Measuring job creation for HOPE VI: a success story for community development efforts

References

• Abt Associates. (2003). Exploring the impact of the HOPE VI program on surrounding neighborhoods. Prepared for Office of Public Housing Investments. Cambridge, MA: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved from http://www.abtassociates.com/reports/ES_NeighCaseStudies_1-14-03_FINAL-A.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alward, G. S., & Palmer, C. J. (1983). IMPLAN: An input-output analysis system for forest service planning. In R. Seppala, C. Row, & A. Morgan (Eds.), Forest sector models: Proceedings of the first North American conference (pp. 131–140). Oxford: AB Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, J. C., Cordell, H. K., Ashley, G. A., & Watson, A. E. (1990). Economic impacts of recreational spending on rural areas: A case study. Economic Development Quarterly, 4, 29–39.10.1177/089124249000400104
   Google Scholar
• Bogart, W. T. (1998). The economics of cities and suburbs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Brazley, M. E. (2002). An evaluation of residential satisfaction of HOPE VI: A study of the Park DuValle revitalization project. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville.
   Google Scholar
• Brazley, M. E., & Gilderbloom, J. I. (2007). HOPE VI housing program: Was it effective? American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 66, 433–442.10.1111/ajes.2007.66.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burby, R. J., & Rohe, W. M. (1989). Deconcentration of public housing: Effects on residents' satisfaction with their living environments and their fear of crime. Urban Affairs Review, 25, 117–141.10.1177/004208168902500108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, J. P. (2003). Two cheers for gentrification. Howard Law Journal, 46, 405–432.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, M. C., & Smith, B. W. (2006). Estimating the economic impact of universities: The case of Bowling Green University. The Industrial Geographer, 3(2), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Urban and Public Affairs (CUPA). (2013). Raider Country Creative Industries Economic Impact Analysis. Retrieved from http://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1004&context=cupa_econdev
   Google Scholar
• Cisneros, H., & Engdahl, L. (Eds.). (2009). From despair to hope: HOPE VI and the new promise of public housing in America’s cities. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clinch, R. (2011). The economic and workforce development impacts of the Cardinal Towne Project. Prepared for 3rd Street Development. Louisville, KY: LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, E. P., Bryant, F. C., Brennan, L. A., Gilliland, C., Dudensing, R., & McCorkle, D. (2013). An economic impact analysis of South Texas landowner hunting operation expenses. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management, 4, 342–350.10.3996/122011-JFWM-069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doeksen, G. A., Johnson, T., Biard-Holmes, D., & Schott, V. (1998). A healthy health sector is crucial for community economic development. The Journal of Rural Health, 14, 66–72.10.1111/j.1748-0361.1998.tb00864.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, A. J., & Harpman, D. A. (1995). Estimating recreation employment effects with IMPLAN for the Glen Canyon Dam region. Journal of Environmental Management, 44, 233–247.10.1006/jema.1995.0043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreier, P., Mollenkopf, J., & Swanstrom, T. (2004). Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty-first century (Rev. 2nd ed.). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C., & Killen, S. P. (1995). The geography of metropolitan opportunity: A reconnaissance and conceptual framework. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 7–43.10.1080/10511482.1995.9521180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C., & Mikelsons, M. (1995). The geography of metropolitan opportunity: A case study of neighborhood conditions confronting youth in Washington, DC. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 73–104.10.1080/10511482.1995.9521182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett-Peltier, H. (2011). Pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure: A national study of employment impacts. Amherst: Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Gilderbloom, J. I. (2008). Invisible city: Poverty, housing, and new urbanism. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilderbloom, J. I., & Hanka, M. J. (2006). Newport’s HOPE VI project evaluation (Vol. IX). Louisville, KY: University of Louisville, Center for Sustainable Urban Neighborhoods.
   Google Scholar
• Gilderbloom, J. I., Hanka, M. J., & Ambrosius, J. D. (2009). Historic preservation’s impact on job creation, property values, and environmental sustainability. Journal of Urbanism, 2, 83–103.
   Google Scholar
• Gilderbloom, J. I., Hanka, M. J., & Lasley, C. B. (2008). Newport’s HOPE VI project evaluation: Final volume. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville, Center for Sustainable Urban Neighborhoods.
   Google Scholar
• Gilderbloom, J. I., & Meares, W. L. (2012). Covington HOPE VI baseline report. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville, Center for Sustainable Urban Neighborhoods (SUN).
   Google Scholar
• Gilderbloom, J. I., & Meares, W. (2013). Measuring the impact of Muncie housing proposal on jobs and environment. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville, Center for Sustainable Urban Neighborhoods (SUN).
   Google Scholar
• Gilderbloom, J. I., & Mullins, Jr., R. L. (2005). Promise and betrayal: Universities and the battle for sustainable urban neighborhoods. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilderbloom, J. I., Wresinski, K. W., Grooms, C. W., & Meares, W. L. (2014). From blighted to beautiful: Covington HOPE VI evaluation: Year four. Covington, KY: Housing Authority of Covington.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. (2013). New Deal ruins: Race, economic justice, and public housing policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gotham, K. F. (2003). Toward an understanding of the spatiality of urban poverty: The urban poor as spatial actors. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24, 723–737.10.1111/ijur.2003.27.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Hanka, M. J. (2009). From vice to nice: A case study of Newport, Kentucky’s HOPE VI program (Doctoral dissertation). University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
   Google Scholar
• Hanka, M. J., Kumaran, M., & Gilderbloom, J. I. (2007, October). Estimating the economic effects, consequences, and impacts of President Clinton’s community economic empowerment programs: An analysis of Empowerment Zones in Enterprise Communities. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Southern Industrial Relations and Human Resources Conference, Louisville, KY.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, G. M., Slifkin, R. T., Randolph, R. K., & Poley, S. (2006). The effect of rural hospital closures on community economic health. Health Services Research, 41, 467–485.10.1111/hesr.2006.41.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotvedt, J. E., Busby, R. L., & Jacob, R. E. (1988). Use of IMPLAN for regional input-output studies. Buena Vista, FL: Southern Forest Economic Association.
   Google Scholar
• Huppertz, C. E., Bloomquist, K. M., & Barbehenn, J. M. (1994). EFIS 5.0 Economic impact forecast system: User’s reference manual ( USACERL Technical Report TA-94/03). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office/US Army Corps of Engineers Construction Engineering Research Laboratories.
   Google Scholar
• Imbroscio, D. (2010). Urban America reconsidered: Alternatives for governance and policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. L., & Moore, E. (1993). Tourism impact estimation. Annals of Tourism Research, 20, 279–288.10.1016/0160-7383(93)90055-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, L., Slater, T., & Wyly, E. (2008). Gentrification. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leistritz, F. L. (1994). Economic and fiscal impact assessment. Impact Assessment, 12, 305–317.10.1080/07349165.1994.9725868
   Google Scholar
• Lindall, S. A., & Olson, D. C. (1996). The IMPLAN input-output system. Stillwater, MN: MIG.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, T. (2000). Analyzing the economic impact of transportation projects using RIMS II, IMPLAN and REMI. Report for Office of Research and Special Programs. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Mandich, A. M., & Dorfman, J. H. (2014, July). The impact of hospitals on local labor markets: Going beyond IMPLAN. Paper presented at Agricultural and Applied Economics Association 2014 Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Preservation Technology and Training. (2001). Preservation economic impact model user guide. Natchitoches, LA: National Park Service.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, A. M. (1993). Urban economics (2nd ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J. (2002). The HOPE VI Program – What about the residents? Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://www.urbaninstitute.org/UploadedPDF/310593_HopeVI.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Buron, L., Levy, D. K., & Cunningham, M. K. (2000). The Gautreaux: What might mixed-income and dispersal strategies mean for the poorest public housing tenants. Housing Policy Debate, 11, 911–942.10.1080/10511482.2000.9521392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Katz, B., Cunningham, M. K., Brown, K. D., Gustafson, J., & Turner, M. (2004). A decade of HOPE VI: Research findings and policy challenges. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute and The Brookings Institution. Retrieved from http://urban.org/uploadedPDF/411002_HOPEVI.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reid, C. K. (2007). Locating the American dream – Assessing the neighborhood benefits of homeownership. In W. M. Rohe & H. L. Watson (Eds.), Chasing the American dream: New perspectives on affordable homeownership (pp. 233–277). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, H. W. (1985). Input-output and economic base multipliers: Looking backward and forward. Journal of Regional Science, 25, 607–661.10.1111/jors.1985.25.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickman, D. S., & Schwer, R. K. (1995). A comparison of the multipliers of IMPLAN, REMI, and RIMS II: Benchmarking ready-made models for comparison. The Annals of Regional Science, 29, 363–374.10.1007/BF01581882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, A. (1995). Input-output economics and computable general equilibrium models. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6, 295–304.10.1016/0954-349X(95)00018-I
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. E. (1995). Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential choice: Lessons from the Gautreaux program. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 231–269.10.1080/10511482.1995.9521186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rypkema, D. D. (1997). The economics of historic preservation: A community leaders’ guide. Washington, DC: National Trust for Historic Preservation.
   Google Scholar
• Salama, J. J. (1999). The redevelopment of distressed public housing: Early results from HOPE VI projects in Atlanta, Chicago, and San Antonio. Housing Policy Debate, 10, 95–142.10.1080/10511482.1999.9521329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. F. (2010). Housing policy in the United States: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shierholz, H., & Mishel, L. (2009). Highest unemployment rate since 1983. Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.epi.org/publication/jobspict_2009_july_preview/
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, P. B., & Leuthold, F. O. (1993). Economic and fiscal impacts of a retirement/recreation community: A study of Tellico Village, Tennessee. Journal of Agriculture and Applied Economics, 25, 134–147.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A., Woolley, M., Kingsley, G. T., Popkin, S. J., Levy, D., & Cove, E. (2007). Estimating the public costs and benefits of HOPE VI investments: A methodological report. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (1992). Final report of the national commission on severely distressed public housing: A report to congress and the secretary of housing and urban development. Washington, DC: HUD.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (1999). HOPE VI: Building communities, transforming lives. Washington, DC: HUD.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (2000). Community building makes a difference. Washington, DC: HUD.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2002). Public housing: HOPE VI leveraging has increased, but HUD has not met annual reporting requirement. Washington, DC: GAO.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2007). Public housing: Information on the financing, oversight, and effects of the HOPE VI Program. Statement of David G. Wood. Director Financial Markets and Community Investment. Washington, DC: GAO.
   Google Scholar
• Voith, R. (2011). Public housing stimulus funding: A report of the economic impact of Recovery Act Capital Improvements. Philadelphia, PA: Eco-consult Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, E. C., Holland, D. W., & Weber, B. A. (1997). Economic impacts of a property tax limitation: A computable general equilibrium analysis of Oregon's measure 5. Land Economics, 73, 72–89.10.2307/3147078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, S. J., & Gooding, E. C. (1968). Estimation of differential employment multipliers in a small regional economy. Land Economics, 44, 235–244.10.2307/3159318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyly, E. K., & Hammel, D. J. (1999). Islands of decay in seas of renewal: Housing policy and the resurgence of gentrification. Housing Policy Debate, 10, 711–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zielenbach, S., & Voith, R. (2010). HOPE VI and neighborhood economic development: The importance of local market dynamics. Cityscape, 12, 99–132.
   Google Scholar