A Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Model for Construction Enterprise Resource Planning System Selection

References

• Ahmed, S., Ahmad, I., Azhar, S., & Mallikarjuna, S. (2003, March). Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems in the construction industry. Proceedings of the ASCE Construction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation of Construction, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Badri M., & Davis, D. (2001). A comprehensive 0–1 goal programming model for project selection. International Journal of Project Management, 19(4), 243–252.
   Google Scholar
• Bechler, B. (1997). Evolution of the virtual enterprise. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of American Production and Inventory Control Society, Alexandria, VA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno, S., & Salmeron, J. (2008). Fuzzy modeling enterprise resource planning tool selection. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 30(3), 137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Lacouture, D., Medaglia, A., & Skibniewski, M. (2007). Supply chain optimization tool for purchasing decisions in B2B construction marketplaces. Automation in Construction, 16, 569–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1979). Short communication: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 3, 339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1981). Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: An application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management Science, 27, 668–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K., & Gorla, N. (1998). Information system project selection using fuzzy logic. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 28, 849–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, E., & Li, U. (2004). Exploring quantitative methods for project location selection. Building and Environment, 39, 1467–1476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, E., Chaing, Y., & Tang, B. (2007). Alternative approach to credit scoring by DEA: Evaluating borrowers with respect to PFI projects. Building and Environment, 42(4), 1752–1760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, B., Skibniewski, M., & Lucas, H. (2008). Analyzing enterprise resource planning system implementation factors in the engineering-construction industry. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 22(6), 373–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelli, T., Rao, D., & Battese, G. (1998). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, W., Seiford, L., & Tone, K. (2006). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Norwell, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. (1998). Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review, July-August, 121–131.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. (2000). Mission critical: Realizing the promise of enterprise systems. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elarbi, N. (2001). ERP and business continuity. Philadelphia, PA: Sungard.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, P. (2003, November). Use of a decision method for tracking organizational or industrial performance over time. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, The Decision Sciences Institute, Atlanta, Georgia,USA.
   Google Scholar
• El-Mashaleh, M. (2010). Decision to bid or not to bid: A data envelopment analysis approach. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 37, 37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Mashaleh, M. (2013). Empirical framework for making the bid/no-bid decision. Journal of Management in Engineering, 29(3), 200–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Mashaleh, M., & Minchin, R. (2014). Concessionaire selection based on data envelopment analysis. Journal of Management in Engineering, 30(4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Mashaleh, M., Minchin, R., & O’Brien, W. (2007). Management of construction firm performance using benchmarking. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(1), 10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Mashaleh, M., O’Brien, W., & Minchin, R. (2006). Firm performance and information technology utilization in the construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(5), 499–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Mashaleh, M., Rababeh, S., & Hyari, K. (2010). Utilizing data envelopment analysis to benchmark safety performance of construction contractors. International Journal of Project Management, 28(1), 61–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, M. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society A (Gen.), 120(3), 253–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, D. (1999). Succeeding with ERP. Manufacturing Engineering, 78(2), 65–67.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, D., & Stecke, K. (1995). The ERP maze: Enterprise resource planning and other production and inventory control software. IEE Solution, 27(8), 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Horta, I., Camanho, A., & Da Costa, J. (2010). Performance assessment of construction companies integrating key performance indicators and data envelopment analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(5), 581–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horta, I., Camanho, A., & Lima, A. (2013). Design of performance assessment system for selection of contractors in construction industry e-marketplaces. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(8), 910–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, A., & Yaisawarng, S. (2004). Sensitivity and dimensionality tests of DEA efficiency scores. European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 410–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., Maheshwari, B., & Kumar, U. (2002). Enterprise resource planning systems adoption process: A survey of Canadian organizations. International Journal of Production Research, 40, 509–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., Maheshwari, B., & Kumar, U. (2003). An investigation of critical management issues in ERP implementation: Empirical evidence from Canadian organizations. Technovation, 23(10), 793–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, V., Robert, T., & Wong, B. (1999). Software selection: A case study of the application of the analytical hierarchical process to the selection of a multimedia authoring system. Information Management, 36, 221–232.
   Google Scholar
• Lee J., & Kim, S. (2001). An integrated approach for interdependent information system project selection. International Journal of Project Management, 19, 111–118.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Arif, A., & Halpin, W. (2002, April). Simulation modeling by enterprise resource planning implementation in medium sized corporation. Proceedings of the first International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century, Miami,FL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, C., & Li, Q. (2008). Enterprise information system project selection with regard to BOCR. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 810–820.
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, B., Tran, V., & Ramani, J. (2005). Construction prequalification using data envelopment analysis. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 32, 183–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ML Payton Consultants. (2002). Enterprise resource planning systems in the construction industry—research summary. Houston, TX: ML Payton.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, J., & Dodd, S. (2000). Achieving integration on capital projects with enterprise resource planning systems. Automation in Construction, 9, 515–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilateris, P., & McCabe, B. (2003). Contractor financial evaluation model (CFEM). Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 30(3), 487–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piturro, M. (1999). How midsize companies are buying ERP. Journal of Accounting, 188(3), 41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Ptak, C. (2004). ERP tools, techniques, and applications for integrating the supply chain (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, R. (2003). An introduction to data envelopment analysis: A tool for performance measurement. New Delhi, India: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Santhanam, R., & Kyparisis, G. (1995). A multiple criteria decision model for information system project selection. Computers and Operations Research, 22(8), 807–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhanam, R., & Kyparisis, G. (1996). A decision model for interdependent information system project selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 89, 380–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, J., & Halpin, D. (2003). Enterprise resource planning for construction business management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(2), 214–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skibniewski, M., & Ghosh, S. (2009). Determination of key performance indicators with enterprise resource planning systems in engineering construction firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(10), 965–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowlati, T. (2001). Establishing the practical frontier in data envelopment analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Tatari, O., Castro-Lacouture, D., & Skibniewski, M. (2008). Performance evaluation of construction enterprise resource planning systems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 24(4), 198–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teltumbde, A. (2000). A framework of evaluating ERP projects. International Journal of Production Research, 28, 4507–4520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis, E. (2001). Introduction to the theory and application of data envelopment analysis: A foundation text with integrated software. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vitner, G., Rozenes, S., & Spraggett, S. (2006). Using data envelop analysis to compare project efficiency in a multi-project environment. International Journal of Project Management, 24(4), 323–329.
   Google Scholar
• Voordijk, H., Van Leuven, A., & Laan, A. (2003). Enterprise resource planning in a large construction firm: Implementation analysis. Construction Management and Economics, 21, 511–521.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. (2002). Data envelopment analysis with ideal or anti-ideal decision making unit. (Working Paper No. 0207). Manchester, UK: The University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, C., & Wang, M. (2004). A comprehensive framework for selecting an ERP system. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 161–169.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, F., Desmond, J., & Roberts, H. (1994). Success and failure of MRPII implementation. British Journal of Management, 5, 221–240.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, X., Shen, Q., Wang, Y., & Lu, J. (2008). Measuring the productivity of the construction industry in China using DEA-based Malmquist productivity indices. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(1), 64–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., Wu, C., & Tsai, C. (2007). Selection of an ERP system for a construction firm in Taiwan: A case study. Automation in Construction, 16, 787–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, D., Chou, D., & Chang, J. (2002). A synergic analysis for web-based enterprise resource planning systems. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 24, 337–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar