eHUBs—Identifying the potential early and late adopters of shared electric mobility hubs

References

• Acheampong, R. A., & Siiba, A. (2020). Modelling the determinants of car-sharing adoption intentions among young adults: The role of attitude, perceived benefits, travel expectations and socio-demographic factors. Transportation, 47(5), 2557–2580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10029-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-González, M. J., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., van Oort, N., Cats, O., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2020). Drivers and barriers in adopting Mobility as a Service (MaaS) – A latent class cluster analysis of attitudes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 132, 378–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosino, G., Nelson, J. D., & Gini, S. (2016). The pivotal role of Public Transport in designing the integration of mobility services and in operating MaaS offer: The concept of Shared Mobility Centre and the experience of Arezzo. In REAL CORP 2016–SMART ME UP! How to become and how to stay a Smart City, and does this improve quality of life? Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society (pp. 737–747). CORP–Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., Blanchard, S. D., Cheah, D., & Levitt, D. (2017). Incorporating equity and resiliency in municipal transportation planning: Case study of mobility hubs in Oakland, California. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2653(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.3141/2653-08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson-Hall, K., Bordenkircher, B., O'Neil, R., & Scott, S. C. (2019). Governing micro-mobility: A nationwide assessment of electric scooter regulations (No. 19-05267). Transportation Research Board 98th Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Atchley, W. R. (2007). Introduction to principal components and factor analysis. Retrieved September 24, 2020, from ftp://statgen.ncsu.edu/pub/thorne/molevoclass/AtchleyOct19.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Blondiau, T., & Zeebroeck, B. V. (2014). Cycling works. Jobs and job creation in the cycling economy. European Cyclists’ Federation. Retrieved October 1, 2020, from https://repository.difu.de/jspui/bitstream/difu/232402/1/DS1369.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Burghard, U., & Dütschke, E. (2019). Who wants shared mobility? Lessons from early adopters and mainstream drivers on electric carsharing in Germany. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 71, 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carteni, A., Henke, I., Molitierno, C., & Errico, A. (2020). Towards E-mobility: Strengths and weaknesses of electric vehicles. In L. Barolli, F. Amato, F. Moscato, T. Enokido, & M. Takizawa (Eds.), Web, artificial intelligence and network applications. WAINA 2020. Advances in intelligent systems and computing (vol. 1150). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44038-1_126
   Google Scholar
• CBS. (2021). Population dashboard (cbs.nl). Retrieved July 25, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Ciari, F., & Becker, H. (2017). How disruptive can shared mobility be? A scenario-based evaluation of shared mobility systems implemented at large scale. In G. Meyer & S. Shaheen (Eds.), Disrupting mobility (pp. 51–63). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Claasen, Y. (2020). Potential effects of mobility hubs: Intention to use shared modes and the intention to reduce household car ownership (Master's thesis). University of Twente. Retrieved September 16, 2020, from http://essay.utwente.nl/81537/
   Google Scholar
• Correia, G., & Viegas, J. M. (2011). Carpooling and carpool clubs: Clarifying concepts and assessing value enhancement possibilities through a Stated Preference web survey in Lisbon, Portugal. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(2), 81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, J., Loo, B. P., & Lin, D. (2017). Travel behaviour and mobility needs of older adults in an ageing and car-dependent society. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 21(2), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2016.1262785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, G. (2018). Lies, damned lies, AVs, shared mobility, and urban transit futures. Journal of Public Transportation, 21(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.21.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte City Mobility Index: Amsterdam. Deloitte insights. Retrieved October 1, 2020, from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/4331_Deloitte-City-Mobility-Index/city-mobility-index_AMSTERDAM_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Donald, I. J., Cooper, S. R., & Conchie, S. M. (2014). An extended theory of planned behaviour model of the psychological factors affecting commuters’ transport mode use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutch Census. (2011). Dutch census 2011 (cbs.nl). Retrieved July 25, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Eccarius, T., & Lu, C. C. (2020). Adoption intentions for micro-mobility – Insights from electric scooter sharing in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 84, 102327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliot, R., Hong, C., & Hughey, M. (2020). Creating mobility hubs to connect transportation modes. Resilient Communities Project (RCP), University of Minnesota. Retrieved September 16, 2020, from https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/214104
   Google Scholar
• Faber, V. (1994). Clustering and the continuous k-means algorithm. Los Alamos Science, 22, 138–144.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, K. L. (2018). Social equity considerations in the new age of transportation: Electric, automated, and shared mobility. Journal of Science Policy & Governance, 13(1). https://www.sciencepolicyjournal.org/jspgvol13.html
   Google Scholar
• Gössling, S. (2020). Integrating e-scooters in urban transportation: Problems, policies, and the prospect of system change. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 79, 102230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, W., Goodkind, D., & Kowal, P. R. (2016). An aging world: 2015. U.S. Census Bureau, International Population Reports, P95/16-1. U.S. Government Publishing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Heinen, E. (2016). Identity and travel behaviour: A cross-sectional study on commute mode choice and intention to change. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 43, 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkeldein, D., Schoenduwe, R., Graff, A., & Hoffmann, C. (2015). Who would use integrated sustainable mobility services – and why? In M. Attard & Y. Shiftan (Eds.), Sustainable urban transport (Vol. 7, pp. 177–203). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• Hoerler, R., & Hoppe, M. (2019). Commuter segmentation and openness to sharing services: A Swiss case study. ZHAW Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw-18749
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, J., Copeland, B., & Johnson, J. X. (2019). Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters. Environmental Research Letters, 14(8), 084031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, O., Swiderski, J. I., Hicks, J., Teoman, D., & Buehler, R. (2019). Pedestrians and e-scooters: An initial look at e-scooter parking and perceptions by riders and non-riders. Sustainability, 11(20), 5591. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing, P., Huang, H., Ran, B., Zhan, F., & Shi, Y. (2019). Exploring the factors affecting mode choice Intention of autonomous vehicle based on an extended theory of planned behavior—A case study in China. Sustainability, 11(4), 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketchen, D. J., & Shook, C. L. (1996). The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal, 17(6), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199606)17:6<441::AID-SMJ819>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodransky, M., & Lewenstein, G. (2014). Connecting low-income people to opportunity with shared mobility. Institute for Transportation & Development Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Kodukula, S., Rudolph, F., Jansen, U., & Amon, E. (2018). Living. Moving. Breathing. Wuppertal Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lavieri, P. S., & Bhat, C. R. (2019). Investigating objective and subjective factors influencing the adoption, frequency, and characteristics of ride-hailing trips. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 105, 100–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Vine, S., & Polak, J. (2015). Introduction to special issue: New directions in shared-mobility research. Transportation, 42(3), 407–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9603-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Shen, J., & Jia, B. (2021). Exploring intention to use shared electric bicycles by the extended theory of planned behaviour. Sustainability, 13(8), 4137. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linting, M., Meulman, J. J., Groenen, P. J. F., & van der Koojj, A. J. (2007). Nonlinear principal components analysis: Introduction and application. Psychological Methods, 12(3), 336–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.3.336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D., Du, H., Southworth, F., & Ma, S. (2017). The influence of social-psychological factors on the intention to choose low-carbon travel modes in Tianjin, China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 105, 42–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, C. A. S., De Salles Hue, N. P. M., Berssaneti, F. T., & Quintanilha, J. A. (2018). An overview of shared mobility. Sustainability, 10(12), 4342. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, E. J., & Kim, J. (2019). The misuse of the diffusion of innovation. Retrieved October 2, 2020, from https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/blogs/technology-and-learning/misuse-diffusion-innovation
   Google Scholar
• Manders, T., Cox, R., Wieczorek, A., & Verbong, G. (2020). The ultimate smart mobility combination for sustainable transport? A case study on shared electric automated mobility initiatives in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 5, 100129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100129
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, G., Anable, J., Bray, J., Seagriff, E., & Spurling, N. (2019). Shared mobility: Where now? where next?. The second report of the Commission on Travel Demand. Centre for Research into Energy Demand Solutions. ISBN: 978-1-913299-01-9.
   Google Scholar
• Mattia, G., Mugion, R. G., & Principato, L. (2019). Shared mobility as a driver for sustainable consumptions: The intention to re-use free-floating car sharing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milakis, D., Gebhardt, L., Ehebrecht, D., & Lenz, B. (2020). Is micro-mobility sustainable? An overview of implications for accessibility, air pollution, safety, physical activity, and subjective wellbeing. In C. Curtis (Ed.), Handbook of sustainable transport. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. R., Hovmøller, H., Blyth, P. L., & Sovacool, B. K. (2015). Of “white crows” and “cash savers:” A qualitative study of travel behavior and perceptions of ridesharing in Denmark. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 113–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikiforiadis, A., Chrysostomou, K., & Aifadopoulou, G. (2019). Exploring travelers’ characteristics affecting their intention to shift to bike-sharing systems due to a sophisticated mobile app. Algorithms, 12(12), 264. https://doi.org/10.3390/a12120264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero, I., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., & Rojas-Rueda, D. (2018). Health impacts of bike sharing systems in Europe. Environment International, 115, 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimentel, R., & Lowry, M. (2020). If you provide, will they ride? Motivators and deterrents to shared micro-mobility. Pacific Northwest Transportation Consortium [136]. Retrieved September 15, 2020, from http://hdl.handle.net/1773/45598
   Google Scholar
• Punj, G., & Stewart, D. W. (1983). Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378302000204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes García, J. R., Lenz, G., Haveman, S. P., & Bonnema, G. M. (2019). State of the art of electric Mobility as a Service (eMaaS): An overview of ecosystems and system architectures. 32nd International Electric Vehicle Symposium (EVS32). Retrieved September 16, 2020, from https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/117977192/EVS32_1.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Santi, P., & Ratti, C. (2017). A future of shared mobility. Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal, 10(4), 328–333.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, G. (2018). Sustainability and shared mobility models. Sustainability, 10(9), 3194. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semanjski, I., & Gautama, S. (2016). Crowdsourcing mobility insights–Reflection of attitude based segments on high resolution mobility behaviour data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 71, 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S. A., Bansal, A., Chan, N., & Cohen, A. (2016). Mobility and the sharing economy: Industry developments and early understanding of impacts. Transport Policy, 51(Supplement C), 141–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.008
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S., & Chan, N. (2016). Mobility and the sharing economy: Potential to facilitate the first-and last-mile public transit connections. Built Environment, 42(4), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.42.4.573
   Google Scholar
• Si, H., Shi, J., Tang, D., Wu, G., & Lan, J. (2020). Understanding intention and behavior toward sustainable usage of bike sharing by extending the theory of planned behavior. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 152, 104513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, A. S., Martinez, L. M., Correia, G. H., Guimarães, D. C., & Farias, T. L. (2017). Environmental and financial impacts of adopting alternative vehicle technologies and relocation strategies in station-based one-way carsharing: An application in the city of Lisbon, Portugal. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 57, 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., Ma, Q., Wang, Z., Cai, Q., Xie, K., & Yang, D. (2020). Safety of micro-mobility: Analysis of E-Scooter crashes by mining news reports. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 143, 105608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., Yi, W., Feng, Y., & Liu, J. (2018). Understanding the intention to use commercial bike-sharing systems: An integration of TAM and TPB. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January).
   Google Scholar