The impact of attitudes on bicycle-oriented and car-oriented attitudes for non-work travel: A hybrid choice model

References

• Aghasi, M., Matinfar, A., Golzarand, M., Salari-Moghaddam, A., & Ebrahimpour-Koujan, S. (2019). Internet use in relation to overweight and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies. Advances in Nutrition, 11(2), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmz073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 79–211. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akar, G., & Clifton, K. J. (2009). Influence of individual perceptions and bicycle infrastructure on decision to bike. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2140(1), 65–172. https://doi.org/10.3141/2140-18
   Google Scholar
• Akar, G., Fischer, N., & Namgung, M. (2013). Bicycling choice and gender case study: The Ohio State University. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7(5), 47–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2012.673694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daziano, R. A., & Bolduc, D. (2013). Incorporating pro-environmental preferences towards green automobile technologies through a Bayesian hybrid choice model. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science,9, 74–106.
   Google Scholar
• Atasoy, B., Glerum, A., & Bierlaire, M. (2013). Attitudes towards mode choice in Switzerland. disP - the Planning Review, 49(2), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2013.827518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberg, S., & Schmidt, P. (1994). Auto order Fahrrad? Empirischer test einer Handlungstheorie… [Automobile or bicycle? Empirical test of a utility-theory approach…]. Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 46(1), 80–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M. E., Walker, J. L., Bernardino, A. T., Gopinath, D., Morikawa, T., & Polydoropoulou, A. (1999). Integration of choice and latent variable models.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R. (1997). An endogenous segmentation mode choice model with an application to intercity travel. Transportation Science, 31(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.31.1.34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R. (1998). Accommodating variations in responsiveness to level-of-service measures in travel mode choice modeling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 32(7), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00011-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., & Dubey, S. K. (2014). A new estimation approach to integrate latent psychological constructs in choice modeling. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 67, 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2014.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R., Dubey, S. K., & Nagel, K. (2015). Introducing non-normality of latent psychological constructs in choice modeling with an application to bicyclist route choice. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 78, 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2015.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Handy, S. L. (2009). Examining the impacts of residential self‐selection on travel behaviour: A focus on empirical findings. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 359–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640802539195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X., Xu, Z., & Fan, Y. (2010). Exploring the connections among residential location, self-selection, and driving: Propensity score matching with multiple treatments. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 44(10), 797–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Handy, S. L. (2007). Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A structural equations modeling approach. Transportation, 34(5), 535–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9132-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (2007). Transit-oriented development’s ridership bonus: A product of self-selection and public policies. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 39(9), 2068–2085. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorus, C. G., & Kroesen, M. (2014). On the (im-)possibility of deriving transport policy implications from hybrid choice models. Transport Policy, 36, 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P. S., ACSM, & Brawner, C A. (2013). ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. https://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=hhosAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=ASCM+resource+manual+for+guidelines+for+exercise+testing+and+prescription&ots=ljA96F1YQu&sig=fFmD3XQq21IWlrXHE3T6ofRPqlI
   Google Scholar
• de Bruijn, G.-J., Kremers, S. P. J., Schaalma, H., van Mechelen, W., & Brug, J. (2005). Determinants of adolescent bicycle use for transportation and snacking behavior. Preventive Medicine, 40(6), 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Kruijf, J., Ettema, D., Kamphuis, C. B. M., & Dijst, M. (2018). Evaluation of an incentive program to stimulate the shift from car commuting to e-cycling in the Netherlands. Journal of Transport & Health, 10, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., Bordagaray, M., Ortúzar, J., & de, D. (2014). Modeling the effects of pro bicycle infrastructure and policies toward sustainable urban mobility. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 140(2), 4014001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, J. E., Kingham, S., Copsey, S., & Hougie, D. J. P. (2003). Employer travel plans, cycling and gender: Will travel plan measures improve the outlook for cycling to work in the UK? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 8(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(02)00018-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dill, J., & Voros, K. (2007). Factors affecting bicycling demand: Initial survey findings from the Portland. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2031(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.3141/2031-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2001). The influence of land use on travel behavior: Empirical strategies. Transportation Research, Policy and Practice, 35, 823–845.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Heredia, Á., Jara-Díaz, S., & Monzón, A. (2016). Modelling bicycle use intention: The role of perceptions. Transportation, 43(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9559-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, E. (2016). Cycling as transport. Transport Reviews, 36(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1114271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, L., Bradley, M., Kavage, S., Chapman, J., & Lawton, T. K. (2007). Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice. Transportation, 35(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-007-9136-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, L. D. (2000). Land use and transportation interaction: Implications on public health and quality of life. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 20(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/073945600128992564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, L. D., & Engelke, P. O. (2001). The built environment and human activity patterns: Exploring the impacts of urban form on public health. Journal of Planning Literature, 16(2), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854120122093339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, L. D., Schmid, T. L., Sallis, J. F., Chapman, J., & Saelens, B. E. (2005). Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, J., Ettema, D., Helbich, M., & Kamphuis, C. B. M. (2019). Travel mode attitudes, urban context, and demographics: Do they interact differently for bicycle commuting and cycling for other purposes? Transportation, 46(6), 2441–2463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10005-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guevara, C. A., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2006). Endogeneity in residential location choice models. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1977(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106197700108
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, M., Cantillo, V., Arellana, J., & Ortúzar, J. d D. (2021). Estimating bicycle demand in an aggressive environment. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(4), 259–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1734886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, M., Hurtubia, R., & Ortúzar, J. d D. (2020). The role of habit and the built environment in the willingness to commute by bicycle. Travel Behaviour and Society, 20, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, K. N., Mann, J., Mahmoud, M., & Weiss, A. (2014). Synopsis of bicycle demand in the City of Toronto: Investigating the effects of perception, consciousness and comfortability on the purpose of biking and bike ownership. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 70, 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, S. (2005). Smart growth and the transportation-land use connection: What does the research tell us? International Regional Science Review, 28(2), 146–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017604273626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, S., Cao, X., & Mokhtarian, P. (2005). Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 10(6), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, S., Cao, X., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2006). Self-selection in the relationship between the built environment and walking: Empirical evidence from Northern California. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, S. L., Boarnet, M. G., Ewing, R., & Killingsworth, R. E. (2002). How the built environment affects physical activity: Views from urban planning. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2), 64–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen, E., Maat, K., & Van Wee, B. (2011). The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(2), 02–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen, E., Maat, K., & van Wee, B. (2013). The effect of work-related factors on the bicycle commute mode choice in the Netherlands. Transportation, 40(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-012-9399-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen, E., Wee, B., & van Maat, K. (2010). Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature. Transport Reviews, 30(1), 59–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640903187001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., Schaap, N. T. W., & OldeKalter, M.-J. (2015). The Netherlands mobility panel: An innovative design approach for web-based longitudinal travel data collection. Transportation Research Procedia, 11, 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.027
   Google Scholar
• Hunecke, M., Blöbaum, A., Matthies, E., & Höger, R. (2001). Responsibility and environment: Ecological norm orientation and external factors in the domain of travel mode choice behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33(6), 830–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal, S., Habib, M. A., & Khan, N. A. (2017). Does the use of smartphone influence travel outcome? An investigation on the determinants of the impact of smartphone use on vehicle kilometres travelled. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 2690–2704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.201
   Google Scholar
• Kamargianni, M., Dubey, S., Polydoropoulou, A., & Bhat, C. (2015). Investigating the subjective and objective factors influencing teenagers’ school travel mode choice – An integrated choice and latent variable model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamargianni, M., & Polydoropoulou, A. (2013). Hybrid choice model to investigate effects of Teenagers’ attitudes toward walking and cycling on mode choice behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2382(1), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.3141/2382-17
   Google Scholar
• Kemperman, A., & Timmerman, H. (2009). Influences of built environment on walking and cycling by latent segments of aging population. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2134(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3141/2134-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. C., Stokols, D., Talen, E., Brassington, G. S., & Killingsworth, R. (2002). Theoretical approaches to the promotion of physical activity: Forging a transdisciplinary paradigm. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00470-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroesen, M. (2017). To what extent do e-bikes substitute travel by other modes? Evidence from the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 53, 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I., Park, H., & Sohn, K. (2012). Increasing the number of bicycle commuters. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport, 165(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1680/tran.10.00024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Hinarejos, R., Sivakumar, A., & Polak, J. W. (2014). Exploring the role of individual attitudes and perceptions in predicting the demand for cycling: A hybrid choice modelling approach. Transportation, 41(6), 1287–1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9551-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1986). The choice theory approach to market research. Marketing Science, 5(4), 75–297. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.5.4.275
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, L., Van Cauwenberg, J., Ghekiere, A., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Deforche, B., Van de Weghe, N., & Van Dyck, D. (2016). Differences in environmental preferences towards cycling for transport among adults: A latent class analysis. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 782.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mokhtarian, P. L., & Cao, X. (2008). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: A focus on methodologies. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 42(3), 204–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2007.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motoaki, Y., & Daziano, R. A. (2015). A hybrid-choice latent-class model for the analysis of the effects of weather on cycling demand. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 75, 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moudon, A. V., Lee, C., Cheadle, A. D., Collier, C. W., Johnson, D., Schmid, T. L., & Weather, R. D. (2005). Cycling and the built environment, a US perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 10(3), 45–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2005.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz, B., Monzon, A., & Daziano, R. A. (2016). The increasing role of latent variables in modelling bicycle mode choice. Transport Reviews, 36(6), 737–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1162874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz, B., Monzon, A., & Lois, D. (2013). Cycling habits and other psychological variables affecting commuting by bicycle in Madrid. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2382(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3141/2382-01
   Google Scholar
• Noland, R. B., & Kunreuther, H. (1995). Short-run and long-run policies for increasing bicycle transportation for daily commuter trips. Transport Policy, 2(1), 7–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-070X(95)93248-W
   Google Scholar
• Oliva, I., Galilea, P., & Hurtubia, R. (2018). Identifying cycling-inducing neighborhoods: A latent class approach. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(10), 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1431822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paix, L. L., Cherchi, E., & Geurs, K. (2021). Role of perception of bicycle infrastructure on the choice of the bicycle as a train feeder mode. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(6), 486–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1765223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, D., & Stradling, S. (2001). Influencing driver attitudes and behaviour: Road safety research report No. 17. Department of the EnVironment, Transport and the Regions (DETR).
   Google Scholar
• Pucher, J., Komanoff, C., & Schimek, P. (1999). Bicycling renaissance in North America: Recent trends and alternative policies to promote bicycling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 33(7–8), 625–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00010-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puello, L. L. P., & Geurs, K. (2015). Modelling observed and unobserved factors in cycling to railway stations: Application to transit-oriented-developments in the Netherlands. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 15(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2015.15.1.3057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossetti, T., Saud, V., & Hurtubia, R. (2019). I want to ride it where I like: Measuring design preferences in cycling infrastructure. Transportation, 46(3), 697–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9830-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallis, J. F., Frank, L. D., Saelens, B. E., & Kraft, M. K. (2004). Active transportation and physical activity: Opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 38(4), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2003.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salon, D. (2006). Cars and the City: An investigation of transportation and residential location choices in New York City. University of California Transportation Center. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1br223vz
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, F., Ton, D., Zomer, L.-B., Daamen, W., Duives, D., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2021). Trip chain complexity: A comparison among latent classes of daily mobility patterns. Transportation, 48, 953–975.
   Google Scholar
• Sener, I. N., & Reeder, P. R. (2014). An integrated analysis of workers’ physically active activity and active travel choice behavior. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 67, 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsekoglu, Ö., & Klöckner, C. A. (2019). The role of psychological and socio-demographical factors for electric bike use in Norway. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13(5), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1466221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sottile, E., Teulada, B. S., di, Meloni, I., & Cherchi, E. (2019). Estimation and validation of hybrid choice models to identify the role of perception in the choice to cycle. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13(8), 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1490465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson, M. A., & Bhat, C. R. (2004). Frequency of bicycle commuting: Internet-based survey analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1878(1), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.3141/1878-15
   Google Scholar
• Ton, D., Duives, D. C., Cats, O., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., & Hoogendoorn, S. P. (2019). Cycling or walking? Determinants of mode choice in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 123, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ton, D., Zomer, L.-B., Schneider, F., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., Duives, D., Cats, O., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2019). Latent classes of daily mobility patterns: The relationship with attitudes towards modes. Transportation, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K. E., McFadden, D. L., & Goett, A. A. (1987). Consumer attitudes and voluntary rate schedules for public utilities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(3), 83–391. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verduzco Torres, J. R., Hong, J., & McArthur, D. P. (2021). How do psychological, habitual and built environment factors influence cycling in a city with a well-connected cycling infrastructure? International Journal of Urban Sciences, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1930111
   Google Scholar
• Vij, A., & Walker, J. L. (2016). How, when and why integrated choice and latent variable models are latently useful. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 90(C), 192–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.04.021
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D., Xiang, Z., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2016). Smartphone use in everyday life and travel. Journal of Travel Research, 55(1), 2–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287514535847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. (2019). Prevalence of insufficient physical activity. WHO. Retrieved May 21, 2019, from http://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/physical_activity_text/en/
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, J., Tainio, M., Cheshire, J., O’Brien, O., & Goodman, A. (2014). Health effects of the London bicycle sharing system: Health impact modelling study. BMJ, 348, g425. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Z., & Zhao, J. (2020). Car pride and its behavioral implications: An exploration in Shanghai. Transportation, 47(2), 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9917-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, B., & Kockelman, K. M. (2008). Self-selection in home choice: Use of treatment effects in evaluating relationship between built environment and travel behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2077(1), 4–61. https://doi.org/10.3141/2077-08
   Google Scholar