References
- Annual survey of corporate leaders and consultants. (n.d.). Area Development Magazine. Retrieved August 26, 2013 from http://www.areadevelopment.com/Corporate-Consultants-Survey-Results/
- Arsen, D. (1997). Is there really an infrastructure/economic development link? In R. Bingham & R. Mier (Eds.), Dilemmas of urban economic development: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 82–98). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Bartik, T. (1985). Business location decisions in the United States: Estimates of the effects of unionization, taxes, and other characteristics of states. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 3, 14–22.
- Bartik, T. (1988). The effects of environmental regulation on business location in the United States. Growth and Change, 19, 22–44.10.1111/grow.1988.19.issue-3
- Bartik, T. (1992). The effects of state and local taxes on economic development: A review of recent research. Economic Development Quarterly, 6, 102–110.10.1177/089124249200600110
- Brunnermeier, S., & Levinson, A. (2004). Examining the evidence on environmental regulations and industry location. The Journal of Environment & Development, 13, 6–41.
- Buss, T. (2001). The effect of tax incentives on economic growth and firm location decisions: An overview of the literature. Economic Development Quarterly, 15, 90–105.10.1177/089124240101500108
- Carlson, V. (2000). Studying firm locations: Survey responses vs. econometric models. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 30(1), 1–22.
- Cohen, N. (2000). Business location decision-making and the cities: Bringing companies back. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution: Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
- Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2010). Clusters and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography, 10, 495–518.10.1093/jeg/lbq010
- DeSena, J. N. (1994). Local gatekeeping practices and residential segregation. Sociological Inquiry, 64, 307–321.10.1111/soin.1994.64.issue-3
- Elkins, D. (1995). The structure and context of the urban growth coalition: The view from the chamber of commerce. Policy Studies Journal, 23, 583–600.10.1111/psj.1995.23.issue-4
- Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Forkenbrock, D., & Foster, N. (1996). Highways and business location decisions. Economic Development Quarterly, 10, 239–248.10.1177/089124249601000304
- Freybote, J., & Gibler, K. (2011). Trust in corporate real estate management outsourcing relationships. Journal of Property Research, 28, 341–360.10.1080/09599916.2011.592207
- Galster, G., & Godfrey, E. (2005). By words and deeds: Racial steering by real estate agents in the U.S. in 2000. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71, 251–268.10.1080/01944360508976697
- Garkovich, L., Brown, K., & Zimmerman, J. N. (2008). “We’re not horsing around:” Conceptualizing the Kentucky horse industry as an economic cluster. Community Development, 39, 93–113.10.1080/15575330809489671
- Gibler, K., & Black, R. (2004). Agency risks in outsourcing corporate real estate functions. Journal of Real Estate Research, 26, 137–160.
- Gius, M., & Frese, P. (2002). The impact of state personal and corporate tax rates on firm location. Applied Economics Letters, 9, 47–49.10.1080/13504850110046859
- Gottlieb, P. (1995). Residential amenities, firm location and economic development. Urban Studies, 32, 1413–1436.10.1080/00420989550012320
- Granger, M., & Blomquist, G. (1999). Evaluating the influence of amenities on the location of manufacturing establishments in urban areas. Urban Studies, 36, 1859–1873.10.1080/0042098992647
- Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.10.1086/ajs.1985.91.issue-3
- Halstead, J., & Deller, S. (1997). Public infrastructure in economic development and growth: Evidence from rural manufacturers. Community Development, 28, 149–169.
- Hayter, R. (1997). Dynamics of industrial location: The factory, the firm, and the production system. Chichester: Wiley.
- Karakaya, F., & Canel, C. (1998). Underlying dimensions of business location decisions. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 98, 321–329.
- Kimelberg, S. M., & Williams, E. (2013). Evaluating the importance of business location factors: The influence of facility type. Growth & Change, 44, 92–117.
- Love, L., & Crompton, J. (1999). Role of quality of life in business (re)location decisions. Journal of Business Research, 44, 211–222.10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00202-6
- Matouschek, N., & Robert-Nicoud, F. (2005). The role of human capital investments in the location decision of firms. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35, 570–583.10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2004.09.001
- Morgan, J. Q. (2012). Regional clusters and jobs for inner-city workers: The case of transportation, distribution, and logistics. Community Development, 43, 492–511.10.1080/15575330.2012.694108
- Pearce, D. (1979). Gatekeepers and homeseekers: Institutional patterns in racial steering. Social Problems, 26, 325–342.10.2307/800457
- Porter, M. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15–34.10.1177/089124240001400105
- Roberts, K., & Smith, P. R. (1992). The effect of labor cost differences on the location of economic activity under the U.S.–Canada Free Trade Agreement. Economic Development Quarterly, 6, 52–63.10.1177/089124249200600105
- Salvesen, D., & Renski, H. (2003). The importance of quality of life in the location decisions of new economy firms. Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Urban and Region Studies, UNC.
- Smith, E. B. (2010). Intermediaries, mediators, and market change. Retrieved from SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=1646332 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1646332
- Suchman, M. (2000). Dealmakers and counselors: Law firms as intermediaries in the development of Silicon Valley. In M. Kenney (Ed.), Understanding Silicon Valley: The anatomy of an entrepreneurial region (pp. 71–97). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
- Taylor, D. F., & Miller, C. R. (2010). Rethinking local business clusters: The case of food clusters for promoting community development. Community Development, 41, 108–112.10.1080/15575330903548778