Seismic Damage Prediction of Masonry Churches by a PGA-based Approach

References

• Brandonisio, G., G. Lucibello, E. Mele, and A. De Luca. 2013. Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Engineering Failure Analysis 34:693–714. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ayala, D. F., and S. Paganoni. 2011. Assesment and analysis of damage in L’Aquila historic centre after 6th April 2009. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 9 (1):81–104. doi:10.1007/s10518-010-9224-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Porto, F., B. Silva, C. Costa, and C. Modena. 2012. Macro-scale analysis of damage to churches after the earthquake in Abruzzo (Italy) on April 6, 2009. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 16 (6):739–58. doi:10.1080/13632469.2012.685207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Matteis, G., G. Brando, G. Cianchino, V. Corlito, and E. Criber. 2017b. The MaChro Form: A new automatic tool for the survey and seismic vulnerability assessment of churches. XVII Convegno ANIDIS, L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia, Pistoia, Italy, September 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• De Matteis, G., G. Brando, V. Corlito, and E. Criber. 2017a. Seismic vulnerability assessment of churches at large territorial scale: Calibration of a methodology on the basis of the 2009 l’Aquila earthquake. 3rd International Conference on “Protection of historical constructions”, Lisbon, Portugal, July 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• De Matteis, G., E. Criber, and G. Brando. 2016. Damage probability matrices for three-nave masonry churches in Abruzzi after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 10 (2–3):120–45. doi:10.1080/15583058.2015.1113340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Prete, M., F. M. Guadagno, and G. S. Mugnozza. 1998. Earthquake induced damage in an historic area: The September-October 1997 seismic sequence which affected Assisi, Central Italy. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 57:101–09. doi:10.1007/s100640050026.
   Google Scholar
• Faccioli, E., and C. Cauzzi. 2006. Macroseismic intensities for seismic scenarios estimated from instrumentally based correlations. First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, September 3–8. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3984.2641.
   Google Scholar
• Faenza, L., and A. Michelini. 2010. Regression analysis of MCS Intensity and ground motion parameters in Italy and its application in ShakeMap. Geophysical Journal International 180 (3):1138–52. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04467.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.U. no 231. 2013, October 2. Manual for surveying the damage on cultural heritage, Churches model A-DC (in Italian). Prime Minister and Departement of Civil Protection. http://www.protezionecivile.it.
   Google Scholar
• G.U. no. 47. 2011, February 26. (suppl. ord. no. 54). Directive of the Prime Minister dated on 9/02/2011, Assessment and mitigation of seismic risk of cultural heritage with reference to the Technical Code for the design of constructions, issued by D.M. 14/1/2008 (in Italian). Rome, Italy: Ministry of Public Building and Works.
   Google Scholar
• Galli, P., S. Castenetto, and E. Peronace. 2017. Rapporto sugli effetti macrosismici del terremoto del 30 Ottobre 2016 (Monti Sibillini) in scala MCS. Rome, interim report DPC, CNR-IGAG, 17+8.
   Google Scholar
• Grünthal, G. 1998. European macroseismic scale 1998. (EMS-98) European Seismological Commission, sub commission on Engineering Seismology, Working Group Macroseismic Scales. Conseil de l’Europe, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie. Vol. 15. Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Gruppo di Lavoro INGV sul terremoto in centro Italia (2016). 2016. Rapporto di sintesi sul Terremoto in centro Italia Mw 6.5 del 30 ottobre 2016. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.166019.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, L., P. Zampieri, M. A. Zanini, F. Faleschini, and C. Pellegrino. 2018. Seismic damage survey and empirical fragility curves for churches after the August 24, 2016 Central Italy earthquake. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 111:98–109. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., and S. Podestà. 2004a. Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches: I. Damage assessment and emergency planning. Earthquake Spectra 20 (2):377–94. doi:10.1193/1.1737735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., and S. Podestà. 2004b. Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches: II. Statistical analysis of surveyed data and methods for risk analysis. Earthquake Spectra 20 (2):395–412. doi:10.1193/1.1737736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., S. Podestà, G. Cifani, and A. Lemme. 2004. The 31st October 2002 Earthquake in Molise (Italy): A new methodology for the damage and seismic vulnerability survey of churches. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, August 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lourenço, P. B., and J. A. Roque. 2006. Simplified indexes for the seismic vulnerability of ancient masonry buildings. Construction and Building Materials 20:200–08. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margottini, C., D. Molin, and L. Serva. 1992. Intensity versus ground motion: A new approach using Italian data. Engineering Geology 33:45–58. doi:10.1016/0013-7952(92)90034-V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press release of Department of Civil Protection. 2017. Terremoto centro Italia: Fondo di Solidarietà dell’Unione Europea, oltre 23 miliardi di euro i costi dell’emergenza e la stima dei danni. http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/jcms/it/view_com.wp?contentId=COM62565.
   Google Scholar
• Pucci, S., P. M. De Martini, R. Civico, F. Villani, R. Nappi, T. Ricci, R. Azzaro, et al. 2017. Coseismic ruptures of the 24 August 2016, Mw 6.0 Amatrice earthquake (central Italy). Geophysical Research Letters 44:2138–47. doi:10.1002/2016GL071859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorrentino, L., L. Liberatore, L. D. Decanini, and D. Liberatore. 2014. The performance of churches in the 2012 Emilia earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12 (5):2299–331. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9519-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, M., G. Barbieri, and L. Biolzi. 2017. Seismic assessment of two masonry Baroque churches damaged by the 2012 Emilia earthquake. Engineering Failure Analysis 79:773–802. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.05.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald, D., V. Quitoriano, T. Heaton, and H. Kanamori. 1999. Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California. Earthquake Spectra 15 (3):557–64. doi:10.1193/1.1586058.
   Google Scholar
• Zanini, A. M., L. Hofer, F. Faleschini, and C. Pellegrino. 2017. The seismic risk map for Italy. 6th DCEE2017 - International Workshop on Design in Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cagliari, Italy, November 9–11.
   Google Scholar