132
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Further optimisation of a macromolecular ocular irritation test (OptiSafeTM)

, , &
Pages 38-48 | Received 05 Oct 2021, Accepted 27 Nov 2022, Published online: 28 Jan 2023

References

  • EPA. Background review document of an in vitro approach for EPA toxicity labeling of anti-microbial cleaning products; 2008. Available from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.401.5509&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  • UN. Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS), ST/SG/AC.10/30/Rev.4. New York and Geneva: United Nations Publications; 2011. Available from: https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/English/ST-SG-AC10-30-Rev4e.pdf.
  • UN. Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS), ST/SG/AC.10/30/Rev.9. New York and Geneva: United Nations Publications; 2021. Available from: https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev04/English/ST-SG-AC10-30-Rev4e.pdf.
  • Lebrun S, Xie Y, Chavez S, et al. An in vitro depth of injury prediction model of a histopathologic classification of EPA and GHS eye irritants. Toxicol in Vitro. 2019;2019:104628.
  • Humane Society International. Rabbits: blinded for beauty [online]; 2013. Available from: https://www.hsi.org/news-media/blinded_rabbits/.
  • H.R.5141. Humane Cosmetics Act of 2019. 116th Congress. (Introduced 11/18/2019) [online]; 2019. Available from: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5141/all-info.
  • Sreedhar D, Manjula N, Pise A, et al. Ban of cosmetic testing on animals: a brief overview. IJCRR. 2020;12(14):113–116.
  • OECD. 2022. Test No. 467: defined approaches for serious eye damage and eye irritation, OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, section 4. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Alépée N, Adriaens E, Abo T, et al. Development of a defined approach for eye irritation or serious eye damage for liquids, neat and in dilution, based on cosmetics Europe analysis of in vitro STE and BCOP test methods. Toxicol in Vitro. 2019;57:154–163.
  • Choksi N, Lebrun S, Nguyen M, et al. Validation of the OptiSafeTM eye irritation test. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2020;39(3):180–192.
  • Lebrun S, Nguyen L, Chavez S, et al. Same-chemical comparison of non-animal eye irritation test methods: bovine corneal permeability, EpiOcular™, isolated chicken eye, ocular irritection®, OptiSafe™, and short time exposure. Toxicol in Vitro. 2020;72:105070.
  • Lebrun SJ, Chavez S, Chan R, et al. Modeling the antioxidant properties of the eye reduces the false-positive rate of a nonanimal eye irritation test (OptiSafe). Toxicol in Vitro. 2021;76:105208.
  • Lebrun S, Chavez S, Chan R, et al. Ascorbic acid specifically reduces the misclassification of nonirritating reactive chemicals in the OptiSafeTM macromolecular eye irritation test. Toxicol in Vitro. 2022;80:105313.
  • Lebrun S, Chan R, Chavez S. Formulations and methods related to eye irritation. Patent application number US-2022-0000838-A1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. 2021.
  • Lebrun S. Biochemistry based ocular toxicity assay. Issued patent number US 20160290982 A1. United States Patent and Trademark Office. 2018.
  • OECD. Test no. 437: bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying (i) chemicals inducing serious eye damage and (ii) chemicals not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, Section 4. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2020.
  • OECD. Test no. 491: short time exposure in vitro test method for identifying (i) chemicals inducing serious eye damage and (ii) chemicals not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, section 4. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2020.
  • Chen Y, Mehta G, Vasiliou V. Antioxidant defenses in the ocular surface. Ocul Surf. 2009;7(4):176–185.
  • Alepee N, Adriaens E, Abo T, et al. Development of a defined approach for eye irritation or serious eye damage for neat liquids based on cosmetics Europe analysis of in vitro RhCE and BCOP test methods. Toxicol in Vitro. 2019;59:100–114.
  • Lebrun S, Chavez S, Nguyen L, et al. Expansion of the application domain of a macromolecular ocular irritation test (optisafe™). Toxicol in Vitro. 2023;86:105515 10.1016/j.tiv.2022.105515. PMC: 36351539
  • OECD. Test no. 496: in vitro macromolecular test method for identifying chemicals inducing serious eye damage and chemicals not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, section 4. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019.
  • EURL ECVAM. The EURL-ECVAM – Cosmetics Europe prospective validation study of reconstructed human cornea-like epithelium (RhCE)-based test methods for identifying chemicals not requiring classification and labelling for serious eye damage/eye irritation. Validation study report. European Union; 2014. Available from: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC100280.
  • ICCVAM. ICCVAM recommended BCOP test method protocol. In: ICCVAM test method evaluation report – current validation status of in vitro test methods proposed for identifying eye injury hazard potential of chemicals and products. Interagency Coordinating Committee on the validation of alternative methods (ICCVAM) and the National Toxicology Program (NTP) Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM) (NIH Publication No.: 10-7553A); 2010.
  • OECD. Test No. 492: reconstructed human cornea-like epithelium (RhCE) test method for identifying chemicals not requiring classification and labelling for eye irritation or serious eye damage, OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, section 4. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019.
  • OECD. Test no. 438: isolated chicken eye test method for identifying (i) chemicals inducing serious eye damage and (ii) chemicals not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage, OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals, section 4. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2018.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.