Framing cooperative development: The bridging role of cultural and symbolic value between human and material resources

References

• Agnitsch, K., Flora, J., & Ryan, V. (2006). Bonding and bridging social capital: The interactive effects on community action. Community Development, 37(1), 36–51.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (1998). The extended case method. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 4–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carolan, M., & Hale, J.W. (2016). “Growing” communities with urban agriculture: Generating value above and below ground. Community Development, 47(4), 530–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Emery, M., & Flora, C. (2006). Spiraling-up: Mapping community transformation with community capitals framework. Community Development, 37(1), 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flora, C.B., Flora, J.L., & Gasteyer, S.P. (2015). Rural communities: Legacy + change. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J.K. (2008). Diverse economies: Performative practices for `other worlds.’. Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 613–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1997). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. In C. Lemert & A. Branaman (Eds.), The Goffman Reader (pp. 149–166). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gonos, G. (1977). “Situation” versus “frame”: The “interactionist” and the “structuralist” analyses of everyday life. American Sociological Review, 42(6), 854–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, J. (2017). Growing diverse co-operative networks?: An examination of boundaries and openings to resilient food futures ( Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA)
   Google Scholar
• Hale, J., & Carolan, M. (2018). Cooperative or uncooperative co-operative: Digging into the process of cooperation in food and agriculture cooperatives. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 8(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J.A. (2012). A realist approach for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D.L. (2007). Focus Groups, 22(1996), 129–152.
   Google Scholar
• Norris-Raynbird, C. (2008). The use of frames analysis in evaluating capacity-building in local coastal programs in Louisiana. Rural Sociology, 73(1), 22–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigg, K., Gasteyer, S.P., Martin, K.E., Keating, K., & Apaliyah, G.P. (2013). The Community Capitals Framework: An empirical examination of internal relationships. Community Development, 44(4), 492–502.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C., & Becker, H.S. (1992). What is a case?: Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H.J., & Rubin, I. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J., Hoang, H., & Ochiai, C. (2015). Post-displacement community resilience: Considering the contribution of indigenous skills and cultural capital among ethnic minority Vietnamese. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 56(2), 208–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D.A., Rochford, E.B., Worden, S.K., & Benford, R.D. (2012). Frame alignment process, micromobilization, and movement participation. 51(4), 464–481.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. Chicago: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, S. (2008). From Mead to a structural symbolic interactionism and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar