From Local Agenda 21 to a localized Agenda 2030 – the Portuguese and Brazilian cases in perspective

References

• Agyeman, J., Bullard, R.D., & Evans, B. (2003). Just sustainabilities: Development in an unequal world. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2018). World inequality report 2018. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banco do Nordeste do Brasil. (2000). Farol do desenvolvimento Banco do Nordeste [Northeast Bank Development Lighthouse Program]. Retrieved from http://repositorio.enap.gov.br/handle/1/612.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, M. (2015). Editorial. Community Development Journal, 50(4), 545–547. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsv030
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, P. G., Barcellos, F. C., Facchima, M. M., Moreira, G. G., & Freitas, J. V. (2010). Are the Brazilian Agenda 21 sustainable? In AAVV, Proceedings of the 4 URBENVIRON - international seminar on environmental planning and management [CD ROM]. Niterói, Brazil: UFF/URBENVIRON.
   Google Scholar
• Covenant of Mayors. (2017). Key facts and figures of the covenant of mayors in Europe. Retrieved from http://www.covenantofmayors.eu/
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R., & York, R. (2008). The globalization of environmental concern and the limits of the postmaterialist values explanation: Evidence from four multinational surveys. The Sociological Quarterly, 49(3), 529–563. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2008.00127.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2018). Access to information, participation and justice in environmental matters in Latin America and the Caribbean: Towards the achievement of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development (LC/TS.2017/83). Santiago de Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.
   Google Scholar
• Fidélis, T., & Moreno Pires, S. (2009). Surrender or resistance to the implementation of Local Agenda 21 in Portugal: The challenges of local governance for sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(4), 497–518. doi:10.1080/09640560902868363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FNMA. 2003. Edital FNMA 02/2003. Brasília: Brazilian Ministry of Environment. Retrieved from http://www.mma.gov.br/informma/item/738-edital-fnma-02-2003
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, I. (2016). A retórica da boa governança: As Agendas 21 Locais no Brasil [The rhetoric of good governance: The local agenda 21 in Brazil]. In A. Moura (Ed.), Governança ambiental no Brasil: Instituições, atores e políticas públicas [Environmental governance in Brazil: Institutions, actors and public policies] (pp. 311–328). Brasília: IPEA.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra, J. (2011). Municípios, participação e sustentabilidade: Dinâmicas locais de imperativos globais [Municipalities, participation and sustainability: Local dynamics of global imperatives]. ( Doctoral thesis in Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10451/4755.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra, J., & Schmidt, L. (2016). Making wishful thinking a reality: From SDGs to COP21. Ambiente & Sociedade, 19(4), 197–214. doi:10.1590/1809-4422asocex0003v1942016
   Google Scholar
• Howard, J., & Wheeler, J. (2015). What community development and citizen participation should contribute to the new global framework for sustainable development. Community Development Journal, 50(4), 552–570. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsv033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). (2005). Perfil dos municípios Brasileiros: Meio Ambiente 2002 [Profile of Brazilian municipalities: Environment 2002]. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). (2012). Indicadores de Desenvolvimento Sustentável: Estudos e pesquisas [Sustainable Development Indicators: Studies and research]. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobi, P. (2005). Governança institucional de problemas ambientais [Institutional governance of environmental problems]. Política & Sociedade, 7, 119–137. doi:10.5007/1969
   Google Scholar
• Lourenço, L.C.B. (2012). A arquitetura do estado estratégico: Agendas de Brasil e EUA sobre biocombustíveis e energias renováveis em perspectiva comparada [The architecture of the strategic state: Agendas of Brazil and USA on biofuels and renewable energies under a comparative perspective]. ( Doctoral thesis in Social Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil). Retrieved from http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/10893. doi:10.1094/PDIS-11-11-0999-PDN
   Google Scholar
• Macedo, M., Pinto, M., & Macedo, P. (2009). Agenda 21 Local em Portugal: Breve ponto de situação [Local Agenda 21 in Portugal: Performance appraisal]. Porto, Portugal: Grupo de Estudos Ambientais – ESB-UCP-CRP.
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães, P.C. (2005). Disaffected democrats: Political attitudes and political action in Portugal. West European Politics, 28, 973–991. doi:10.1080/01402380500310626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministério do Meio Ambiente (MMA). (2011). Agenda 21 Local: Resultados selecionados [Local Agenda 21: Selected results]. Brasília, Brazil: Ministério do Meio Ambiente.
   Google Scholar
• Ministério do Meio Ambiente (MMA). (2012). Agenda 21 Brasileira: Avaliação e resultados [Brazilian Agenda 21: Evaluation and results]. Brasília, Brazil: Ministério do Meio Ambiente.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, S., & Barber, T. (2012). In search of transformative practice: A paper developed from a workshop at the 2011 IACD Lisbon conference. In M. Carpenter & R. Purcell (Eds.), The Lisbon Papers: Transformative leadership and empowering communities (pp. 23–34). Glasgow, Scotland: Community Development Journal/IACD.
   Google Scholar
• O’Riordan, T., & Church, C. (2001). Synthesis and context. In T. O’Riordan (Ed.), Globalism, localism, and identity: Fresh perspectives on the transition to sustainability (pp. 3–24). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. (2010). Community engagement and social organization: Introducing concepts, policy, and practical applications. In M. Peters, S. Fudge, & T. Jackson (Eds.), Low carbon communities: Imaginative approaches to combating climate change locally (pp. 13–32). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, M., Macedo, P., Macedo, M., Almeida, C., & Silva, M. (2015). The lifecycle of a voluntary policy innovation: The case of local agenda 21. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 5(2), 69–83. doi:10.5539/jms.v5n2p69
   Google Scholar
• REBAL. (2012, March). Carta aberta da Rede Brasileira de Agendas 21 Locais – REBAL [Open letter from the Brazilian Local Agenda 21 Network - REBAL]. Salvador da Bahia: VII Fórum de Brasileiro de Educação Ambiental.
   Google Scholar
• Redclift, M. (2010). The environment and carbon dependence: Landscapes of sustainability and materiality. Current Sociology, 57(3), 369–388. doi:10.1177/0011392108101588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, L., Ferrão, J., Guerra, J., Mourato, J., Alves, A., Baixinho, A., & Ferreira, J. (2015). Adaptação às Alterações Climáticas nos municípios: Um processo de aprendizagem social [Adaptation to climate change in municipalities: A process of social learning]. In J. Ferrão & A. Horta (Eds.), Ambiente, território e sociedade: Novas agendas de investigação [Environment, territory and society: New research agendas] (pp. 125–131). Lisbon: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, L. (2015). Políticas de ambiente: Vencer os impasses com uma agenda para o futuro. In V. Soromenho-Marques & P.T. Pereira (Eds.), Afirmar o futuro: Políticas públicas para Portugal (pp. 314–326). Lisbon: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. [Environmental policies: Overcoming impasses with an agenda for the future].
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, L., & Guerra, J. (2010). Da governança global à sustentabilidade local: Portugal e o Brasil em perspetiva comparada [From global governance to local sustainability: Portugal and Brazil in a comparative perspective]. Revista de Ciências Sociais, 41(2), 106–124.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, L., Nave, J.G., & Guerra, J. (2005). Autarquias e desenvolvimento sustentável: Agenda 21 Local e novas estratégias ambientais. [Municipalities and sustainable development: Local Agenda 21 and new environmental strategies]. Porto, Portugal: Fronteira do Caos.
   Google Scholar
• Toth, B. (2010). Public participation and democracy in practice – aarhus convention principles as democratic institution building in the developing world. Journal of Land Resources & Environmental Law, 30(2), 295–330.
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
   Google Scholar
• UNCED. (1992). Agenda 21: Program of action for sustainable development. New York: United Nations Department of Public Information.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN). 2017. New urban agenda. Quito: Author. Retrieved from http://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-English.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). (1998). Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters. Aarhus, Denmark: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe – Committee on Environmental Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Veiga, J.E. (2015). Para entender o desenvolvimento sustentável. [Understanding sustainable development]. São Paulo: Editora 34.
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development. (WCED). (1987). Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wuthnow, R. (2005). Democratic renewal and cultural inertia: Why our best efforts fall short. Sociological Forum, 20(3), 343–367. doi:10.1007/s11206-005-6593-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar