The relationship between project team members’ effectiveness and acknowledgment of talent: Team members’ perspective

References

• Abraham, S. (2012). Job satisfaction as an antecedent to employee engagement. SIES Journal of Management, 8(2), 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, T. R. (2007). Swift trust and distrust in strategic partnering relationships: Key considerations of team-based designs. Journal of Business Strategies, 24(2), 105.
   Google Scholar
• Airila, A., Hakanen, J., Punakallio, A., Lusa, S., & Luukkonen, R. (2012). Is work engagement related to work ability beyond working conditions and lifestyle factors? International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 85(8), 915–915. doi:10.1007/s00420-012-0732-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton, C., & Morton, L. (2005). Managing talent for competitive advantage: Taking a systemic approach to talent management. Strategic HR Review, 4(5), 28–31. doi:10.1108/14754390580000819
   Google Scholar
• Badir, Y., Büchel, B., & Tucci, C. (2012). A conceptual framework of the impact of NPD project team and leader empowerment on communication and performance: An alliance case context. International Journal of Project Management, 30(8), 914–926. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, G. (2011). Enhancing effectiveness on virtual teams. Journal of Business Communication, 48(2), 186–206. doi:10.1177/0021943610397270
   Google Scholar
• Björkman, I., Ehrnrooth, M., Mäkelä, K., Smale, A., & Sumelius, J. (2013). Talent or not? Employee reactions to talent identification. Human Resource Management, 52(2), 195–214. doi:10.1002/hrm.v52.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond-Barnard, T., & Steyn, H. (2013). The programme benefits of improving project team communication through a contact centre. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 24(2), 127–139. doi:10.7166/24-2-460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramwell, S. (1948). Galton’s “Hereditary Genius”. The Eugenics Review, 39(4), 146–153.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppe, R., & Stace, R. (2009). Integral team effectiveness: Validity analysis of a theory-based team measure. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 15(5/6), 220–234. doi:10.1108/13527590910983503
   Google Scholar
• Cervone, H. F. (2014). Effective communication for project success. OCLC Systems and Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 30(2), 74–77. doi:10.1108/OCLC-02-2014-0014
   Google Scholar
• ChamiMalaeb, R. (2012). Talent management as a key driver to employee performance. In B. Chapelet, & M. LeBerre (Eds.), Producing new knowledge on innovation management (pp. 209–222). Presses universitaires de Grenoble.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., & Bailey, D. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop fioor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239–290. doi:10.1177/014920639702300303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Poel, F., Stoker, J., & Van Der Zee, K. (2014). Leadership and organizational tenure diversity as determinants of project team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 40(5), 532–560. doi:10.1177/1059601114550711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driedonks, B., Gevers, J., & Weele, A. (2013). Success factors for sourcing teams: How to foster sourcing team effectiveness. European Management Journal, 32(2), 288–304. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2013.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esquivel, M., & Kleiner, B. (1997). The importance of conflict in work team effectiveness. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 3(2), 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Festing, M., & Schäfer, L. (2014). Generational challenges to talent management: A framework for talent retention based on the psychological-contract perspective. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 262–271. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2013.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2002). The economic geography of talent. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4), 743–755. doi:10.1111/1467-8306.00314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foo, M. D., Sin, H. P., & Yiong, L. P. (2006). Effects of team inputs and intrateam processes on perceptions of team viability and member satisfaction in nascent ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4), 389–399. doi:10.1002/smj.514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. (1985). Giftedness and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(3), 103–112. doi:10.1177/001698628502900302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Gliem, J., & Gliem, R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for likert-type scales. Presented at the Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, October 8-10, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Handford, M., & Matous, P. (2015). Problem-solving discourse on an international construction site: Patterns and practices. English for Specific Purposes, 38, 85–98. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2014.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helding, L. (2011). Innate talent: Myth or reality? Journal of Singing, 67(4), 451–458.
   Google Scholar
• Ikaheimo, H., & Laitinen, A. (2003). Analyzing recognition: Identification, acknowledgement and recognitive attitudes towards persons. Recognition and Power – symposium. Utrecht University, March 13-15, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Imran, H., Arif, I., Chemma, S., & Azeem, M. (2014). Relationship between job satisfaction, job performance, attitude towards work, and organizational commitment. Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management Journal, 2(2), 135–144.
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, J. (2014). Historical Perspectives: The 1958 Conference Report. Gifted Child Today, 37(2), 119–122.
   Google Scholar
• Jordanian Department of Statistics. (2014). http://web.dos.gov.jo/
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., & Knight, A. (2015). Who defers to whom and why? Dual pathways linking demographic differences and dyadic deference to team effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 58((1)), 59–84. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, K., Lavoie-Tremblay, M., Ritchie, J., & Lamothe, L. (2014). Advanced practice nursing, health care teams, and perceptions of team effectiveness. Journal of Trauma Nursing, 21(6), 291–299. doi:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisielnicki, J. (2011). The communication system in project teams: Problems of transfer of knowledge and information for the management of IT projects. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 8, 351–361.
   Google Scholar
• Kotlyar, I., & Karakowsky, L. (2014). Sources of satisfaction with high-potential employee programs. Journal Of Management Development, 33(10), 1035–1056.
   Google Scholar
• Lederer, V., Loisel, P., Rivard, M., & Champagne, F. (2014). Exploring the diversity of conceptualizations of work (Dis)ability: A scoping review of published definitions. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 24(2), 242–267. doi:10.1007/s10926-013-9459-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtirantaa, L., Kärnäa, S., Junnonena, J. M., & Julinb, P. (2012). The role of multi-firm satisfaction in construction project success. Construction Management and Economics, 30((6)), 463–475. doi:10.1080/01446193.2012.669485
   Google Scholar
• Li, F., Li, Y., & Wang, E. (2009). Task characteristics and team performance mediating effect of team member satisfaction. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37(10), 1373–1382. doi:10.2224/sbp.2009.37.10.1373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litzky, B., & Greenhaus, J. (2007). The relationship between gender and aspirations to senior management. Career Development International, 12(7), 637–659. doi:10.1108/13620430710834404
   Google Scholar
• Loh, J., Restubog, S., & Gallois, C. (2009). Attitudinal outcomes of boundary permeability: A comparison of Australian and Singaporean employees. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 17(2), 118–134. doi:10.1108/13527601021038697
   Google Scholar
• MacBeath, J. (2006). The talent enigma. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9(3), 183–204. doi:10.1080/13603120600741474
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J., & Schmidt, C. (2010). How to keep your top talent. Harvard Business Review, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough, E. (2000). Investigation of factors contributing to the success of cross-functional teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(3), 221–235. doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1730221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minbaeva, D., & Collings, D. G. (2013). Seven myths of global talent management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(9), 1762–1776. doi:10.1080/09585192.2013.777539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamad, M. I., Ibrahim, R., & Nekooie, M. A. (2014). A new method for evaluating the current collaborative teamwork environment within the Malaysian construction industry. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 9(4), 265–275. doi:10.1080/17509653.2014.917362
   Google Scholar
• Moltzen, R. (2009). Talent development across the lifespan. In L . V. Shavinina (Ed.) International handbook on giftedness, Part IV (pp. 353–379). Berlin, Germany: Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1990). The allocation of talent: Implications for growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, CVI, 503–530.
   Google Scholar
• Nzekwe-Excel, C. (2012). Satisfaction assessment in construction projects: A conceptual framework. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 2(1), 86–102. doi:10.1108/20441241211235071
   Google Scholar
• Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Thomson, D. (2015). Talent development what does it look like in practice? Gifted Child Today, 38(1), 5–6. doi:10.1177/1076217514556280
   Google Scholar
• Otter, A., & Emmitt, S. (2007). Exploring effectiveness of team communication. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(5), 408–419. doi:10.1108/09699980710780728
   Google Scholar
• Picazo, C., Gamero, N., Zornoza, A., & Peiró, J. (2014). Testing relations between group cohesion and satisfaction in project teams: A cross-level and crosslagged approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 297–307. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2014.894979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piña, M., Martínez, A., & Martínez, L. (2007). Teams in organizations: A review on team effectiveness. Team Performance Management, 14(1/2), 7–21. doi:10.1108/13527590810860177
   Google Scholar
• Ramsing, L. (2009). Project communication in a strategic internal perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14(3), 345–357. doi:10.1108/13563280910980113
   Google Scholar
• Richter, A., Dawson, J., & West, M. (2011). The effectiveness of teams in organizations: A meta-analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(13), 2749–2769. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.573971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico, R., & Cohen, S. (2005). Effects of task interdependence and type of communication on performance in virtual teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(3/4), 261–274. doi:10.1108/02683940510589046
   Google Scholar
• Roche, M., & Haar, J. (2013). Leaders life aspirations and job burnout: A self-determination theory approach. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(6), 515–531. doi:10.1108/LODJ-10-2011-0103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, S. (2013a). How definitions of talent suppress talent management. Industrial and Commercial Training, 45(3), 166–170. doi:10.1108/00197851311320586
   Google Scholar
• Ross, S. (2013b). Talent derailment: A multi-dimensional perspective for understanding talent. Industrial and Commercial Training, 45(1), 12–17. doi:10.1108/00197851311296656
   Google Scholar
• Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2009). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (5th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Song, J., Lim, D., Kang, I., & Kim, W. (2014). Team performance in learning organizations: Mediating effect of employee engagement. The Learning Organization, 21(5), 290–309. doi:10.1108/TLO-07-2012-0049
   Google Scholar
• Sonnenberg, M., Sonnenberg, V., & Brinks, M. (2014). The role of talent-perception incongruence in effective talent management. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 272–280. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2013.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swailes, S. (2013). The ethics of talent management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22(1), 32–46. doi:10.1111/beer.12007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sypniewska, B. (2013). Evaluation of factors influencing job satisfaction. Contemporary Economics, 8(1), 57–72. doi:10.5709/ce.1897-9254.131
   Google Scholar
• Tansley, C. (2011). What do we mean by the term “talent” in talent management? Industrial and Commercial Training, 43(5), 266–274. doi:10.1108/00197851111145853
   Google Scholar
• Tengland, P. (2013). A qualitative approach to assessing work ability. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 44(4), 393–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, G., & Cleveland, J. (1990). Developing Managerial Talent Through Simulation. American Psycholo~Cal Association, 45(2), 190–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre-Ruiz, J., Ferrón-Vílchez, V., & Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N. (2014). Team decision making and individual satisfaction with the team. Small Group Research, 45(2), 198–216. doi:10.1177/1046496414525478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventegodt, S., Andersen, N., & Merrick, J. (2003). The life mission theory III. Theory of talent. The Scientific World Journal, 3, 1286–1293. doi:10.1100/tsw.2003.115
   Google Scholar
• Vivekanand, & Pevekar, S. (2008). Understanding the Aspirations of Prospective Employees. ICFAI Journal of Management Research, 7(12), 74–86.
   Google Scholar
• Yüksel, H. (2014). The concept of workaholism as the extreme point in work engagement, its individual and organizational outcomes. International Journal of Alanya Faculty of Business, 6(2), 119–130.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., & Bright, D. (2012). Talent definition and talent management recognition in Chinese private-owned enterprises. Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship., 4(2), 14–163. doi:10.1108/17561391211242753
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., & Venkatesh, V. (2013). Explaining employees job performance: The role of online and offline workplace communication networks. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 695–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zikmund, W. (2003). Business research methods (7th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
   Google Scholar