Discrete and Continuous Finite Element Models and Their Calibration via Vibration and Material Tests for the Seismic Assessment of Masonry Structures

References

• ANSYS® v. 13.2. 2011. Computer program Swanson analysis system. Pennsylvania, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono, V., G. P. Cimellaro, and J. A. Ochsendorf. 2015. Analysis of the failure mechanisms of the basilica of Santa Maria di Collemaggio during 2009 L Aquila earthquake. Engineering Structures 99:502–16. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM C67. 2014. Standard test methods for sampling and testing brick and structural clay tile. New Jersey: American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM International).
   Google Scholar
• Bakir, P. G., and Y. S. Erdogan. 2013. Damage identification in reinforced concrete beams by finite element model updating using parallel and hybrid genetic algorithms. International Journal of Computational Methods 10 (3):1350010(20 pages). doi:10.1142/S0219876213500102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathe, K. J. 1996. Finite element procedures. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Betti, M., and A. Vignoli. 2008. Modelling and analysis of a Romanesque church under earthquake loading: Assessment of seismic resistance. Engineering Structures 30 (2):352–67. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.03.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boscato, G., S. Russo, R. Ceravolo, and L. Z. Fragonara. 2015. Global sensitivity-based model updating for heritage structures. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 30 (8):620–35. doi:10.1111/mice.2015.30.issue-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brincker, R., P. Andersen, and N. J. Jacobsen. 2007. Automated frequency domain decomposition for operational modal analysis. In Conference proceedings: IMAC-XXIV: A conference & exposition on structural dynamics. Orlando,FL: Society for Experimental Mechanics.
   Google Scholar
• Bui, T. T., A. Limam, and Q. B. Bui. 2014. Characterisation of vibration and damage in masonry structures: Experimental and numerical analysis. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 18 (10):1118–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliò, I., M. Marletta, and B. Pantò. 2012. A new discrete element model for the evaluation of the seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry buildings. Engineering Structures 2012 (40):327–38. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casapulla, C., and F. Portioli. 2015. Experimental and analytical investigation on the frictional contact behavior of 3D masonry block assemblages. Construction and Building Materials 78:126–43. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceravolo, R., G. Pistone, Z. L. Fragonara, S. Massetto, and G. Abbiati. 2016. Vibration-based monitoring and diagnosis of cultural heritage: A methodological discussion by way of three examples. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 10 (4):375–95. doi:10.1080/15583058.2013.850554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimellaro, G. P., S. Piantà, and A. De Stefano. 2012. Output-only modal identification of Ancient L’Aquila city hall and civic tower. Journal of Structural Engineering 138 (4):481–91. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, C., A. Arêde, A. Costa, E. Caetano, Á. Cunha, and F. Magalhães. 2015. Updating numerical models of masonry arch bridges by operational modal analysis. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 9:760–74. doi:10.1080/15583058.2013.850557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ambrisi, A., V. Mariani, and M. Mezzi. 2012. Seismic assessment of a historical masonry tower with nonlinear static and dynamic analyses tuned on ambient vibration tests. Engineering Structures 36:210–19. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitri, R., L. De Lorenzis, and G. Zavarise. 2011. Numerical study on the dynamic behavior of masonry columns and arches on buttresses with the discrete element method. Engineering Structures 33:3172–88. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, Y. S., T. Kocaturk, and C. Demir. 2017a. Seismic analysis and investigation of damage mechanism of 57th infantry regiment memorial using finite-discrete element method. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (4):1397–424. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-0024-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, Y. S., T. Kocaturk, and C. Demir. 2017b. Investigation of the seismic behavior of a historical masonry minaret considering the interaction with surrounding structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. In Press. doi:10.1080/13632469.2017.1309725.
   Google Scholar
• Fragonara, Z. L., G. Boscato, R. Ceravolo, S. Ientile, S. Russo, M. L. Pecorelli, and A. Quattrone. 2017. Dynamic investigation on the Mirandola bell tower in post-earthquake scenarios. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (1):313–37. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-9970-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentile, C., A. Saisi, and A. Cabboi. 2015. Structural Identification of a Masonry Tower Based on Operational Modal Analysis. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 9:98–110. doi:10.1080/15583058.2014.951792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattori, G., and A. L. Serpa. 2015. Contact stiffness estimation in ANSYS using simplified models and artificial neuralnetworks. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 97:43–53. doi:10.1016/j.finel.2015.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, J., and A. W. Smyth. 2017. Model updating of a full-scale FE model with nonlinear constraint and sensitivity-based cluster analysis for updating parameters. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 83:337–55. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.06.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocaturk, T., and Y. S. Erdogan. 2016. Earthquake behavior of M1 minaret of historical Sultan Ahmed Mosque (Blue Mosque). Structural Engineering and Mechanics 59 (3):539–58. doi:10.12989/sem.2016.59.3.539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos, J. V. 2007. Discrete element modeling of masonry structures. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 1 (2):190–213. doi:10.1080/15583050601176868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenço, P. B., N. Mendes, L. F. Ramos, and D. V. Oliveira. 2011. Analysis of masonry structures without box behavior. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 5:369–82. doi:10.1080/15583058.2010.528824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milani, G., and M. Valente. 2015. Failure analysis of seven masonry churches severely damaged during the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) earthquake: Non-linear dynamic analyses vs conventional static approaches. Engineering Failure Analysis 54:13–56. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, C. S., E. Caktı, D. Stenge, and M. Branco. 2012. Minaret behavior under earthquake loading: The case of historical Istanbul. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 41:19–39. doi:10.1002/eqe.1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainieri, C., G. Fabbrocino, and G. M. Verderame. 2013. Non-destructive characterization and dynamic identification of a modern heritage building for serviceability seismic analyses. NDT&E International 60:17–31. doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos, L. F., G. De Roeck, P. B. Lourenço, and A. Campos-Costa. 2010a. Damage identification on arched masonry structures using ambient and random impact vibrations. Engineering Structures 32:146–62. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos, L. F., L. Marques, P. B. Lourenco, G. De Roeck, A. Campos-Costa, and J. Roque. 2010b. Monitoring historical masonry structures with operational modal analysis: Two case studies. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 24:1291–305. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, D., R. Calçada, R. Delgado, M. Brehm, and V. Zabel. 2012. Finite element model updating of a bowstring-arch railway bridge based on experimental modal parameters. Engineering Structures 40:413–35. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roca, P., M. Cervera, L. Pela, R. Clemente, and M. Chjumenti. 2013. Continuum FE models for the analysis of Mallorca Cathedral. Engineering Structures 46:653–70. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacco, E. 2009. A nonlinear homogenization procedure for periodic masonry. European Jornal of Mechanics-A/Solids 28 (2):209–22. doi:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2008.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simo, J. C., and T. A. Laursen. 1992. An augmented lagrangian treatment of contact problems involving friction. Computers and Structures 42 (1):97–116. doi:10.1016/0045-7949(92)90540-G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoljanovic, H., Z. Nikolic, and N. Zivaljic. 2015. A finite-discrete element model for dry stone masonry structures strengthened with steel clamps and bolts. Engineering Structures 90:117–29. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teughels, A., and G. De Roeck. 2005. Damage detection and parameter identification by FE model updating. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 12 (2):123–64. doi:10.1007/BF03044517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tóth, A. R., Z. Orbán, and K. Bagi. 2009. Discrete element analysis of a stone masonry arch. Mechanics Research Communications 36:469–80. doi:10.1016/j.mechrescom.2009.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TS EN 772-1. 2012. Methods of test for masonry units-Part 1: Determination of compressive strength. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee of Standardization (CEN).
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC). 2007. Specification for buildings to be built in disaster areas. Ankara, Turkey: Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Government of Republic of Turkey Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Valente, M., and G. Milani. 2016. Non-linear dynamic and static analyses on eight historical masonry towers in the North-East of Italy. Engineering Structures 114:241–70. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar