Characterization of pozzolanic lime mortars used as filling material in shaped grooves for restoring member connections in ancient monuments

References

• Aggelakopoulou, E., A. Bakolas, and A. Moropoulou. 2011. Properties of lime–metakaolin mortars for the restoration of historic masonries. Applied Clay Science 53 (1):15–19. doi:10.1016/j.clay.2011.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agioutantis, Z., S. Agalaniotou, S. Maurigiannakis, and K. N. Kaklis. 2015. The mechanical properties of pozzolanic lime mortars used as filler material in the restoration of ancient monuments. In Proceedings of 8th GRACM international congress on computational mechanics, ed. N. Pelekasis and G.E. Stavroulakis, ISBN: 978-960-9439-36-7. Greece: Volos.
   Google Scholar
• Arizzi, A., and G. Cultrone. 2012. Aerial lime-based mortars blended with a pozzolanic additive and different admixtures: A mineralogical, textural and physical-mechanical study. Construction and Building Materials 31:135–43. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, S., W. J. McCarter, and B. Suryanto. 2015. Bond-strength performance of hydraulic lime and natural cement mortared sandstone masonry. Construction and Building Materials 84:128–35. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieniawski, Z. T., and M. J. Bernede. 1979. Suggested methods for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 16 (5):135–40. doi:10.1016/0148-9062(79)91450-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieniawski, Z. T., and I. Hawkes. 1978. Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 15 (3):99–103. doi:10.1016/0148-9062(78)90003-7.
   Google Scholar
• Chiotis, E., E. Dimou, G. D. Papadimitriou, and S. Tzoutzopoulos. 2001. The study of some ancient and prehistoric plasters and watertight coatings from Greece. In Archaeometry Issues in Greek Prehistory and Antiquity, Hellenic Society for Archaeometry and the Society of Messenean Archaeological Studies, ed. E. Aloupi, Y. Bassiakos, and Y. Facorellis, 327–42. Athens, Greece: Hellenic Society for Archaeometry.
   Google Scholar
• Costigan, A., and S. Pavía. 2010. Influence of mechanical properties of lime mortar on the strength of masonry. In Proceedings of 2nd Conference on Historic Mortars - HMC 2010 and RILEM TC 203-RHM final workshop, ed. J. Válek, C. Groot, and J. J. Hughes, e-ISBN: 978-2-35158-112-4, 457–66. Paris, France: RILEM Publications SARL.
   Google Scholar
• Exadaktylos, G. E., and K. N. Kaklis. 2001. Applications of an explicit solution for the transversely isotropic circular disc compressed diametrically. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 38:227–343. doi:10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00072-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, V. C. 1974. Infrared Spectra of Minerals. London: Mineralogical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Gameiro, A., A. Santos Silva, P. Faria, J. Grilo, T. Branco, R. Veiga, and A. Velosa. 2014. Physical and chemical assessment of lime–metakaolin mortars: Influence of binder: Aggregate ratio. Cement and Concrete Composites 45:264–71. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, R., R. Vigil De La Villa, O. Rodríguez, and M. Frías. 2009. Mineral phases formation on the pozzolan/lime/water system. Applied Clay Science 43:331–35. doi:10.1016/j.clay.2008.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grist, E. R., K. A. Paine, A. Heath, J. Norman, and H. Pinder. 2013. Compressive strength development of binary and ternary lime–pozzolan mortars. Materials and Design 52:514–23. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groot, C. 2016. Repair mortars for historic masonry; Effects of the binder choice on durability. Heron 61 (1):33–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hees, R. P. J., C. Van Groot, J. J. Hughes, K. Balen, B. Van Bicer-Simsir, L. Binda, J. Elsen, T. Konow, J. E. Von Lindqvist, I. Papayanni, M. Subercaseaux, C. Tedeschi, E. E. Toumbakari, and B. Thompson. 2012. Rilem TC 203-RHM: Repair mortars for historic masonry. Requirements for repointing mortars for historic masonry. Materials and Structures 45 (9):1303–09. doi:10.1617/s11527-012-9849-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISRM. 1983. Suggested method for determining the strength of rock material in triaxial compression: Revised version. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 20 (6):283–90.
   Google Scholar
• Kaklis, K., S. Mavrigiannakis, Z. Agioutantis, E. Steiakakis, and F. Stathogianni. 2017. Experimental investigation of the mechanical properties of Alfas stone. Frattura Ed Integrita Strutturale 40:18–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kourkoulis, S. K., E. Ganniari-Papageorgiou, and M. Mentzini. 2010. Dionysos marble beams under bending: A contribution towards understanding the fracture of the Parthenon architraves. Engineering Geology 115 (3–4):246–56. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourkoulis, S. K., and E. D. Pasiou. 2015. Interconnected Epistyles of Marble Monuments Under Axial Loads. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 9 (3):177–94. doi:10.1080/15583058.2012.756079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lama, R. D., and V. S. Vutukuri. 1978. Handbook on mechanical properties of rocks- Testing techniques and results, Vols. 1–4. Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lanas, J., J. L. Perez Bernal, M. A. Bello, and J. I. Alvarez Galindo. 2004. Mechanical properties of natural hydraulic lime-based mortars. Cement and Concrete Research 34:2191–201. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malan, D. F., J. A. L. Napier, and B. P. Watson. 1994. Propagation of fractures from an interface in a Brazilian test specimen. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts 31:581–96. doi:10.1016/0148-9062(94)90002-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki, P., Z. Agioutantis, E. Lionakis, M. Stavroulaki, and V. Perdikatsis. 2013. Physico-chemical and mechanical characterization of hydraulic mortars containing nano-titania for restoration applications. Cement and Concrete Composites 36:33–41. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki, P., A. Bakolas, I. Karatasios, and V. Kilikoglou. 2005. Hydraulic lime mortars for the restoration of the historic masonry in Crete. Cement and Concrete Research 35 (8):1577–86. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matias, G., P. Faria, and I. Torres. 2014. Lime mortars with ceramic wastes: Characterization of components and their influence on the mechanical behaviour. Construction and Building Materials 73:523–34. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metaxa, Z. S., E. D. Pasiou, I. Dakanali, I. Stavrakas, D. Triantis, and S. K. Kourkoulis. 2016. Carbon nanotube reinforced mortar as a sensor to monitor the structural integrity of restored marble epistyles under shear. Procedia Structural Integrity 2:2833–40. doi:10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.354.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S. 2017. Processing, effect and reactivity assessment of artificial pozzolans obtained from clays and clay wastes: A review. Construction and Building Materials 140:10–19. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moropoulou, A., A. Bakolas, and K. Bisbikou. 2000. Investigation of the technology of historic mortars. Journal of Cultural Heritage 1:45–58. doi:10.1016/S1296-2074(99)00118-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moropoulou, A., A. Bakolas, P. Moundoulas, E. Aggelakopoulou, and S. Anagnostopoulou. 2005. Strength development and lime reaction in mortars for repairing historic masonries. Cement and Concrete Composites 27:289–94. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsy, M. S., Y. A. Al-Salloum, T. H. Almusallam, and H. Abbas. 2017. Mechanical properties, phase composition and microstructure of activated Metakaolin-slaked binder. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 21 (3):863–71. doi:10.1007/s12205-016-0667-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navrátilová, E., and P. Rovnaníková. 2016. Pozzolanic properties of brick powders and their effect on the properties of modified lime mortars. Construction and Building Materials 120:530–39. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nežerka, V., Z. Slížková, P. Tesárek, T. Plachý, D. Frankeová, and V. Petráňová. 2014. Comprehensive study on mechanical properties of lime-based pastes with additions of metakaolin and brick dust. Cement and Concrete Research 64:17–29. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomo, A., M. T. Blanco Varela, S. Martinez Ramirez, F. Puertas, and C. Fortes. 2002. Historic mortars: Characterization and durability: new tendencies for research. Madrid: Eduardo Torroja Institute (CSIC).
   Google Scholar
• Papayianni, I. 2006. The longevity of old mortars. Applied Physics A 83:685–88. doi:10.1007/s00339-006-3523-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papayianni, I., V. Pachta, and M. Stefanidou. 2013. Analysis of ancient mortars and design of compatible repair mortars: The case study of Odeion of the archaeological site of Dion. Construction and Building Materials 40:84–92. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papayianni, I., and M. Stefanidou. 2006. Strength–porosity relationships in lime–pozzolan mortars. Construction and Building Materials 20:700–05. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, R. H. G. 1985. Mohr circles, stress paths and geotechnics. London, UK: E & FN Spon, an imprint of Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, B. 1961. A modification of the Coulomb-Mohr Theory of Fracture. Journal of Applied Mechanics 28:259–68. doi:10.1115/1.3641665.
   Google Scholar
• Pavía, S., and R. Hanley. 2010. Flexural bond strength of natural hydraulic lime mortar and clay brick. Materials and Structures 43 (7):913–22. doi:10.1617/s11527-009-9555-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravikumar, C. M., M. B. Sreenivasa, K. Abdul Raheem, M. H. Prashanth, and R. M. Vijay Sekhar. 2013. Experimental Studies on Strength and Durability of Mortars Containing Pozzolanic Materials. International Journal of Advanced Structures and Geotechnical Engineering 2 (2):45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. W. 1973. Minoan architecture. Materials and Techniques, Annuario Della Scuola Archeologica Di Atene 49:7–256.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanidou, M., and I. Papayianni. 2005. The role of aggregates on the structure and properties of lime mortars. Cement & Concrete Composites 27:914–19. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodoridou, M., I. Ioannou, and M. Philokyprou. 2013. New evidence of early use of artificial pozzolanic material in mortars. Journal of Archaeological Science 40 (8):3263–69. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2013.03.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiga, R. M., A. Fragata, A. L. Velosa, A. Magalhaes, and G. Margalha. 2010. Lime-Based Mortars: Viability for Use as Substitution Renders in Historical Buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 4:177–95. doi:10.1080/15583050902914678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiga, R. M., A. Velosa, and A. Magalhaes. 2009. Experimental applications of mortars with pozzolanic additions: Characterization and performance evaluation. Construction and Building Materials 23:318–27. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vejmelková, E., M. Keppert, Z. Keršner, P. Rovnaníková, and R. Černý. 2012. Mechanical, fracture-mechanical, hydric, thermal, and durability properties of lime-metakaolin plasters for renovation of historical buildings. Construction and Building Materials 31:22–28. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogler, U. W., and Κ. Kovari. 1978. Suggested methods for determining the strength of rock materials in triaxial compression. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 15 (2):47–51. doi:10.1016/0148-9062(78)91677-7.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, P., R. J. Kirkpatrick, B. Poe, P. F. McMillan, and X. Cong. 1999. Structure of Calcium Silicate Hydrate (C-S-H): Near-, Mid-, and Far-Infrared Spectroscopy. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 82 (3):742–48. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1551-2916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar