Publication Cover
Journal of School Choice
International Research and Reform
Volume 14, 2020 - Issue 2
181
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Section

Heterogeneous Achievement Impacts across Schools in the Louisiana Scholarship Program

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Abdulkadiroğlu, A., Pathak, P. A., & Roth, A. E. (2005). The New York City high school match. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 95, 364–367. doi:10.1257/000282805774670167
  • Abdulkadiroğlu, A., Pathak, P. A., & Walters, C. R. (2018). Free to choose: Can school choice reduce student achievement? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(1), 175–206. doi:10.1257/app.20160634
  • Anderson, S. C., Humlum, M. K., & Nandrup, A. B. (2016). Increasing instruction time in school does increase learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(27), 7481–7484. doi:10.1073/pnas.1516686113
  • Andrews, I., Stock, J. H., & Sun, L. (2018). Weak instruments in IV regression: Theory and practice. Working paper. Retrieved from https://scholar.harvard.edu/iandrews/publications/weak-instruments-iv-regression-theory-and-practice
  • Angrist, J. D., & Lavy, V. (1999). Using Maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 533–575. doi:10.1162/003355399556061
  • Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from https://economics.mit.edu/files/8273
  • Barnard, J., Frangakis, C. E., Hill, J. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2003). Principal stratification approach to broken randomized experiments: A case study of school choice vouchers in New York City. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98(462), 299–323. doi:10.1198/016214503000071
  • Berends, M., Goldring, E., Stein, M., & Cravens, X. (2010). Instructional conditions in charter schools and students’ mathematics achievement gains. American Journal of Education, 116(3), 303–335. doi:10.1086/651411
  • Betts, J. R. (2005). The economic theory of school choice. In J. R. Betts & T. Loveless (Eds.), Getting choice right: Ensuring equity and efficiency in education policy (pp. 14–39). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Betts, J. R., Goldhaber, D., & Rosenstock, L. (2005). The supply side of school choice. In J. R. Betts & T. Loveless (Eds.), Getting choice right: Ensuring equity and efficiency in education policy (pp. 61–84). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Betts, J. R., & Tang, Y. E. (2014, August). A meta-analysis of the literature on the effect of charter schools on student achievement. Center for Reinventing Public Education working paper, pp. 1–71. Retrieved from https://www.crpe.org/sites/default/files/CRPE_meta-analysis_charter-schools-effect-student-achievement_workingpaper.pdf
  • Bitler, M. P., Domina, T., Penner, E. K., & Hoynes, H. W. (2015). Distributional effects of a school voucher program: Evidence from New York City. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(3), 419–450. doi:10.1080/19345747.2014.921259
  • Chan, C. (2008). The impact of school library services on student achievement and the implications for advocacy: A review of the literature. Access, 22(4), 15–20. Retrieved from https://repository.hkbu.edu.hk/lib_ja/5
  • Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, & America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED012275.pdf
  • Coleman, J. S., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public, Catholic, and private schools: The importance of community. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1982). High school achievement: Public, Catholic, and private schools compared. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Cookson, P. W. (2002). Privatization and educational equity: Can markets create a just school system? Current Issues in Comparative Education, 1(2), 57–64. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=8A92CCA0DD75EAFD10E538346B504D12?doi=10.1.1.200.1508&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  • Corcoran, S. P., & Cordes, S. A. (2017). The economics of school choice. In R. A. Fox & N. K. Buchanan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of school choice (1st ed., pp. 69–80). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Cowen, J. M. (2008). School choice as a latent variable: Estimating the complier average causal effect of vouchers in Charlotte. Policy Studies Journal, 36(2), 301–315. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00268.x
  • DeAngelis, C. A., Burke, L. M., & Wolf, P. J. (2019a). The effects of regulations on private school choice program participation: Experimental evidence from Florida. Social Science Quarterly. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12689
  • DeAngelis, C. A., Burke, L. M., & Wolf, P. J. (2019b). The effects of regulations on private school choice program participation: Experimental evidence from California and New York (EDRE working paper 2019-07). Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3349453
  • EdChoice. (2020). The ABCs of school choice: A comprehensive guide to every private school choice program in America. Indianapolis, IN: Author.
  • Egalite, A. J., & Wolf, P. J. (2016). A review of the empirical research on private school choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 91(4), 441–454. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2016.1207436
  • Elliott, S. N., & Bartlett, B. J. (2016). Opportunity to Learn. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935291.013.70
  • Figlio, D., & Karbownik, K. (2016). Evaluation of Ohio’s EdChoice scholarship program: Selection, competition, and performance effects. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. Retrieved from http://edex.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/publication/pdfs/FORDHAM%20Ed%20Choice%20Evaluation%20Report_online%20edition.pdf
  • Friedman, M. (1955). The role of government in education. In R. A. Solo (Ed.), Economics and the public interest (pp. 123–144). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Fuhrer, R. (2013). Know the facts on parental school choice. NEA-Alaska President’s Blog. Retrieved from www.neaalaska.org
  • Gennetian, L. A., Bos, J. M., & Morris, P. A. (2002). Using instrumental variables analysis to learn more from social policy experiments (MDRC Working Papers on Research Methodology). New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/65d9/788397a560e82bbd5d3e5b29ff9898cd1744.pdf
  • Greene, J. P. (2001). Vouchers in Charlotte. Education Matters, 1, 55–60. Retrieved from http://media.hoover.org/sites/default/files/documents/ednext20012_46b.pdf
  • Greene, J. P., Peterson, P. E., & Du, J. (1999). Effectiveness of school choice: The Milwaukee experiment. Education and Urban Society, 31(2), 191–213. doi:10.1177/0013124599031002005
  • Gutmann, A. (2003). Assessing arguments for school choice: Pluralism, parental rights, or educational results? In A. Wolfe (Ed.), School choice: The moral debate (pp. 126–148). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Hamilton, L. S., & Guin, K. (2005). Understanding how families choose schools. In J. R. Betts & T. Loveless (Eds.), Getting choice right: Ensuring equity and efficiency in education policy (pp. 40–60). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Hanushek, E. A. (1999). Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and from other investigations of class size effects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 143–163. doi:10.2307/1164297
  • Hanushek, E. A. (2006). School resources. In E. A. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 2, pp.  865–908) . Amsterdam: North Holland.
  • Harris, D. N., & Larsen, M. F. (2018). The effects of the New Orleans post-Katrina market-based school reforms on student achievement, high school graduation, & college outcomes. Education Research Alliance for New Orleans. Policy paper. Retrieved from https://educationresearchalliancenola.org/files/publications/Harris-Larsen-Effects-of-New-Orleans-Post-Katrina-Market-Based-School-Reforms.pdf
  • Henig, J. (1999). School choice outcomes. In S. D. Sugarman & F. R. Kemerer (Eds.), School choice and social controversy (pp. 68–107). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Howell, W. G., & Peterson, P. E., (with P. J. Wolf & D. E. Campbell). (2006). The educational gap: Vouchers and urban schools (rev ed.). Washington, DC: Brookings.
  • Howell, W. G., Wolf, P. J., Campbell, D. E., & Peterson, P. E. (2002). School vouchers and academic performance: Results from three randomized field trials. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(2), 191–217. doi:10.1002/pam.10023
  • Hoxby, C. M. (2003). School choice and school productivity (or could school choice be a tide that lifts all boats?). In C. M. Hoxby (Ed.), The economics of school choice (pp. 287–341). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Jackson, C. K., Johnson, R. C., & Persico, C. (2015). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 157–218. doi:10.1093/qje/qjv036
  • Jensen, V. M. (2013). Working longer makes students stronger? The effects of ninth grade classroom hours on ninth grade student performance. Educational Research, 55(2), 180–194. doi:10.1080/00131881.2013.801244
  • Jin, H., Barnard, J., & Rubin, D. B. (2010). A modified general location model for noncompliance with missing data: Revisiting the New York City school choice scholarship program using principal stratification. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35(2), 154–173. doi:10.3102/1076998609346968
  • Kisida, B., Wolf, P. J., & Rhinesmith, E. (2015). Views from private schools: Attitudes about school choice programs in three states. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute. Retrieved from http://www.aei.org/publication/views-private-schools-attitudes-school-choice-programs-three-states/
  • Krueger, A. B. (2003). Response to Carneiro and Heckman. In B. M. Friedman (Ed.), Inequality in America: What role for human capital policies? (pp. 293–312). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Krueger, A. B., & Whitmore, D. M. (2001). The effect of attending a small class in the early grades on college-test taking and middle school test results: Evidence from Project STAR. The Economic Journal, 111(468), 1–28. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00586
  • Lauder, H., & Hughes, D. (Eds). (1999). Trading in futures: Why markets in education don’t work. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
  • Lieberman, M. (1989). Privatization and educational choice. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Lovenheim, M., & Turner, S. E. (2018). Economics of education. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
  • Lubienski, C. A., & Lubienski, S. T. (2014). The public school advantage: Why public schools outperform private schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • McShane, M. Q., Kisida, B., Jensen, L. I., & Wolf, P. J. (2012, February). Milwaukee Parental Choice Program: Descriptive report on participating schools 2010-11 (Milwaukee Evaluation Report #33). Fayetteville: School Choice Demonstration Project, University of Arkansas. Retrieved from http://www.uaedreform.org/milwaukee-parental-choice-program-descriptive-report-on-participating-schools-2010-11/
  • Mill, J. S. (1962). On liberty. In M. Warnock (Ed.), Utilitarianism, on liberty, essay on Bentham, together with selected writings of Jeremy Bentham and John Austin (pp. 126–250). New York, NY: Meridian. (Original work published 1869).
  • Mills, J. N. (2015). The effectiveness of cash transfers as a policy instrument in K-16 education (Doctoral Dissertation). Fayetteville: University of Arkansas.
  • Mills, J. N., & Wolf, P. J. (2017a). Vouchers in the bayou: The effects of the Louisiana Scholarship Program on student achievement after two years. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(3), 464–484. doi:10.3102/0162373717693108
  • Mills, J. N., & Wolf, P. J. (2017b). The effects of the Louisiana Scholarship Program on student achievement after three years (Louisiana Scholarship Program Evaluation Report #7). New Orleans, LA: Education Research Alliance for New Orleans. Retrieved from http://educationresearchalliancenola.org/publications/the-effects-of-the-louisiana-scholarship-program-on-student-achievement-after-three-years
  • Mills, J. N., & Wolf, P. J. (2019, April 23). The effects of the Louisiana Scholarship Program on student achievement after four years (EDRE working paper no. 2019-10). Social Science Research Network.
  • Montiel Olea, J. L., & Pflueger, C. E. (2013). A robust test for weak instruments. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 31(3), 358–369. doi:10.1080/00401706.2013.806694
  • Montiel Olea, J. L., Pflueger, C. E., & Wang, S. (2013). A robust test for weak instruments in Stata. Stata Journal. Retrieved from https://www.carolinpflueger.com/MontielPfluegerWang20131104.pdf
  • Paine, T. (1791). The rights of man: Answer to Mr. Burke’s attack on the French Revolution. London, UK: J. S. Jordan.
  • Parinduri, R. A. (2014). Do children spend too much time in schools? Evidence from a longer school year in Indonesia. Economics of Education Review, 41, 9–104. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.05.001
  • Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Allen, A. B. (2010). Extending the school day or school year: A systematic review of research (1985-2009). Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 401–436. doi:10.3102/0034654310377086
  • Polikoff, M. S., & Porter, A. C. (2014). Instructional alignment as a measure of teaching quality. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 399–416. doi:10.3102/0162373714531851
  • Puma, M. J., Olsen, R. B., Bell, S. H., & Price, C. (2009). What to do when data are missing in group randomized controlled trials. NCEE 2009-0049. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pdf/20090049.pdf
  • Rinehart, J. R., & Lee, J. F., Jr. (1991). American education and the dynamics of choice. New York, NY: Praeger.
  • Rouse, C. E. (1998). Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 553–602. doi:10.1162/003355398555685
  • Schanzenbach, D. W. (2006). What have researchers learned from Project STAR? In T. Loveless & F. M. Hess (Eds.), Brookings papers on education policy (Vol. 9, pp. 205–228). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20067282
  • Shakeel, M. D., Anderson, K. P., & Wolf, P. J. (2016, May 10). The participant effects of private school vouchers across the globe: A meta-analytic and systematic review (EDRE working paper 2016-07). Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://www.uaedreform.org/downloads/2016/05/the-participant-effects-of-private-school-vouchers-across-the-globe-a-meta-analytic-and-systematic-review-2.pdf
  • Smith, K. B., & Meier, K. J. (1995). The case against school choice: Politics, markets and fools. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Staiger, D., & Stock, J. H. (1997). Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica, 65(3), 557–586. doi:10.2307/2171753
  • Stewart, T., & Wolf, P. J. (2014). The school choice journey: School vouchers & the empowerment of urban families. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Stock, J. H., & Yogo, M. (2005). Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In D. W. K. Andrews & J. H. Stock (Eds.), Identification and inference for econometric models: Essays in honor of Thomas Rothenberg (pp. 80–108). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sude, Y., DeAngelis, C. A., & Wolf, P. J. (2018). Supplying choice: An analysis of school participation decisions in voucher programs in Washington, DC, Indiana, and Louisiana. Journal of School Choice, 12(1), 8–33. doi:10.1080/15582159.2017.1345232
  • Waddington, R. J., & Berends, M. (2018). Impact of the Indiana choice scholarship program: Achievement effects for students in upper elementary and middle school. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 37(4), 783–808. doi:10.1002/pam.22086
  • Walberg, H. J., & Bast, J. L. (2003). Education and capitalism: How overcoming our fear of markets and economics can improve America’s schools. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
  • Webber, A., Rui, N., Garrison-Mogren, R., Olsen, R. B., Gutmann, B., & Bachman, M. (2019). Evaluation of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program: Impacts three years after students applied. U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, NCEE 2019-4006, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20194006/pdf/20194006.pdf
  • Witte, J. F., Wolf, P. J., Cowen, J. M., Carlson, D., & Fleming, D. J. (2014). High stakes choice: Achievement and accountability in the nation’s oldest urban voucher program. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 437–456. doi:10.3102/0162373714534521
  • Wolf, P. J. (2007). Civics exam: Schools of choice boost civic values. Education Next, 7(3), 66–72. Retrieved from https://www.educationnext.org/civics-exam/
  • Wolf, P. J. (2008). School voucher programs: What the research says about parental school choice. Brigham Young University Law Review, 415–446 Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2008/iss2/9
  • Wolf, P. J., & Egalite, A. J. (2018). Does private school choice improve student achievement? A review of the evidence. In M. Berends, R. J. Waddington, & J. A. Schoenig (Eds.), School choice at the crossroads: Research perspectives (pp. 54–68). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Wolf, P. J., Gutmann, B., Puma, M., Kisida, B., Rizzo, L., & Eissa, N. A. (2009, March). Evaluation of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program: Impacts after three years (NCEE 2009-4050). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20094050/
  • Wolf, P. J., & Hoople, D. S. (2006). Looking inside the black box: What school factors explain voucher gains in Washington, DC? Peabody Journal of Education, 81(1), 7–26. doi:10.1207/S15327930pje8101_2
  • Wolf, P. J., Kisida, B., Gutmann, B., Puma, M., Eissa, N. O., & Rizzo, L. (2013). School vouchers and student outcomes: Experimental evidence from Washington, DC. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32, 246–270. doi:10.1002/pam.21691

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.