Intergenerational family farm leadership, organizational innovativeness, and resiliency

References

• Abdulai, A.-R., & Oppong, A. (2021). Understanding the agriculture policy environment in Newfoundland and labrador – a focus on farmer attraction and retention interventions. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 16(2), 232–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abernethy, K. E., Bodin, Ö., Olsson, P., Schwarz, H. A., & Schwarz, A. (2014). Two steps forward, two steps back: The role of innovation in transforming towards community-based marine resource management in Solomon Islands. Global Environmental Change, 28, 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astrachan, J. H., Klein, S. B., & Smyrnios, K. X. (2002). The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00045.x
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2021). Towards an entrepreneurial ecosystem typology for regional economic development: The role of creative class and entrepreneurship. Regional Studies, 55(4), 735–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1854711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, H., Jo, S. H., & Lee, E. (2021). Why do older consumers avoid innovative products and services? Journal of Services Marketing, 35(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM10-2019-0408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balfour, B., & Alter, T. R. (2016). Mapping community innovation: Using social network analysis to map the interactional field, identity facilitators, and foster community development. Community Development, 47(4), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2016.1153493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckett, J., & Galt, R. E. (2014). Land trusts and beginning farmers’ access to land: Exploring the relationships in coastal California. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 4(2), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2014.042.008
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L., & Lane, H. (2014). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. (8th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Bigliardi, B., & Dormio, A. I. (2009). Successful generational change in family business. Measuring Business Excellence, 13(2), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040910961207
   Google Scholar
• Boddy, C. R. (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 19(4), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borich, T. O., & Korsching, P. F. (1990). Community image and community innovativeness. Community Development Society Journal, 21(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575339009489968
   Google Scholar
• Borychowski, M., Stępień, S., Polcyn, J., Tošović-Stevanović, A., Ćalović, D., Lalić, G., & Žuža, M. (2020). Socio-economic determinants of small family farms’ resilience in selected Central and Eastern European countries. Sustainability, 12(24), 10362. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosworth, G., & Wilson-Youlden, L. (2019). Women tourism entrepreneurs and the survival of family farms in North East England. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 14(3), 126–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabell, J. F., & Oelofse, M. (2012). An indicator framework for assessing agroecosystem resilience. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04666-170118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camisón-Zornoza, C., Lapiedra-Alcamí, R., Segarra-Ciprés, M., & Boronat-Navarro, M. (2004). A meta-analysis of innovation and organizational size. Organization Studies, 25(3), 331–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604040039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDFA. (2017). Farms + data: Most California farms are family-run, and farmers are aging, Retrieved June 24, 2022, from https://plantingseedsblog.cdfa.ca.gov/wordpress/?p=10909
   Google Scholar
• CDFA. (2018). California agricultural statistics review, 2017–2018, Retrieved June 24, 2022, from https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/statistics/PDFs/2017-18AgReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five. Approaches. 2nd. Sage
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, M., & McKenzie, H. (2006). The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Social Science Information, 45(4), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018406069584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darnhofer, I. (2010). Strategies of family farms to strengthen their resilience. Environmental Policy & Governance, 20(4), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Massis, A., Chua, J. H., & Chrisman, J. J. (2008). Factors preventing intra‐family succession. Family Business Review, 21(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17416248.2008.00118.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Kotlar, J., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Wright, M. (2016). Innovation through tradition: Lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earls, A., & Hall, H. (2018). Lessons for succession planning in rural Canada: A review of farm succession plans & available resources in Haldimand County, Ontario. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 13(4), 25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feranita, F., Kotlar, J., & De Massis, A. (2017). Collaborative innovation in family firms: Past research, current debates and agenda for future research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(3), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, M. A., & Muske, G. (2016). Family businesses and community development: The role of small business owners and entrepreneurs. Community Development, 47(4), 412–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2015.1133683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenberger, T., Mueller, M., Spangler, T., & Alexander, S. (2013). Community resilience: Conceptual framework and measurement feed the future learning agenda. Westat.
   Google Scholar
• Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408–1416. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelo, O., Braakmann, D., & Benetka, G. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research: Beyond the debate. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42(3), 266–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-008-9078-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: principles and practices. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803123
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection for case study analysis: Qualitative and quantitative techniques. In J. Box-Steffensmier, H. Brady, & D. Collier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 645–684). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilding, M., Gregory, S., & Cosson, B. (2015). Motives and outcomes in family business succession planning. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(2), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullifer, J., & Thompson, A. P. (2006). Subjective realities of older male farmers: Self perceptions of ageing and work. Rural Society, 16(1), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.5172/rsj.351.16.1.80
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. K., & Rogers, E. M. (1991). Internal marketing: Integrating R&D and marketing within the organization. Journal of Services Marketing, 5(2), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876049110035558
   Google Scholar
• Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Marante, C. A. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauck, J., & Prügl, R. (2015). Innovation activities during intra-family leadership succession in family firms: An empirical study from a socioemotional wealth perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(2), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herold, D. M., Jayaraman, N., & Narayanaswamy, C. R. (2006). What is the relationship between organizational slack and innovation? Journal of Management Issues, 18(3), 372–392.
   Google Scholar
• Hersey, A., & Adams, M. (2017). Using contribution analysis to assess the influence of farm link programs in the US. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 7(3), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2017.073.006
   Google Scholar
• Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 28(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer-Dixon, T. (2000). The ingenuity gap. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, M. (2005). Rural crisis, good practice and community development responses. Community Development Journal, 40(4), 425–432. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsi087
   Google Scholar
• Howley, P., O’Donoghue, C., & Heanue, K. (2012). Factors affecting farmers adoption of agricultural innovations: A panel data analysis of the use of artificial insemination among dairy farmers in Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(6), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v4n6p171
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, E. T. (2004). Community innovation through entrepreneurship: Grantmaking in Canadian community economic development. Journal of the Community Development Society, 35(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330409490122
   Google Scholar
• Kharrazi, A., Yu, Y., Jacob, A., Vora, N., & Fath, B. D. (2020). Redundancy, diversity, and modularity in network resilience: Applications for international trade and implications for public policy. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2020.06.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurland, N. B., & McCaffrey, S. J. (2020). Community socioemotional wealth: Preservation, succession, and farming in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. Family Business Review, 33(3), 244–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486520910876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampel, J., Honig, B., & Drori, I. (2014). Organizational ingenuity: Concept, processes and strategies. Organization Studies, 34(4), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614525321
   Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lietz, C. A., & Zayas, L. E. (2010). Evaluating qualitative research for social workpractitioners. Advances in Social Work, 11(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.18060/589
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28(7), 993–1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607078111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luk, C. L., Yau, O. H. M., Sin, L. Y. M., Tse, A. B. C., Chow, R. P. M., & Lee, J. S. Y. (2008). The effects of social capital and organizational innovativeness in different institutional contexts. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 589–612. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet, 358(9280), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mars, M. M. (2013). Framing the conceptual meaning and fundamental principles of innovation. In M. M. Mars & S. Hoskinson (Eds.), A cross-disciplinary primer on the meaning and principles of innovation (pp. 1–12). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Mars, M. M. (2020a). From within the shadows of the everyday: Localized entrepreneurship and the dilemma of scale. Community Development, 51(5), 628–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2020.1825504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mars, M. M. (2020b). Inter-organizational dynamics and the ecology of localized entrepreneurship. Community Development, 51(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2020.1713835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mars, M. M., & Schau, H. J. (2019). The jazziness of local food work: Organization level ingenuity and the entrepreneurial formation and evolution of local food systems. Rural Sociology, 84(2), 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis. (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, A. K., El-Osta, H. S., & Shaik, S. (2010). Succession decisions in U.S. family farm businesses. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 35(1), 133–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroney, A., O’Reilly, S., & O’Shaughnessy, M. (2016). Taking the leap and sustaining the journey: Diversification on the Irish family farm. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 6(4), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2016.064.004
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. (2000). Using technology and constituting structure: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation: Integrating theory and practice. (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, R. D. G., Sendra, M. J. M., & López-I-Gelats, F. (2020). Strategies and drivers determining the incorporation of young farmers into the livestock sector. Journal of Rural Studies, 78, 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.06.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plana-Farran, M., & Gallizo, J. L. (2021). The survival of family farms: Socioemotional wealth(SEW). Agriculture, 11(6), 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11060520
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. (5th ed.). Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. E. (2009). Making visible the coding process: Using qualitative data software in a post-structural study Making visible the coding process. Issues in Educational Research, 19(2), 142–161.
   Google Scholar
• Smithers, J., & Johnson, P. (2004). The dynamics of family farming in North HuronCounty, Ontario. Part I. Development trajectories. The Canadian Geographer, 48(2), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0008-3658.2004.00055.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielman, D. J., Davis, K., Negash, M., & Ayele, G. (2011). Rural innovation systems and networks: Findings from a study of Ethiopian smallholders. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-010-9273-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suess-Reyes, J., & Fuetsch, E. (2016). The future of family farming: A literature review on innovation, sustainable and succession-oriented strategies. Journal of Rural Studies, 47(Part A), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.008
   Google Scholar
• Sundstrom, S. M., & Allen, C. R. (2019). The adaptive cycle: More than a metaphor. Ecological Complexity, 39, 100767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2019.100767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taneja, S., Pryor, M. G., & Hayek, M. (2016). Leaping innovation barriers to small business longevity. Journal of Business Strategy, 37(3), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-12-2014-0145
   Google Scholar
• USDA. (2017). Census of Agriculture | National Agricultural Statistics Service. Retrieved August 2, from https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2017/index.php
   Google Scholar
• USDA. (n.d.). National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Family Farms | National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Retrieved June 24, 2022 from https://nifa.usda.gov/family-farms
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00650-090205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, B., Sayer, J., Andrew, N. L., & Campbell, B. (2010). Should enhanced resilience be an objective of natural resource management research for developing countries? Crop Science, 50(S1), S-10-S–19. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.10.0565
   Google Scholar
• Whitt, P. B., Bailey, B., & Harris, M. (2021, July 29). A look at America’s family farms. Retrieved June 24, 2022, from https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2020/01/23/look-americas-family-farms
   Google Scholar
• Worstell, J. (2020). Ecological resilience of food systems in response to the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 9(3), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2020.093.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worstell, J., & Green, J. (2017). Eight qualities of resilient food systems: Toward a sustainability/resilience index. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 7(3), 23–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2017.073.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar