Learning Space Design: The Presentation of a Framework for the Built Environment Discipline

References

• Ackerman, P. L., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2011). Trait complexes and academic achievement: Old and new ways of examining personality in educational contexts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 27–40. doi:10.1348/000709910X522564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adedokun, O. A., Parker, L. C., Henke, J. N., & Burgess, W. D. (2017). Student perceptions of a 21st century learning space. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Altimare, E., & Sheridan, D. M. (2016). The role of nonclassroom spaces in living-learning communities. Journal of Learning Spaces, 5(2), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, L. (2016). Communities of practice in higher education: Professional learning in an academic career. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(3), 230–241. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2015.1127813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustin, S. (2009). Place advantage: Applied psychology for interior architecture. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Axelsson, Ö. (2007). Individual differences in preferences to photographs. Psychology of aesthetics. Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 61.
   Google Scholar
• Baskin, T. W., Wampold, B. E., Quintana, S. M., & Enright, R. D. (2010). Belongingness as a protective factor against loneliness and potential depression in a multicultural middle school. The Counseling Psychologist, 38(5), 626–651. doi:10.1177/0011000009358459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckers, R., van der Voordt, T., & Dewulf, G. (2016). Learning space preferences of higher education students. Building and Environment, 104, 243–252. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beichner, R. J. (2014). History and evolution of active learning spaces. New directions for teaching and learning, 2014(137), 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bluyssen, P. M., Aries, M., & van Dommelen, P. (2011). Comfort of workers in office buildings: The European HOPE project. Building and Environment, 46(1), 280–288. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2014). The evaluation of physical learning environments: A critical review of the literature. Learning Environments Research, 17(1), 1–28. doi:10.1007/s10984-013-9149-3
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, J. (2016). A framework for the delivery of built environment student satisfaction in England. PhD, University of Salford, Manchester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business., Innovation & Skills (2010). Changes to tuition fees and higher education: Changes to tuition fees for 2012/2013 cleared by parliament [online] Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/changes-to-tuition-fees-and-higher-education [Accessed 12th August 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, D., & Gifford, R. (2001). Evaluation of the physical classroom by students and professors: A lens model approach. Educational Research, 43(3), 295–309. doi:10.1080/00131880110081053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. R. (2012). Management research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. A., & Goodyear, P. (2016). Models of learning space: Integrating research on space, place and learning in higher education. Review of Education, 4(2), 149–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrow, C. B., Liu, J., & Tatum, M. C. (2011). Curriculum delivery and assessment for net generation construction students. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 7(2), 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrell, G. (2016). Universities and colleges information systems associations: The higher education learning space tooklkit: ASCHOMS, AUDE and UCISA collaboration. Retrieved from http://www.ucisa.ac.uk/~/media/Files/publications/learningspaces/Toolkit_UK%20HE%20learning%20space_FINAL
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, H., Lewis, J & Turley, C (2003). Focus groups. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. (pp. 211–239) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gann, D., Salter, A., & Whyte, J. (2003). Design quality indicator as a tool for thinking. Building Research & Information, 31(5), 318–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, S., Porter, D., & Smith, C. (2012). Student visualization: Using 3-D models in undergraduate construction management education. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 8(1), 26–46.
   Google Scholar
• Granito, V. J., & Santana, M. E. (2016). Psychology of learning spaces: Impact on teaching and learning. Journal of Learning Spaces, 5(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, T., & Shao, J. (2016). Synthesizing the effect of building condition quality on academic performance. Education Finance and Policy, 11(1), 97–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harfield, T., Panko, M., Davies, K., & Kenley, R. (2007). Toward a learning-styles profile of construction students: Results from New Zealand. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 3(3), 143–158.
   Google Scholar
• Harrop, D., & Turpin, B. (2013). A study exploring learners’ informal learning space behaviors, attitudes, and preferences. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 19(1), 58–77.
   Google Scholar
• Haverinen-Shaughnessy, U., Shaughnessy, R. J., Cole, E. C., Toyinbo, O., & Moschandreas, D. J. (2015). An assessment of indoor environmental quality in schools and its association with health and performance. Building and Environment, 93(Part 1), 35–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2016). Teaching excellence framework: Year two additional guidance. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Pubs/2016/201632/HEFCE2016_32.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hoque, S., & Weil, B. (2016). The relationship between comfort perceptions and academic performance in university classroom buildings. Journal of Green Building, 11(1), 108–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, R.-L., Lin, T.-P., & Kuo, N.-J. (2006). Field experiments on thermal comfort in campus classrooms in Taiwan. Energy and Buildings, 38(1), 53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irizarry, J., Gheisari, M., Zolfagharian, S., & Meadati, P. (2013). Human computer interaction modes for construction education applications: Experimenting with small format interactive displays. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 9(2), 83–101.
   Google Scholar
• JISC. (2006). Designing spaces for effective learning. Bristol, UK: HEFCE. Retrieved from www. jisc. ac. uk/uploaded documents/JISClearningspaces. pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., & Lomas, C. (2005). Design of the learning space: Learning and design principles. EDUCAUSE Review, 40(4), 16.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Hall, C. (2016). NMC horizon report: 2016 higher education edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Sutcliffe, M. J., Bragg, J., & Harris, D. (2016). To what extent is capital expenditure in UK higher education meeting the pedagogical needs of staff and students? [Article]. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 38(4), 477–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kariippanon, K. E., Cliff, D. P., Lancaster, S. L., Okely, A. D., & Parrish, A.-M. (2017). Perceived interplay between flexible learning spaces and teaching, learning and student wellbeing. Learning Environments Research, 21, 301–320.
   Google Scholar
• Lamond, J., Proverbs, D., & Wood, T. (2013). What matters to built environment students: An analysis of the National Students Survey (NSS) and Key Information Sets (KIS) data. York, UK: Higher Education Academy. Available at: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/disciplines/built-environment/what-matters-be-students [Accessed 5th July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Lindal, P. J., & Hartig, T. (2013). Architectural variation, building height, and the restorative quality of urban residential streetscapes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomas, C., & Oblinger, D. (2006). Student practices and their impact on learning spaces. In D. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces (pp. 5). Washington, DC: Educause.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, G. C., Nardi, N. M., Reynolds, D., & Pamoukov, S. (2014). The impact of the classroom built environment on student perceptions and learning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 187–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, G., Roque Ferreira, C., & Pitarma, R. (2018). A system based on the internet of things for real-time particle monitoring in buildings. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(4), 821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, K., & Glover, I. (2016). The Beacon project: Art and design-Learning space innovation. [Online]. Available at: Beaconprojectbloggo.nmc.org/beacproj [Accessed 12th February 2020].
   Google Scholar
• McManus, I. C., & Furnham, A. (2006). Aesthetic activities and aesthetic attitudes: Influences of education, background and personality on interest and involvement in the arts. British Journal of Psychology, 97(4), 555–587.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNeil, J., & Borg, M. (2018). Learning spaces and pedagogy: Towards the development of a shared understanding. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(2), 228–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2010). Procedures and practice of mixed method design; Maintaining control, rigor, and complexity. In C. T. A. Teddlie (Ed.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (2nd ed., pp. 339–353). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Neary, M., Harrison, A., Crelin, G., Parekh, N., Saunders, G., Duggan, F., Williams, S & Austin, S. (2009). Learning landscapes in higher education: Clearing pathways, making spaces, involving academics in the leadership, governance and management of academic spaces in higher education. Project report: Higher Education Funding Council for England. Retrieved from http://learninglandscapes.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk/files/2010/04/FinalReport.pdf [Accessed 12th February 2020].
   Google Scholar
• O’ Shea, S., Stone, C., & Delahunty, J. (2015). “I ‘Feel’ like i am at university even though i am online.” Exploring how students narrate their engagement with higher education institutions in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 36(1), 41–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlowska, D. K., Westerman, J. W., Bergman, S. M., & Huelsman, T. J. (2014). Student personality, classroom environment, and student outcomes: A person–environment fit analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 180–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perks, T., Orr, D., & Al-Omari, E. (2016). Classroom re-design to facilitate student learning: A case study of changes to a university classroom. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(1), 53–68.
   Google Scholar
• Poon, J. (2017). Examining graduate built environment student satisfaction in the UK. What matters the most?. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 13(3), 179–197.
   Google Scholar
• Proverbs, D & Gameson, R. (2008). Case study research. In A. R. L. Knight (Ed.), Advanced research methods in the built environment. (pp.99–110) Oxford, UK: Wiley- Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (2008). The future of higher education teaching and the student experience. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/future-higher-education-teaching-and-student-experience
   Google Scholar
• Ray, J. L., & Smith, A. D. (2012). Using photographs to research organizations: Evidence, considerations, and application in a field study. Organizational Research Methods, 15(2), 288–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, M. (2013). Developing a model for the application of Post-occupancy Evaluation (POE) as a facilities performance enhancement tool in the higher education sector. PhD thesis, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Rullman, L. J., & Van den Kieboom, J. (2012). Creating community: Designing spaces that make a difference [report]. Planning for Higher Education, 41(1), 178–193.
   Google Scholar
• Sagioglou, C., & Greitemeyer, T. (2016). Individual differences in bitter taste preferences are associated with antisocial personality traits. Appetite, 96, 299–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sami, K., & Päivi, J. (2015). A framework for measuring student and staff satisfaction with university campus facilities. Quality Assurance in Education, 23(1), 47–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (2017). The influence of hierarchy and layout geometry in the design of learning spaces. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(3), 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, N. J. (2001). Designing effective study environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(2), 179–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunidijo, R. Y., & Kamardeen, I. (2018). Psychological challenges confronting graduate construction students in Australia. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 14, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Temple, P. (2009). From space to place: University performance and its built environment [journal article]. Higher Education Policy, 22(2), 209–223.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, R. (2007). Southern drift: The learning styles of first-and third-year students of the built environment. Architectural Science Review, 50(3), 246–255.
   Google Scholar
• Usher, N. (2018). The elemental workplace: The 12 elements for creating a fantastic workplace for everyone. London, UK: LID Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L. B., Gonzalez-Mora, J. L., Leder, H., Modroño, C., Nadal, M., Rostrup, N and Skov, M. (2015). Architectural design and the brain: Effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure on beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 10–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassigh, S., Davis, D., Behzadan, A. H., Mostafavi, A., Rashid, K., Alhaffar, H., Elias, A & Gallardo, G. (2018). Teaching building sciences in immersive environments: A prototype design, implementation, and assessment. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 14, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Vinales, J. J. (2015). The learning environment and learning styles: A guide for mentors. British Journal of Nursing, 24(8), 454–457.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, H. K., & Cotgrave, A. (2016). Factors that influence students’ satisfaction with their physical learning environments. Structural Survey, 34(3), 256–275.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Young, E., Green, H. A., Roehrich-Patrick, L., Joseph, L., & Gibson, T. (2003). Do K-12 school facilities affect education outcomes? Staff information report. Tennessee Advisory Commision on Intergovernmental Relations. Retrieved from www.state.tn.us/tacir/PDF_FILES/Education/SchFac.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, D., McCoy, A. P., Bulbul, T., Fiori, C., & Nikkhoo, P. (2015). Building collaborative construction skills through bim-integrated learning environment. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 11(2), 97–120.
   Google Scholar