References

References

• Anderson, T. W. 1958. An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Andorka, R., and Zagórski, K. 1980. Sociooccupational Mobility in Hungary and Poland. Budapest-Warszaw: Polish Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Aronowitz, S. 1974. False Promises. The Shaping of American Working Class Consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacol, M. M. 1971. “Intergenerational mobility in the Philippines.” Philippine Sociological Review 19: 199–208.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. 1957. Social Stratification. A Comparative Analysis of Structure and Process. New York: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, J. N. 1980. “Indianapolis and beyond: a structural model of occupational mobility across generations.” American Journal of Sociology 85: 815–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D. 1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bendix, R., and Lipset, S. M. 1959. Social Mobility in Industrial Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M., and Duncan, O. D. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Blishen, B. 1958. “The construction and use of an occupational class scale.” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 24: 519–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacich, P., and Kirby, D. 1975. “Using assumptions of linearity to establish a metric.” In Sociological Methodology 1976, ed. D. R. Heise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 230–49.
   Google Scholar
• Boudon, R. 1974. Mathematical Structures of Social Mobility. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., and Gintis, H. 1976. Schooling in Capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Breiger, R. R. 1981. “The social class structure of occupational mobility.” American Journal of Sociology 87: 578–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broom, L., and Jones, F. L. 1969. “Father-to-son mobility: Australia in comparative perspective.” American Journal of Sociology 14: 333–42.
   Google Scholar
• Burshtyn, H. 1968. “Factor analysis study of occupational prestige ratings.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 5: 156–80.
   Google Scholar
• Carchedi, G. 1978. On the Economic Identification of Social Classes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, G. 1958. Social Mobility and Class Structure. Lund: Gleerup.
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, F. S. 1936. Measurement of Social Status. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K., and Moore, W. E. 1945. “Some principles of stratification.” American Sociological Review 10: 242–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Fave, L. R. 1974. “Success values: are they universal or class differentiated?” American Journal of Sociology 80: 153–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domanski, H., and Sawinski, Z. 1984. “Prestiz i pozycja spoleczna jako wymiary ruchliwósci zawodowej” [ Prestige and socioeconomic status as dimensions of occupational mobility]. Studia Socjologiczne, 2: 107–25.
   Google Scholar
• Domanski, H., and Sawinski, Z. 1986 “Occupational mobility in Poland, 1972-82.” Social Science Information 25: 825–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, O. D. 1961 “A socioeconomic index for all occupations.” In Occupations and Social Status, ed. A. J. Reiss. New York: The Free Press, pp. 109–38.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan-Jones, P. 1972. “Social mobility, canonical scoring and occupational classification.” In The Analysis of Social Mobility. Methods and Approaches, ed. K. Hope. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 191–210.
   Google Scholar
• Encel, S. 1975. Equality and Authority. A Study of Class, Status and Power in Australia. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• L. Erikson, R.; Goldthorpe, J. H.; and Portocarero L. 1979. “Intergenerational class mobility in three western countries: England, France and Sweden.” British Journal of Sociology 30: 415–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherman, D. L., and Hauser, R. M. 1978. Opportunity and Change. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Featherman, D. L.; Jones, F. L.; and Hauser, R. M. 1978. “Assumptions of social mobility research in the U.S.: the case of occupational status.” In Social Mobility in Comparative Perspective, eds. W. Wesolowski, K. M. Słomczyński, and B. W. Mach. Wroclaw: Ossolineum, pp. 81–109.
   Google Scholar
• Featherman, D. L., and Stevens, G. 1982. “A revised socioeconomic index of occupational status: application in analysis of sex differences in attainment.” In Social Structure and Behavior, ed. R. M. Hauser, et al. New York: Academic Press, pp. 141–81.
   Google Scholar
• Form, W. 1972. “Automobile workers in four countries: the relevance of system participation for working class.” British Journal of Sociology 25: 442–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliani, S. 1982. “How many working classes?” American Journal of Sociology 87: 259–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1973. The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, D., ed. 1954. Social Mobility in Britain. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, N. D., and Alston, J. P. 1968. “Cultural distances among occupational categories.” American Sociological Review 33: 365–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldthorpe, J. H. 1980. Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthorpe, J. H.; Paine, C.; and Llewelyn, C. 1978. “Trends in class mobility.” Sociology 12: 441–68.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, L. A. 1969a. “How to ransack social mobility tables and other kinds of cross-classification tables.” American Journal of Sociology 75: 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, L. A. 1969b. “On the measurement of social mobility: an index of status persistence.” American Sociological Review 34: 831–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, L. A. 1979. “Simple models for analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 537–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grusky D., and Hauser R. M. 1984. “Comparative social mobility revisited. Models of convergence and divergence in 16 countries.” American Sociological Review 49: 19–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R. R. 1969. Occupations and the Social Structure. New York: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Halsey, A. H.; Heath, A. F., and Ridge, J. M. 1980. Origins and Destinations. Family, Class and Education in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, H. H. 1967. Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatt, P. K. 1961. “Occupation and social stratification.” In Occupations and the Social Status, ed. A. Reiss. New York: Free Press, pp. 330–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, R. M. 1978. “A structural model of the mobility table.” Social Forces 56: 919–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, R. M., and Featherman, D. L. 1977. The Process of Stratification. Trends and Analysis. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelrigg, L. E., and Gamier, M. A. 1976. “Occupational mobility in industrial societies: a comparable analysis of differential access to occupational ranks in seventeen countries.” American Sociological Review 41: 498–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, A. 1981. Social Mobility. Glasgow: Fontana Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, R. W.; Siegel, P. M.; and Rossi, P. M. 1964. “Occupational prestige in the United States, 1925-63.” American Journal of Sociology 70: 286–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, R. 1983. Workers’ Earnings and Corporate Economic Structure. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoggart, R. 1957. Uses of Literacy. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A., and Redlich, F. 1958. Social Class and Mental Illness. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, K. 1972a. “Marriage markets in the stratification system.” In The Analysis of Social Mobility. Methods and Approaches, ed. K. Hope. Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 105–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, K. 1972b. “Quantifying constraints on social mobility: the latent hierarchies of a contingency table.” In The Analysis of Social Mobility. Methods and Approaches, ed. K. Hope. Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 121–90.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, K. 1982 “Vertical and nonvertical class mobility in the three countries.” American Sociological Review 47: 99–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horan, P. M. 1974. “The structure of occupational mobility: conceptualization and analysis.” Social Forces 53: 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahl, J. 1957. The American Class Structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Kalleberg A. L., and A. Sorensen 1979. “The sociology of labor markets.” Annual Review of Sociology 5: 351–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. K. 1974. “Recruitment to the higher civil service.” In Elites and Power in British Society, ed. A. Giddens and P. Kelsall Stantworth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klatzky, S., and Hodge, R. W. 1971. “A canonical correlation analysis of occupational mobility.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 66: 16–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleining, G. 1971. “Die Veränderungen der Mobilitätschancen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.” Kölner Zeitschriftfür Sozialpsychologie 23: 789–807.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, M. L. 1969. Class and Conformity: A Study in Values. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
   Google Scholar
• Kolosi T., and Wnuk-Lipiñski E. 1983. Equality and Inequality under Socialism. Poland and Hungary Compared. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Krauze, T., and Slomczynski, K. M. 1986. “Matrix representation of structural and circulation mobility.” Sociological Methods and Research 14: 247–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J. B. 1964. “Multidimensional scaling: a numerical method.” Psychometrika 29: 115–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson-Sarafatti, M. 1977. The Rise of Professionalism. A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laumann, E. O. 1965. “Subjective distance and urban occupational stratification.” American Journal of Sociology 71: 26–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laumann, E. O. 1973. Bonds of Pluralism. The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Laumann, E. O., and Guttman, L. 1966. “The relative associational contiguity of occupations in an urban setting.” American Sociological Review 31: 169–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, A. M. 1936. The Measurement of Urban Home Environment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenski, G. 1966. Power and Privilege: A Theory of Social Stratification. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M., and Zetterberg, H. 1956 “A theory of social mobility.” In Transactions of the Third World Congress of Sociology. London: International Sociological Association, pp. 155–77.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, D. 1958. The Blackcoated Worker. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, K. I. 1972 “MDSCAL and distances between socioeconomic groups.” In The Analysis of Social Mobility. Methods and Approaches, ed. K. Hope. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 211–34.
   Google Scholar
• B. W. Mach, and Weslowski W. 1986. “Unfulfilled systemic functions of social mobility”. International Sociology 1 (nos. 1, 2).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mallet, S. 1975. The New Working Class. Bristol: Spokesmen Books.
   Google Scholar
• J. Marceau 1977. Class and Status in France. Economic Change and Social Immobility 1945-1975. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matras, J., and Weintraub, D. 1977. “Ethnic and other primordial differences in intergenerational mobility in Israel.” Discussion Paper 25-77. Jerusalem: Brookdale Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Maung, K. 1941. “Measurement of association in a contingency table with special reference to the pigmentation of hair and eye colours of Scottish school children.” Annals of Eugenics 11: 189–223.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, A. E. 1977. Multivariate Analysis in Behavioural Research. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, K. 1955. Class in American Society. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R. 1966. The New Classes. London: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. M. 1960. “Comparative social mobility.” Current Sociology 9: 1–89.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. 1951. White Collars. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy R. J., and R. T. Morris 1961. “Occupational situs, subjective class identification and political affiliation.” American Sociological Review 26: 383–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin, F. 1971. Class Inequality and Political Order: Social Stratification in Capitalist and Communist Societies. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, F. 1974 “Strategies of social closure in class formation.” In The Social Analysis of Class Structure, ed. F. Parkin. London: Tavistock, pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1953. “A revised analytical approach to the theory of social stratification.” In Class, Status and Power, ed. R. Bendix and S. M. Lipset. Glencoe: Free Press, pp. 450–94.
   Google Scholar
• Pohoski, M. 1983. “Ruchliwosc społeczna a nierównosci społeczne” [Social mobility and social inequalities]. Kultura i Spoleczenstwo 27: 135–64.
   Google Scholar
• Pöntinen, S. 1982. “Models and social mobility research: a comparison of some log-linear models of a social mobility matrix.” Quality and Quantity 16: 91–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöntinen, S. 1983. Social Mobility and Social Structure. A Comparison of Scandinavian Countries. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fenica.
   Google Scholar
• Portocarero, L. 1983. “Social mobility in industrial nations: women in France and Sweden.” Sociological Review 31: 57–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogoff, N. 1953. Recent Trends in Occupational Mobility. Glencoe: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scase, R. 1974. “Conceptualization of the class structure and political ideology: some observations on attitudes in England and Sweden.” In The Social Analysis of Class Structure, ed. F. Parkin. London: Tavistock, pp. 50–84.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. H. 1940. The Construction and Standardization of a Scale for the Measurement of Socio-Economic Status in Oklahoma Farm Families. Oklahoma A. and M. College Technical Bulletin, 9. Stillwater.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, P. M. 1971. “Prestige in the American Occupational Structures.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Słomczynski, K. M.; Miller, J.; and Kohn, M. L. 1981. “Stratification, work and values: a Polish-United States comparison.” American Sociological Review 46: 720–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. E. 1983. “Structural mobility, circulation mobility and the analysis of occupational mobility: a conceptual mismatch.” American Sociological Review 48: 721–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorokin, P. 1959. Social and Cultural Mobility. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, R. 1957. “Mobility orientations and stratification of 1,000 ninth graders.” American Sociological Review 22: 204–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svalastoga, K. 1959, Prestige, Class and Mobility. Copenhagen: Glydendale.
   Google Scholar
• Tolbert, C. M. 1983. “Industrial segmentation and men’s intergenerational mobility.” Social Forces 61: 1, 119–37.
   Google Scholar
• Tominaga, K. 1978. “A comparative analysis of social mobility: Tokyo and Chicago.” In Social Mobility in Comparative Perspective, eds. W. Wesolowski, K. M. Siomczynski, and B. W. Mach. Wroclaw: Ossolineum, pp. 201–33.
   Google Scholar
• Treiman, D. J. 1977. Occupational Prestige in the Comparative Perspective. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tumin, M. M., and Feldman, A. S. 1957. “Theory and measurement of occupational mobility.” American Sociological Review 22:281–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, R. H. 1960. “Sponsored and contest mobility and the school system.” American Sociological Review 25: 855–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Tyree; Semyonow, M.; and R. W. Hodge 1979. “Gaps and glissandos: inequality, economic development, and social mobility in 24 countries.” American Sociological Review 44: 410–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanneman, R. 1977. “The occupational composition of American classes: results from cluster analysis.” American Journal of Sociology 82: 783–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westergaard, J., and Resier, H. 1975. Class in Capitalist Society. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, H. 1964. “Orderly careers and social participation: the impact of work history on the integration in the middle mass.” American Sociological Review 26.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, H. 1966 “Measures and effects of social mobility.” In Social Structure and Mobility in Economic Development, eds. Smeiser, N., and Lipset, S. M. Chicago: Aldine, pp. 51–97.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. 1985. Classes. London: Thetford.
   Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi, K. 1983. “The structure of intergenerational occupational mobility: generality and specificity in resources, channels and barriers.” American Journal of Sociology 88: 718–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasuda, S. 1964. “A methodological inquiry into social mobility.” American Sociological Review 29: 16–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagórski, K. 1984. Social Mobility into Post-Industrial Society: Socioeconomic Structure and Fluidity of the Australian Work Force. Departmental Monograph No. 5. Australian National University.
   Google Scholar