Evaluating social impact bonds: questions, challenges, innovations, and possibilities in measuring outcomes in impact investing

References

• Adams, D. (2012, August 1). Mass. Program ties nonprofits’ success to payment. The Boston Globe. Retrieved from http://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2012/07/31/massachusetts-among-first-pay-for-success-socialprograms/FckmI2GZ0vycLNBLXpgRCM/story.html?s_ca
   Google Scholar
• Bannick, M., & Goldman, P. (2012). Priming the pump: The case for a sector-based approach to impact investing. Redwood City, CA: Omidyar Network. Retrieved from www.omidyar.com/pdf/Priming_the_Pump_Sept_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bannick, M., & Hallstein, E. (2012). Learning from Silicon Valley. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Summer 2012. Sponsored Supplement, 10, 8–11. Retrieved from http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/learning_from_silicon_valley1
   Google Scholar
• Brest, P. (2010). The Power of theories of change. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8, 47–51. Retrieved from http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/the_power_of_theories_of_change
   Google Scholar
• Brest, P., & Born, K. (2013). When can impact investing create real impact? Stanford Social Innovation Review, 11, 22–27. Retrieved from http://www.ssireview.org/up_for_debate/article/impact_investing
   Google Scholar
• Bugg-Levine, A., & Emerson, J. (2011). Impact investing: Transforming how we make money while making a difference. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. (2013). Centre for social impact bonds. London, UK. Retrieved from http://blogs.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/socialimpactbonds/outcomes-fund/
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship. (2013). Building robust data and knowledge for an emerging field. Durham, NC: Duke University. Retrieved from http://sites.duke.edu/casei3/case-i3-basics/case-i3-research/case-i3-b-lab-and-giirs-research-project/
   Google Scholar
• Curry, B. (2013, October 4). Tories launch ‘social financing’ programs. The Globe and Mail.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2013, June 1). The credit kulak: China’s shadow banks. The Economist.
   Google Scholar
• Funnell, S. C., & Rogers, P. J. (2011). Purposeful program theory. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, B. (2011). Innovation with impact: Financing 21st century development. Speech presented to the G-20 Summit, Cannes. Retrieved from http://www.thegatesnotes.com/Topics/Development/G20-Report-Innovation-with-Impact/
   Google Scholar
• Global Impact Investing Rating System. (2013). Various. Retrieved from http://www.giirs.org/
   Google Scholar
• Godeke, S. (2013). Community reinvestment act banks as pioneer investors in pay for success financing. Community Development Investment Review, 9, 69–74. Retrieved from http://www.frbsf.org/community-development/files/community-reinvestment-act-banks-pioneer-investors-pay-for-success-financing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Godeke, S., & Resner, L. (2012). The investor landscape: Building a healthy and sustainable social impact bond market. New York, NY: The Rockefeller Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/media/download/6a7eba56-aa6f-47bf-a451-f883b8b4ccc5
   Google Scholar
• Harji, K., & Jackson, E. T. (2012). Accelerating impact: Achievements, challenges and what’s next in building the impact investing industry. New York, NY: The Rockefeller Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/uploads/images/fda23ba9-ab7e-4c83-9218-24fdd79289 cc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hebb, T. (Ed.). (2013). Special issue: Impact investing. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 3, 71–175.
   Google Scholar
• Impact Reporting and Investment Standards. (2013). Various. New York, NY: Global Impact Investing Network. Retrieved from http://iris.thegiin.org/iris-catalog
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, E. T. (2005). Participatory monitoring and evaluation. In S. Mathison (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Evaluation (p. 296). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved from http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/encyclopedia-of-evaluation/n399.xml
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, E. T. (2012, December 9). How the LGBT community gets down to business. Huffington Post Canada. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/edward-jackson/lgbt_b_1877229.html
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, E. T. (2013). Interrogating the theory of change: Evaluating impact investing where it matters most. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 3, 95–110. doi:10.1080/20430795.2013.776257
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, E. T., & Harji, K. (2012). Unlocking capital, activating a movement: Final report of the strategic assessment of the Rockefeller Foundation’s impact investing initiative. New York, NY: The Rockefeller Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kintez, E. (2012, February 25). Small loans add up to lethal debts. The Hindu.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, H., Karamchandani, A., & Katz, R. (2012). From blueprint to scale: The case for philanthropy in impact investing.Boston, MA and New York, NY: Monitor Group and Acumen Fund. Retrieved from http://evpa.eu.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/From-Blueprint-to-Scale-Case-for-Philanthropy-in-Impact-Investing_Full-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mayne, J. (2008). Contribution analysis: An approach to exploring cause and effect. ILAC Briefs, 16. Macaresse, IT: Institutional Change and Learning Initiative, Biodiversity International. Retrieved from http://www.cgiar-ilac.org/files/publications/briefs/ILAC_Brief16_Contribution_Analysis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mendell, M., & Barbosa, E. (2013). Impact investing: A preliminary analysis of emergent primary and secondary exchange platforms. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 3, 111–123.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, C. (2012, November 8). Getting back more than a warm feeling. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/09/giving/investors-profit-by-giving-through-social-impact-bonds.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
   Google Scholar
• Rockefeller Foundation. (2013, June 10). State and local governments receive assistance to launch social impact bond projects across the country. New York, NY. Retrieved from http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/blog/state-local-governments-receive-2
   Google Scholar
• Rodin, J., & MacPherson, N. (2012). Shared outcomes. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Summer 2012. Sponsored Supplement. 10, 12–15. Retrieved from http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/shared_outcomes
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, P. (2008). Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions. Evaluation, 14, 29–48.
   Google Scholar
• Roodman, D. (2012). Due diligence: An impertinent inquiry into microfinance. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
   Google Scholar
• Social Finance.(2013). Social impact bonds. London, UK. Retrieved from http://www.socialfinance.org.uk/work/sibs
   Google Scholar
• Thornley, B., Wood, D., Grace, K., & Sullivant, S. (2011). Impact investing: A framework for policy design and analysis. San Francisco, CA and Cambridge, MA: Pacific Community Ventures and the Initiative for Responsible Investment at Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkinson, E. (2012). Social impact bonds: An Australian snapshot. Sydney, AU: Centre for Social Impact. Retrieved from http://www.csi.edu.au/assets/assetdoc/f74ab922e6b00299/Social%20Impact%20Bonds%20-%20An%20Australian%20snapshot.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tomkinson, E. (2013, June 21). What do the interim Peterborough SIB interim results tell us? [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://emmatomkinson.com/2013/06/21/what-do-the-peterborough-sib-interim-results-tell-us/
   Google Scholar
• Trelstad, B., & Katz, R. (2011). Mission, margin, and mandates: Multiple paths to scale. Innovations, Technology, Governance, Globalization, 6, 69–82. Retrieved from http://www.gbfund.org/sites/default/files/INNOVATIONS-SOCAP11_Ramirez.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Thornley, B., & Grace, K. (2013). Institutional impact investing: Practice and policy. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 3, 75–94.
   Google Scholar