Dynamic linear models to predict bike availability in a bike sharing system

References

• Almannaa, M., Elhenawy, M., & Rakha, H. (2019). A novel supervised clustering algorithm for transportation system applications. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Valdes, R., Belenguer, J. M., Benavent, E., Bermudez, J. D., Muñoz, F., Vercher, E., & Verdejo, F. (2016). Optimizing the level of service quality of a bike-sharing system. Omega, 163–175. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashqar, H., Elhenawy, M., Almannaa, M., Ghanem, A., Rakha, H. A., & House, L. (2017). Modeling bike availability in a bike-sharing system using machine learning. Paper presented at the 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems, Napoli, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Ashqar, H. I., Elhenawy, M., Ghanem, A., Almannaa, M. H., & Rakha, H. A. (2018). Quantifying the effect of various features on the modeling of bike counts in a bike-sharing system. Transportation Research Board 98th Annual Meeting, Washington DC,USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Hillel, A., Hertz, N., Shental, T., & Weinshall, D. (2003). Learning distance functions using equivalence relations. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-03). Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• bayareabikeshare. (2016). Introducing bay area bike share, your new regional transit system. Retrieved from from http://www.bayareabikeshare.com/faq#BikeShare101.
   Google Scholar
• Daddio, D. W., & Mcdonald, N. (2012). Maximizing bicycle sharing: An empirical analysis of capital bikeshare usage. University of North Carolina, Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• DeMaio, P. (2009). Bike-sharing: History, impacts, models of provision, and future. Journal of Public Transportation, 12(4), 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Demiriz, A., Bennett, K. P., & Embrechts, M. J. (1999). Semi-supervised clustering using genetic algorithms. Paper presented at the Artificial Neural Networks in Engineering (ANNIE-99), 809–814. Missouri, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Espegren, H. M., Kristianslund, H., Andersson, J., & Fagerholt, K. (2016). The static bicycle repositioning problem-literature survey and new formulation. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computational Logistics, Springer. Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Etienne, C., & Latifa, O. (2014). Model-based count series clustering for bike sharing system usage mining: A case study with the velib' system of Paris. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 5(3), 1–21. doi: 10.1145/2560188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, C., Hillston, J., & Reijsbergen, D. (2017). Moment-based availability prediction for bike-sharing systems. Performance Evaluation, 117, 58–74. doi: 10.1016/j.peva.2017.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricker, C., & Gast, N. (2016). Incentives and redistribution in homogeneous bike-sharing systems with stations of finite capacity. Euro Journal on Transportation and Logistics, 5(3), 261–291. doi: 10.1007/s13676-014-0053-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froehlich, J., Neumann, J., & Oliver, N. (2009). Sensing and predicting the pulse of the city through shared bicycling. IJCAI. Pasadena, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gallop, C., Tse, C., & Zhao, J. (2011). A seasonal autoregressive model of Vancouver bicycle traffic using weather variables. i-Manager's Journal on Civil Engineering, 1(4), 9. doi: 10.26634/jce.1.4.1694
   Google Scholar
• Gast, N., Massonnet, D., Reijsbergen, G., & Tribastone, M. (2015). Probabilistic forecasts of bike-sharing systems for journey planning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, ACM. Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., & West, M. (1999). Bayesian forecasting & dynamic models. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jerez, J. M., Molina, I., García-Laencina, P. J., Alba, E., Ribelles, N., Martín, M., & Franco, L. (2010). Missing data imputation using statistical and machine learning methods in a real breast cancer problem. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 50(2), 105–115. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2010.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenbrunner, A., Meza, R., Grivolla, J., Codina, J., & Banchs, R. (2010). Urban cycles and mobility patterns: Exploring and predicting trends in a bicycle-based public transport system. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 6(4), 455–466. doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2010.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petris, G., Petrone, S., & Campagnoli, P. (2009). Dynamic Linear models with R. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas; Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pfrommer, J., Warrington, J., Schildbach, G., & Morari, M. (2014). Dynamic vehicle redistribution and online price incentives in shared mobility systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15(4), 1567–1578. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2014.2303986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regue, R., & Recker, W. (2014). Proactive vehicle routing with inferred demand to solve the bikesharing rebalancing problem. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 72, 192–209. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2014.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rixey, R. (2013). Station-level forecasting of bikesharing ridership: Station network effects in three US systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2387(1), 46–55. doi: 10.3141/2387-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudloff, C., & Lackner, B. (2014). Modeling demand for bikesharing systems: Neighboring stations as source for demand and reason for structural breaks. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2430(1), 1–11. doi: 10.3141/2430-01
   Google Scholar
• Schuijbroek, J., Hampshire, R., & van Hoeve, W.-J. (2017). Inventory rebalancing and vehicle routing in bike sharing systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 257(3), 992–1004.
   Google Scholar
• Singla, A., Santoni, M., Bartók, G., Mukerji, P., Meenen, M., & Krause, A. (2015). Incentivizing users for balancing bike sharing systems. AAAI. Austin, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Sinkkonen, J., Kaski, S., & Nikkilä, J. (2002). Discriminative clustering: Optimal contingency tables by learning metrics. European conference on machine learning. Springer. Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, P., Greiser, T., & Mattfeld, D. C. (2011). Understanding bike-sharing systems using data mining: Exploring activity patterns. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 514–523. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.058
   Google Scholar
• Wang, B., & Kim, I. (2018). Short-term prediction for bike-sharing service using machine learning. Transportation Research Procedia, 34, 171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2018.11.029
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Lindsey, G., Schoner, J. E., & Harrison, A. (2016). Modeling bike share station activity: Effects of nearby businesses and jobs on trips to and from stations. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 142(1), 04015001. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, C., Ji, J., Liu, P., & Peng, L. (2018). Forecasting the travel demand of the station-free sharing bike using a deep learning approach. Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, J. W., Pinelli, F., & Calabrese, F. (2012). Cityride: A predictive bike sharing journey advisor. IEEE. Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
   Google Scholar