Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Rehabilitation Priority Ranking: A Collaborative Application to Heritage Workforce Housing Sites

References

• Alba-Rodríguez, M., A. Martinez-Rocamora, P. González-Vallejo, A. Ferreira-Sánchez, and M. Marrero. 2017. Building rehabilitation versus demolition and new construction: Economic and environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 66:115–26. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2017.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alyami, S., and Y. Rezgui. 2012. Sustainable building assessment tool development approach. Sustainable Cities and Society 5:52–62. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2012.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottero, M., C. D’Alpaos, and A. Oppio. 2019. Ranking of adaptive reuse strategies for abandoned industrial heritage in vulnerable contexts: A multiple criteria decision aiding approach. Sustainability 11:705. doi:10.3390/su11030785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerreta, M., S. Panaro, and D. Cannatella 2012. Multidimensional spatial decision-making process: Local shared values in action. 12th International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, 7334, Part II, LNCS 7334, 54–70, Springer-Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Chakhar, S., and V. Mousseau (2008) Multicriteria Spatial Decision Support Systems. In: Shekhar S., Xiong H. (eds) Encyclopedia of GIS. Springer, Boston, MA. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35973-1
   Google Scholar
• Clemen, R. T., and T. Reilly. 2001. Making hard decisions with decision tools. Mason: South-Western Cencage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• CML. 1993. Plano de Pormenor dos Pátios e Vilas considerados património a preservar e reabilitar (IPA/IMP 1994/PP 1993/GT1990). Direção Municipal de Reabilitação Urbana/Departamento de Reabilitação Urbana da Colina do Castelo/Divisão de Reabilitação Urbana Pátios e Vilas, Câmara Municipal de Lisboa, Lisboa.
   Google Scholar
• Droj, L., and G. Droj. 2015. Usage of location analysis software in the evaluation of commercial real estate properties. Procedia Economics and Finance 32:826–32. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01525-7.
   Google Scholar
• Ferretti, V., M. Bottero, and G. Mondini. 2014. Decision making and cultural heritage: An application of the Multi-Attribute Value Theory for the reuse of historical buildings. Journal of Cultural Heritage 15 (6):644–55. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2013.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girard, L. F., and P. De Toro. 2007. Integrated spatial assessment: A multicriteria approach to sustainable development of cultural and environmental heritage in San Marco dei Cavoti, Italy. Central European Journal of Operations Research 15 (3):281–99. doi:10.1007/s10100-007-0031-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani, F., A. D. Falco, S. Landi, M. G. Bevilacqua, L. Santini, and S. Pecori. 2018. Reusing grain silos from the 1930s in Italy. A multi-criteria decision analysis for the case of Arezzo. Journal of Cultural Heritage 29:145–59. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2017.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, L., A. P. Falcão, T. Cerejo, and A. Almeida. 2017. The use of multispectral images and 3D-GIS analysis for monitoring the state of conservation of buildings: Case study of the historical city centre of Leiria, Portugal. In Non-Destructive techniques for the assessment and preservation of historic structures, ed. L. Gonçalves, H. Rodrigues, and F. Gaspar. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guarini, M. R., A. Chiovitti, F. Battisti, and P. Morano. 2017. An integrated approach for the assessment of urban transformation proposals in historic and consolidated issues. In Computational science and its applications – ICCSA 2017. Lecture notes in computer science, 10406, ed. O. Gervasi, et al. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62398-6_40.
   Google Scholar
• Guarini, M. R., A. Chiovitti, and F. Rocca. 2018b. Multicriteria spatial decision analysis for the development of the italian minor airport system. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2018:33, art. 6847030. doi:10.1155/2018/6847030.
   Google Scholar
• Guarini, M. R., F. Battisti, and A. Chiovitti. 2018a. A methodology for the selection of multi-criteria decision analysis methods in real estate and land management processes. Sustainability 10 (2):507. doi:10.3390/su10020507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hapciuc, O. E., G. Romanescu, I. Minea, M. Iosub, A. Enea, and I. Sandu. 2016. Flood susceptibility analysis of the cultural heritage in the Sucevita catchment (Romania). International Journal of Conservation Science 7 (2):501–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ildefonso, S., R. Machete, A. P. Falcão, and T. Heitor. 2019. The proto-social housing in the city of Lisbon: A holistic perspective about work force housing in the current urban context. Urbe – Revista Brasileira De Gestão Urbana 11. doi:10.1590/2175-3369.011.001.ao05.
   Google Scholar
• Ishizaka, A., and P. Nemery. 2013. Multi-criteria decision analysis: Methods and software, 310. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-1-119-97407-9.
   Google Scholar
• Jajac, N., K. Rogulj, and J. Radnić. 2017. Selection of the method for rehabilitation of historic bridges—A decision support concept for the planning of rehabilitation projects. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 11 (2):261–77. doi:10.1080/15583058.2016.1207113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, P. 1995. Integrating geographical information system and multiple criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 9 (3):251–73. doi:10.1080/02693799508902036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malczewski, J. 1999. GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Malczewski, J. 2004. GIS based land-use suitability analysis: A critical overview. Progress in Planning 62:3–65. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2003.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malczewski, J. 2006. GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20 (7):703–26. doi:10.1080/13658810600661508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markelj, J., M. K. Kuzman, P. Grošelj, and M. Zbašnik-Senegačnik. 2014. A simplified method for evaluating building sustainability in the early design phase for architects. Sustainability 6:8775–95. doi:10.3390/su6128775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateus, R., J. A. Ferreira, and J. Carreira. 2008. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA): Central Porto high-speed railway station. European Journal of Operational Research 187:1–18. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateus, R. J. G., J. C. Bana e Costa, and P. V. Matos. 2017. Supporting multicriteria group decisions with MACBETH tools: Selection of sustainable brownfield redevelopment actions. Group Decision and Negotiation 26:495–521. doi:10.1007/s10726-016-9501-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morkūnaitė, Ž., D. Kalibatas, and D. Kalibatienė. 2019. A bibliometric data analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods in heritage buildings. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 25 (2):76–99. doi:10.3846/jcem.2019.8315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munda, G. 2008. Social multi-criteria evaluation for a sustainable economy. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Nicu, I. C. 2016. Cultural heritage assessment and vulnerability using Analytic Hierarchy Process and Geographic Information Systems (Valea Oii catchment, North-eastern Romania). An approach to historical maps. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 20:103–11. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, A. N., R. L. Jensen, T. S. Larsen, and S. B. Nissen. 2016. Early stage decision support for sustainable building renovation – A review. Building and Environment 103:165–81. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2008. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), Ispra, Italy. ISBN 9789264043459. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/sdd/42495745.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, R. A. F., J. Lopes, H. Sousa, and M. I. Abreu. 2017. A system for the management of the old building retrofit projects in historical centres: The case of Portugal. International Journal of Strategic Property Management 21 (2):199–211. doi:10.3846/1648715X.2016.1251984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppio, A., M. Bottero, V. Ferretti, U. Fratesi, D. Ponzini, and V. Pracchi. 2015. Giving space to multicriteria analysis for complex cultural heritage systems: The case of the castles in Valle D’Aosta Region, Italy. Journal of Cultural Heritage 16 (6):779–89. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2015.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Páez, A., D. A. Scott, and C. Morency. 2012. Measuring accessibility: Positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators. Journal of Transport Geography 25:141–53. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincha, J. P. 2017. Há alegria no Beato … e não só. As vilas de Lisboa vão ter nova vida. Público (newspaper). Accessed August 1, 2018. http://www.publico.pt/2017/02/02/local/reportagem/ha-alegria-no-beato-e-nao-so-as-vilas-de-lisboa-vao-ter-nova-vida–1760645.
   Google Scholar
• Piñero, I., J. T. San-José., P. Rodríguez, and M. M. Losáñez. 2017. Multi-criteria decisión-making for grading the rehabilitation of heritage sites. Application in the historic center of La Habana. Journal of Cultural Heritage 26:144–52. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2017.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourahmad, A., A. Hosseini, A. Banaitis, H. Nasiri, N. Banaitienė, and G. Zeng. 2015. Combination of fuzzy-AHP and dematel-anp with GIS in a new hybrid MCDM model used for the selection of the best space for leisure in a blighted urban site. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 21 (5):773–96. doi:10.3846/20294913.2015.1056279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PTPC. 2018. Portugal e o Futuro da política de coesão. Contributo para o plano nacional de investimentos. Cluster AEC – Arquitetura, Engenharia e Construção. Associação PTPC – Plataforma Tecnológica Portuguesa para a Construção.
   Google Scholar
• Roberti, F., R. Oberegger, E. Lucchi, and A. Troi. 2017. Energy retrofit and conservation of a historic building using multi-objective optimization and an analytic hierarchy process. Energy and Buildings 138:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San-José Lombera, J. T., and I. Garrucho Aprea. 2010. A system approach to the environmental analysis of industrial buildings. Building and Environment 45 (3):673–483. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarragüel, A. A., B. Krol, and C. Westen. 2012. Analysing the possible impact of landslides and avalanches on cultural heritage in Upper Svaneti, Georgia. Journal of Cultural Heritage 13:453–61. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2012.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira, M. A. C. 1992. As estratégias de habitação em Portugal, 1880-1940. Análise Social XXVII (115):65–89.
   Google Scholar
• Teotónio Pereira, N. 1994. Pátios e Vilas de Lisboa, 1870-1930: A promoção privada do alojamento operário, 1870/1930. Análise Social XXIX (127):509–24.
   Google Scholar
• Torrieri, F., and A. Batà. 2017. Spatial multi-criteria decision support system and strategic environmental assessment: A case study. Buildings 7:96. doi:10.3390/buildings7040096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turskis, Z., Z. Morkunaitė, and V. Kutut. 2017. A hybrid multiple criteria evaluation method of ranking of cultural heritage structures for renovation projects. International Journal of Strategic Property Management 21 (3):318–29. doi:10.3846/1648715X.2017.1325782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J. 2019. From walking buffers to active places: An activity-based approach to measure human-scale urban form. Landscape and Urban Planning, early view. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar