Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of the Urban Building Environment in Nablus, Palestine

References

• Abo-El-Ezz, A., C. Houalard, M. J., Assi R. 2017. Vulnerability assessment of seismic induced out-of-plane failure of unreinforced masonry wall buildings. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 44 (12):1045–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Dabbeek, J., and R. El-Kelani. 2008. Rapid assessment of seismic vulnerability in Palestinian refugee camps. Journal of Applied Science 8 (8):1371–82. doi:10.3923/jas.2008.1371.1382.
   Google Scholar
• Athmani, A., T. M. Ferreira, and R. Vicente. 2017. Seismic risk assessment of the historical urban areas of Annaba city, Algeria. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. doi:10.1080/15583058.2017.1370508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbat, A. H., M. L. Carreño, L. G. Pujades, N. Lantada, D. O. Cardona, and M. C. Marulanda. 2010. Seismic vulnerability and risk evaluation methods for urban areas. A review with application to a pilot area. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering: Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance 6 (1–2):17–38. doi:10.1080/15732470802663763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolognini, D., B. Borzi, and R. Pinho. 2008. Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis of traditional Italian RC precast structures. 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Borzi, B., P. Ceresa, M. Faravelli, E. Fiorini, and M. Onida. 2011. Applicazione del metodo meccanico SP-BELA alla definizione di rischio sismico e scenari di danno del patrimonio edilizio italiano. In: Proceedings of XIV Congresso Nazionale “L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia” ANIDIS 2011, Bari, Italia (paper N. 802). ISBN 978-88-7522-040-2.
   Google Scholar
• Borzi, B., P. Ceresa, M. Faravelli, E. Fiorini, and M. Onida. 2013. Seismic risk assessment of Italian school buildings. Computational methods in earthquake engineering. In Part of computational methods in applied science, eds. M. Papadrakakis, M. Fragiadakis, and V. Plevris, Vol. 30. 317–34. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Borzi, B., H. Crowley, and R. Pinho. 2008a. Simplified pushover-based earthquake loss assessment (SP-BELA) method for masonry buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 2 (4):353–76. doi:10.1080/15583050701828178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzi, B., H. Crowley, and R. Pinho. 2008c. The influence of infill panels on vulnerability curves for RC buildings. 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Borzi, B., R. Pinho, and H. Crowley. 2008b. Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis for large scale assessment of RC buildings. Engineering Structures 30 (3):804–20. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardona, O. D. 2001. Estimación holística del riesgo sísmico utilizando sistemas dinámicos complejos. PhD Thesis (in Spanish) [A Seismic Risk Holistic Estimation using Complex Dynamic Systems], Universidade Politécnica de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Carreño, M. L. 2006. Técnicas innovadoras para la evaluacio´n del riesgo sísmico y su gestión en centros urbanos: acciones ex ante. PhD Thesis (in Spanish). Universidade Politécnica de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Carreño, M. L., O. D. Cardona, and A. H. Barbat. 2007a. Urban seismic risk evaluation: A holistic approach. Natural Hazards 40:137–42. doi:10.1007/s11069-006-0008-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreño, M. L., O. D. Cardona, and A. H. Barbat. 2007b. Disaster risk management performance index. Natural Hazards 41:1–20. doi:10.1007/s11069-006-9008-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisafulli, F. J., A. J. Carr, and R. Park. 2000. Analytical modelling of infilled frame structures—A general overview. Bulletin New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 33 (1):30–47.
   Google Scholar
• Deliverable D.C.1. 2016. Report on the identification of retrofit measures. SASPARM 2.0 Project. DG-ECHO 2014, ECHO/SUB/2014/694399. www.sasparm2.com.
   Google Scholar
• Deliverable D.F.1. 2016. Fragility curves for each structural typology that sub-classifies the building stock. SASPARM 2.0 Project. DG-ECHO 2014, ECHO/SUB/2014/694399. www.sasparm2.com.
   Google Scholar
• Di Meo, A., B. Borzi, M. Faravelli, D. Polli, M. Pagano, and A. Cantoni. 2017a. Vulnerability data collection and definition of seismic risk for cities in Palestine. 6th Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Rhodes Island, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Di Meo, A., M. Faravelli, D. Polli, M. Denari, A. Cantoni, and B. Borzi. 2017b. Collecting and managing building data to perform seismic risk assessment – Palestine case study. In ICCSA 2017. LNCS, eds. O. Gervasi, et al., Vol. 10405, 527–42. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62395-5_36.
   Google Scholar
• Dolce, M., G. Di Pasquale, E. Speranza, and F. Fumagalli. 2012. A multipurpose method for seismic vulnerability assessment of urban areas. Proceedings of the 15 WCEE, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Duzgun, H. S. B., M. S. Yucemen, H. S. Kalaycioglu, K. Celik, S. Kemec, K. Ertugay, and A. Deniz. 2011. An integrated earthquake vulnerability assessment framework for urban areas. Natural Hazards 59:917. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9808-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsabbagh, A., M. C. Sawada, M. Saatcioglu, H. Aoude, K. Ploeger, and M. Nastev. 2013. New tools for the seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings in Ottawa, Ontario. Proceedings of the Annual Conference - Canadian Society for Civil Engineering 1:1772–81.
   Google Scholar
• Faravelli, M., B. Borzi, A. Di Meo, and D. Polli. 2017. A mechanic-based model for definition of seismic risk and real time damage scenario of buildings 6th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Rhodes Island, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 1999. HAZUS99. Earthquake loss estimation methodology. Technical manual. Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA 547. 2006. Techniques for the seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. Washington D.C: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA HAZUS 99. Earthquake loss estimation methodology. Technical manual. Washington D.C: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, T. M., A. A. Costa, and A. Costa. 2015. Analysis of the out-of-plane seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry: A literature review. International Journal of Architectural Heritage Conservation, Analysis, and Restoration 9 (8):949–72.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP-Jordan Project Team. 2013. Integrated Risk Assessment for the Petra Development and Tourism Region. Final Report. Part II: Technical report. UNDP JORDAN RFP/2012/19.
   Google Scholar
• GNDT. 1993. Rischio sismico di edifici pubblici - Parte I: Aspetti metodologici. Bologna: Centro Servizi Quasco.
   Google Scholar
• GNDT-SSN, Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti. 1994. Scheda di esposizione e vulnerabilità e di rilevamento danni di primo e secondo livello (murata e cemento armato) [Exposure Sheet and Vulnerability Assessment of Damage of the First and Second Level for Masonry and Reinforced Concrete]. Rome: Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti.
   Google Scholar
• Grigoratos, I., P. Ceresa, R. Monteiro, and B. Borzi. 2016. Extending the applicability of simplified pushover-based vulnerability assessment methods to irregular RC buildings. 1st International Conference on Natural Hazards and Infrastructure, Chania, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Grigoratos, I., R. Monteiro, P. Ceresa, A. Di Meo, M. Faravelli, and B. Borzi. 2017. Crowdsourcing exposure data for seismic vulnerability assessment in Nablus, Palestine. Journal of Earthquake Engineering (Under Review).
   Google Scholar
• Grünthal, G. ed.. 1998. Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie: Volume 15 – European Macroseismic Scale 1998. European Center for Geodynamics and Seismology. Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Jordanian National Building Council (JNBC). 2005. Jordanian code for earthquake-resistant buildings. 236 pp
   Google Scholar
• Kagermanov, A., and P. Ceresa. 2016. Physically based cyclic tensile model for RC membrane elements. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001590,04016118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagermanov, A., and P. Ceresa. 2017a. RC fiber-based beam-column element with flexure-shear-torsion interaction. High tech concrete: where technology and engineering meet. Proceedings of the 2017 fib Symposium, Maastricht, The Netherlands, June 12-14, 2017), Book Chapter: 1006-1014, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59471-2_117.
   Google Scholar
• Kagermanov, A., and P. Ceresa. 2017b. Modelling flexure-shear failures in masonry-infilled RC frames with inelastic fiber-based frame elements. In Proceedings of COMPDYN 2017, eds.. M. Papadrakakis, and M. Fragiadakis.Greece: Institute of Structural Analysis and Antiseismic Research, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA).1: 5035–44. Available online at www.eccomasproceedia.org
   Google Scholar
• Kagermanov, A., and P. Ceresa. 2017c. Fiber-section model with an exact shear strain profile for two-dimensional RC frame structures. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 143 (10). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maio, R., T. M. Ferreira, R. Vicente, and J. Estêvão. 2016. Seismic vulnerability assessment of historical urban centres: Case study of the old city centre of Faro, Portugal. Journal of Risk Research 19 (5):551–80. doi:10.1080/13669877.2014.988285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesgara, M. A. A., and P. Parham Jalilvandb. 2017. Vulnerability analysis of the urban environments to different seismic scenarios: Residential buildings and associated population distribution modelling through integrating dasymetric mapping method and GIS. Procedia Engineering 198:454–66. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.100.
   Google Scholar
• Molina, S., D. H. Lang, and C. D. Lindholmb. 2010. SELENA – An open-source tool for seismic risk and loss assessment using a logic tree computation procedure. Computers & Geosciences 36 (3):257–69. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2009.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Imagery and mapping Agency (NIMA). 2000. Department of Defense World Geodetic System 1984 – Its definition and Relationships with Local Geodetic Systems. Technical Report. 3RD Edition, TR8350.2”.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. J. N., and G. M. Calvi. 1991. Towards a capacity design assessment procedure for reinforced concrete frames. Earthquake Spectra 7 (3):413–37. SASPARMProject. Support Action for Strengthening Palestinian-administrated Areas capabilities for Seismic Risk Mitigation, FP7-INCO, ID. 295122 www.sasparm.ps/en/
   Google Scholar
• Sasparm Project, 2012” is: “SASPARM Project. 2012. Support Action for Strengthening Palestinian-administrated Areas capabilities for Seismic Risk Mitigation, FP7-INCO, ID. 295122; www.sasparm.ps/en/
   Google Scholar
• SASPARM 2.0 Project. 2014 Support action for strengthening Palestine’s capabilities for seismic Risk Mitigation. DG-CHO 2014, ECHO/SUB/2014/694399. www.sasparm2.com.
   Google Scholar
• Sorrentino, L., D. D’Ayala, G. De Felice, M. C. Grifith, S. Lagomarsino, and G. Magenes. 2017. Review of out-of-plane seismic assessment techniques applied to existing masonry buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage Conservation, Analysis, and Restoration. Methods and Challenges on the Out-Of-Plane Assessment of Existing Masonry Buildings 11 (1):2–21.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP JORDAN RFP/2012/19 project. 2012 Building DDR capacity in the petra development and tourism region, Project n° 00080352.
   Google Scholar
• USAID MERC Project Team (M18-057). 2007. Earthquake hazard assessment and building code, final report. Earth Sciences and Seismic Engineering Center at An Najah National University. pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnadj898.pdf.
   Google Scholar