283
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF A 17th CENTURY ADOBE CHURCH IN THE PERUVIAN ANDES

, , , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 140-152 | Received 18 Jan 2018, Accepted 07 May 2018, Published online: 26 Jul 2018

References

  • Aguilar, R., C. Briceño, and L. F. Ramos. 2017. Comprehensive analysis for the structural assessment of Andean Colonial churches. Unpublished.
  • Aguilar, R., M. F. Noel, C. Briceño, B. Castañeda, and L. F. Ramos. 2016. Geomatics’ procedures and dynamic identification for the structural survey of the church of ‘San Juan Bautista de Huaro’ in Perú. Paper presented at the 6th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference ( IBMAC 2016), Padova, Italia, pp. 815–20. 10.1177/1753193416632640
  • Almeida, J. A. P. P. 2012. Mechanical characterization of traditional adobe masonry elements. Guimarães, Portugal: University of Minho.
  • Arce, H. 2016. Informe sobre estudio técnico del templo de la Virgen de la Asunción de Sacsamarca. Proyecto de restauración de la iglesia de Sacsamarca. Lima, Perú. Internal document. Lima, Peru: DARS – PUCP. Unpublished.
  • Arya, A. S., T. Boen, Y. Ishiyama, I. Martemianov, R. Meli, C. Scawthorn, and Y. Yaoxian. 2004. Guidelines for Earthquake Resistant Non-Engineered Construction. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Bank, W., and U. Nations. 2010. Natural Hazards, Unnatural Disasters: The economics of effective prevention. In World Bank and United Nations, 11(5). Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
  • Blondet, M., G. Villa Garcia, S. Brzev, and A. Rubiños. 2011. Earthquake-Resistant Construction of Adobe Buildings: A Tutorial. In EERI/IAEE World Housing Encyclopedia. Oakland, CA. Journal of Building Engineering 8:29–47. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2016.09.005.
  • Compañia, D. J. 2017. Ruta del Barroco Andino. http://rutadelbarrocoandino.com/ (Accessed December 1, 2017).
  • Cundari, G. A., G. Milani, and G. Failla. 2017. Seismic vulnerability evaluation of historical masonry churches: Proposal for a general and comprehensive numerical approach to cross-check results.”. Engineering Failure Analysis 82:208–28. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.08.013.
  • DIANA. 2016. DIANA user’s manual Version 9.6. Netherlands: DIANA FEA BV.
  • Dolce, M., and A. Martinelli. 2005. Analisi di vulnerabilità e rischio sísmico. Inventario e vulnerabilità degli edifici pubblici e strategici dell’Italia centro-meridionale, 2. L’Aquila. Italy: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia/ Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai terremoto.
  • Escobar, M. 2016. Caracterización mecánica de componentes estructurales en construcciones arqueológicas de tierra: El caso de Huaca de La Luna. Lima, Peru: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. ( Master diss)
  • Fonseca-Ferreira, C., and D. D’Ayala 2012. Seismic assessment and retro-fitting of Peruvian earthen churches by means of numerical modeling. Paper presented at the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, September 24–28.
  • LourençO, P. B. 2009. Recent advances in masonry structures: Micromodeling and homogeneization. In Multiscale Modeling in Solid Mechanics: Computational Approaches, U. Galvanetto, and M. H. F. Aliabadi. Ed, 251–294. London: Imperial College Press.
  • Lourenço, P. B. 2014. Presentation SA2 12. Modeling of masonry and homogenization. Guimarães, Braga, Portugal: University of Minho.
  • Lourenço, P. B., D. V. Oliveira, J. C. Leite, J. M. Ingham, C. Modena, and F. Porto. 2013. Simplified indexes for the seismic assessment of masonry buildings : International database and validation. Engineering Failure Analysis 34:585–605. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.02.014.
  • Lourenço, P. B., and J. A. Roque. 2006. Simplified indexes for the seismic vulnerability of ancient masonry buildings. Construction and Building Materials 20(4):200–08. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.027.
  • MMC. 2005. Natural hazard mitigation saves: An independent study to assess the future savings from mitigation activities. Washington. DC: Multihazard Mitigation Council/National Institute of Building Sciences.
  • MVCS. 2006. Norma Técnica E.080: Adobe. Peru: Ministerio de Vivienda, Construcción y Sanamiento.
  • MVCS. 2016. Norma Técnica E.030: Diseño Sismorresistente. Ministerio de Vivienda. Peru: Construcción y Sanamiento.
  • NTC. 2008. Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni D.M. 14 gennaio 2008. n. 29 del 4/02/2008 Suppl. ord. n° 30 alla G.U. Roma, Italy: Consiglio Superiore dei Lavori Pubblici.
  • Ottazzi, G., J. Yep, M. Blondet, G. Villa-Garcia, and J. Ginocchio. 1989. Simulation Tests of Adobe Houses. Research Project Financed by IDRC–Canada. Departamento de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Lima: Perú.
  • Romão, X., E. Paupério, and N. Pereira 2017. Screening procedure for the risk analysis of Cultural Heritage Assets. Paper presented at the 16th World Conference on Earthquake, Santiago, Chile, January 9- 13.
  • Silveira, D., H. Varum, A. Costa, T. Martins, H. Pereira, and J. Almeida. 2012. Mechanical properties of adobe bricks in ancient constructions. Construction and Building Materials 28(1):36–44. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.046.
  • Valente, M., G. Barbieri, and L. Biolzi. 2017. Seismic assessment of two masonry Baroque churches damaged by the 2012 Emilia earthquake. Engineering Failure Analysis 79:773–802. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.05.026.
  • Van Der Pluijm, R. 1999. Out of plane bending of masonry: Behaviour and strength. Eindhoven, Netherlands: University of Technology.
  • Varum, H., A. Costa, T. Martins, H. Pereira, J. Almeida., H. Rodrigues, and D. Silveira. 2007. Structural behaviour characterization of existing adobe constructions in Aveiro. EL-BARBARY 50(257):477.
  • Vicente, R. 2008. Estratégias e metodologias para intervenções de reabilitação urbana. Avaliação da vulnerabilidade e do risco sísmico do edificado da Baixa de Coimbra. Aveiro, Portugal: University of Aveiro.
  • Vicente, R., S. Parodi, S. Lagomarsino, H. Varum, and J. A. R. M. Silva (2011). Seismic vulnerability and risk assessment: Case study of the historic city centre of Coimbra, Portugal. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 9(4),1067–96. 10.1007/s10518-010-9233-3

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.