Earthquakes and Tie-Rods: Assessment, Design, and Ductility Issues

References

• Calderini, C., R. Vecchiatini, C. Battini, and P. Piccardo. 2016. Mechanical and metallographic characterization of iron tie-rods in masonry buildings: An experimental study. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions (SAHC2016) - Anamnesis, diagnosis, therapy, controls, Leuven, Belgium, September 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J., D. Dizhur, M. Hodgson, G. Fergusson, and J. M. Ingham. 2012. Test results for extracted wall-diaphragm anchors from Christchurch unreinforced masonry buildings. Journal of the Structural Engineering Society New Zealand (SESOC) 25 (1):57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Celik, O., H. Sesigur, and F. Cili. 2009. Importance of wood and iron tension members on seismic performance of historic masonry buildings: Three case studies from Turkey. Paper presented at the ATC and SEI Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures:1374–83, San Francisco, California, United States, December 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cifani, G., A. Lemme, and S. Podestà, edited by. 2005. Cultural heritage and earthquake: From the emergency to the reconstruction. Rome: DEI – Tipografia del genio civile (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• Collini, L., R. Fagiani, R. Garziera, K. Riabova, and M. Vanali. 2015. Load and effectiveness of the tie-rods of an ancient Dome: Technical and historical aspects. Journal of Cultural Heritage 16:597–601. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2014.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Como, M. 2016. Statics of historic masonry constructions. Cham, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24569-0.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ayala, D., and E. Speranza. 2003. Definition of collapse mechanisms and seismic vulnerability of historic masonry buildings. Earthquake Spectra 19 (3):479–509. doi:10.1193/1.1599896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degli Abbati, S., and S. Lagomarsino. 2017. Out-of-plane static and dynamic response of masonry panels. Engineering Structures 150:803–20. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dizhur, D., J. Campbell, A. Schultz, and J. M. Ingham. 2013. Observations from the 2010/2011 Canterbury earthquakes and subsequent experimental pull-out test program of wall-to-diaphragm adhesive anchor connections. Journal of the Structural Engineering Society of New Zealand (SESOC) 26 (1):11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Dizhur, D., J. M. Ingham, L. Moon, M. Griffith, A. Schultz, I. Senaldi, G. Magenes, J. Dickie, S. Lissel, J. Centeno, et al. 2011. Performance of masonry buildings and churches in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 44 (4):279–97.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S. A. 1998. Development and use of capacity spectrum method. Paper presented at 6th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, M. C., G. Magenes, G. Melis, and L. Picchi. 2003. Evaluation of out-of-plane stability of unreinforced masonry walls subjected to seismic excitation. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 7 (Special Issue 1):141–69. doi:10.1080/13632460309350476.
   Google Scholar
• Guidelines for the evaluation and mitigation of seismic risk to cultural heritage. 2007. Italian Directive P.C.M. of October 12th, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S. 2015. Seismic assessment of rocking masonry structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13:97–128. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9609-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., and C. Calderini. 2005. The dynamical identification of the tensile force in ancient tie-rods. Engineering Structures 27 (6):846–56. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenço, P. B., N. Mendes, L. F. Ramos, and D. V. Oliveira. 2011. Analysis of masonry structures without box behavior. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 5 (4–5):369–82. doi:10.1080/15583058.2010.528824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, A., G. Vasconcelos, and A. C. Costa. 2017. Experimental assessment of the mechanical behavior of ties on brick veneers anchored to brick masonry infills. Construction and Building Materials 156:515–31. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milani, G., R. Shehu, and M. Valente. 2018. A kinematic limit analysis approach for seismic retrofitting of masonry towers through steel tie-rods. Engineering Structures 160:212–28. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NTC. 2018. Italian building technical code, D.M. January 17, 2018. (in Italian)
   Google Scholar
• Paganoni, S., and D. D’Ayala. 2014. Testing and design procedure for corner connections of masonry heritage buildings strengthened by metallic grouted anchors. Engineering Structures 70:278–93. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisani, M. A. 2016. Theoretical approach to the evaluation of the load-carrying capacity of the tie-rod anchor system in a masonry wall. Engineering Structures 124:85–95. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podestà, S. 2012. Seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry building. Palermo, Italy: Flaccovio Editore (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• Tomaževič, M., M. Lutman, and P. Weiss. 1996. Seismic upgrading of old brick‐masonry Urban Houses: Tying of walls with steel ties. Earthquake Spectra 12 (3):599–622. doi:10.1193/1.1585898.
   Google Scholar
• Ural, A., F. K. Firat, Ş. Tuğrulelçi, and M. E. Kara. 2016. Experimental and numerical study on effectiveness of various tie-rod systems in brick arches. Engineering Structures 110:209–21. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar