and women. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1693, 79–85 doi:10.3141/1693-12.
   Google Scholar
• McGuckin, N., Zmud, J., & Nakamoto, Y. (2005). Trip-chaining trends in the United States: Understanding travel behavior for policy making. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1917, 199–204. doi:10.3141/1917-22.
   Google Scholar
• Millward, H., Spinney, J., & Scott, D. (2013). Active-transport walking behavior: Destinations, durations, distances. Journal of Transport Geography, 28, 101–110. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtarian, P. (2005). The positive utility of travel. Transportation Research -Special Issue, 39A, 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtarian, P. (2005b). Travel as a desired end, not just a means. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2), 93–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijland, E. L., Arentze, T. A., Borgers, A. W., & Timmermans, H. J. (2009). Individuals' activity–travel rescheduling behaviour: Experiment and model-based analysis. Environment and Planning A, 41(6), 1511–1522. doi:10.1068/a4134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, P. (2005). Exchanging travel speed: Time politics in mobility practices. Configurations, 13(3), 395–419. doi:10.1353/con.2007.0025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rau, H, & Edmondson, R. (2013). Time and sustainability. In: F. Fahy & H. Rau (eds). Methods of sustainability research in the social sciences (pp. 173–190). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roorda, M. J., Miller, E. J., & Habib, K. M. (2008). Validation of TASHA: A 24-h activity scheduling microsimulation model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(2), 360–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, T. (2005). The design and implementation of an activity scheduling survey using the internet. In H. Timmermans (ed.) Progress in Activity-Based Analysis, pp. 373–388, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, T., & García-Garcés, P. (2015). Measuring the impact of travel behavior change programs on the activity scheduling process. Transportation Letters, 7(2), 104–113. doi:10.1179/1942787514Y.0000000037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sattlegger, L., & Rau, H. (2016). Carlessness in a car‐centric world: A reconstructive approach to qualitative mobility biographies research. Journal of Transport Geography, 53, 22–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S., Allen, D., & Liu, J. (2008). Public transit training: A mechanism to increase ridership among older adults. Institute of Transportation Studies. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2000). The city and the car. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(4), 737–757. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1975). Introduction to qualitative research method. A phenomenological approach to the social sciences., New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. O., Walker, I., & Musselwhite, C. (2014). Grounded theory analysis of commuters discussing a workplace carbon-reduction target: Autonomy, satisfaction, and willingness to change behaviour in drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, motorcyclists, and bus users. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 26, 72–81. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuerzer, T., & Mason, S. G. (2015). Cycling willingness: Investigating distance as a dependent variable in cycling behavior among college students. Applied Geography, 60, 95–106. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Znaniecki, F. (1934). The method of sociology. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.
   Google Scholar