Removal of arsenic(III) from aqueous media using amine functionalized-grafted styrene/maleic anhydride low-density polyethylene films

References

• Abdel Ghaffar, A., et al., 2014. Radiation graft copolymerization of butyl methacrylate and acrylamide onto low density polyethylene and polypropylene films, and its application in wastewater treatment. Radiation effects and defects in solids, 169 (9), 741–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alka, S., et al., 2021. Arsenic removal technologies and future trends: a mini review. Journal of cleaner production, 278, 123805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argos, M., et al., 2010. Arsenic exposure from drinking water, and all-cause and chronic-disease mortalities in Bangladesh (HEALS): a prospective cohort study. The lancet, 376 (9737), 252–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awadallah-F, A. and Sobhy, A., 2018. Dual function of cellulose triacetate–graft–polymethacrylic acid films for dyes removal and for high-dose radiation dosimetry. Journal of polymers and the environment, 26 (7), 2758–2772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, M., et al., 2020. Modeling regional-scale groundwater arsenic hazard in the transboundary Ganges River Delta, India and Bangladesh: infusing physically-based model with machine learning. Science of the total environment, 748, 141107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva, E.B., et al., 2019. Anaerobic digestion to reduce biomass and remove arsenic from as-hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata. Environmental pollution, 250, 23–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, A.C. and Fontes, M.P.F., 2020. Arsenic (V) removal from water using hydrotalcites as adsorbents: a critical review. Applied clay science, 191, 105615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao, L., et al., 2018. A critical review on arsenic removal from water using iron-based adsorbents. RSC advances, 8 (69), 39545–39560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, V., et al., 2019. Arsenic toxicity and its remediation strategies for fighting the environmental threat. Emerging and eco-friendly approaches for waste management. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 143–170.
   Google Scholar
• Huq, M.E., et al., 2020. Arsenic in a groundwater environment in Bangladesh: occurrence and mobilization. Journal of environmental management, 262, 110318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idriss, I.E., et al., 2020. Isotopic and chemical facies for assessing the shallow water table aquifer quality in Goly Region, White Nile State, Sudan: focusing on nitrate source apportionment and human health risk. Toxin Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/15569543.2020.1775255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R., and Heijnen, H., 2002. Safe water technology for arsenic removal. Report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (WHO).
   Google Scholar
• Kabir, F. and Chowdhury, S., 2017. Arsenic removal methods for drinking water in the developing countries: technological developments and research needs. Environmental science and pollution research international, 24 (31), 24102–24120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., et al., 2016. Polymeric nanocomposite proton exchange membranes prepared by radiation-induced polymerization for direct methanol fuel cell. Radiation physics and chemistry, 118, 35–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal, S., et al., 2020. Exploring carbonaceous nanomaterials for arsenic and chromium removal from wastewater. Journal of water process engineering, 36, 101276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litter, M.I., 2017. Last advances on TiO2-photocatalytic removal of chromium, uranium and arsenic. Current opinion in green and sustainable chemistry, 6, 150–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., et al., 2020. A review of functional sorbents for adsorptive removal of arsenic ions in aqueous systems. Journal of hazardous materials, 388, 121815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihajlov, I., et al., 2020. Arsenic contamination of Bangladesh aquifers exacerbated by clay layers. Nature communications, 11 (1), 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohseni, M., et al., 2019. Amine-terminated dendritic polymers as a multifunctional chelating agent for heavy metal ion removals. Environmental science and pollution research international, 26 (13), 12689–12697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, A., et al., 2018. Evaluation of amine-functionalized acrylic ion exchange fiber for chromium (VI) removal using flow-through experiments modeling and real wastewater. Journal of industrial and engineering chemistry, 66, 187–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicomel, N.R., et al., 2015. Technologies for arsenic removal from water: current status and future perspectives. International journal of environmental research and public health, 13 (1), 62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochedi, F.O., et al., 2020. A review on coal fly ash-based adsorbents for mercury and arsenic removal. Journal of cleaner production, 267, 122143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliani, W., et al., 2013. Study of gel formation by ionizing radiation in polypropylene. Radiation physics and chemistry, 84, 20–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Z., et al., 2020. Enhanced As(Ш) removal from aqueous solutions by recyclable Cu@MNM composite membranes via synergistic oxidation and absorption. Water research, 168, 115147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, Z. and Singh, V.P., 2019. The relative impact of toxic heavy metals (THMs) (arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr)(VI), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb)) on the total environment: an overview. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 191 (7), 419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddique, T., et al., 2020. Nanofiltration for arsenic removal: challenges, recent developments, and perspectives. Nanomaterials, 10 (7), 1323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, R., et al., 2015. Arsenic contamination, consequences and remediation techniques: a review. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 112, 247–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, M.O., et al., 2020. Geochemical transformations beneath man-made ponds: implications for arsenic mobilization in South Asian aquifers. Geochimica et cosmochimica acta, 288 (1), 262–281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, J., et al., 2018. Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using layered double hydroxide derived adsorbents, a critical review. RSC advances, 8 (40), 22694–22709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S.H. and Lee, J.H., 2005. Oxidation mechanism of as(III) in the UV/TiO2 system: evidence for a direct hole oxidation mechanism. Environmental science & technology, 39 (24), 9695–9701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar