REFERENCES
- Bagley DM, Cerven D, Harbell J. Assessment of the chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay (CAMVA) in the COLIPA in vitro eye irritation validation study. Toxicol Vitro 1999; 13: 285–293.
- Bagley DM, Waters D, Kong GM. Development of a 10-day chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay as an alternative to the Draize rabbit eye irritation test. Food Chem oxicol 1994; 32: 1155–1160.
- Bantseev V, McCanna D, Banh A, Wong WW, Moran KL, Dixon DG, Trevithick JR, Sivak JG. Mechanisms of ocular toxicity using the in vitro bovine lens and sodium dodecyl sulfate as a chemical model. Toxicol Sci 2003; 73: 98–107.
- Boue-Grabot M, Bernardin G, Chaumond S, Pinon JF. Alternative methods: hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane and in vitro cytotoxicity – a complementary approach. Int J Cosmet Sci 1995; 17: 207–215.
- Bruner LH, de Silva O, Earl LK, Easty DL, Pape W, Spielmann H. Report on the colipa workshop on mechanisms of eye irritation. ATLA 1998; 26: 811–820.
- Doucet O, Lanvian M, Zastrow L. Comparison of three in vitro methods for the assessment of the eye-irritating potential of formulated cosmetic products. Vitro Mol Toxicol 1999; 12: 63–76.
- Fisher RG, Paller BS, Ziets GA, Ginn GL, Rachui SR. Predicting in vivo eye irritation potential using a tissue equivalent assay and a bovine corneal opacity and permeability test. In Vitro Toxicol 1995; 8: 139–147.
- Gilleron L, Coecke S, Sysmans M, Hansen E, van Oproy S, Marzin D, van Cauteren H, Vanparys Ph. Evaluation of a modified het-cam assay as a screening test for eye irritancy. Toxicol Vitro 1996; 10: 431–446.
- Gilleron L, Coecke S, Sysmans M, Hansen E, van Oproy S, Marzin D, van Cauteren H, Vanparys Ph. Evaluation of the het-cam-tsa method as an alternative to the Draize eye irritation test. Toxicol Vitro 1997; 11: 641–644.
- Hagino S, Kinoshita S, Tani N, Nakamura T, Ono N, Konish K, Iimura H, Kojima H, Ohno Y. Interlaboratory validation of in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients. (2) chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) test. Toxicol Vitro 1999; 13: 99–113.
- Kojima H, Hanamura A, Miyamoto S, Sato A, Konishi H, Yoshimura I. Evaluation of seven alternative assays on the main ingredients in cosmetics as predictors of Draize eye irritation scores. Toxicol Vitro 1995; 9: 333–340.
- Lordo RA, Feder PI, Gettings SD. Comparing and evaluating alternative (in vitro) tests on their ability to predict the Draize maximum average score. Toxicol Vitro 1999; 13: 45–72.
- Luepke NP. Hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane test for irritation potential. Food Chem Toxicol 1985; 9: 287–291.
- Ohno Y, Kaneko T, Inoue T, Morikawa Y, Yoshida T, Fujii A, Masuda M, Ohno T, Hayashi M, Momma J, Uchiyama T, Chiba K, Ikeda N, Imanishi Y, Itakagaki H, Kakishima H, Kasai Y, Kurishita A, Kojima H, Matsukawa K, Nakamura T, Ohkoshi K, Okumura H, Saijo K, Sakamoto K, Suzuki T, Takano K, Tatsumi H, Tani N, Usami M, Watanabe R. Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients. (1) overview of the validation study and Draize scores for the evaluation of the tests. Toxicol Vitro 1999; 13: 73–98.
- Spielmann H, Kalweit S, Liebsch M, Wirnsberger T, Gerner I, Bertram-Neis E, Krauser K, Kreiling R, Miltenburger HG, Pape W, Steiling W. Validation study of alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test in Germany: cytotoxicity testing and het-cam test with 136 industrial chemicals. Toxicol Vitro 1993; 7: 505–510.
- Steiling W, Bracher M, Courtellemont P, de Silva O. The HET-CAM, a useful in vitro assay for assessing the eye irritation properties of cosmetic formulations and ingredients. Toxicol Vitro 1999; 13: 375–384.