Piloting Collaborative Learning Activities in a Sustainable Construction Class

References

• Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). (2013). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Retrieved June 10, 2014, from http://www.abet.org/eac-criteria-2014-2015/
   Google Scholar
• American Council for Construction Education (ACCE). (2014). Document 103: Standards and criteria for post-secondary construction education degree programs. Retrieved June 12, 2014, from http://www.acce-hq.org/images/uploads/OBS_-_Standards_Committees_Final_Document_-_3-10-20143.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anvuur, A., & Kumaraswamy, M. (2007). Conceptual model of partnering and alliancing. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133(3), 225–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatchford, P., Kutnick, P., Baines, E., & Galton, M. (2003). Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1), 153–172.
   Google Scholar
• Borden, L. M., & Perkins, D. F. (1999). Assessing your collaboration: A self-evaluation tool. Journal of Extension, 37(2), 67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., Karlin, J., McNair, L., and Beddoes, K. (2013). Team effectiveness theory from industrial and organizational psychology applied to engineering student project teams: A research review. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 472–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014). Increasing the use of evidence‐based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Curşeu, P. L., & Pluut, H. (2013). Student groups as learning entities: The effect of group diversity and teamwork quality on groups’ cognitive complexity. Studies in Higher Education, 38(1), 87–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagenais, D. A. (2007). Introduction to good faith in construction contracts. Construction Management and Economics, 25(7), 715–721.
   Google Scholar
• Dershimer, G. (1993). Finding your way through conflict. Journal of Management in Engineering, 9(2), 142–147.
   Google Scholar
• Duderstadt, J. J. (2007). Engineering for a changing road: A roadmap to the future of engineering practice, research, and education. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Emmitt, S., & Ruikar, K. (2013). Collaborative design management. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., & Dietz, E. J. (1998). A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention. V. Comparisons with traditionally‐taught students. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 469–480.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, D. R. (2010). Group dynamics. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Froyd, J. E., Wankat, P. C., & Smith, K. A. (2012). Five major shifts in 100 years of engineering education. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(Special Centennial Issue), 1344–1360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Rohrbeck, C. A., & Fantuzzo, J. W. (2006). A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gransberg D., Dillon, W., Reynolds, L., & Boyd, J. (1999). Quantitative analysis of partnered project performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(3), 161–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson, D. E., & Moore, J. D. (2008). Group learning pedagogy and group selection. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 4(1), 34–45. doi:10.1080/15578770801943893
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher 38(5), 365–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, K., & Harms, J. (2005). Getting started: A guide to collaboration in the classroom. Manoa, HI: The President’s Educational Improvement Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Krug, J. (1997). People skills: Teamwork. Journal of Management in Engineering, 13(2), 15–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, D. (2013). Group dynamics for teams. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liska, R. (1993). Management education: Partnering for project success. Alachua, FL: National Center for Construction Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• McGraw-Hill Construction. (2012). The business value of BIM in North America: Multi-year trend analysis and user ratings (2007–2012). Bedford, MA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Muir, T., & Rance, B. (Eds.). (1995). Collaborative practice in the built environment. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2001). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Retrieved May 30, 2014, from http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10999&page=53
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (NSF) Research in Engineering Education. (2014). Retrieved June 10, 2014, from http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=503584
   Google Scholar
• Ohland, M. W., Loughry, M. L., Woehr, D. J., Bullard, L. G., Felder, R. M., Finelli, C. J., & Schmucker, D. G. (2012). The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness: development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale for self-and peer evaluation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(4), 609–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas-Drummond, S., & Mercer, N. (2003). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1), 99–111.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, S. M., Morrison, G. R., & Lowther, D. L. (2005). Using experimental methods in higher education research. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 39–64.
   Google Scholar
• Salmons, J. (2001). Taxonomy for online collaboration: Theory and practice in e-learning. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Saner, H., McCaffrey, D., Stetcher, B., Klein, S., & Bell, R. (1994). The effects of working in pairs in science performance assessments. Educational Assessment, 2(4), 325–338.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, J., Woodward, J., & Smith, S. (2011, August). Applied tests of engineering design skills: Visual thinking characterization, test development and validation. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, R. E. (1974). Representative and quasi-representative designs for research on teaching. Review of Educational Research, 44(3), 265–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarricone, P., & Luca, J. (2002). Employees, teamwork and social interdependence—A formula for successful business? Team Performance Management, 8(3-4), 54–59.
   Google Scholar
• Thyssen, M. H., Emmitt, S., Bonke, S., & Kirk-Christoffersen, A. (2010). Facilitating client value creation in the conceptual design phase of construction projects: A workshop approach. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 6(1), 18–30.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (1995). Group collaboration in assessment: Multiple objectives, processes, and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(2), 239–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar