The Profit Motive in the Classroom—Friend or Foe?

References

• Aligica, P. D., Boettke, P. J., & Tarko, V. (2019). Public governance and the classical-liberal perspective. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alston, L. J. (2008). New institutional economics. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (pp. 4544–4551). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, F., Jordahl, H., & Josephson, J. (2019). Outsourcing public services: Contractibility, cost, and quality. CESifo Economic Studies, 65(4), 349–372. https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifz009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., Dynarski, S. M., Kane, T. J., Pathak, P. A., & Walters, C. R. (2012). Who benefits from KIPP? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31(4), 837–860. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., Pathak, P. A., & Walters, C. R. (2013). Explaining Charter school effectiveness. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.5.4.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1954 2006). “The crisis in education, and Arendt, H. Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought (Reprint, pp. 170–193). Penguin Books. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Badelt, C., & Weiss, P. (1990). Specialization, product differentiation and ownership structure in personal social services: The case of nursery schools. Kyklos, 43(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1990.tb02049.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. J. (2010). The microtheory of innovative entrepreneurship. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Besanko, D., Dranove, D., Shanley, M., & Schaefer, S. (2013). The economics of strategy (6th ed.). John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, J., & Grogger, J. (2003). The impact of grading standards on student achievement, educational attainment, and entry-level earnings. Economics of Education Review, 22(4), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(02)00059-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biasi, B., Deming, D. J., & Moser, P. (2021). Education and Innovation. NBER working paper no. 28544. National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Black, S. (1999). Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 578–599. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blix, M., & Jordahl, H. (2021). Privatizing welfare services: Lessons from the Swedish experiment. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blomqvist, P. (2004). The choice revolution: Privatization of Swedish welfare services in the 1990s. Social Policy & Administration, 38(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2004.00382.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, N., Lemos, R., Sadun, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2015). Does management matter in schools? The Economic Journal, 125(584), 647–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, H. S., Unterman, R., Zhu, P., & Reardon, S. F. (2020). Lessons from New York City’s small schools of choice about high school features that promote graduation for disadvantaged students. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(3), 740–771. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J., & Williams, H. (2019). A toolkit of policies to promote innovation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(3), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.3.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, S. (2016). The moral economy. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bulman, G., & Fairlie, R. W. (2016). Technology and education: Computers, software, and the internet. NBER working paper no. 22237. National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Chabrier, J., Cohodes, S., & Oreopoulos, P. (2016). What can we learn from charter school lotteries? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.3.57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterji, A. K. (2018). Innovation and American K-12 education. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 18(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1086/694406
   Google Scholar
• Chatterji, A. K., & Jones, B. F. (2016). Learning what works in educational technology with a case study of EDUSTAR. Brookings Institution policy memo 2016-1. Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, A., Hitt, C., Kisida, B., & Mills, J. N. (2017). ’No excuses’ charter schools: A meta analysis of the experimental evidence on student achievement. Journal of School Choice, 11(2), 209–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2017.1286210
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1984). The new institutional economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 140(1), 229–231.
   Google Scholar
• Cohodes, S. R., & Parham, K. S. (2021). Charter schools’ effectiveness, mechanisms, and competitive influence. NBER working paper no. 28477. National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Crato, N. (2020). Curriculum and educational reforms in portugal: An analysis on why and how students’ knowledge and skills improved. In F. M. Reimers (Ed.), Audacious education purposes (pp. 209–231). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41882-3_8
   Google Scholar
• Dir. 2023:153. En nationell skolpengsnorm för ökad likvärdighet (A National Norm for the Size of the School Voucher). Directives for the public investigation. Government of Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbie, W., & Fryer, R. G. (2013). Getting beneath the veil of effective schools: Evidence from New York City. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(4), 28–60. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.5.4.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doncel, L. M., Sainz, J., & Sanz, I. (2012). An estimation of the advantage of charter over public schools. Kyklos, 65(4), 442–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulleck, U., & Kerschbamer, R. (2006). On doctors, mechanics, and computer specialists: The economics of credence goods. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(1), 5–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205106776162717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmark, K., & Persson, L. (2021). The impact of attending an Independent upper secondary school: Evidence from Sweden using school ranking data. Economics of Education Review, 84(October), 102148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102148
   Google Scholar
• Eggertsson, T. (2013). Quick guide to new institutional economics. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enkvist, I. (2023). Kunskap i kris. Gidlunds förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Epple, D., Romano, R., & Zimmer, R. (2016). Charter schools: A survey of research on their characteristics and effectiveness. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of Education (pp. 139–208). North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Ernestam, J. (2018, June 4). Systematiken i betygssättningen är det som väcker frågor. Lärarförbundets utredarblogg. https://www.lararforbundet.se/bloggar/lararforbundets-utredarblogg/systematiken-i-betygssattningen-ar-det-som-vacker-fraagor
   Google Scholar
• Fack, G., & Grenet, J. (2010). When do better schools raise housing prices? Evidence from Paris public and private schools. Journal of Public Economics, 94(1–2), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E. (1992). The creation and evolution of quasi markets in the public sector: A problem for strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130907
   Google Scholar
• Figlio, D. N., & Lucas, M. (2004). Do high grading standards affect student performance? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9), 1815–1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00039-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Bill. (1991/92:95). Om valfrihet och fristående skolor. Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill. (1995/96:200). Fristående skolor m.m. Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill. (2017/18:158). Ökade tillståndskrav och särskilda regler för upphandling inom välfärden. Ministry of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Haeffele, S., & Storr, V. H. (2019). Understanding nonprofit social enterprises: Lessons from Austrian economics. The Review of Austrian Economics, 32(3), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-019-00449-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C., Lundin, M., & Sibbmark, K. (2019). A laptop for every child? The impact of ICT on educational outcomes. IFAU Working Paper 26. Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy (IFAU.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, O., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). The proper scope of government: Theory and an application to prisons. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1127–1161. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller Sahlgren, G. (2021). “Bra skolor i hela landet – skillnader i resultat mellan stad och land i TIMSS 2019”. Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.
   Google Scholar
• Henrekson, E., Andersson, F. O., Wijkström, F., & Ford, M. R. (2020). Civil society regimes and school choice reforms: Evidence from Sweden and Milwaukee. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 11(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2019-0042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrekson, M., & Stenkula, M. (2017). The entrepreneurial rent: The value of and compensation for entrepreneurship. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 6(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-07-2016-0027
   Google Scholar
• Henrekson, M., & Wennström, J. (2022). Dumbing down: The crisis of quality and equity in a once-great school system—and how to reverse the trend. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Henrekson, M., & Wennström, J. (2023). The view of knowledge: An institutional theory of differences in educational quality. Independent Review, 27(4), 511–532.
   Google Scholar
• Holcombe, R. (2013). Producing prosperity: An inquiry into the operation of the market process. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holmlund, H. (2020). Vad kan den nationalekonomiska forskningen lära oss om framgångsfaktorer i skolan? Ekonomisk Debatt, 48(3), 6–23.
   Google Scholar
• Holmlund, H., Häggblom, J., Lindahl, E., Martinson, S., Sjögren, A., Vikman, U., & Öckert, B. (2014). Decentralisering, skolval och fristående skolor: resultat och likvärdighet i svensk skola. Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy (IFAU).
   Google Scholar
• Hoxby, C. M. (2003). School choice and school productivity. Could school choice be a tide that lifts all boats? In C. M. Hoxby (Ed.), The economics of school choice (pp. 287–342). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jabbar, H., Fong, C. J., Germain, E., Li, D., Sanchez, J., Sun, W., & Devall, M. (2022). The competitive effects of school choice on student achievement: A systematic review. Educational Policy, 36(2), 247–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904819874756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordahl, H., & Öhrvall, R. (2013). Nationella reformer och lokala initiativ. In H. Jordahl (Ed.), Välfärdstjänster i privat regi: framväxt och drivkrafter (pp. 33–87). SNS Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, S. (2007). The transformation of government in the decade ahead. In D. F. Kettl & S. Kelman, (Ed.), Reflections on 21st century government management (pp. 33–61). IBM Center for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, S. (2021). Bureaucracies as innovative organizations. Harvard Kennedy school faculty research working paper RWP21-017. Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A. (2008). Epistemology or pedagogy, that is the question. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 144–157). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klitgaard, M. B. (2008). School vouchers and the new politics of the welfare state. Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 21(4), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knodel, P., Martens, K., & Niemann, D. (2013). PISA as an ideational roadmap for policy change: Exploring Germany and England in a comparative perspective. Globalisation, Societies & Education, 11(3), 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2012.761811
   Google Scholar
• Le Grand, J. (2009). The other invisible hand. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. (2009). Do quasi-markets foster innovation in education? A comparative perspective. OECD education working papers nr 25. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Merrifield, J. (2001), The school choice wars. R & L Education.
   Google Scholar
• Merrifield, J., & Gray, N. (2023), Unproductive school choice debates: All sides assert much that is wrong, misleading, or irrelevant. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. (2011). “Student standardised testing: Current practices in OECD countries and a literature review”. OECD education working papers, no. 65. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. D. (2005). “Schumpeterian profits and the alchemist fallacy”. Yale working papers on economic applications and policy no 6. Department of Economics, Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Nordin, M., Heckley, G., & Gerdtham, U. (2019). The impact of grade inflation on higher education enrolment and earnings. Economics of Education Review, 73, 101936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.101936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010). The OECD innovation strategy: Getting a head start on tomorrow. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1991). Public goods and public choices: The emergence of public economies and industry structures. In V. Ostrom (Ed.), The meaning of American federalism (pp. 163–197). ICS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, K., Menasce Horowitz, J., & Rohal, M. (2015). Parenting in America: Outlook, worries, aspirations are strongly linked to financial situation. Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shakeel, M. D., Anderson, K. P., & Wolf, P. J. (2021). The participant effects of private school vouchers around the globe: A meta-analytic and systematic review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(4), 509–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.1906283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A. (1998). State versus private ownership. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.4.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, P., Nunes, L., Seabra, C., Balcão Reis, A., & Alves, M. (2020). Student selection and performance in higher education: Admission exams vs. High school scores. Education Economics, 28(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2020.1782846
   Google Scholar
• SOU. (2020:43). Bygga, bedöma, betygssätta – betyg som bättre motsvarar elevernas kunskaper. Betänkande av Betygsutredningen 2018. Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Law 2022:115. Lag om ändring i skollagen. (2010:). Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (1994). Läroplan för det obligatoriska skolväsendet, förekoleklassen och fritidshemmet Lpo 94, Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2019). Analyser av likvärdig betygssättning mellan elevgrupper och skolor. Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2023). Pisa 2022. Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Thernstrom, A., & Thernstrom, S. (2004). No excuses: Closing the racial gap in learning. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (2016). Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tricot, A., & Sweller, J. (2014). Domain-specific knowledge and why teaching generic skills does not work. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9243-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrefors, B., & Vlachos, J. (2017). The impact of upper–secondary voucher school attendance on student achievement. Swedish evidence using external and internal evaluations. Labour Economics, 47(August), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2017.03.009
   Google Scholar
• Vlachos, J. (2019). Trust–based evaluation in a market–oriented school system. In M. Dahlstedt & A. Fejes (Eds.), Neoliberalism and market forces in education: Lessons from Sweden (pp. 212–230). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wållgren, I. (2017). Den postmodernistiska kunskapssynen och den svenska skolan. In M. Henrekson (Ed.), Kunskapssynen och pedagogiken (pp. 65–93). Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, C. R. (2018). The demand for effective charter schools. Journal of Political Economy, 126(6), 2179–2223. https://doi.org/10.1086/699980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennström, J. (2020). Marketized education: How regulatory failure undermined the Swedish school system. Journal of Education Policy, 35(5), 665–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1608472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikforss, Å. (2019). Critical thinking in the post-truth Era. In P. Kendeou, D. H. Robinson, & M. T. McCrudden (Eds.), Misinformation, “Quackery,” and “Fake News” in Education (pp. 279–304). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. T. (2010). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach?. Arts Education Policy Review 109(4), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.109.4.21-32
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, P. J., Kisida, B., Gutmann, B., Puma, M., Eissa, N., & Rizzo, L. (2013). School vouchers and student outcomes: Experimental evidence from Washington, DC. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(2), 246–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar