The capacity for direct engagement: case study of a neighborhood assistance center in a university–community partnership

References

• Adams, K. R. (2014). The exploration of community boundary spanners in university-community partnerships. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 18(3), 113–118.
   Google Scholar
• Agans, J. P., Burrow, A. L., Kim, E. S., Garbo, C., Schroeder, M., Graf, S., & Davis, T. (2020). “You’re going to burn some bridges if you come at it the wrong way”: Reflecting on the realities of research-practice partnerships. Community Development, 51(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2020.1714686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00666.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (1995). How organizations act together: Interorganizational coordination in theory and practice. Gordon and Breach.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, C., & Hage, J. (1993). Organizations working together. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, G., Blair, R., & Shirk, J. (2018). Neighborhood associations and community development: Differences in needs and strategies. Community Development, 49(5), 504–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2018.1529049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer-Kuhn, B., & Grant, J. (2014). Challenging contextual factors in university-community partnerships. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 7(2), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.54656/KVGO8397
   Google Scholar
• Babbie, E. (2017). The basics of social research (7th ed.). Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, L. B. (2006). The new urban governance: Processes for engaging citizens and stakeholders. Review of Policy Research, 23(4), 815–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00234.x
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, A. M. (2017). University-community partnership models: Employing organizational management theories of paradox and strategic contradiction. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 21(2), 37–64.
   Google Scholar
• Buick, F., Blackman, D., O’Flynn, J., O’Donnell, M., & West, D. (2016). Effective practitioner- scholar relationships: Lessons from a coproduction partnership. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. B. (2005). Theorizing the authentic: Identity, engagement, and public space. Administration & Society, 36(6), 688–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399704270582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor, N., Englot, P., & Higgins, M. (2013). Making the work of anchor institutions stick: Building coalitions and collective expertise. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17 (3), 17–46 .
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J. (2001). Building community capacity: A definitional framework and case studies from a comprehensive community initiative. Urban Affairs Review, 36(3), 291–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780870122184876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, J. R., & Nation, M. (2016). Community engagement: Universities’ roles in building communities and strengthening democracy. Community Development, 47(5), 718–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2016.1226912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, K., Volker, B., Lelieveldt, H., & Torenvlied, R. (2010). Civic engagement in urban neighborhoods: Does the network of civic organizations influence participation in neighborhood projects? Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(5), 609–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00524.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlenz, M. M. (2016). Neighborhood revitalization and the anchor institution: Assessing the impact of the University of Pennsylvania’s West Philadelphia initiatives on University City. Urban Affairs Review, 52(5), 714–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087415601220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlenz, M. M. (2019). The university and its neighborhood: A study of place-making and change. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(6), 776–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1530568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrandino, J. (2018). Building and sustaining a university-anchored collaborative public safety data network: The northwest Indiana model. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 22(1), 143–159.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, R. A., & Podolny, J. (1992). Differentiation of boundary spanning roles: Labor negotiations and implications for role conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frieling, M. A., Lindenberg, S. M., & Stokman, F. N. (2014). Collaborative communities through coproduction: Two case studies. American Review of Public Administration, 44(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012456897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauntner, J., & Hansman, C. A. (2017). Boundary-spanner role conflict in public urban universities. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 21(1), 104–131.
   Google Scholar
• Gittell, R. J., & Vidal, A. (1998). Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Green, G., & Haines, A. (2012). Asset building & community development (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, L. M. (1995). Understanding the empowerment process: Does consciousness make a difference? Social Work Research, 19(4), 229–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeberle, S. H. (1987). Neighborhood identity and citizen participation. Administration & Society, 19(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539978701900203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeberle, S. H. (1988). People or place: Variations in community leaders’ subjective definitions of neighborhood. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 23(4), 616–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/004208168802300408
   Google Scholar
• Hays, R. A. (2014). Neighborhood networks, social capital, and political participation: The relationships revisited. Journal of Urban Affairs, 37(2), 122–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, R. A., & Kogl, A. M. (2007). Neighborhood attachment, social capital building, and political participation: A case study of low- and moderate-income residents of Waterloo, Iowa. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(2), 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00333.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidayat, D., & Stoecker, R. (2021). Collective knowledge mobilization through a community- university partnership. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 25(2), 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagannathan, R., Camasso, M. J., Mend, S. G., Varela, J., & Shah, A. (2011). University- community partnering using a targeted mutual-interests approach. Community Development, 42(3), 410–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2010.551662
   Google Scholar
• Jun, K.-N., & Musso, J. (2013). Participatory governance and the spatial representation of neighborhood issues. Urban Affairs Review, 49(1), 71–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087412453704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kathi, P. C., & Cooper, T. L. (2005). Democratizing the administrative state: Connecting neighborhood councils and city agencies. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 559–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00483.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2006). Managing boundaries in American administration: The collaboration imperative. Public Administration Review, 66(Suppl. 1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00662.x
   Google Scholar
• Lelieveldt, H. (2004). Helping citizens help themselves: Neighborhood improvement programs and the impact of social networks, trust, and norms on neighborhood-oriented forms of participation. Urban Affairs Review, 39(5), 531–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087404263601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRoux, K. (2007). Nonprofits as civic intermediaries: The role of community-based organizations in promoting political participation. Urban Affairs Review, 42(3), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087406292257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Wen, B., & Cooper, T. L. (2019). What makes neighborhood associations effective in urban governance? Evidence from neighborhood council boards in Los Angeles. American Review of Public Administration, 49(8), 931–943. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019854160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R., & Rabrenovic, G. (1990). Neighborhood associations: Their issues, their allies, and their opponents. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 26(1), 68–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/004208169002600104
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, J. S. (2004). Community foundations: What do they offer community development? Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2166.2004.00198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (9th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacIndoe, H. (2013). Reinforcing the safety net: Explaining the propensity for and intensity of nonprofit-local government collaboration. State and Local Government Review, 45(4), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X13515004
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, B. C. (2005). The rules are different here: An institutional comparison of cities and homeowner associations. Administration & Society, 37(4), 404–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399705277137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, J., Goodman, S., & Schmid, B. (2016). Illuminating “transaction spaces” in higher education: University-community partnerships and brokering as “boundary work”. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 20(3), 8–30.
   Google Scholar
• Medved, P., & Ursic, M. (2021). The benefits of university collaboration within university- community partnerships in Europe. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 25(2), 79–94.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, W., Gingras, J., Robinson, P., & Waddell, J. (2014). Community-university research partnerships: A role for university research centers. Community Development, 45(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2014.892018
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, E., Sorensen, J., & Howarth, J. (2015). The Charlotte Action Research Project: A model for direct and mutually beneficial community-university engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 19(1), 105–132.
   Google Scholar
• Musso, J. A., Weare, C., Oztas, N., & Loges, W. E. (2006). Neighborhood governance reform and networks of community power in Los Angeles. American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005282586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., & Amsler, L. B. (2014). Direct public engagement in local government. American Review of Public Administration, 44(4), 63S–88S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013519702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• One Omaha, (2022, July 5). One Omaha. https://www.oneomaha.org/
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. (2004). Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. American Review of Public Administration, 34(4), 315–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074004269288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandmann, L. R., & Kliewer, B. W. (2012). Theoretical and applied perspectives on power: Recognizing processes that undermine effective community-university partnerships. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 5(2), 20–28. DOI: 10.54656/uzkb4871.
   Google Scholar
• Scheller, D. S. (2015). Neighborhood hierarchy of needs. Journal of Urban Affairs, 38(3), 429–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Nebraska at Omaha Center for Public Affairs Research. (2019). One Omaha report (Author).
   Google Scholar
• Van Schyndel, T., Pearl, A. J., & Purcell, J. W. (2019). Extending our conceptualization of boundary-spanning leadership for community engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 23(2), 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Managing collaborative processes: Common practices, uncommon circumstances. Administration & Society, 40(5), 431–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399708320181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2008). Building a two-way street: Challenges and opportunities for community engagement at research universities. The Review of Higher Education, 32(1), 73–106. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2010). Community engagement and boundary-spanning roles at research universities. Journal of Higher Education, 81(6), 632–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2010.11779075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, H. J., Young, B. R., Murray, N., Burton, D. L., Levin, B. L., Massey, O. T., & Baldwin, J. A. (2016). Community-university partnerships for research and practice: Application of an interactive and contextual model of collaboration. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 20(2), 55–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang, K., & Callahan, K (2007). Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00711.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar