Effect of Air-entraining and Water-repellent Admixtures and of Their Dosage on the Performance of Lime Mortars

References

• Aïtcin, P., and R. J. Flatt, Eds. 2015. Science and technology of concrete admixtures. first ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM E1876-01. 2006. Standard test method for dynamic young’s modulus, shear modulus, and poisson’s ratio by impulse excitation of vibration. West Conshohocken, USA: American Society for Testing Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Borges, C., A. S. Silva, and R. Veiga. 2014. Durability of ancient lime mortars in humid environment. Construction and Building Materials 66:606–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botas, S., V. Rato, and P. Faria. 2010. Testing freeze/thaw cycles in lime mortars. 2nd historic mortars conference and RILEM TC 203-RHM final workshop, Prague, Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, S. 2003. History of architecture and ancient building materials in India. New Delhi: TechBooks International.
   Google Scholar
• Cultrone, G., E. Sebastian, and M. O. Huertas. 2007. Durability of masonry systems: A laboratory study. Construction and Building Materials 21 (1):40–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cultrone, G., E. Sebastián, and M. Ortega Huertas. 2005. Forced and natural carbonation of lime-based mortars with and without additives: Mineralogical and textural changes. Cement and Concrete Research 35 (12):2278–2289. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.12.012.
   Google Scholar
• Dheilly, R. M., J. Tudo, Y. Sebaı̈bi, and M. Quéneudec. 2002. Influence of storage conditions on the carbonation of powdered Ca(OH)2. Construction and Building Materials 16 (3):155–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(02)00012-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, L., and K. J. Folliard. 2005. Mechanisms of air entrainment in concrete. Cement and Concrete Research 35 (8):1463–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, T. 2014. Concrete durability. 1st ed. Boca Raton, USA: Crc Press.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1015-11. 1999. Methods of test for mortar for masonry. Part 11: Determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar. Brussels, Belgium: CEN
   Google Scholar
• EN 1015-3. 1999. Methods of test for mortar for masonry Part 3: Determination of consistency of fresh mortar by flow table. Brussels, Belgium: CEN
   Google Scholar
• EN 1015-6. 1999. Methods of test for mortar for masonry Part 6: Determination of bulk density of fresh mortar. CEN
   Google Scholar
• EN 1015-7. 1998. Methods of test for mortar for masonry Part 7: Determination of air content of fresh mortar. Brussels, Belgium: CEN
   Google Scholar
• EN 13139 . 2002. Aggregates for mortar. Brussels, Belgium: CEN
   Google Scholar
• EN 196-1. 2005. Methods of testing cement Part 1: Determination of strength. CEN
   Google Scholar
• EN 459-1. 2010. Building lime Definitions, specifications and conformity criteria. Brussels, Belgium: CEN .
   Google Scholar
• Falchi, L., U. Müller, P. Fontana, F. C. Izzo, and E. Zendri. 2013. Influence and effectiveness of water-repellent admixtures on pozzolana–lime mortars for restoration application. Construction and Building Materials 49:272–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchi, L., E. Zendri, U. Müller, and P. Fontana. 2015. The influence of water-repellent admixtures on the behaviour and the effectiveness of Portland limestone cement mortars. Cement and Concrete Composites 59:107–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feneuil, B., O. Pitois, and N. Roussel. 2017. Effect of surfactants on the yield stress of cement paste. Cement and Concrete Research 100:32–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira Pinto, A. P. 2002. Conservation of carbonate stones. Study and selection of treatments, (in Portuguese). PhD Thesis, Technical University of Lisbon, Instituto Superior Técnico, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Flores-Colen, I., L. Silva, J. de Brito, and V. P. de Freitas. 2016. Drying index for in-service physical performance assessment of renders. Construction and Building Materials 112:1101–09. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambhir, M. L. 2013. Concrete technology: Theory and practice. New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, T. D., L. Pel, and J. D. Rodrigues. 2007. Drying of salt-contaminated masonry: MRI laboratory monitoring. Environmental Geology 52 (2):293–302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0461-4.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, A., and J. Stewart, Eds. 2011. Practical building conservation: Mortars, renders and plasters. Farnham, England: English Heritage, Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Izaguirre, A., J. Lanas, and J. I. Alvarez. 2009. Effect of water-repellent admixtures on the behaviour of aerial lime-based mortars. Cement and Concrete Research 39 (11):1095–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.07.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izaguirre, A., J. Lanas, and J. I. Alvarez. 2010. Ageing of lime mortars with admixtures: Durability and strength assessment. Cement and Concrete Research 40 (7):1081–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H., and R. E. Robertson. 1998. Effects of polyvinyl alcohol on aggregate-paste bond strength and the interfacial transition zone. Advanced Cement Based Materials 8 (2):66–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1065-7355(98)00009-1.
   Google Scholar
• Lanzón, M., and P. A. García-Ruiz. 2008. Effectiveness and durability evaluation of rendering mortars made with metallic soaps and powdered silicone. Construction and Building Materials 22 (12):2308–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., F. H. Wittmann, T. Zhao, R. Jiang, and R. Wolfseher. 2011. Integral water repellent treatment of concrete: Production and properties. In Basic research on concrete and applications, ed. F. H. Wittmann, and O. Mercier, 83–102. Freiburg, Germany: Aedificatio Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski, R. 1982. Durable ancient mortars and concretes. Nordic Concrete Research 1, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, A. I., J. Morais, P. Morais, M. R. Veiga, C. Santos, P. Candeias, and J. G. Ferreira. 2020. Modulus of elasticity of mortars: Static and dynamic analyses. Construction and Building Materials 232:117216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menezes, M., M. R. Veiga, and A. R. Santos. 2012. Oral testimony of artisans as a source of knowledge for the safeguard of historical renders. II international conference on oral tradition: Orality and cultural heritage.Évora, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• NORMAL 29/88. 1991. Misura dell’indice di asciugamento (drying index). Rome, Italy: CNR-ICR
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, C., P. Mácová, D. Frankeová, R. Ševčík, and A. Viani. 2018. Influence of linseed oil on the microstructure and composition of lime and lime-metakaolin pastes after a long curing time. Construction and Building Materials 189:787–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, C., and Z. Slížková. 2016. Freezing and thawing resistance of aerial lime mortar with metakaolin and a traditional water-repellent admixture. Construction and Building Materials 114:896–905. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papayianni, I. 2006. The longevity of old mortars. Applied Physics A 83 (4):685–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-006-3523-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papayianni, I., and M. Stefanidou. 2007. Durability aspects of ancient mortars of the archeological site of Olynthos. Journal of Cultural Heritage 8 (2):193–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2007.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasian, C., M. Secco, F. Piqué, S. Rickerby, G. Artioli, and S. Cather. 2016. Performance of grout with reduced water content: The importance of porosity and related properties. 4th Historic mortars conference – HMC, Santorini, Greece 2016.
   Google Scholar
• RILEM Test I.1. 1980. Porosity accessible to water. RILEM 25-PEM – Recommended tests to measure the deterioration of stone and to assess the effectiveness of treatment methods. Materials and Structures 13 (75): 177–179.
   Google Scholar
• RILEM Test II.1. 1980. Saturation coefficient, S. RILEM 25-PEM – Recommended tests to measure the deterioration of stone and to assess the effectiveness of treatment methods. Materials and Structures 13 (75): 194–197.
   Google Scholar
• RILEM Test II.2. 1980. Coefficient of water vapour conductivity (δ). RILEM 25-PEM – Recommended tests to measure the deterioration of stone and to assess the effectiveness of treatment methods. Materials and Structures 13 (75):  197–199.
   Google Scholar
• RILEM Test II.5. 1980. Evaporation curve. RILEM 25-PEM – Recommended tests to measure the deterioration of stone and to assess the effectiveness of treatment methods. Materials and Structures 13 (75): 204-207.
   Google Scholar
• RILEM Test II.6. 1980. Water absorption coefficient (capillarity). RILEM 25-PEM – Recommended tests to measure the deterioration of stone and to assess the effectiveness of treatment methods. Materials and Structures 13 (75): 209-210.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, M., F. König, S. Stadtmüller, and B. Weyershausen. 2008. Evolution of silicone based water repellents for modern building protection. Hydrophobe V, 5th international conference on water repellent treatment of building materials, Aedificatio Publishers, Brussels, Belgium 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, G. W. 1990. Theory of drying. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 73 (1):3–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05082.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sickels, L. B. 1981. Organics vs. synthetics, their use as additives in mortars. Mortars, cements and grouts used in conservation of historic buildings Symposium, ICCROM, Rome 25–52.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, B., A. P. Ferreira Pinto, A. Gomes, and A. Candeias. 2020a. Suitability of different surfactants as air-entraining admixtures for lime mortars. Construction and Building Materials 256:118986. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, B., A. P. Ferreira Pinto, A. Gomes, and A. Candeias. 2020b. Comparative analysis of the behaviour of integral water-repellents on lime mortars. Construction and Building Materials 261:120344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, B. A., A. P. Ferreira Pinto, and A. Gomes. 2014. Influence of natural hydraulic lime content on the properties of aerial lime-based mortars. Construction and Building Materials 72:208–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soutsos, M., and P. Domone, Eds. 2017. Construction materials: Their nature and behaviour. fifth ed. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spaeth, V., M. P. Delplancke-Ogletree, J. P. Lecomte, H. De Clercq, and A. E. Charola. 2008. Hydration process and microstructure development of integral water-repellent cement based materials. Hydrophobe V - 5th international conference on water repellent treatment of building materials, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Spaeth, V., J. P. Lecomte, M. P. Delplancke, J. Orlowsky, and T. Büttner. 2013. Impact of silane and siloxane based hydrophobic powder on cement-based mortar. Advanced Materials Research 687:100–06. doi:https://doi.org/10.4028/w ww.scientific.net/AMR.687.100.
   Google Scholar
• Stolz, H. J. 2007. Oleochemicals – Important additives for building protection. 2nd national conference on mortars and ETICS, APFAC, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Torraca, G. 2009. Lectures on materials science for architectural conservation. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tunstall, L. E., G. W. Scherer, and R. K. Prud’homme. 2017. Studying AEA interaction in cement systems using tensiometry. Cement and Concrete Research 92:29–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiga, R. 2017. Air lime mortars: What else do we need to know to apply them in conservation and rehabilitation interventions? A review. Construction and Building Materials 157:132–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiga, R., A. Fragata, A. Velosa, A. Magalhães, and G. Margalha 2008. Substitution mortars for application in historical buildings exposed to the sea environment. Analysis of the viability of several types of compositions. 1st Historic mortars conference – HMC 2008, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Vitruvious Pollio, M. 1960. Vitruvious: The ten books of architecture. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar