Joint use between communities and schools: unpacking dimensions of power

References

• Aldag, A. M., & Warner, M. (2018). Cooperation, not cost savings: Explaining duration of shared service agreements. Local Government Studies, 44(3), 350–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1411810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldag, A. M., Warner, M. E., & Bel, G. (2020). It depends on what you share: The elusive cost savings from service sharing. Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory, 30(2), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle, C., Mette, I., & Mercado, A. (2018). Partnering with schools for community development: Power imbalances in rural community collaboratives addressing childhood adversity. Community Development, 49(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2018.1429001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierbaum, A., Butler, A., O‘Keefe, E. 2021. Possibilities and Challenges of School-Centered Community Development in Baltimore Community Devlopment, (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Santiago, G. (2020). Community development transformation of cooper neighborhood: A Rutgers-Camden university and LEAP Academy school collaboration through sustainable development. Community Development, 51(5), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2020.1781222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Cities and Schools and 21st Century School Fund. (2014). School facility cost calculator. http://www.bestschoolfacilities.org/jointusecalc/
   Google Scholar
• Clopton, A. W., & Finch, B. L. (2011). Re-conceptualizing social anchors in community development: Utilizing social anchor theory to create social capital’s third dimension. Community Development, 42(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2010.505293
   Google Scholar
• Driskell, D. (2017). Creating better cities with children and youth: A manual for participation. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Emery, M., & Flora, C. (2006). Spiraling-up: Mapping community transformation with community capitals framework. Community Development, 37(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330609490152
   Google Scholar
• Filardo, M., & Vincent, J. M. (2014). A Policy Framework for Joint Use: Enabling and Supporting Community Use of K-12 Public School Facilities (Berkeley, CA: Center for Cities & Schools). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED573796.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Filardo, M., Vincent, J. M., Allen, M., & Franklin, J. 2010. Joint Use of Public Schools: A Framework for a New Social Contract. Washington, DC: 21st Century School Fund. https://escholarship.org/content/qt44m449tp/qt44m449tp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Flora, C. B., & Flora, J. L. (1993). Entrepreneurial social infrastructure: A necessary ingredient. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 529(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716293529001005
   Google Scholar
• Flora, C. B., Flora, J. L., & Gasteyer, S. P. (2016). Rural communities: Legacy and change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flora, C. B., & Gillespie, A. H. (2009). Making healthy choices to reduce childhood obesity: Community capitals and food and fitness. Community Development, 40(2), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330903001430
   Google Scholar
• Hefetz, A., Warner, M. E., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2012). Privatization and intermunicipal contracting: The US local government experience 1992–2007. Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy, 30(4), 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1068/c11166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsford, S. D., & Sampson, C. (2014). Promise neighborhoods: The promise and politics of community capacity building as urban school reform. Urban Education, 49(8), 955–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085914557645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000293170
   Google Scholar
• Israel, G. D., & Beaulieu, L. J. (2004). Investing in communities: Social capital’s role in keeping youth in school. Community Development, 34(2), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330409490111
   Google Scholar
• Israel, E., & Warner, M. E. (2008). Planning for family friendly communities. American Planning Association. PAS Memo https://www.planning.org/pas/memo/2008/nov/
   Google Scholar
• Kania, J., Kramer, M., Kania, J., Hartman, M., & Pawłowska-Góral, K. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 62 (1), 37–40. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/collective_impact
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, M. S. (2002). International programs in schools: Considerations of form and function. International Review of Education, 48(5), 305–334. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021231713392
   Google Scholar
• Kelleher, K., Reece, J., & Sandel, M. (2018). The healthy neighborhood, healthy families initiative. Pediatrics, 142(3): e20180261. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-0261
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, P., & Lobao, L. (2021). Whose need matters?: The local welfare state, poverty, and variation in US counties’ social service provisioning. Social Currents, 8(6), 566–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294965211047886
   Google Scholar
• Kjolhede, C., Lee, A. C., Duncan De Pinto, C., O’Leary, S. C., Baum, M., Savio Beers, N., Moran Bode, S., Gibson, E. J., Gorski, P., Jacob, V., Larkin, M., Christopher, R., & Schumacher, H. (2021). School-Based Health Centers and Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics, 148(4): e2021053758. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-053758
   Google Scholar
• Knopf, J. A., Finnie, R. K., Peng, Y., Hahn, R. A., Truman, B. I., Vernon-Smiley, M., Johnson, R. L., Fielding, J. E., Muntaner, C., Hunt, P. C., Phyllis Jones, C., Fullilove, M. T., & Johnson, C. (2016). School-based health centers to advance health equity: A community guide systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51(1), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, L. E., Heinrich, C. J., & Hill, C. J. (2001). Improving governance: A new logic for empirical research. Georgetown Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyson, T. A. (2002). What does a school mean to a community? Assessing the social and economic benefits of schools to rural villages in New York. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED464777.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Makarewicz, C. (2022). Supporting parent engagement in children’s learning through neighborhood development and improvements to accessibility. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 42(1), 47–63. doi:10.1177/0739456X18804036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKoy, D. L., & Vincent, J. M. (2007). Engaging schools in urban revitalization: The Y-PLAN (Youth—Plan, learn, act, now!). Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X06298817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKoy, D., Vincent, J. M., & Bierbaum, A. H. (2011). Opportunity-rich schools and sustainable communities: Seven steps to align high-quality education with innovations in city and metropolitan planning and development. Center for Cities and Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., Wills, N., & Scanlan, M. (2013). Educational leadership on the social frontier: Developing promise neighborhoods in urban and tribal settings. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(4), 543–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X12471531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, D. (2015). Mutual benefits and equity amid racial diversity: A generational strategy for growing a broader base of support for social equity. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(3), 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X15596579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New York Academy of Medicine. (2011). Age-friendly NYC: A Progress Report.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). Analyzing collective action. Agricultural Economics, 41, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00497.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reece, J., & Gough, M. Z. (2019). Planning for regional sustainability and justice: The role of collective impact. Community Development, 50(3), 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2019.1610014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafft, K. A. (2016). Rural education as rural development: Understanding the rural school–community well-being linkage in a 21st-century policy context. Peabody Journal of Education, 91(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2016.1151734
   Google Scholar
• Severcan, Y. C. (2015). Planning for the unexpected: Barriers to young people’s participation in planning in disadvantaged communities. International Planning Studies, 20(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2014.985195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipple, J. W., Francis, J. D., & Fiduccia, P. C. (2019). Exploring the gradient: The economic benefits of ‘nearby’schools on rural communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 68, 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spengler, J. O., Young, S. J., & Linton, L. S. (2007). Schools as a community resource for physical activity: Legal considerations for decision makers. American Journal of Health Promotion, 21(4_suppl), 390–396. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-21.4s.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmage, C. A., Figueroa, H. L., & Wolfersteig, W. L. (2018). Perceptions of expanded shared use of schools: A mixed method examination of pathways and barriers to community well-being. School Community Journal, 28(2), 297–320.
   Google Scholar
• Testa, K. (2001). Joint-Use School Facility Agreements Strengthen School Communities. Educational Facility Planner, 36(3), 11–13. http://www.schoolcommunitynetwork.org/SCJ.aspx
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF, . (2018). . In Child friendly cities and communities: Handbook. Geneva: United Nations Children’s Fund.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2018). Delineation Files. Retrieved April 2020, from https://www.census.gov/geographies/reference-files/time-series/demo/metro-micro/delineation-files.html
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 2021, American community survey, ( 2015–2019). 2015–2019
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, J. M. (2010). In Partnerships for joint use: expanding the use of public school infrastructure to benefit students and communities. Berkeley, CA: Center for Cities and Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, J. M. (2014). Joint use of public schools: A framework for promoting healthy communities. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X13513615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer, N., Weaver, L., & McGuire, C. (2016). Collective impact approaches and community development issues. Community Development, 47(2), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2015.1133686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E. (1999). Social Capital construction and the role of the local state. Rural Sociology, 64(3), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1999.tb00358.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E. (2011). Competition or cooperation in urban service delivery? Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 82(4), 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2011.00450.x
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., Homsy, G. C., & Morken, L. J. (2017). Planning for aging in place: Stimulating a market and government response. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 37(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16642824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Rukus, J. (2013). Planners’ role in creating family-friendly communities: Action, participation and resistance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 35(5), 627–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Weiss Daugherty, C. (2004). Promoting the ’Civic’ in Entrepreneurship: The Case of Rural Slovakia. Community Development, 35(1), 117–134. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15575330409490125
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Zhang, X. (2019). Planning communities for all ages. Journal of Planning Education and Research, doi: 10.1177/0739456X19828058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Zhang, X. (2020). Healthy places for children: the critical role of engagement, common vision, and collaboration. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9277. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Zhang, X. (2021). Serving an ageing population: Collaboration is key. Local Government Studies, 47(3), 498–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1787166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westin, M. (2022). The framing of power in communicative planning theory: Analysing the work of John Forester, Patsy Healey and Judith innes. Planning Theory, 21(2), 132–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952211043219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. (2007) . Global age-friendly cities: A guide. World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., & Warner, M. E. (2022). Crowding out development: Fiscal federalism after the Great Recession. Environment & Planning A, 54(2), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211053643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Warner, M. E., & Wethington, E. (2020). Can age-friendly planning promote equity in community health across the rural-urban divide in the US? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1275. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar